Preview

Julius Caesar - Qualities of a Good Leader

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
954 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Julius Caesar - Qualities of a Good Leader
Selecting a good leader for a country is like dominoes. The leader needs to be somebody that won't make the occasional mistake that would, in dominoes, hit one of the others and make them all fall down. If the leader does their job correctly, the country will be strong. A good leader must be able to make his own decisions because if he cannot, he will be considered a weak leader. A country's leader must be able to communicate with the people as well because if he gets the people of the country to listen, then his job would be much easier. Also, if the leader were noble to his countrymen, then there would not be any disputes within the country. In Julius Caesar, Mark Antony is a perfect example of a good leader. Not only is he a confident and noble person, he is also persuasive and that helps in becoming a good leader. Antony would be a good leader of Rome because he is confident, noble, and persuasive. He never changes his mind when he makes a decision and that is good in a leader.

When the triumvirate was making a list of people to kill, Antony came across the name of his nephew. Even though it was his nephew that he was killing, Antony said, "He shall not live; look, with a spot I damn him." (IV.i.9) Antony had to kill his nephew, who might oppose him, and he did not want to take the chance. Another part where Antony's confidence in decision-making was when he was talking to Octavius about Lepidus. The triumvirate was made up of three people, Antony, Lepidus, and Octavius, and so "The threefold world divided, he should stand / One of the three to share it? (IV.i.14-15) Antony meant that Lepidus would not be capable of ruling a third of the world, and that he would rather take half and Octavius take the other half. Antony's confidence shows him being capable of being a great leader.

Along with being confident, Antony would make a great leader because of his nobility towards others. Antony was seen to be noble towards Caesar. The two men were close to each other

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ptolemy was a generous and a loving ruler. He was born on 62 BCE and he died 47 BCE. Ptolemy was married to Cleopatra VII, his older sister. He ruled during the Ptolemaic dynasty. During his ruling he went to war with Julius Caesar and his wife. He ruled over upper and lower egypt. He did not have any kids because he became pharaoh at age 9 and died at age 15 trying to flee the romans and drowned in the nile river.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Caesar played an important role for Ancient Rome. Julius was a Roman statesmen who lead the Roman Republic to spread around and rise Ancient Rome. He did so many differences to the city of Rome when he became dictator, and most of the people loved his acts and his good leadership. Julius gave the people 5 different types of reforms, which the people were happy to have an considered him as a great leader. During Julius Caesar's lifetime, he had held just about every important title in the Roman Republic including consul tribune of the people, and including a high commander of the army. He suggested new laws the improve the city of Rome, most of them were approved by the Senate to make them into official laws. He reorganized the army…

    • 152 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli once stated,“He who wishes to be obeyed must know how to command.” This seems simple, but some don’t understand, including most in the play Julius Caesar. Mark Antony, one of the few who understands how to command, is a loyal friend who is gifted with the ability to use rhetorics, and is able to appeal to people’s hearts. While Brutus uses force and facts, Antony is able to lift others up while conspiring against them. It is a skill that comes into play later in the tragedy when Caesar is killed Antony takes it into his own hands to get even with the conspirators. By being able to command respect Antony is able to turn the throng of citizens against Cassius, Brutus, and the others. This is why Mark Antony…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antony not only played with the emotions of his audience like they were children’s toys, but he did so in an ingenious way which helped to keep the conspirators from suspecting him in doing something to go against them. He made the people of Rome sort…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mark Antony deftly speaks to his audience in a way that requires them to challenge their preconceived characterizations of Brutus and Cassius. He intentionally expresses the deliberate opposite of what he genuinely wishes and excessively compliments the people to the point that they forget their own seemingly unwavering convictions. His finesse and dexterity in bending words and minds ultimately works to his favor. Antony accomplishes his initial goal to convince the Roman people to revenge Caesar’s demise. This achievement in and of itself exhibits…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Antony proves to be a master of persuasion. He uses ethos in his speech to obtain trust by showing he is a man who respects all. “Friends, Romans, lend me your ears”(III.ii.73). He doesn't show good will or respect for Caesar as it’s apparent he has a sarcastic tone when he mocks him with the repetition of “honorable men” when he is talking about the conspirators, an example of verbal irony. He also uses logos to point out obvious reasons why Caesar wasn't actually ambitious. He said, “when the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept” (III.ii.91). “Brought captives to Rome/ransom did the general coffers fill” (III.ii.89). He uses Pathos to spark emotion and sorrow among the plebeians and have them revolt. “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar” (III.ii.106). He asks two rhetorical questions after listing reasons why Caesar wasn’t ambitious. “Was this ambition?” (III.ii.97) and even tries to make the commoners feel guilty for doubting Caesar “What cause withholds you to then mourn for him” (III.ii.103).…

    • 369 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To be a great leader, one must be honorable and persistent. A leader is someone who has done something great and tremendous for his country. In the early years of the Roman Empire, most leaders were of great military rank and nobility. Julius Caesar was a great military figure with high nobility during his rule and in fact was a great leader for the country of Rome.…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Which highlites that you need to be able to lead other people which highlites again, that you need to be born as an alpha, you need to be born in commanding other people around, you need to be born in leading people, and we can celearly se that with both of the leaders. Aswell Julius Caesar and clearly Napoleon. If we look at their battles. The battle of Austerlitz for napoleon. There is no need to give an example to see, that both of them are leaders, and not just with being popular, or advertising propaganda. They are just born as a leader, and everybody can copy eachother, but having the ability to copy a leader that well takes more than just copying it. Leadership doesn’t have anything to do with any other political idea of either propaganda nor popularity. It is something compleately differnet. As stated above it is the entrance to an entire different era, and if people are born with this capability and emulate eachother, this power can m anipulate people better than everything else, and we can clearly see that with Julius Ceasar and with Napopleon. How did leadership affect…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Antony is also notably obedient to Caesar. “When Caesar says “do this’ it is perform’d,” (pg.4, Act I by Antony). He is also very truthful. When Caesar was killed by Brutus and Cassius, Mark Antony…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Despite these attributes, Antony also is not morally strong. He cleverly cheats his arrangement with the conspirators, in which he claimed he would not speak ill of the assassins. Instead, he continually refuted their claims all while claiming that they were “all honorable men”. (3.2.92) Slowly, Antony planted seeds of doubt and anger towards the conspirators in the minds of the masses. As he ended his speech the seeds quickly sprouted and grew into unbridled rage aimed at Brutus and his allies. Resulting from this deception was the brief, but harmful, civil war between the assassins and Antony and Octavius, Caesar’s son. While his intentions may have been pure, revenge for what seemed an unnecessary tragedy, what he accomplished was not. He eventually killed some of those whom he considered friends and brought about the end of the Roman…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mark Antony appeals to the crowd's sense of ethos to establish himself in their eyes as a noble man, and to surreptitiously separate the conspirators' from their lofty reputations. Specifically, Antony mentions that he has the power to "do Brutus wrong and Cassius wrong, who, you know, are honourable men", but he "will not do them wrong: [he] rather choose[s] to wrong the dead, to wrong [himself] and [the people], than [he] will wrong such honourable men" (). Antony says that though he could, it wouldn’t be right to speak against the conspirators, and he would rather take the blow of Caesar's death himself. The repetition of the words "wrong" and "honourable" places emphasis on the killers' reputation, and sheds light on how Antony has respect…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Brutus and Caesar had a lot of power already in the Roman society, but who would make a better leader? These two characters are from The Tragedy of Julius Caesar written by William Shakespeare. The play takes place during 44 B.C. in ancient Rome, towards the end of the Roman republic. This selection is a tragic and historical drama. Brutus places his ideals, Rome, over his friend, Julius Caesar, and is willing to kill Caesar to protect the Republic. In the play, the two main characters, Julius Caesar and Marcus Brutus, both possess leadership qualities, but if the citizens of Rome had a choice, they should most definitely choose Julius Caesar.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Antony was well known throughout the political world in Rome and among his military colleagues as a virtuous, trailblazing commander. After all, he was in fact the great Julius Caesar’s second in command. Through much of the internal conflict of his time, he did astoundingly maintain at least some support in Rome. However, his failing to acknowledge Octavian’s military and political potential was his first mistake.…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hitler - a Great Leader

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In my opinion, being a good leader firstly he should be able to take full advantage of favorable circumstance, able to rule the country under a chaotic situation. Besides he made attractive promises to gain popular support, skilled in using of propaganda, amoral. Moreover he should have the organizational ability and has the ambition to make his country powerful in the world. In addition, he could use his words to twist and manipulate the minds of people into believing that what he was saying. Using this power, he could get people to do anything for him, which prove his amorality. He should be skillful in carry out successful policy to bring the country to economic prospect, since economy is very important to a country.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marc Antony

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Someone is not born with greatness, they are destined with greatness. Achieving greatness in leadership may be hard to maintain, keeping it and being known for your greatness is even harder to accomplish. Greatness can be achieved through military victories, being appointed a high officer, known as a political figure and considering the lower-class citizens. Many leaders strive to reach being one of the people’s greatest leaders, but many fail. However, there is one in particular who was capable of achieving the position of being known as ‘one of the people’s greatest leaders’. Marc Antony, who served with Julius Caesar, was known as one of the people’s greatest leaders for being a warrior, being considerate, achieving great power and appointed a part of the government.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays