Preview

Jurassic Park film vs book

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
559 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jurassic Park film vs book
Jurassic Park Film vs. Book The film version of Jurassic Park does not effectively convey the ideas from the novel. The films adaptation changed many things including characters, settings, scenes, ending, and others things. The novel was written by Michael Crichton in 1990. The film was made in 1993 and was directed by Steven Spielberg. The film and the novel were both great. The novel was better in many ways. The novel gave an immense amount of detail in the characters and the settings. The film made it simple and to the point and didn't really consider the detail that was in the novel. The film would have been better if they didn't change the most important parts of the novel. In the film the characters were changed and switched around. Tim and Lex Murphy, John Hammonds grandchildren, were switched around. In the novel Tim was the older sibling and Lex was younger but in the film they were switched so that Lex was older and Tim was younger. In the novel Lex was described as a seven or eight year old girl, relatively outgoing, blonde and "a sporty young girl who loves baseball." Tim was described as a bespectacled boy of about eleven who has an interest in dinosaurs and computers. Steven Spielberg did that so that he can work with the actor who play Tim but some aspects of his personality and story responsibilities were given to Lex. For example, he is still the child interested in dinosaurs, however all of his computer knowledge was given to Lex. The book's opening chapter describes a young American girl on vacation at a beach shore with her family in Central America getting attacked by Procompsognathus while her parents are not looking. Instead, the film's opening showed the events that are alluded to by the bedridden patient in the book's prologue. This is because the film dropped the Procompsognathus dinosaur and also the entire subplot about dinosaurs escaping from the island; consequently the opening scene, the climax of the book in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Davie Movie Vs Book

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I think, hopefully along with you, the reader that books are greater than the movie, especially in this case. For some extra details, here are some good mentions. The book, produced in 1886, had more evidence that Alan had committed the Appin Murder than the movie! Also, the plot and timing of character scenes were off. One example was when Davie asked the woman in the book where the House of Shaws was, in the movie it was a man! Also, in the book, the woman had hatred for the House of Shaws, when in the movie he had no hatred that would of made the movie slightly more…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The settings I imagined while reading the book were very different from what I saw in the movie. Some of the characters such as Kenny and Byron were shorter than I imagined, but Joetta was taller than I imagined her and Grandma Sands looked very different than I imagined. I thought she would be tiny, really old looking, and very mean. She wasn’t really any of those. The settings were very different such as the church and the Watsons house. I thought they would be more dated. Their house wasn’t modern, but wasn’t as old as I imagined from the context clues in the book. Overall I liked the movie better because it had more information about racism and I felt I learned more about it. I think I would like the movie even better if it had Rufus as a character, but it was still a great…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many differences between the movie and the book. First the positive points: This film attaches faces to Scout, Jem, Miss Maudie, and Dill, since no description of their faces is given in the book. Also, the film has some genuinely hilarious moments, particularly the scene where Scout is dressed as a ham and walking through the forest. Another good point is that the acting was superb and a treat to watch. Gregory Peck, who played Atticus, was captivating. The film is cast very well. The novel does not give physical descriptions of Scout, Jem, Miss Maudie, and Dill, but the film characters were believable. The actors look like what we would expect them to look like.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Red Fern Grows

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Personally, I like the book better. The movie just doesn't give enough information. It leaves out so many details from the book that it just messes up the story line. Don't get me wrong the movie was a great movie but it just wasn't good enough. It needed more details than what it had. The little details is what counts the…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Blind Side

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Another noticeable change in the movie verses the book was the emphasis on the different characters. The main character was indisputably Michael Oher in both the book and the movie. However, the movie put a strong emphasis on Leigh Anne Touhy (who was played by Sandra Bullock) and presented her as the second most major character aside from Michael. The book, on the other hand, had a lot more facts about Sean that the movie never presented. Leigh Anne was a key player in both, but in the movie, she seemed to be so much more of a main character that the other characters that stood out in the book did not do so in the movie. The major example of that was Sean Touhy who seemed to be the first one to invest in Michael in the book unlike the movie where he played a more quiet and uninvolved role in Michael's life. There were other subtle differences that could be noticed, like having the necessary GPA for an NCAA scholarship be 2.5 (movie) instead of 2.56 (book) which led to another problem to work around, or having Michael's fight be with the gang members in his old neighborhood (movie) instead of with one of his teammates at Ole Miss (book). Overall, however, the movie attempted to portray an accurate account of the book which made it enjoyable to read and watch both.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The movie and the book Like Water for Chocolate are both well written. I enjoyed the book because it had a different layout than the other books we have read thus far. The film was an asset to see because it followed the book so well that it gave you more ideas about things that you might not have totally understood while reading it. This is the first Spanish movie that has had such a positive effect on the book which makes the movie that much more amazing.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some actors acted and appeared entirely different in the movie than the book. The directing and special effects were okay in some scenes, but half-baked and lousy in others. Furthermore, the characters are developed far less in the film and many semi-important scenes in the novel are excluded in the film. Do not watch this movie unless you have read the novel (or even if you have read it). If you haven’t read the book and decide to watch the movie instead, you will fail to understand the complicated relationships between each character and between the Socs and Greasers and just think the movie is substandard and all aspects of the movie lacked in action, emotion, or just seemed like they were not well thought out. A 3.5/10 may seem harsh, but I was not pleased. Just go read the book instead. It had the potential to be a great film, but severely missed the…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First of all, one of the biggest reasons the movie is better than the book is because of the quality of the flashbacks. In the book the flashbacks were more set in the past and much longer, sometimes too drawn out and a little boring for how much background story there is for just one day dream, whereas in the movie the daydreams are a bit shorter but more set in the present and more affect by what he does in that moment with little background because of how short they are and how close to the present they may be. The daydreams are usually much more exciting in the movie as well, whereas in the book it's set back to just a boring doctor surgery, that was…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One thing in particular that the book does much better is making use of complex metaphors and themes, such as: the river for life, and oneness with nature, that string themselves together as you turn each page of the book, while in the movie the metaphors and symbolism are represented in a much different way through picture. In the book, both themes regarding the river are very vivid and clear, as they use strong imagery of nature to draw pictures in the minds of the readers. In the movie both themes are represented and referred to much less because of the lack of narration.…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How does Jurassic Park use cinematic devices in the early scenes to establish narrative, character and theme?…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both the book and the movie are very different, they have lots of similarities and differences. The Setting, Plot and Characterisation are three parts that the book and movie can be compared.…

    • 333 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Finally as mentioned before, there are many comparisons and contrast that can be made from the film and the book The Big Sleep. There were a few changes, twist and turns, and unexpected endings at the end of the film. All in all, I think that the film is a very good interpretation of the book. The actors and actresses did a great job of portraying the characters in the…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Crucible

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why I think the moviemaker chose those difference between the book and the movie was because in the book there was a narrator to tell you specific things. The narrator is there to tell some background information and make sure you get a better grasp of what’s taking place. So I feel as if in the movie they wanted you to pay closer attention to what was happening. And you have to have some differences between the two. While in the movie you can see more action and can sometimes explain things better by acting out, rather than being written out.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I consider the plot to be complex. The novel is based upon a theme park featuring dinosaurs, which are created from prehistoric DNA. The novel begins with bizarre attacks from bird like creatures.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How would you feel if you were the author of a book, and when it was made into a movie the director had changed many very important parts? This is what happened to Suzanne Collins, when she wrote “The Hunger Games”. She had put many things in the book that were vital to know and yet had been changed. When comparing the movie and the book “The Hunger Games” there were many things that had been changed and or cut out, even though they were vital to know, for instants the character Madge had never even been mentioned in the movie, the river that dried up in the book, and even Threshes death had been changed.…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics