Preview

Kant's Deontological Theory Of Morality

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
978 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kant's Deontological Theory Of Morality
"Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law” was a quote by the philosopher Immanuel Kant who developed what is known as deontological ethics followed by his famous categorical imperatives. Kant embraced the idea that all human beings have equal worth and therefore it is important to protect and promote each person's freedom. He was in favor of laying down obligations because he believed that citizenship should be a task, a responsibility to contribute to those moral condition. Therefore, it was his goal to inform people that morality is a duty and duty alone. Morality should be independent and not affected by any other factor. For this reason, the strength behind …show more content…
To start off, Kant's moral theory is deontological because it emphasize the concept of duty. According to Kant, the right actions should only develop from pure motives and from a sense of duty. In other words, that action should conform to moral laws and done from motivation of good will. Good will is what Kant defined as a one's intention to follow the moral law to ensure that all actions arise from the only purpose of doing what is right. Any motivations that influence the action would make that action morally worthless. In addition, the basis of deontological view is that an action cannot be considered right because of the positive consequences that follows, but rather the action itself has to be correct in itself. For example, if your neighbor's house was on fire and you decided to go in to rescue, your only intention should be to save the people inside and no other reasons beyond that. The action you choose to perform should be universal that everyone should be made to follow that action because it is a universal norm. The nature of morality is to do one’s duty even when we are not inclined to do it, and not …show more content…
The strength of the moral theory is that it allows one to self evaluate their behaviors and their true intentions before carrying out their actions. Most of the time, we are not aware of the unconscious intentions that is hidden underneath our actions. With Kant's moral theory, we can carefully analyze whether our actions are dedicated wholeheartedly for the good of others. The weakness within Kant's moral theory is that duties are not ranked in order of most to least important. This can result in immoral dilemmas as well as tragic outcomes when obeying the particular duty. As an example, we can refer back to a eerie and remorseful times during the Holocaust. If you were in the shoes of a family who was hiding a Jewish family in their home to protect their lives, and a German soldiers arrived all of the sudden to question, you are faced with a dilemma between obeying your duty by telling the truth or to tell a lie in order to protect the Jewish family. Therefore, the duty of telling the truth would result in an unjust consequence and it proves that no set of rules can control the different possibilities and events that occurs throughout

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Deontological theory claims that there are consequences in our actions that determine whether or not they are the right choice for the circumstance, and or person involved. The consequences can be defined by the actions of the extent to moral duties. For example, driving while intoxicated relates the ethical theory or commandment that“above all do no harm. These are duties which are born from religion, metaphysics, psychology, culture, biology, and language. Depending on the deontological theory, these are duties which will have no exceptions. Either it can overcome by a more important duty, or conditional. It does not matter if the intoxicated driver made it home safely. Driving drunk was still wrong because a person knows they have to drive.…

    • 291 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his paper, 'The Secret Joke of Kant's Soul', Greene argues that deontological moral theory is a post hoc rationalisation. That is, although deontological philosophy claims to base its judgements in reason, deontological judgements are instead typically emotionally driven judgements which are then rationalised after the fact. In this analysis I will briefly explain Greene's argument, which is grounded in evolutionary theory, particularly evolutionary psychology, and backed up by empirical studies, all of which converge to give Greene's argument significant weight. Consequently, Greene's case ought to cause us to question the legitimacy of deontological philosophy, at least as a theory which is based on reason.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lastly he states, “Duty is the necessity of an action done out of respect for the law.” One should act out of respect for the reason everyone could act on that maxim. One should act as an equal to when reasoning if the action is something everyone would act on. Again in the grocery store owner example he must treat all customers fairly because the maxim says he must obey this. One cannot make an exception for themselves and think they are higher than anyone else; the action needs to be consistent for every…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the four deontological systems that we have discussed, I would like to share my thoughts about the Kantian Deontological System. Kantian Ethics is formulated by Immanuel Kant in which he discussed that the nature of duty is based on human reason. For him, human reason, not human nature, can determine what is right and wrong. He also stressed that human desires are not the right measurement for ethics. In addition, Kantian Ethics is known for its two kinds of command or imperative: the hypothetical and categorical imperative. According to Immanuel Kant, hypothetical imperative has conditions and has no value. We do a certain action or decision because we are waiting for something in return or because we are afraid of punishment. On the other…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Good And Evil Casablanca

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He believed that our actions must come from a sense of Duty, not because we care for or love one another but because it is our Duty to “respect the Moral Law” (p. 246). Judging the importance of a decision based on whether or not it was following a rule or set of rules is called deontological ethics. He believed that it was not the consequences of the action which were important but the person’s motive carrying out the said action. Many disagree with Kant saying that we must have a foundation to start from, a reason such as love or concern to do what is morally…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The deontological/Kantian ethical-decision making philosophy was created by the philosopher Kant. His view on ethical-decision making is about how we morally commit an act or decide on something in the sense of obligation. Kant indicates that ethics is about acting upon our own duty, essentially doing what we ought to do. This philosophy is solely about duty. For example, one can say that “I ought to do my homework”, in this case it would be my duty do my homework in order to get a good grade. Another proposition is, following a maxim when it comes to acting on an action out of oughtness. This maxim one may have is like a policy that one will follow by, when a particular situation or event arises.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Groundwork for the metaphysic of Morals, it is formulated that Kant bases his theory of morality off the groundwork of metaphysics. The idea behind the science of metaphysics brings about the a priori and/or pure necessary truths. Any existence of anything empirical is immoral which only abandons one’s reason and intentions, which are the foundation of their duty to gain good will. Good intensions bring out good will. As Kant presents the four reasons of all actions, he believes that one gains the ability to test and evaluate moral actions universally by the categorical imperative.…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phil 3033

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory begins from the starting point of the good will. In assessing the moral worth on an action we must focus not on the consequences of results of the action, but on the agent’s will ( the motivation of conducting an action is really important).…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Kant’s book, The Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, he believes that the “good will” is only good in itself and that reason is what produces the “goodness” of the “good will.” According to Kant, to act out of a “good will” means to act out of “duty,” or doing something because you find it necessary to do. Also, “good will” is will that is in accordance with reason. He believes everyone has a moral obligation or duty to do actions and he backs his theory up by discussing his idea of the “moral law.”…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout this paper, I will contrast and compare two moral theories in attempt to uncover what one provides a better argument and can be applied as a universal moral code. The two moral theorists Immanuel Kant and J.S Mill have created two distinctly different theories on morality and how to develop a universal moral code. Both theories focus on intentions and consequences. Kant believes that the intentions and reasons of our actions can be measured and defined as morally correct, where as Mill believes that our intentions really play no role in morality, and that we should focus on the consequences and outcomes of our actions to evoke the most happiness for the most people. Even though both philosophers make incredibly different points, each encompasses strong arguments as well as issues with their approach. However, Kant will be successful in articulating a better universal moral theory through the use of his categorical imperative.…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant philosophy has contributed in development of "pure" moral philosophy, a "metaphysics of morals" that is based on the concepts of reason, not on empirical observations. According to his philosophy moral obligations are applicable to all human beings as it applies not only for particular person in particular situation, but also to all rational beings in all circumstances.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two sources of moral guidance are the rivaling theories of Kantianism and Utilitarianism, both normative moral theories, meaning they deal with how we know what is right or wrong. Kantianism is a deontological theory developed by Immanuel Kant. This means that the theory holds the importance of duty and motives of an act in higher prestige than the consequences of said act. Kant argued, what came with is religiosity, that we, humans are rational, moral beings. This meant that we understand intrinsically what our moral duty is; this means that our motives that we act on will be based on what we feel it is our duty to do and then equally important goodwill. Goodwill is what, Kant believed to be good without question, for example murder and lying. This is where Kant introduces the idea of maxims. Maxims are rules that are formulated as rules to follow as moral law similar to a divine commandment e.g. do not murder, do not lie. Kant claimed that in order for a maxim to be used as a moral law it must pass the test that is Categorical Imperative (CI). The CI consists of 3 formulations, the Universal Law, this is the test of the logical possibility of universalizability – “Act only on that maxim which you can at the same time will should become a universal law” which claims that if a maxim is universalizable then if every person were to follow the same maxim then the world would be a more moral place. Secondly was the End in itself which claimed that it is fine to use people to achieve goals as long as that is not all you use them for and lastly the Kingdom of Ends which was Kant’s logical combination of the two. Kant held two things on equal as Universalizable maxims and these were to never lie and to never murder, so in this case then Kant would agree on never murdering because he would argue that murdering is not part of a moral duty or a goodwill motive. Kant’s theory sounds all well and good but it lacks massive ecological validity because it is not applicable to…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The deontological theory contends that right and wrong are determined by the consequences of an action. Deontologists do not negate that consequences are significant but they believe there are more relevant aspects to the moral duty of the action. Deontology mainly focuses on Immanuel Kant and W.D. Ross. Kant based his view on moral principles that define between right and wrong. He also views deontology as an act on any maxim if and only if you can will it into a universal law. Kant introduces that there are rules to determine situations and he also shares that we should never treat people as means to ends. In this way, rational beings should always treat each other as ends in themselves, never as only means. Kant believed that humans have intrinsic worth and we should act to respect the mortality for us and others. He also believed that when humans recognize their worth, they cannot see themselves being used as entities to an end. Kant also shows the importance of not actually doing the right thing, but doing things for the sense of duty for getting moral worth in return. W.D. Ross developed the prima facia obligations. These obligations are obligations that override other obligations. According to Ross, there are seven types of obligations: 1. Duties of fidelity, 2. Duties of reparation, 3. Duties of gratitude, 4. Duties of justice, 5. Duties of beneficence, 6. Duties of…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Utilitarian Ethics

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The major distinction between Emmanual Kant’s deontological reasoning and Mill’s utilitarian reasonsing is that deontological reasoning refers to duty, which is usually determined without regard to circumstances or consequences where as utilitarian reasoning always considers circumstances and consequences.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deontology judges morality by examining the nature of actions and the will of people, rather than the goals achieved. We cannot predict the future and that is the reason why we must shift away from consequences to duties. Deontologists do care for the outcomes of our actions, but as far as moral evaluation, our actions are concerned not our consequences. We must be able to do what we would allow or want others to do. If the rule governing our action is not capable of being universalized, then it is not acceptable. Many would call this the “golden rule.” However, they are wrong because the golden rule claims to do to others what you would like them to do to you, which involves self- interest. The deontology rule actually claims that if you cannot incline everyone to follow the same rule…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays