Preview

Just War and Pacifism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
932 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Just War and Pacifism
Ulzhan Mukasheva
09/11/13
Religious Studies
Just War and Pacifism

(I) Examine the view that some wars can be justified. (21) What is just war? It’s the act of war that must be justified because of the considerable losses which war entails. Pacifism? The pacifist will pursue every other option a prior to resorting to war. War actually has some advantages and can be justified; mainly it establishes peace. It stimulates the economy e.g. weapon development, employment, reparations, rebuilding. War raises consciousness of civil and human rights. It also advances technology and medicine. The Just War theory was developed my Augustine during the 3rd century and Aquinas during 13th century. This theory responded to the need for Christians to fight for the defense of the empire, but without compromising Christian principles, following Constantine’s conversion to Christianity. There are three categories: jus ad bellum (conditions for going to war), jus in bello (conditions during war), and jus post bellum (conditions for ending war). Jus ad bellum has to have a just cause e.g. liberation from oppression, to restore peace, protect the innocent, and self defense. Last resort which means after all peaceful methods of negotiation, sanctions; isolation; have failed. The legitimate authority has to approve e.g. the elected or recognized government of the land; religious authority if appropriate; military government that is the legitimate authority. A just intention should be present, a just outcome as means e.g. not to take a nation’s wealth is the process of lecturing peace. There should be a comparison of justice on both sides; in principle both sides should have a just cause and a just intention. A reasonable likelihood of success, do not commit a nation to an unwinnable war that will lead to increasing suffering. Also, the level of weaponry should be proportionate to the offense e.g. conflict becoming a country for a dispute over trade. Jus in Bello, the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The first three conditions necessary for a just war were listed by Aquinas which included right authority, just cause and just intention. These and…

    • 1943 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that they are incompatible as Just War is just trying to make a war seem just by putting in the seven principles but at the end of the day they are just killing. Where as pacifism is a principle against this completely. However, there are four types of pacifism and to an extent you could argue that some of these fit the Just War theory.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    POL.355.Final.Paper

    • 2412 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Just War Theory evolves from three ideas; jus ad bellum, jus in bello and jus post bellum. Jus ad bellum means justice for war, that is what the motive behind going into war is? This first part concentrates on the reasons why states use war as a means in which to achieve a justifiable end. Jus in bello means justice in war, deals with the means used in the actual war which is normally the soldiers’ responsibility. The last idea used in just war theory is Jus post bellum which means justice after war; this involves the consequences of war.…

    • 2412 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just War

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Force should be used when there are legitimate reasons for using it, and when it is the last resort for the government, who is responsible for civic peace. Elshtain uses Augustine to discuss justice and war. A paradox between war and peace is introduced, Elshtain uses an Augustine quote to discuss the similarity of two words that are complete polar opposites, “Peace and war had a contest in cruelty, and peace won the prize.” In history, there are many instances where evil and horrible things are done in the name of ‘peace’. Elshtain continues with the early Christian beliefs that under Jesus’ teaches forbid force in anyway, even under authority. Later, it transforms to the necessity of force to protect others. This leads to the four qualifications that Elshtain wrote to justify a war, the first is that the war must be publicly declared by a legitimate jurisdiction. The second criteria is that an unjust violence must have occurred against the government’s own people or a defenseless group. Third, the war has to be start with the proper motives. Finally, all other alternatives must be exhausted before leading to war. In the end, Elshtain includes a final criteria that must be met for a war to be ‘just’, the possibility of actually winning the conflict. If there is no chance of succeeding, the conflict should not be…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Avoidance of War

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “America’s first foreign policy formulated by President George Washington and John Adams had as its primary goal the avoidance of war at all costs.”…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    peace and war

    • 782 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There was roughly seventy two million people who were killed during World War two. The war was felt worldwide in every country across the globe. It was almost impossible for someone to not be affected by that war. Things are different in today’s society. Nowadays when wars happen most people brush it off like nothing, just another war. This was not the way that Moacyr Scliar saw things. He thought was war was a thing that should not be taken lightly no matter how small. Moacyr Scliar intended for Peace and War to be about society’s numbing to the tragedies in life to a point where war is seen as nothing more than just a job. Peace and War depicts a futuristic satire where war is seen as just a job. In the story it compares war to being nothing more than an average job where you work 9-5. This is shown at the beginning when the main character says “I was late for the war;…

    • 782 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This article “Just War Tradition” also refer to as Just War Theory is related to war because it explains the principles and morals behind on taking war as a last resort solution only if the options don't meet the requirements. Also, in the case of war was to happen they discussed on when and where warfare is appropriate to be taken place. Including that, the Just War Tradition was originally discovered by the Christians and their based it on their philosophy. Then theorist Saint Augustine made who made other factions to their philosophy for a better outcome. As years passed another theorist named Michael Walzer stepped in but this time around modernize the principles. The government must apply two principles the first principle is Jus ad Bellum…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Just War and Pacifism

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are six conditions that must be satisfied for a war to be considered just:…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just War Theory

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jus a bellum, the right to go to war, explicitly describes how a nation-state should conduct itself before preparing for war. There are seven sub-categories within Jus a bellum: Just Cause, Comparative Justice, Competent Authority, Right Intention, Profitability of Success, Last Resort, and Proportionality. Just Cause is explained as needing to have a reason to go to war. Not just for recapturing material possessions, but if lives are in danger. Comparative Justice is described, as the suffering and injustice on one side within a war must outweigh the suffering and injustice on the opposite side. Competent Authority must be in order within a war. Nation-states that start war must only start it if the authorities within the nation-state are focused on justice. Right Intention is defined as; force may be only used for a just cause correcting a suffered wrong. Gaining or maintaining economies by a nation-state is not considered just. Profitability of Success indicates that arms are not to be used where unbalanced measures are pertinent to be successful. The Last Resort category is presented as; force in war may only be used if peaceful alternatives have been completely depleted. The final category, Proportionality, is the foreseen benefits of starting war must be proportionate to its expected wrongs.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As a citizen of the United States, I am part of an institution that has been, and is currently, killing people. Whether or not all or some of these killings are ethically defensible is a difficult question to answer and most people simply never confront the issue. I will evaluate literature on the topic, identify the different justifications for killing in time of war and decide if they legitimize our actions. After describing some compelling arguments, I will defend my own position that pacifism is the only ideal which mankind should embrace.…

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Just War Theory

    • 2504 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Just war is a war that is justified because it is necessary for peace to happen. Just war theory has its origins in the catholic church. In order for a war to be considered just it must meet certain criteria. For a war to be just it must: have a just cause, have a valid authority, be comparative justice, the right intention, be the last resort, have a good probability of success, and have proportionality.[1]…

    • 2504 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tim O'Brien on Injustice

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The unclearness and uncertainty of war is something that penetrates deep into life and it is something that affects every facet of every day. Justice is the pursuit of right, the elevation of goodness, and the elimination of evil; however, such lucid definitions often lack substance when stood up to the tests of reality. Injustice is the denial of rights and the lack of morality for the embracement of barbarism. When looking for injustices in the world, what most readily comes to mind are violent crimes? Murder, theft, and rape are domestic injustices commonly recognized, but injustices, like reality, exist in perception. Therefore, to deem someone or something unjust, first agreement upon its definition must be established. When the United States declared her independence, we perceived the unjust indignities to be clear; however, to the militant king, the refusal to pay his taxes was injustice and the nullification of his law was the warrant for war. When such implied meanings come in to play, one has to determine what is just. In order to eliminate war, first all nations must outline the true meaning of “injustice” and find suitable solutions for reparation. The most diligent participant of war is the injustice done upon both sides, the backing of both by god, and the misconception that both will prevail due to their side being right and just. These differing views of injustice and justice are what cause the eventual degradation of war. (JRSOT) Tim O’Brien takes account of the injustices of war when he refers to opposing…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Just War theory demands that for war to be justified a state must fulfil each of the following 6 requirements: (1) Just cause, (2) Legitimate Authority, (3) Right intention, (4) Likelihood of Success, (5) Proportionality and (6) Last resort. Just war theory was developed by theologians Augustine and Aquinas. This will be further discussed in the essay. In addition to this these 6 requirements can be categorised in 3 parts – Jus ad bellum, Jus in bello and Jus post bellum…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Albert Einstein once said, “You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war.” Although Einstein is considered one of the greatest thinkers in history, he was surely not an ethicist. Regardless, his statement of pacifism, should not be taken lightly. In passages such as “Pacifism” by Douglas P Lackey pacifism and it many forms are defined and justified as valid moral theories . Initially pacifists such as Albert Schewerzer considered it wrong to kill and this was their central concept , over time the ideas by which pacifists are defined became more specific in some cases, while more broad in others. Famous visionaries such as Mahatma Ghandi and Leo Tolstoy have gone down in history for their peaceful and somewhat passive moral theories. In their theory these universal pacifists specified that it was immoral to take place in violence in cases of personal affairs or between nation-states. “Private pacifists” believe that personal violence is morally wrong but political violence is right in certain cases. These pacifists believe that it is sometimes permissible for nations to go to war. Finally the last type of pacifists think personal violence is sometimes wrong but war is always morally wrong , this type of pacifist is called an anti-war pacifist. In this essay I will be comparing and contrasting “Pacifism” by Douglas P Lackey and the listed forms of pacifism with just war theory arguments addressed in passages such as Michael Walzer’s “Terrorism: A Critique of Excuses”.…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    War Brings Peace

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    First M . Last Name Professor ‘s Name Class and Number 7 February 2007 Can War Bring Peace ?War is considered as a particular branch of a specific philosophy , with Carl von Clausewitz being considered as the “only philosopher of war ‘stated in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy . It also says that it refers to , “a phenomenon which occurs only between political communities ‘ or “certain political pressure groups , like terrorist organizations , might also be considered `political communities ‘ in that they are associations of people with a political purpose (Stanford ,War , 2005 . On the other hand , peace is the pursuit of justice with opposite methods of human diversity and who seek peace are more or less responsible for social changes in visionary ways , while the proponents of war are considered to be narrow minded with one thing in mind – to win something they want , using whatever methods they need to accomplish this .Religion has been blamed as the cause of many wars , yet they considered themselves to be an advocacy for non-violence . A source of conflict ,religion is also a philosophy and practitioner of peace . Contradictory in itself , this explains the conflicting views bringing war into existence . Not all wars are caused by opposing religious views , but the majority of them are . Jenny Teichman wrote in The Philosophy of War and Peace that “Aggressive wars have often been waged for religious reasons and still are today (Teichman , 2002 , pg . 2 .According to Alexander Mosley in Philosophy of War , “man cannot stop war – it is his nature to wage war ‘ which backs my theory that war is the product of man ‘s ideas and hence is a product of choice . We fight for peace through war , and war continues on until peace comes into being–these are contradictory statements . Peace found through war is not peace , only a win-win situation , or a give-in…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics