Preview

Kant Against Pre-Crime

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
179 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kant Against Pre-Crime
Hi Victoria, understand your claim of Pre-crime being immoral. First of all, I agree with you on the fact that Kant would be against Pre-crime. It goes against his formula for the universal law; if you do it, then it you shouldn’t have a problem with someone returning the favor. Chief Anderton, is a prime example since Pre-crime was used against him after Anderton had been all for it. However, he later figured out that Pre-crime was immoral because of the fact that it was used against him.
I also agree with you on the aspect of Director Burgess’ intentions. Not only did Burgess’ murder compromise the morality of Pre-crime, it also called into question all the criminals that were caught because of it. Kant believed that for an action to be moral,
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Crime and Punishment
    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Crime and Punishment

    Punishment is defined as the infliction of a penalty for an offense. The novel Crime and Punishment by Dostoevsky took place in St. Petersburg, Russia, mid 1860s. The main character, Raskolnikov, committed the murder of a pawn broker and her sister which he became ill with guilt. He is accused as the murderer but denied it until the end where he eventually confessed and was sent to Siberia. In the novel, Raskolnikov had an unbearable amount of guilt, faced punishment by imprisonment, and gave his heart to God for forgiveness. Conflicts he was put through helped illuminate the meaning of the novel: For all crimes, there will be punishment.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant's Ethical Summary
    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Immanuel Kant's Ethical Summary

    There is an old saying that it is better to be lucky than good. This may be true if a person is always lucky, but luck sometimes has a tendency to run out. Making decisions that affect other people’s lives based on luck can be sometimes dangerous, and usually ethically questionable. Leaders who routinely depend on luck for success may find themselves relying on other questionable actions, such as lying, cheating, or stealing, to ensure luck stays on their side. Additionally, this type of behavior may force subordinates to make ethically questionable decisions when luck begins to run out.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Immanuel Kant's Theory Of Morality
    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page

    Immanuel Kant's Theory Of Morality

    Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher from the 18th century who is well known as an essential person in philosophy today. He has made the argument that there are a set of essential ideas that structure human experience and is the source of morality. His thought continues to have a major influence in contemporary thought, especially the fields of metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, political philosophy, and aesthetics. Kant’s theory on morality as often been criticized on being too…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kant's Ethical Theory Analysis
    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant's Ethical Theory Analysis

    Kant’s formulas are then treated as candidates for a universal moral criterion for the permissibility of maxims, to be tested against our intuitions regarding the best cases that inventive philosophers can devise as apparent counterexamples. If one interpretation of Kant’s formula yields counterintuitive results, then another interpretation is proposed. The fate of Kantian ethics itself, as a moral theory, is then seen as depending on this enterprise of interpretation, and how well our best interpretation of Kant’s principle fares against our intuitions about the most challenging examples against which we can test…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    crime and punishment morally ambigous character
    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages

    crime and punishment morally ambigous character

    Several morally ambiguous characters played different vital roles in Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoevsky. In fact, most characters illustrated in this twisted novel can be evaluated as possesing "good" and "evil" qualities. Sonia Marmeladov is especially ambiguous and important in this novel. Her contradicting social and moral statuses along with her contrasting roles as a saintly liberator and sinner allowed Sonia to play a crucial role throughout the novel. Not only that but her character further strengthens the theme of religious awakening. At times Sonia's character becomes hard to categorize as "good" or "evil" because of her actions. The first descriptions the reader gets of Sonia are from her drunk father, Marmeladov. She has lived her life with little money, poor housing conidtions described as having "every sign of povery" (294). Sonia tries to make an honest living by making linen shirts but "do you suppose that a respectable poor girl can earn much by hard work? Not fifteen farthings a day can she earn"(15). Not merely enough to support a family along with her drunk father's habits. So Sonia eventually becomes a prositute in order to to support her family and gains a "yellow ticket" (16) This is what gained Sonia her title as a sinner and which puts her character at question. However, Marmeladov explains to Raskolnikov how Sonia goes to them "mostly after dark, she comforts Katerina Ivanorna and gives her all she can"( 16). This part of Sonia's character depicts her as a loving daughter willing to sacrifice herself to save her family. This portrayal in some ways resembles Christ as "He himself bore our sins" in his body on the cross, so that we might die to sins and live for righteousness." He sarcrificed himself as she sacrifies herself. Does that change the fact that she is committing a sin? No of course not and that is exactly where the conflict of her morality takes place. The world sees her in "such an attire"(163)which puts her to…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Emmanuel Kant Analysis
    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Emmanuel Kant Analysis

    Emmanuel Kant argues that the human understanding of our world is perceived by our experiences and only through them can we gain knowledge. Kant’s philosophic question is rooted in the theory of understanding; in short, what can we know and how can we know it? Most of our knowledge of the world can be derived from our observation of it. As children, we see things, touch things, smell things and so on. Gradually, we understand the world in which we live in; this is the knowledge of sense-perception. For example, wind has no physical form but we can see its effects and can classify it as being part of nature. Kant, however, perceives knowledge only through our experiences. So going back to the example of wind, Kant would say we have knowledge of wind not because we…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kant vs. Virtue Ethics
    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant vs. Virtue Ethics

    The approach that we take with Kant's views is strictly based on reason. The key factor in this situation with Kant would ask if we did this action without any thought. Because Kant heavily argues that a moral person has to be rational, the thought process that you went through to arrive to the action is needed and very important. With this in mind we need to look at the other key concepts of his theory. With every action we take, we need to consider whether or not we are willing to say that it could be turned into a universal law. This law would then have to apply to everyone and there would be no exceptions. He believes that we should not lie in any circumstance. We need to maintain the no exception policy because it helps with the consistency of this theory. Most of Kant's beliefs are also based on duties to one another, ourselves, etc. We have a strict duty to benefit towards other people. We should strive to promote their welfare or as he says, "respect their rationality."…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Crime Is Necessary: Durkheim’s Theory of Crime
    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Crime Is Necessary: Durkheim’s Theory of Crime

    Crime can not be removed completely from society because it will always be the necessary unacceptable norm that can be located in all forms of societies around the world. Crime is regarded, by many people such as politicians and other people of everyday society, as horrid and unnecessary. Emile Durkheim believes that crime is normal and it isn't possible for it to not exist. If crime is everywhere and in no area has crime ever been successfully eradicated then we should assume it is there for a reason. According to many books written by Emile Durkheim, such as Suicide, and The Division of Labor, society plays a large role in our actions and Durkheim explains that reasons to which why crime is executable. Experts in the Department of Sociology have given their own words and critiques toward Durkheim’s theory.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    English 12 Homework - Crime and Punishment: The Ubermensch
    • 734 Words
    • 2 Pages

    English 12 Homework - Crime and Punishment: The Ubermensch

    The ubermensch is someone who is willing to risk it all for the betterment of humanity. He finds the meaning of life within himself and the world alone as opposed to finding them in God and other divine beings. Because of this, he rises above the conventional Christian morality and establishes his own values which affects and influences the lives of others. He is content with his life, appreciating the past even though he went through pain and suffering, because it is what shaped him. Moreover, the overman will achieve kleos, living on long after his death through the thoughts and values of people.…

    • 734 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Crime and Punishment
    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Crime and Punishment

    In the Russian novel Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoevsky, the main character, Raskalnikov goes through a vast time period of great psychological turmoil. When comparing and contrasting this death and reincarnation of his consciousness and mind to the biblical tale of Lazarus’s resurrection, the author not only highlights the extremeness of the crimes he has committed, but also touches on the importance of recognizing one’s guilt. This theme of reconciliation and religion becomes one of the central themes of the novel.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ethics and Morals crime and punishment
    • 614 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ethics and Morals crime and punishment

    In Dostoyevsky’s novel Crime and Punishment the main character plots and carries out the murder of an old woman who has a considerable amount of money in her apartment. After killing the old women, he steals her money and argues that she was a malicious women; useless to society and herself. He goes on to state that the old women’s life causes no happiness to her or to others. For the old women’s money; the main character argues that if found after her death, the money would only fall into the hands of chisellers anyway, whereas he would use it to pay for his education. In terms of main stream society, Dostoyevsky’s main characters’ action more likely than not wouldn’t be proven ethically justifiable, but according to the moral standard of Utilitarianism the reason behind the main characters plot can be justifiable whereas the concept of Wickedness purposed by Stanley Ben clearly states the main character actions where evil and unethical.…

    • 614 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kants Moral Argument
    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kants Moral Argument

    Kant's moral argument can be summarised in 4 points. Point 1, a good will or a person with right moral intentions seeks to bring about the summum bonum. If we take our ethics seriously we can see that we want to achieve the summum bonum. Kant, however was adamant that people should not act nice to receive an award at the end of the act. Kant was convinced that an act is only morally good if it is done for its on sake and without any selfish thoughts. He believed that people should do the right thing because it is the right thing and not for any reward or praise.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Crime and Punishment Thought Piece
    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Crime and Punishment Thought Piece

    “Power is given only to him who dares to stoop and take it ... one must have the courage to dare.”…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Marxist Explanation of Crime and Deviance
    • 905 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Marxist Explanation of Crime and Deviance

    Marxists argue that the nature and organisation of capitalism, creates the potential for criminal behaviour. Gordon states that capitalism is characterised by class inequalities in the distribution of, for example, wealth and income, poverty, unemployment and homelessness. Gordon argues that the ideology of capitalism encourages criminal behaviour in all social classes. The term ‘crime’ means behaviour that breaks the law. For example, someone who commits a crime such as murder or rape is considered a criminal. And the term ‘deviance’ refers to behaviour that the majority see as different from the accepted norms of society. For example, wearing a bikini is suitable at the beach but, it would not be appropriate to wear it at work.…

    • 905 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Crime and Justice
    • 4245 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Crime and Justice

    Crime is a complex social, economic and political problem. Crime refers to conduct in violation of the sanctioned laws of a state, the federal government, or a local jurisdiction for which there is no legally acceptable justification or excuse. There are several explanations put forward by criminologists for the problem of crime, and these influence criminal justice policy and practice.…

    • 4245 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics