Preview

Justice Antonin Scalia Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1828 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Justice Antonin Scalia Summary
Justice Antonin Scalia has said in the past regarding abortion that there is nothing in the Constitution that mentions anything about a right to abortion. The Constitution simply states nothing about this issue. One possible way to fix whether there is a female right for women or not is to look at how most rights are created in a democratic society and then either amend the Constitution, or create a law. The Constitution cannot compromise, but a law can because the Constitution as Justice Scalia believed is a document that is meant to hinder and restrain from change. The Constitution is our supreme law of the land, and it is not and should not be meant to encourage or make change happen.
It can be argued that the Supreme Court is very much influenced by public opinion. If the Court were in fact influenced by public opinion, then it would be dependent on what the people think. Being concerned about what the people think is important, but this can make the Court seem just as political as congress and the president. As a …show more content…
She remains strong because she is notorious and because she believes that she has the potential to continue influencing the Court. I admire RBG’s strength and hope that she is able to serve on the Court for as long as she is able to do so because her love for the work she does is quite evident through all that she has done for our society. And even though Justice Scalia’s ideology is different than it is to that of Justice Ginsburg, I think that one thing that they have in common is their ability to boldly argue cases. When they, as an example, intend to write a dissent on an issue, they do it strategically both laying out the cons and stating why or how the Court decided
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Role Of Abortion In The United States
    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Role Of Abortion In The United States

    The United States has prided itself on making “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” stated in its Declaration of Independence as accessible for its citizens as possible. Recently, the country has tried both politically and socially to reduce the exclusion and discrimination of any and all groups of people from society as evidenced by topics such as gay marriage, equal pay for women and the frequently debated topic concerning the constitutionality of abortion. The Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution states, “no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States” (US Const. Amend. XIV). Many pro-choice arguments defend that the choice of abortion is a right of women…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The History Of Abortion In The United States
    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The History Of Abortion In The United States

    The history of abortions in the United States is complicated and has been going on for more than 200 years. The debate on whether abortions should be legal divides Americans to this day. Abortions has been illegal since the 1800’s, although, women would have the procedure without legal rights to do so. On January 22, 1973, the US Supreme Court declared it was a fundamental right after the Roe vs. Wade case. Many states have changed the rules on abortions but as of today women have the right to get abortions in all 50 states. The legalization give women the right to remain in control of their body.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Court Case Summary
    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Court Case Summary

    In December, Republican North Carolina Governor Pat McCrory signed into law a bill that limits Gov. –elect Roy Cooper’s power in making appointments by combining the elections board with the State Ethics Commission. The State Ethics Commission oversees ethics laws governing lobbyists, elected officials, and government employees. Under this law, governor successors are only able to appoint 50% of the new board’s members under the requirement that two must be Republicans. Legislative leaders would appoint the other 50% of the new board. Previously, the Governor appointed 60% of the Board of Elections members.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Antonin Scalia Summary
    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Antonin Scalia Summary

    Throughout Antonin Scalia’s dissent opinion, he states that the way the court interprets the Affordable Care Act, is different to the way he interprets it. For instance, the interpretation of “exchange established by the state,” and the tax credits under code §36B differs between the court and Scalia.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analyzing Antonin Scalia's Case
    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Analyzing Antonin Scalia's Case

    He went on to become Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel, then 8 years later he was nominated to the United States Court of Appeals by Ronald Regan. During Regan’s presidency, Scalia was appointed, and confirmed by the senate to be one of the Associate Justices on the Supreme Court (Reilly, 2016). Antonin Scalia earned his place on the Supreme Court through hard work, and dedication to the Judicial System throughout his career. Scalia’s voice will never be forgotten because he remained to have a strong conservative view throughout his career, and always vocalized his opinions on issues brought forth in the…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparing Justice Scalia And Justice Breyer
    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Comparing Justice Scalia And Justice Breyer

    Both Justice Scalia and Justice Breyer agree more than they differ and they agree about nothing so much as the extent to which they agree. Justice Scalia is a conservative and a calls himself an “originalist,” believing that judges should determine the framers’ original intent in the words of the constitution, and stick by what is says. Justice Breyer, on the other hand, is more of liberal, often called a pragmatist. Breyer believes in what he calls the living Constitution, the idea that the values outlined by the framers must be molded to apply to our ever-changing modern society.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of Cavanaugh's Consumed '
    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Summary Of Cavanaugh's Consumed '

    One of the main ways that Cavanaugh interacts with the situations, which he explains, is through critique. Throughout his work Being Consumed, William Cavanaugh, a Catholic theologian, communicates his sincere desire for Christians to live responsibly in the world God created by explaining the interaction between theology and economics. Cavanaugh specifically uses examples of the free market, consumerism, globalization and the failures of current economic practices in his explanations of theology and economics. He seems to quite a broad audience but may specifically be targeting an audience who is interested not simply theology or economics, but really how they have effect on one another.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ruth Ginsburg Research Paper
    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ruth Ginsburg Research Paper

    Ruth Bader Ginsburg is a major part in woman’s fight for equality, and social matters. She fights against gender based discrimination such as abortion rights and sexual equality.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Antonin Scalia Research Paper
    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Antonin Scalia Research Paper

    Antonin Scalia was a very wise, smart educated man who was driven by politics. “He was born in Trenton, New Jersey, March 11, 1936. He married Maureen McCarthy and has nine children named, Ann Forrest, Eugene, John Francis, Catherine Elisabeth, Mary Clare, Paul David, Matthew, Christopher James, and Margaret Jane. He received his A.B. from Georgetown University and the University of Fribourg, Switzerland, and his LL.B. from Harvard Law School, and was a Sheldon Fellow of Harvard University from 1960–1961. He was working in a private practice in Cleveland, Ohio from 1961–1967, a Professor of Law at the University of Virginia from 1967–1971. In 1972, Antonin Scalia entered public service when President Nixon appointed him general counsel for the Office of Telecommunications Policy where he helped formulate regulations for the cable television industry. And he also was a Professor of Law at the University of Chicago from 1977–1982, and a Visiting Professor of Law at Georgetown University and Stanford University” (Court, 2013).so he had his hands tied up in a lot of different important places with many important people.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Incoherence Of Antonin Scalia
    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Incoherence Of Antonin Scalia

    Joan Biskupic’s novel In American Original: The Life and Constitution of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, describes Scalia’s success as an influential conservative force in the Supreme Court, which conservative lawyer, Alfred S. Regnery, bolsters, expanding on William Rehnquist’s role in establishing the groundwork allowed for a major a shift towards right in courts, in The American Spectator article, “The Good Old Days”. Regnery begins by establishing he agrees with Biskupic’s assertions that Scalia has been the “most influential member”: “changing the terms of the debate at the Court” and influencing many. Regnery, however, submits that although the degree of Scalia’s achievements hadn’t been accomplished before, Rehnquist, in fact…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Term Limit In Supreme Court Justices
    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Term Limit In Supreme Court Justices

    One of the major jobs for the federal judges is to protect the United States from the “tyranny of the majority”. Furthermore, even if the majority rules, the minority still has rights. Many components of the Bill of Rights, which the judges are called to enforce, are designed to protect the rights of the unpopular minorities. Being a Supreme Court judge is a difficult job, and even with life tenure, they are not completely immune from political pressure. They remain members of society; therefore it is difficult to allow things to happen even if they know it is morally wrong, but constitutionally…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Consitutional Review
    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Consitutional Review

    I do believe this is true. Judicial decisions reject political motives in judicial making because the court operated on judicial impartiality and judicial independence which holds the court and judges to law without being under the influence of governmental or political agencies. Judicial independence is most important for maintain individuals rights for all citizens. The Supreme Court does not like to overturn established laws of congress but in turn will be able to overturn state rights principles.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Philosophies Of Justices In The United States
    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Judicial Philosophies Of Justices In The United States

    The judicial philosophies of the justices in the United States Supreme Court differ from one another. These philosophies are depended on the justices personal experiences and ideologies they grew up with. We find some are on the liberal side, some are conservative, while others are more on the moderate side. The liberal judges believe that the U.S constitution is a living document. This means that the Constitution should be open to modification and modernization according to the demands of contemporary times. They believe that there are certain rules and restrictions that are outdated and should be revised. The conservative judges on the other hand, strictly believe that the meaning of the Constitution was fixed by the founding fathers of the U.S…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Models
    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Supreme Court Models

    Even though it doesn’t seem like a big deal, public support of the Supreme Court is a very big deal. “If the public respects the court, then the court will have an easier time getting the public to accept their decisions. Furthermore, other branches of government will be more likely to listen to the court if the court has the public’s support.” (Cengage 2016) This quote from the Cengage power point hits the nail on the head when it comes to public support. If the Court didn’t have the support of the public, then the public wouldn’t follow the decision of the Courts. With the support of the public, then the Supreme Court has a better chance of getting the support from Congress. Public opinion defiantly shapes the decisions the courts make. Without the support of the public, then why would the public follow the laws the courts make? The Supreme Court has to put into account how the people will react and if their support is strong enough to follow through with the ruling. The courts should listen to the public because, as stated before, if the courts have the peoples support then they will have Congress’s support. The Supreme Court needs to listen to the public’s opinion because it gives them a chance to further win the publics support. The role of the government is to make policies and rulings that will essentially help our country. When the courts listen to the public then it makes it easier for them to decide their…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Supreme Court Case Brandenburg V. Ohio
    • 2201 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Supreme Court Case Brandenburg V. Ohio

    Sometimes the Supreme Court will look at the importance of the case as well. When there is disagreement between lower courts, the Supreme Court will read over the case and see if there is something in this case that may be of great concern to the nation, area, sex, race, etc. Also, the Supreme Court may deny a case depending on the effect of the case in the long-run. A good example of this is when cases were sent to the court to challenge whether or not the Vietnam War was constitutional. The court as always tried to be neutral and avoid any kind of negative involvement, especially in political disputes, and for this reason they would negate any cases on the Vietnam War. Also, and this is more over the last criteria for determining a case, the Court tries to avoid any unnecessary inflammation of the public 's opinion. The Court 's do this by limiting the amount of issues that may cause controversy to the public. They consider the publics reaction in choosing cases in order…

    • 2201 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics