JURNAL STRATEGI OPERASI
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at www.emeraldinsight.com/0144-3577.htm Conceptualizing operations strategy processes
Conceptualizing
OS processes
Niels Gorm Rytter
Department of Production, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
1093
Harry Boer
Center for Industrial Production, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark, and
Christian Koch
Department of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Denmark,
Lyngby, Denmark
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present insights into operations strategy (OS) in practice. It outlines a conceptualization and model of OS processes and, based on findings from an in-depth and longitudinal case study, contributes to further development of extant OS models and methods which presently mainly focus on OS content, as distinct from process issues.
Design/methodology/approach – The methodology combines action research and a longitudinal single site case study of OS processes in practice.
Findings – The paper conceptualises an OS process as: events of dialogue and action; taking place in five dimensions of change – technical-rational, cultural, political, project management, and facilitation; and typically unfolding as a sequential and parallel, ordered and disordered, planned and emergent as well as top-down and bottom-up process. The proposed OS conceptualization provides a useful tool for describing and analyzing real-time OS processes unfolding in practice.
Research limitations/implications – The research is based on a single case, which limits the generalizability of the findings.
Practical implications – The findings suggest that, in order to obtain successful outcomes for an
OS process in practice, change agents may need to moderate their outcome ambitions, manage process dimensions and agendas in a situational manner, balance inherent process paradoxes, strive at bridging both language and reality, as well as mobilizing key stakeholders, especially middle managers, throughout
Conceptualizing
OS processes
Niels Gorm Rytter
Department of Production, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
1093
Harry Boer
Center for Industrial Production, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark, and
Christian Koch
Department of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Denmark,
Lyngby, Denmark
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present insights into operations strategy (OS) in practice. It outlines a conceptualization and model of OS processes and, based on findings from an in-depth and longitudinal case study, contributes to further development of extant OS models and methods which presently mainly focus on OS content, as distinct from process issues.
Design/methodology/approach – The methodology combines action research and a longitudinal single site case study of OS processes in practice.
Findings – The paper conceptualises an OS process as: events of dialogue and action; taking place in five dimensions of change – technical-rational, cultural, political, project management, and facilitation; and typically unfolding as a sequential and parallel, ordered and disordered, planned and emergent as well as top-down and bottom-up process. The proposed OS conceptualization provides a useful tool for describing and analyzing real-time OS processes unfolding in practice.
Research limitations/implications – The research is based on a single case, which limits the generalizability of the findings.
Practical implications – The findings suggest that, in order to obtain successful outcomes for an
OS process in practice, change agents may need to moderate their outcome ambitions, manage process dimensions and agendas in a situational manner, balance inherent process paradoxes, strive at bridging both language and reality, as well as mobilizing key stakeholders, especially middle managers, throughout
References: Adam, E.E. and Swamidass, P.M. (1989), “Assessing operations management from a strategic perspective”, Journal of Management, Vol Anderson, J.C., Cleveland, G. and Schroeder, R.G. (1989), “Operations strategy – a literature review”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol Anderson, J.C., Schroeder, R.G. and Cleveland, G. (1991), “The process of manufacturing strategy: some empirical observations and conclusions”, International Journal of Operations & Badham, R. and Buchanan, D. (1999), Power, Politics and Organizational Change – Winning the Turf Game, Sage, Thousan Oaks, CA. Bamford, D.R. and Forrester, P.L. (2003), “Managing planned and emergent change within an operations management environment”, International Journal of Operations & Production Barnes, D. (2001), “Research methods for the empirical investigation of the process of formation of operations strategy”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 21 No. 8, pp. 1076-95. Barnes, D. (2002), “The complexities of the manufacturing strategy process in practice”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol pp. 1090-111. Bates, K.A., Amundson, S.D., Schroeder, R.G. and Morris, W.T. (1995), “The crucial interrelationship between manufacturing strategy and organizational culture”, Management Sciences, Vol. 41 No. 10, pp. 1565-80. Beer, M. (2003), “Why total quality management programs do not persist: the role of management quality and implications for leading a TQM transformation”, Decision Benningson, L.A. (1996), “Changing manufacturing strategy”, Production and Operations Management, Vol Bessant, J. and Caffyn, S. (1997), “High involvement innovation through continuous improvement”, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol Borum, F. (1995), Strategier for Organisationsændringer (Strategies for Organizational Change), Copenhagen Business School Press, Copenhagen. Boyer, K., Swink, M. and Rosenzweig, E.D. (2005), “Operations strategy research in the POMS journal”, Production and Operations Management, Vol Brunsson, N. (1989), The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations, Wiley, Chichester. Brunsson, N. (2000), The Irrational Organization – Irrationality as a Basis for Organizational Action and Change, Fagbokforlaget, Stockholm. Burnes, B. (2004), “Emergent change and planned change – competitors or allies”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol Burnes, B. and Hakeem, J. (1994), “Culture, cognitive dissonance and the management of change”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol Coughlan, P. and Coghlan, D. (2002), “Action research for operations management”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol Czarniawska-Joerges, B. (1995), “Narration or science? Collapsing the division in organization studies”, Organization, Vol Dangayach, G.S. and Deshmukh, S.G. (2001), “Manufacturing strategy – literature review and some issues”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol Eden, C. and Ackermann, F. (1998), Making Strategy – The Journey of Strategic Management, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. Englyst, L.N. (2003), “Operations strategy formation – a continuous process”, Integrated Manufacturing Systems, Vol Hayes, R., Pisano, G., Upton, D. and Wheelwright, S. (2005), Pursuing the Competitive Edge, Wiley, Englewood Cliff, NJ. Hill, T.J. (1993), Manufacturing Strategy. The Strategic Management of the Manufacturing Function, Macmillan, London. Hill, T., Nicholson, A. and Westbrook, R. (1999), “Closing the gap: a polemic on plant-based research in for operations management”, International Journal of Operations & Production Leong, G.K., Snyder, D.L. and Ward, P.T. (1990), “Manufacturing strategy: an overview of current process and content models”, OMEGA, Vol MacIntosh, R. and MacLean, D. (2001), “Conditioned emergence: researching change and changing research”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 21 No. 10, pp. 1343-57. March, J.G. (1994), A Primer on Decision Making – How Decisions Happen, The Free Press, New York, NY. Maruchek, A., Pannesi, R. and Anderson, C. (1992), “An exploratory study of the manufacturing strategy process”, in Voss, C Maslen, R. and Platts, K. (1997), “Manufacturing vision and competitiveness”, Integrated Manufacturing Systems, Vol Menda, R. and Dilts, D. (1997), “The manufacturing strategy formulation process: linking multifunctional viewpoints”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol Mills, J., Platts, K. and Gregory, M. (1995), “A framework for the design of manufacturing strategy processes – a contingency approach”, International Journal of Operations & Mills, J., Platts, K., Neely, A., Richards, H. and Bourne, M. (2002), Creating a Winning Business Formula, Strategy and Performance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Minarro-Viseras, E., Baines, T. and Sweeney, M. (2005), “Key success factors when implementing strategic manufacturing initiatives”, International Journal of Operations & Production Minor, E.D., Hensley, R.L. and Wood, R.D. Jr (1994), “A review of empirical manufacturing strategy studies”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol Misterek, S.D.A., Schroeder, R.G. and Bates, K.A. (1992), “The nature of the link between manufacturing strategy and organizational culture”, in Voss, C