Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Juvenile Jurisdiction “vs” Adult Jurisdiction

Better Essays
1493 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Juvenile Jurisdiction “vs” Adult Jurisdiction
JUVENILE JURISDICTION “VS” ADULT JURISDICTION
A. Banks

Introduction to Criminal Justice –CRN 21737

December 12, 2012

Juvenile Jurisdiction v. Adult Jurisdiction This paper explores the different views that have been in debate among society and the juvenile justice system. Since the inception of juvenile court more than a hundred years ago, the underlying debate has been that juvenile offenders shouldn’t go through the adult criminal courts. Juvenile court was originally created to handle minor offenders on the foundation of their youth rather than the crimes they commit, the focus being; to treat and guide the children as opposed to punishing them. Recently there has been a dramatic change in the way juvenile crime is viewed by policymakers and the general public. This shift has led to widespread changes in policies and practices that concern the treatment of juvenile offenders. “The juvenile justice system in the United States has conventionally emphasized individualized treatment and rehabilitation; there has been a movement to redefine them as adults, thus transferring juvenile crimes to the adult court and criminal justice system” (Steinberg, 2009), as opposed to classifying offenses committed by youth as delinquent; “this focus has shifted over the years, however, and while juvenile courts are still directed at reform of young offenders, juvenile proceedings have become more punitive in nature” (Steward-Lindsey, 2006). Over the last 100 years, American society has treated offenses committed by minors as mischievous acts that are less serious, it has dealt with juvenile offenses by treating them as delinquent acts to be adjudicated within a separate justice system, what we refer to today as the juvenile justice system. Theoretically the juvenile justice system is designed to recognize the special needs and immature status of young people and emphasize rehabilitation over punishment, juveniles have different competencies than adults and need to be adjudicated as such; they also have different potential for change than adults and therefore deserve a second chance through targeted rehabilitation. Most people agree that there are a small number of juvenile offenders that should be transferred to the adult system because they pose a legitimate threat to the safety of other people and the harshness of their offenses warrant a more severe punishment, however, there are many juvenile offenders being prosecuted in the adult criminal justice system that do not belong there; these offenders have largely been charged with nonviolent crimes. When the transfer of youth offenders to adult court becomes the rule rather than the exception, there becomes a fundamental challenge to the very premise that the juvenile court was founded on; “the fact that adolescents and adults are different” (Steinberg, 2009). “During the 1980s and 1990s, there was a public push for getting tough with juveniles and trying them as adults, as a result many states passed laws making it easier to try certain offenders as adults, while some states even considered the radical plan of abolishing juvenile courts altogether” (Should Juveniles Be Tried as Adults, 2009). “Justice stresses that juvenile courts should be abolished, they believe that if juveniles were tried in adult courts, they would be afforded their full array of constitutional rights” (Should Juveniles Be Tried as Adults, 2009). The supporters for the abolition of juvenile courts base their arguments on the need to punish juvenile criminals and to protect the juveniles ' rights. Some of their focal points include: * That juvenile court was founded on false grounds because its purpose is to protect youths from the consequences of their own actions. * Overall juvenile court fails to deter juvenile violence. * The severity of the current juvenile crime problem requires that all juvenile offenders should be punished in order to discourage the next generation of juveniles from becoming predators.
On the other side of this argument are many experts that believe that getting rid of the juvenile court will only make things worse. They feel that: * The premise of the juvenile court is good because of the fact that children have not fully matured yet so they shouldn 't be held to the same standards of accountability as adults. * The purpose of the juvenile court is to treat and rehabilitate, not to deter or punish. * Changing the social environment in which juveniles live is a more effective in reducing juvenile violence than punishing them in adult courts. “While the denial of full constitutional rights for juveniles is sometimes a problem, the juvenile court 's mission is compassion and to serve the best interests of the children” (Should Juveniles Be Tried as Adults, 2009). Because each state sets its own guidelines for the circumstances under which juveniles will be transferred to adult criminal court and how the juvenile will interact with the adult court, it is very difficult to have any unity; every state has a different view, “the entire issue is complicated by the differences in how the juvenile justice system and the adult criminal system in each state handles the various steps in the process from confinement, trial, sentencing, and incarceration” (Should Juveniles Be Tried as Adults, 2007). From state-to-state, the issues that have been brought to the fore front as growing problems from minors being tried as adults include: prisoner-on-prisoner brutality, whether the juvenile remains within the adult criminal system or is transferred back to the juvenile system and increased recidivism due to what the juvenile learns from elder prisoners. Many people believe that if a teen-ager is locked up with an adult offender, they get more than just a cell mate, they get a role model. In an effort to stop the growing problems associated with minors in adult prisons, a number of states separate juveniles and adults within the prison. “Judges consider the availability of beds when they determine sentences for juveniles that have been tried as adults and may go so far as putting the youth on probation rather than putting them in an adult prison with adult prisoners” (Should Juveniles Be Tried as Adults, 2007). Brain development is not fully complete until the age of 23, because of this, a teenager is less likely to realize, if they realize at all, just how bad a situation can get if they commit a crime. Most proponents feel that juveniles should be punished, but tried as a child if the crime was committed as a child, when the system thinks they have been properly rehabilitated and competent enough to be released; then they should be released with a plan for on-going supervision, “they need to be put on probation, and monitored by their probation officer as often as the court decides” (Beeler, 2009). Some states have even incorporated blended sentencing to “allow youth offenders to be incarcerated in the juvenile system until the age of majority, followed by a period of adult incarceration or other sentence” (O’Neill, 2008). By nature children are less responsible than adults, even when they aren’t doing anything mischievous, and that should always be a factor in determining how to handle juvenile offenders; “In the last decade, virtually every state has made it much easier to try juveniles as adults. These sweeping changes came amidst widespread alarm that a wave of "juvenile super predators" was coming — which fortunately turned out to be false” (Maroney, 2007). The juvenile justice system was originally established to deal with youth offenders in a different way than adult offenders. Trying juveniles in the adult criminal justice system goes against every premise the juvenile system was based on; on the other hand the crimes that are being committed by today’s youth are more serious and often more heinous than those that were being committed 100 years ago. This debate about whether to try children as adults has been going on for many years; perhaps alternative resolutions to a growing issue provides the most bi-partisan approach offering understanding for both sides. In the end, doing what is best for the youth and protecting society at all times should be done in a very conscientious way, after all the children are the future, and like anything else, getting the best result later requires giving the best effort now.

References Beeler, Lori. (2009). People, They Are Not Adults. Retrieved December 8, 2012, from Web site: http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1635352/should_juveniles_be_tried_as_adults.htm l?cat=17 Maroney, Terry. (2007). Should Juveniles Be Tried as Adults? Retrieved December 8, 2012, from Vanderbilt Law School Web site: http://law.vanderbilt.edu/article-search/article- detail/index.aspx?nid=80

O’Neill, Lindsey. (2008). should juveniles be tried for crimes as adults? Retrieved December 8, 2012, from Lead Counsel Corner Web site: http://blog.lawinfo.com/2008/11/16/should-juveniles- be-tried-for-crimes-as-adults/

Should Juveniles Be Tried as Adults? (2007). Retrieved December 8, 2012, from Wise to Social Issues Web site: http://socialissues.wiseto.com/Articles/FO3020640013/ Should Juveniles Be Tried as Adults? (2009). Retrieved December 8, 2012, from CliffsNotes.com. Web site: http://www.cliffsnotes.com/WileyCDA/CliffsReviewTopic/topicArticleId-10065,articleId- 10063.html

References: Beeler, Lori. (2009). People, They Are Not Adults. Retrieved December 8, 2012, from Web site: http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1635352/should_juveniles_be_tried_as_adults.htm l?cat=17 Maroney, Terry. (2007). Should Juveniles Be Tried as Adults? Retrieved December 8, 2012, from Vanderbilt Law School Web site: http://law.vanderbilt.edu/article-search/article- detail/index.aspx?nid=80 O’Neill, Lindsey. (2008). should juveniles be tried for crimes as adults? Retrieved December 8, 2012, from Lead Counsel Corner Web site: http://blog.lawinfo.com/2008/11/16/should-juveniles- be-tried-for-crimes-as-adults/ Should Juveniles Be Tried as Adults? (2007). Retrieved December 8, 2012, from Wise to Social Issues Web site: http://socialissues.wiseto.com/Articles/FO3020640013/ Should Juveniles Be Tried as Adults? (2009). Retrieved December 8, 2012, from CliffsNotes.com. Web site: http://www.cliffsnotes.com/WileyCDA/CliffsReviewTopic/topicArticleId-10065,articleId- 10063.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Jessica Wilde stated, “All crimes committed by juveniles should and must be treated in the same regard, it’s not to punish heinous acts, then to provide justice to the families of the victims” (Teens Should). Some argue that children should be tried as adults because they know what they are doing. According to some studies, brain development is not complete until the mid-20s (Merrefield 3). Others believe that by not punishing juveniles to the full extent of the law, it is implied that they are above the law and receive special treatment (Should Juveniles be Tried as Adults? 3). On the other hand, holding a twelve year old to the same standards as a thirty year old when they lack the same mental development is wrong (Should Juveniles be Tried as Adults? 5). It is proven that the cognitive development of a child is not complete until they are in their early twenties (Should Juveniles be Tried as Adults? 5). Although there may be a few downfalls to not prosecuting juveniles as adults, it benefits the youth of the nation far…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Persuasive Paper Part 1

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages

    From the 1980s to the 1990s there has been a surge in minors who commit violent crimes as shown in a research study conducted by the Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch Currently. The information was based on federal and state correctional data related to race, history and nature of crimes committed by minors. The study showed inmates under the age of 18 in state prisons has more than doubled from 1985-1997. The study also shows that 61% of those minors admitted were convicted of violent offenses1. The Juvenile Court Act was founded in 18992 when the idea of reforming minors took place and the majority of crimes committed by minors were of minor misconduct. The justice systems were separated because adults were treated as criminals and minors were treated for rehabilitation. , created to rehabilitate and protect minors. The courts intended the system to be more informal and treat the juveniles rather than punish them. This system was not developed to undertake the current rise of…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is argued that one of the main issues as to why the needs are not being met is because of the tensions in the juvenile justice system itself. Delinquent behavior must be responded to only when competing mandates and priorities. The main focus of the juvenile justice system is rehabilitation for the youth, in performing this it must be taken in account that while holding juveniles for their behavior the community must also be protected.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eassy

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Should teenagers accused of violent crimes be tried and sentenced as adults? Why or Why not?…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States government is based on a checks and balances type system. The three main parts of this system are the executive branch, the legislative branch, and the judicial branch. This judicial system’s job is to uphold the law of the land. Law can be defined as a set of rules or norms of conduct which mandate, proscribe or permit specified relationships among people and organizations, provide methods for ensuring the impartial treatment of such people, and provide punishments for those who do not follow the established rules of conduct (Wikipedia.org, 2005). This is a very wide and all encompassing definition of the law and the governing judicial system. Just like the United States government the judicial system is broken up into different checks, balances, and systems. Two of these main systems are the juvenile justices system and the adult justice system. The obvious difference between these two courts is that the juvenile system is designed to handle youth offenders and the adult system is designed to handle adult offenders. Both of these two systems despite their difference have the same end goal; to administer justice. In the pages to follow we will discuss the big picture of the juvenile justice system, go over a point by point comparison between the juvenile system and the adult system, touch on both the benefits and disadvantages to being tried as a minor in the juvenile court from the perspective of a minor, and review the societal implication of abolishing the juvenile court system.…

    • 2342 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Several authors address the issues surrounding juveniles who are tried as adults (Hudson, 2009; Mason, Chapman, Chang & Simons, 2003; Nunez, Tang, 2003). Hudson (2009) emphasizes…

    • 1525 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juvenile Justice Center

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Both juveniles and adults have the right to counsel in court proceedings. Nevertheless, juveniles may be represented by court appointed advocates who look out for the juvenile’s “best interest,” as a parent would for his or her child; with right ways to help the child rehabilitate. In the case of adult trials, court appointed advocates may be representing the accused, but the “best interest” lies in reducing or foregoing the sentence, not rehabilitate (Goldstein, 2007). In the cases of both groups, a “traditional” counsel may be hired to…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trying Juveniles

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Trying juveniles has been a topic to the public we hear about in the judustrial system. It contains a lot of arguments which has its pros and cons. Considering being a juvenile delinquent you must commit a crime that is under the age of 18. Prosecutors can charge juveniles as adults when they are suspected of violent offenses or crime. Back in time when this happened, this treatment involved the death penalty. As of today it involves being prosecuted through adult courts and incarcerated in the adult jails and prisons. Addressing this topic is important because society is not aware what happened or what is happening to juveniles being tried as adults. After reading this paper, you will learn different offenses juveniles commit and why it leads to being tried as adults. You will know how the death penalty came in effect, ended, and the different cases that happened between times. I will talk about juveniles being prosecuted through adult courts and the benefit of it. Also juveniles being incarcerated with adults and the risks they face. My intention of writing this paper is to get you to know the research I gained from it, and hoping it interest you to do more research on it too. Do convicting a juvenile as adults helps stop crime.…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Juveniles Serving Life

    • 4252 Words
    • 18 Pages

    A juvenile court system was intentionally created and designed to accommodate offenders under a certain age, who committed certain offenses. Consideration of sentencing was based on future recidivism, and possible rehabilitation for proper functionality within society. Yet, the courts do not appear to be separating this judicial process and are sending these young individuals directly to adult criminal courts as a preemptory strike against the potential for future crimes, as well as the protection of society as a whole (Brink, 2004).…

    • 4252 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Juveniles have been incarcerated in secure facilities since 1974. Juveniles are committing more heinous crimes and citizens have advocated for tougher penalties on crime. They want justice for the violence perpetrated on their families, businesses and communities. The Juvenile Justice system is charged with simultaneously protecting the public as well as reforming those juveniles who are convicted and sentenced to secure facilities. Barry C. Feld (1995) believes that there is a “desire to "get tough," fueled in part by frustration with the intractability of crime, that provides political impetus to transfer some young offenders to criminal courts for prosecution as adults and to strengthen the sanctioning powers of juvenile courts”(p.966).…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil Injuction Process

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Before the modern era, youth who committed crimes in the Western world received no preferential treatment because of their age. These children were adjudicated, punished, and confined alongside adult offenders. In more recent years the juvenile justice system has maintained different priorities than those that exist in the adult criminal justice system. However, there are still many get tough advocates of law and order, many of whom are fed up with violent juvenile crime, that are increasingly questioning the philosophy that underlies the juvenile justice system in America. Many people call for harsher punishments while others call for better rehabilitation programs for youth offenders. This paper will focus on the differences between the adult and juvenile justice systems, and whether rehabilitation or incarceration is the best method to assist in reducing the juvenile crime rate and help today’s youth become contributing members of society.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Juvenile Justice System

    • 2095 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In today’s society, there are not that many distinctions between juveniles and adults when it comes to the criminal justice system. The main distinction between an adult and a juvenile is of course the age and the types of sentencing a juvenile may receive compared to an adult. The juvenile justice system has a tiered affect when it comes to sentencing but it relies heavily on the maturity and intellect of the juvenile. Due to that reason, there will always be a separate juvenile justice system to ensure the juvenile truly understands the nature of the crime and the consequences.…

    • 2095 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    For many years, people have believed that the juvenile justice system was meant to serve as a way to protect the community. Juveniles who commit crimes are different from adults because many do not understand the complexity of the crime committed. In order to respond to these differences, many states have established a way to treat these adolescents through juvenile courts and youth-based recovery systems. While most states recognize that juveniles who commit crimes should not be treated as an adult there are still some that are skeptic that the juvenile justice system works.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PSY328 final proposal

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Semple, J. & Woody, W. (2011). Juveniles tried as adults: the age of the juvenile matters.…

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I will view both sides to whether children should be tried as adults. The rate of murders by juveniles and children has skyrocketed across the country. There are many people who feel that children should be tried as adults due to the popular saying “If you do the crime, you must do the time”. According to many sources it is believed that it will make them understand the consequences of their actions and deter them from committing any further crimes.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics