Section 1: Jus ad bellum
1. Summarize the argument that the United States has a just cause for war.
“military operations to disarm Iraq, to free its people and to defend the world from grave danger” (bush 2003)
“Helping Iraqis achieve a United, stable and free country will require our sustained commitment.”(Bush, 2003)
“Saddam Hussein has placed Iraqi troops and equipment in civilian areas, attempting to use innocent men, women and children as shields for his own military” (Bush 2003)
“We have no ambition in Iraq, except to remove a threat and restore control of that country to its own people.” (Bush 2003)
These quotes are the answers George w bush gave to Americans on why this war is just, he states that the united states military is in Iraq to disarm Iraq and defend the world from grave danger he also says that Americans don’t have any ambition in Iraq and they are only going into Iraq to help the “oppressed people”.
2. Is the President indicating that the United States will act with “right intention”? What motives does he give for calling for war?
Yes the quotes above from George w bush’s speech are indicating that the united states is entering Iraq with the right intentions, the motives he gives are that he wants to free the “oppressed Iraq people” and to defend the world from grave danger.
3. How does the President indicate that war is sanctioned by legitimate authority?
“ More than 35 countries are giving crucial support -- from the use of naval and air bases, to help with intelligence and logistics, to the deployment of combat units. Every nation in this coalition has chosen to bear the duty and share the honor of serving in our common defence.” (bush, 2003)
This quote from george w bush shows that it is not just the united states planning an attack on iraq and that 35 other countries around the world are also aiding the united states, this shows that the war is sanctioned by legitimate authority.
4. Does the President mention having tried other measures to keep the peace, and that war is a “last resort”?
No, there are no indications in this speech that there were any other measures taken to avoid going to war and leaving it as a Last resort, this speech indicates that the united states just went straight to war with Iraq.
5. Does the President give any indication of the probability of success in this war?
“Now that conflict has come, the only way to limit its duration is to apply decisive force. And I assure you, this will not be a campaign of half measures, and we will accept no outcome but victory. ” (Bush, 2003)
This is the only indication of the probability of success in the war, George w. bush says that there will be no half measures and the Americans wont stop until they are successful.
6. Does the President indicate that the war will lead to a long-term positive benefit?
No, the president does no indicate this; the only indication of long term positive benefit is when he says he is saving the world from grave danger, which indicates it will cause peace. But there are no other indications of long term positive benefits in this speech.
Section 2: Jus in bello
Section 2
1. Does the President give an indication that this war will be conducted justly?
Summary analysis:
In about 200 words, answer this question below: Explain why, according to President Bush, Operation Iraqi Freedom was a just war.
In this speech president George w. bush gives many examples of why this war “operation Iraqi freedom” is a just war, the title of the operation even suggests that the war is a just war (giving Iraqi’s their freedom). In the beginning of the speech George w bush states “… to free its people and to defend the world from grave danger” (bush 2003) he is saying that the Iraqi government is oppressing its people and that they are going into Iraq to free the people and save the world! And to make the president of Iraq look like an evil person he states “Saddam Hussein has placed Iraqi troops and equipment in civilian areas, attempting to use innocent men, women and children as shields for his own military” (Bush 2003) this leads people to believe that Saddam Hussein is an evil person and the united states is fighting with the right intentions (to get rid of this “evil”). Bush also says “Helping Iraqis achieve a united, stable and free country will require our sustained commitment.”(Bush, 2003) this suggests that the Americans are entering Iraq to fight with the people to help them attain their freedom. These are a few of the things George W. Bush said to justify Operation Iraqi Freedom.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
After September 11, President Bush and his administration, associated the Iraqi regime with terrorism, and said Iraq had the capacity to produce Weapons of Mass Destruction, which could be used by terrorists to threaten the United States. Therefore, encouraging the U.S. citizens to support Bush and reelect him as President because he would take action by sending troops to Iraq, to find Saddam and other terrorists, while obtaining weapons that could potentially be used against the U.S. However, over time Bush and his administration began to lose support for their action taken in the war.…
- 689 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
"As Americans, we want peace -- we work and sacrifice for peace. But there can be no peace if our security depends on the will and whims of a ruthless and aggressive dictator. I'm not willing to stake one American life on trusting Saddam Hussein." -George W. Bush. President Bush promised America that he would bring down Saddam Hussein no matter what it took. But why? Why would the president make such an imposing promise? In order to ensure the safety of his people (the Americans) such terrorists must be brought down. President Bush was willing to sacrifice the lives of many heroic soldiers to halt terrorism from afflicting this country. Are the lives of these young brave soldiers worth the sacrifice that is needed to bring change into the corrupt government of Iraq? Sacrifice becomes necessary to achieve social change when there is loss of personal freedoms, abuse of power, and physical abuse. This is demonstrated by the revolutions in Nicaragua and Haiti as well as the novel, In the Time of the Butterflies, by Julia Alvarez.…
- 1175 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In order to make everyone feel that Bush is paying attention to everything going on, he reassures us that despite what happened American is doing just fine, “My fellow citizens, for the last nine days, the entire world has seen for itself the state of union, and it is strong” (Bush) he then goes on to speak about how America is going to solve the issue of terrorism by having the terrorists turn themselves over, “And tonight the United States of America makes the following demands on the Taliban. Deliver to United States authorities all of the leaders of al-Qaida who hide in your land. Release all foreign nationals, including American citizens you have unjustly imprisoned. Protect foreign journalists, diplomats and aid workers in your country. Close immediately and permanently every terrorist training camp in Afghanistan. And hand over every terrorist and every person and their support structure to appropriate authorities. Give the United States full access to terrorist training camps, so we can make sure they are no longer…
- 758 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
“This is not a fireside chat on war. It is a talk on national security, because the nub of the whole purpose of your President is to keep you now, and your children later, and your grandchildren much later, out of a last-ditch war for the preservation of American independence and all of the things that American independence means to you and to me and to ours.”…
- 610 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Bush’s war in Iraq has done untold damage to the United States. It has impaired our military power and undermined the morale of our armed forces. Our troops were trained to project overwhelming power. They were not trained for occupation duties.” I completely agree with George Sorors thoughts on the war between the United States and Iraq.…
- 626 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
"The fact is in my opinion, we have had confusion for years between the White House, the Pentagon, and the battle field. And congress needs to do its job. Now, let's actually have a debate against the authorized use of military force. Let's debate what our soldiers are doing. If we can't define what our soldiers are doing, then this is how we get a decades-long fight, and the American people don't know what is…
- 559 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Euphemisms are used in writing to reduce offenses or disturbances in the audience created by certain words or phrases. Euphemisms are widely used in normal social contexts, the media and even politics. Politicians use euphemisms in their rhetoric to lessen the impact of their words to avoid creating alarm and heighten emotions. Political euphemisms often “sugar coat” the real message and do not give an actual portrayal of the message, in essence understating the facts. In his speech, “Responsibly ending the war in Iraq”, President Obama uses a lot of euphemisms to sound politically correct, to minimize the impact of the war in Iraq and to justify the continued presence of the US military in Iraq. This essay includes a rebuttal of these euphemisms and shows how the euphemisms used downplay certain situations arising from the war, and how they are used to justify the continued occupation of Iraq.…
- 1037 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Savoy, Paul. May 31, 2004. "The Moral Case Against the Iraq War" In The Nation. New York, NY: The Nation Company, L.P.…
- 1686 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
OUSDP. (February 21, 2002b) Memo to Paul Wolfowitz. Links between Al-Qaida and Iraq. Available at http://www.waranddecision.com/docLib/20080403_IraqAlQaeda.pdf. (Accessed March 10, 2009). Packer, George. (2006) The Assassin’s Gate: America in Iraq. New York: McMillan Press. PBS. (October 9, 2003) Frontline: Truth, War, and Consequences. Interview with Richard Perle. PBS. (June 20, 2006) Frontline: The Dark Side: The Oct ‘02 National Intelligence Estimate (NIE). Interview with David Kay Pillar, Paul. (2006) Intelligence, Policy and the War in Iraq. Foreign Affairs 85 (2): 15–26. PNAC. (2000) Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century. Powell, Colin. (February 6, 2003) Remarks to the United Nationals Security Council. Available at http://www.cnn.com/2003/us/02/05/sprj.irq.powell.transcript/. (Accessed January 18, 2009). Prados, John. (2004) Hoodwinked: The Documents that Reveal How Bush Sold Us a War. New York: New Press. Raven, B. H. (1974) The Nixon Group. Journal of Social Issues 30: 297–320. Rumsfeld, Donald. (July 27, 2001) Memo to Condoleeza Rice. Iraq. Available at http://www. waranddecision.com/docLib/20080403_RumsfeldmemoIraq.pdf. (Accessed March 10, 2009). Rumsfeld, Donald. (April 11, 2003b) Department of Defense News Briefing. Available at http:// www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=2367. (Accessed March 10, 2009). Schafer, Mark, and Scott Crichlow. (1996) Antecedents of Groupthink: A Quantitative Study. Journal of Conflict Resolution 40 (3): 415–435. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. (September, 2006) Postwar Findings about Iraq’s WMD Programs and Links to Terrorism and How they Compare with Prewar Assessments. Available at http://intelligence.senate.gov/phaseiiaccuracy.pdf. (Accessed January 18, 2009). Shannon, Vaughn P., and Jonathan W. Keller. (2006) Leadership Style and International Norm Violation: The Case of the Iraq War. Foreign Policy Analysis 3 (1): 79–104. Sifry, Micah L., and Christopher Cerf, Eds. (2003). Iraq War Reader: History, Documents, Opinions. New York: Simon and Schuster. Silberman, Laurence H., and Charles S. Robb. (March 31, 2005) Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United States Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction. Available at http:// govinfo.library.unt.edu/wmd/report/wmd_report.pdf. (Accessed February 10, 2009). Smith, Steve. (1985) Groupthink and the Hostage Rescue Mission. British Journal of Political Science 15 (1): 117–123. Stern, Eric K. (1997) Probing the Plausibility of Newgroup Syndrome: Kennedy and the Bay of Pigs. In Beyond Groupthink: Political Group Dynamics and Foreign Policy-making, edited by Paul t’Hart, Erik K. Stern and Bengt Sundelius. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.…
- 11914 Words
- 48 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The insurgents’ war is an unethical war. They use tactics of manipulation, deceit and media propaganda to brainwash vulnerable and desperate individuals into becoming suicide bombers. Analyzing these three tactics through events in The Sirens of Baghdad” by Yasmina Khadra with “Eros and Thanatos” by Chris Hedges and “Just War Theory” by Alexander Moseley and then comparing these events to real life stories such as “Abandoned in Iraq; We did our job as interpreters; why has the U.S reneged on its promise?” by Tariq and "Iraq 's Young Blood" by Christian Caryl provide insight.…
- 1871 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
The Bush administration had sent US troops to Iraq because there was a belief that the country had been developing weapons of mass destruction and were an aid to Al-Qaeda. Furthermore, a portion of America had supported this possible war as “44 percent of Americans reported [in a poll] that either ‘most or ‘some of the Sept.11 hijackers were Iraqi citizens. The answer is zero”( The Christian Science Monitor, March 14,2003). Moreover, America wanting to hurt Iraq was seen as a victim mentality act by others. On claimed that “We [Americans] do those who lost their lives no service at all by adopting a victim mentality”(An attack on Us All: NATO’s Response to Terrorism). This indicates that America had dwelled so much in this tragedy that their grievance became anger and that led into violence. Instead America should not thier anger interfere but rather “think about a rational response that brings real peace and justice to [the] world” (Zinn & Arnove, eds. (2009). Voices of a People’s History, 2nd edition (NY: Seven Stories Press), p. 603.). America invading Iraq was seen injustice since their involvement in the 9/11 attack was more of an assumption then factual…
- 710 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Just cause: In my opinion, the United States had no right to go into Iraq based solely on a theory that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. According to the Just War Theory, war is permissible only to confront “a real and certain danger," to protect innocent life, to preserve conditions necessary for decent human existence and to secure basic human rights.…
- 262 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
“The people of the united states and our friends and allies will not live at the mercy of an outlaw regime that threatens the peace with weapons of mass murder.” These words were spoken by President George Bush on the 22nd of March in 2003.…
- 407 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
THE MORAL PHILOSOPHY IN VIETNAM WAR The moral judgement on the vietnam war is relatively simple: all war is forbidden, the conflict in vietnam is war, therefore the vietnam war is forbidden. From the viewpoint of the “just war” theory, the morality or justice of the vietnam war can be determined only by applying the principles of jus ad bellum and details of vietnam war. There are 6 of the principles of the jus ad bellum: 1. Just Cause: ‘War is permissible only to confront “a real and certain danger” i.e., to protect innocent life, to preserve conditions necessary for decent human existence, and to secure basic human rights.’…
- 1524 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
actions and policies of the rest of the world," that all actions of defense taken by the US…
- 2273 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays