Preview

Kalem Cosmological Argument Proving The Existence Of God

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
644 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kalem Cosmological Argument Proving The Existence Of God
Consistently from the dawn of human existence, the idea of “God”, or simply the questions of the place from whence the human body has come from forced any individual to consider the religious value or idea of God regarding God’s responsibility for every piece of matter in which makes up life. One of the most critical arguments that claim that there must be a God is the Kalem Cosmological argument, which uses the universe’s mere existence or the beginning of the universe’s existence to claim that whatever has a beginning, must have a cause, insinuating that the cause of the universe’s beginning is in theory, God. Though with creative intellect in further questioning it’s impossible for one not to question that the Cosmological argument may be correct in theory, but does the cause of the universe have to be God? Throughout this paper, I’ll be focusing on the argument that God’s existence does not have to be the direct cause of the begging of the universe, nor does the cosmological argument actually prove the existence of God for that matter. …show more content…
People use the Cosmological argument to claim that this uncaused cause has to be God and there is no other explanation that could change that the initial cause of the universe is God. According to William L. Rowe in “The Cosmological Argument”, the cosmological argument has several key elements that make the argument into one that is to be taken into
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Clifford on the Immorality of Religious Belief Without Evidence
    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Clifford on the Immorality of Religious Belief Without Evidence

    We are looking for evidence god exists, so we turned to an evidential argument in favor of God: the cosmological argument.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    William Lane Craig Analysis
    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages

    William Lane Craig Analysis

    This argument has been subject to great applause through the religious community for its simplistic and impactful articulation. However the cosmological argument is also opposed by atheists who fail to find substance and empirical evidence within its core.…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kalam Cosmological Argument Analysis
    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Kalam Cosmological Argument Analysis

    Starting off, the atheistic view of the beginning of the universe occurring by chance is irrational and irreverent in many ways. The thought of the universe just existing from no cause, let alone not a personal cause is just illogical. This universe has a contingency for God and the Kalam cosmological argument proves this. The Kalam cosmological argument is a well-organized argument for God that has been developed from Muslim philosophers al-Kindi and al-Ghazali, and has been reinvented by philosopher William Lane Craig. The Kalam argument is very simple and straightforward. It is dealt with as a series of dilemmas. Those dilemmas starts with since the universe exists, is there a beginning or no beginning, is that beginning caused or uncaused, and is that cause personal or impersonal. The first premise states that whatever begins to exist as a cause. This premise if very logical and denying it is only possible to have things come from a cause is counterintuitive. The second premise of the Kalam cosmological argument states that universe began…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mccloskey's Argument For The Existence Of God
    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mccloskey's Argument For The Existence Of God

    The cosmological argument argues the existence of God since there had to be a creator of all things in nature that depend on something else for their existence. McCloskey’s idea is that the existence of the universe is not enough to confirm the existence of God. An argument that can be used against this statement is the non-temporal form of the cosmological argument. In the book “Philosophy of Religion” by Evans and Manis, the non-temporal form has three components. First there is some contingent beings exist (Evans and Manis, 69). The second component is that if any contingent being exist then a significant being must exist (69). Third, there must be the existence of a significant being (69). Furthermore, the cause of the universe is necessary because is important because without that development then there would be not existence of the contingent beings. Another claim by McCloskey is that the cosmological argument “does not entitle us to postulate an all-powerful, all-perfect, uncaused cause”; this statement is not necessarily true. Since the world around McCloskey does exist there must be an ultimate creator who created the universe and this creator is…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Assess the Cosmological Argument
    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Assess the Cosmological Argument

    ‘Why is there something rather than nothing?’ Assess whether the existence of the universe requires God as a first cause?…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Examine the cosmological argument for t
    • 789 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Examine the cosmological argument for t

    The key idea in cosmological arguments is that the world, the universe, and everything in them are dependent on something other than themselves for their existence. In other words, cosmological arguments attempt to justify God's existence on the assumption that nothing can come from nothing, and that God must exist in order for anything to be here.…

    • 789 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Is The Design Argument For God's Existence
    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page

    What Is The Design Argument For God's Existence

    One of the most fascinating arguments for the existence of an all-perfect God is the ontological argument. While there are several different versions of the argument, all purport to show that it is self-contradictory to deny that there exists a greatest possible being. Thus, on this general line of argument, it is a necessary truth that such a being exists; and this being is the God of traditional Western theism. This article explains and evaluates classic and contemporary versions of the ontological argument.…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Key Features of the Cosmological Argument
    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Key Features of the Cosmological Argument

    Although the cosmological argument was expressed by Aquinas it was originally introduced and influenced by Aristotle. Aristotle stated ‘the series must start with something since nothing can come from nothing’. This suggests that Aristotle believed that the creation of universe is dependent on a supreme, ultimate primary mover, and is therefore an ‘unmoved mover’. Overall it is the vital cause of the creation of the universe, and is identified in Christianity as God. Aristotle persuaded this using the idea of planet motion which he highlighted as the cause of the change of seasons. For this transformation to happen, it required an ‘unmoved mover’ who would be capable of upholding order of the universe during the alterations. Aquinas used this concept as the labour of God.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Cosmological Argument: Proving The Existence Of God
    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Cosmological Argument: Proving The Existence Of God

    There are 3 main arguments that each seek to prove the existence of God; the Ontological, Cosmological, and Teleological Arguments. Each is different in its approach, but all arrive at the same conclusion. Ontological Argument argues God’s existence from the assumption of the existence a “Greatest Thing that can ever be conceived.” From there, it argues that in order for something to be “The Greatest Thing ever” it must exist physically (that is outside of the mind). The Cosmological Argument argues that since everything in the universe is contingent (or is dependent on other things for its existence), there must be a first cause that set the universe in motion.…

    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Anshelm´s Proof of God´s Existence
    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Anshelm´s Proof of God´s Existence

    The question about the existence of God or, more generally speaking, of a supernatural entity that steers the course of the world, is probably as old as humanity itself. Many great philosophers were concerned with this basic and yet so important question which remains to be a controversial issue to this day! In the following I will commit myself to the above-mentioned question by firstly reconstructing Anselm´s proof of God´s existence and secondly considering his position in the light of the critique put forward by Gaunilo, Aquinas and Kant.…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Cosmological Argumentative Analysis
    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Cosmological Argumentative Analysis

    In The Cosmological Argument Premise 2 explains that everything cannot be a dependent living thing. William Rowe explains why the Principle of Sufficient reason is true, then premise 2 is also true. Rowe suggests that there has never been a self-existing living thing, but only an infinite series of dependent living things. In this case, every living thing has an explanation, because it is explained if a living thing that came before it then that caused its existence.…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    God Knows The Ethical Decisions We Will Make Med
    • 2022 Words
    • 6 Pages

    God Knows The Ethical Decisions We Will Make Med

    The question over the existence of free will has raged on over many years. Many feel that God, saw an omniscient being, must be aware of all that has happened and all that will happen. Supporters of the cosmological argument would suggest that everything has a cause and that god was the initial cause, “the unmoved mover” (Tomas Aquinus), this would support the idea that humanity has no free will as everything is pre determined. This highlights the idea that humanity is not free, and even when we think we have a choice our actions have already been determined.…

    • 2022 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Cosmological Argument
    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cosmological Argument

    The cosmological argument for God’s existence differs from both the scriptural and ontological arguments in the way in which humans created it. Rather than looking at logical arguments or religious texts, the cosmological argument was derived because of humanity’s ability to project their need for cause onto the world. The cosmological argument is centered on the way in which we, humans in general, perceive there to be a need for a God due to the existence of the world around us.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Cosmological Argument
    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cosmological Argument

    This cause, proponents of Cosmological argument claim, is God. This argument rests on the fact that all beings or events have some cause. The only exception to this rule is God, who must have existed for an infinite amount of time or been created from nothing. The main criticism of this argument is that it requires that every being has a cause, but it follows that God cannot have a cause. It is very hard to imagine a being that has no cause because it is in human nature to believe there is a cause for everything…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Philosophy Response Paper
    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Philosophy Response Paper

    Another statement made by McCloskey regarding the cosmological argument states that the argument "does not entitle us to postulate an all-powerful, all-perfect, uncaused cause."{2} Evans and Manis' response basically says that there are…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics