Preview

Julius Caesar: Most Noble Speaker

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1162 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Julius Caesar: Most Noble Speaker
Have you ever wondered what it would be like if a close friend was gruesomely murdered? Can you imagine the crazy mixed emotions you would feel? The heartache, betrayal, and hurt? What would you do to get back at the people who hurt you the most? In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, the beloved leader, Caesar, is tragically murdered by conspirators, who were thought to be his most trusted friends. Caesar’s right hand man, Antony, plans to seek revenge on Caesar’s killers, including once-friend Brutus. In order to execute his plan, he must use several manipulative tactics in his funerary speech to sway the plebeians into participating and getting what he wants: revenge.

Antony ends up using pathos, his emotion, to have a better connection with the plebeians. He used certain words to make the crowd sad, angry, and trusting. To make the crowd sad he would use words such as mourn, death, funeral, coffin, and disapprove. Using those words, he had made the crowd sad about losing a strong leader. But to help make the crowd trust him, he would use words such as honorable, rich, and legacy. To show the crowd that he honored and loved Caesar he would use words like heart and praise. By using these words he would sway the crowd to do what he wants. Brutus ended up not being manipulative with his words. He tried to have the crowd trust and agree with him but the words he used didn’t have as big of an effect as Antony’s did. Brutus used fear as a tactic to have the plebeian’s side with him. He asked if they would rather have Caesar “living, and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all freemen?(III. ii.24-25). Brutus ended up hurting himself by saying this because he made the plebeians second think their grief. Antony didn’t force the crowd to do anything that they didn’t want to do. He allowed them to choose for themselves. Antony’s words stirred the crowd more and got a bigger wave than Brutus. Brutus talked about how ambitious Caesar was but didn’t move

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar” by Shakespeare, highlights the story of the popular figure of Rome namely Julius Caesar. It covers his return from the defeat against Pompeii till the time of his death. It also covers the fact that Caesar was betrayed and killed by his fellow comrades because he wanted all the power to himself. Of the comrades who committed the murder is his best friend, Brutus. Other comrades bought Brutus into this murder plot by sending him a letter pretending it was from the people, which the letter encouraged him to “Speak, Strike, and Redress”. However, another comrade named Marc Anthony did not buy into the plan, and the other comrades decides to kill him also. They plan to do so because they thought he stop them from…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marc Antony’s funeral speech captured the audience’s attention even after Marcus Brutus had given his argument. His words were precise and well thought out. He not only appealed logically to the citizens of Rome, but emotionally as well. Furthermore, his use of sarcasm was highly effective and persuaded the audience to riot against Brutus even though he appeared like he supported the conspirators side. Brutus’ speech was persuasive of his cause, he even questioned the audience as to taking his own life if what they thought he had done was unjust. The citizens of Rome were ready to accept their new leaders from the argument Brutus had given, but Antony rose to the occasion and made the confused people of Rome realize that what Brutus and the conspirators had done was wrong. Antony did a superior job against Brutus of persuading the citizens that Brutus was guilty of wrongful murder and that Caesar loved them.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethos, Logos, and Pathos are the three tools that have been used to persuade any individual, and throughout Julius Caesar you tend to see towards the end Brutus and Antony using these tools to pursued the crowd of people. While Brutus used ethos, logos, and pathos to try and justify his reasoning for killing Caesar, Antony used them to get the citizens in an uproar and avenge Caesar’s death. Logos is used to persuade by using logic, Ethos’s appeal is based on the character of whoever is speaking or being spoken of, and Pathos is used by appealing to your emotions. At the end of the play you see Brutus and Antony become very good at persuasive speaking by making the citizens believe them and in turn making them choose who’s side they would be…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar was the greatest Roman leader. Julius Caesar was popular because he included not only the nobles, but also common people in the political process. He did not enjoy destroying things, but rather building up and helping people. He was born July 100 B.C., in Rome, Italy. He had a small family. Caesar was well-built and of sound heath. He was also kidnapped by pirates(Rinaldo11-13). His life was in jeopardy for a while. He and two other men became known as the First Triumvirate and controlled Rome through the 50s. In 58 B.C. he conquered Gaul. As he got bigger he showed his ruthlessness with his enemies. In 49 B.C., he conquered Rome. When he took control of Rome, he destroyed the system which he wanted to keep. Julius Caesar only…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the assassination of Caesar, Brutus explains his reasons for committing such an act. Antony deceives Brutus into believing that Antony understood their reasons and would join them as an ally. By becoming a supposed ally, Antony gains the advantage of trust, as Brutus trusts him to speak at Caesar’s funeral. At Caesar’s funeral, Antony goes against Brutus’ trust, and reveals Caesar’s will, and incites the plebeians to come to the conclusion that Caesar had been a good man, and that Brutus was in the wrong. Antony reveals his true intentions when he says to himself, “Mischief thou art afoot; / Take thou what course thou wilt” (III. iii. 275-276). Antony had taken advantage of the trust bestowed upon him by pulling off a brilliant act on his part, that effectively persuaded Brutus. Not only that, Antony also takes advantage of the trust that the plebeians had given him. His ulterior motives are revealed when he criticizes Lepidus’ ability to stand besides them and asks, “Is it fit, / The threefold world divided, he should stand / One of the three to share it?” (IV. i. 15-17). This shows how Antony has no intention of fulfilling his promise made to the plebeians to uphold Caesar’s will. Instead, he wants to gain power for himself, and gets rid of Brutus and the other conspirators to get his way. He had acted as a perfect friend/ally to the plebeians as he acted to Brutus, and he also took advantage of them as well.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Julius Caesar’s rise to prominence up until 60BC transpired due to a number of factors. The first of these being his family background and Marian connections, which at varying stages of his life were both a help and a hindrance. We can also note that most of his marriages were used to gain political and financial resources accentuating his connections to powerful families and individuals. This rise to prominence can also be attributed to Caesar’s opportunistic nature and vast ambitions coupled with his education and specialised tuition in the art of rhetoric, skills essential to gain popularity and political office. Additionally his acquisition of religious titles added prestige and status to his name while providing him with an array of religious powers. We also see his political alliances reflecting the success of his early political career and rise through the cursus honorum. All of these aspects were an integral part of Caesar’s public and personal life contributing in no small way to his eventual rise to prominence.…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Brutus and Antony’s speeches both men share the strategy of swaying the crowd. In the middle of his speech, Brutus tries to quell the crowd’s anger because “as [Caesar] was valiant [he] honour him”, and because Caesar was “ambitious”, Brutus “slew” him. While speaking to the Roman citizens, Brutus places equal grammatical constructions near each other, and logically appeals to the crowd by showing a cause and effect for the killing of Julius Caesar. Although his efforts are seemingly effective, it is does not have the lasting impact of Antony’s appeals due to the fact that the roman people are not rational, because their emotions are running high. Antony states that Caesar “hath brought many captives” to Rome, “wept” when the poor cried, and “thrice presented him” a crown which he refused. Antony’s explicit details provide examples of Caesar’s good deeds, which logically appeals to the crowd, and renders Anthony’s sympathy toward Caesar justified. Although Antony also applies logical rhetoric to his oration, his strategy is more effective than Brutus’s because Brutus provided hypothetical details of Caesar’s misdoings, while Antony shares his specific memories of Caesar’s kindness and humility. Therefore, Antony’s strategy suggested Brutus and his fellow conspirators committed an unjust crime toward Caesar, and established a stronger impact on the crowd’s attitude.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Caesar played an important role for Ancient Rome. Julius was a Roman statesmen who lead the Roman Republic to spread around and rise Ancient Rome. He did so many differences to the city of Rome when he became dictator, and most of the people loved his acts and his good leadership. Julius gave the people 5 different types of reforms, which the people were happy to have an considered him as a great leader. During Julius Caesar's lifetime, he had held just about every important title in the Roman Republic including consul tribune of the people, and including a high commander of the army. He suggested new laws the improve the city of Rome, most of them were approved by the Senate to make them into official laws. He reorganized the army…

    • 152 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    First off, Antony was a genius in how he presented his speech to the populous with how he sparked so many different emotions in them. In the beginning of his speech Antony sparks impatience in the Roman people by making them want to hear what Caesar has left them in his will. And when he finally tells them what he included in it, he made them feel melancholy towards their deceased leader who was described by Antony as a noble and respectable man who cared only for the people and the country that he was about to rule over. But very quickly after that, the audience of Antony’s became enraged towards the men who had called themselves his friends and killed Caesar. They wanted to murder them all and avenge their beloved leader. Antony told them not to be angry, but he clearly did this on purpose because he too wanted to avenge Caesar’s death. He very skillfully manipulated these people’s feelings and made them vengeful as he wanted them to be.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus came out not knowing what he was going to get himself into and that’s probably why his wasn't as compassionate as Antony’s. Brutus trusted Antony and didn’t think he needed to compare his speech with anyone else’s. Antony’s speech connected with the citizens. His speech had emotion, hate, and revenge written all over it. Antony made pitty for Caesar by showing the people what Caesar had left for them. Antony knew what he was doing all along. He knew he had to get revenge on the conspiracers because they killed his friend, and this is what he had to do. Antony showed the citizens Caesar’s cloak and blamed each conspiracy for the murder. Throughout the whole speech Antony stayed calm and contained himself which is what the people want. Antony got what he wanted and he got it by having his speech win the people…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Antony proves to be a master of persuasion. He uses ethos in his speech to obtain trust by showing he is a man who respects all. “Friends, Romans, lend me your ears”(III.ii.73). He doesn't show good will or respect for Caesar as it’s apparent he has a sarcastic tone when he mocks him with the repetition of “honorable men” when he is talking about the conspirators, an example of verbal irony. He also uses logos to point out obvious reasons why Caesar wasn't actually ambitious. He said, “when the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept” (III.ii.91). “Brought captives to Rome/ransom did the general coffers fill” (III.ii.89). He uses Pathos to spark emotion and sorrow among the plebeians and have them revolt. “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar” (III.ii.106). He asks two rhetorical questions after listing reasons why Caesar wasn’t ambitious. “Was this ambition?” (III.ii.97) and even tries to make the commoners feel guilty for doubting Caesar “What cause withholds you to then mourn for him” (III.ii.103).…

    • 369 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sometimes, Brutus’s speech is considered to be the better of the two speeches. Yes, Brutus does use a lot of pathos to move the crowd. But Brutus doesn’t use a lot of other aids like ethos and pathos. Antony uses pathos, ethos, and even some logos to appeal to the crowd.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Caesar

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Communication greatly impacts in Caesar's funeral. Antony's speech at Caesar's funeral has a great impact on the plebeians. Before Antony speaks to the plebeians, Brutus says to Antony that he should not say any bad things about Brutus. However, Antony implies that Brutus is a villain, and he changes the people's thoughts towards Brutus. Before Antony speaks to the plebeians, they worshipped Brutus as a hero, because at first, the plebeian believed that Brutus killed the ambitious king. They thought that Brutus did right things. However, by Antony's great communication towards people, people realize they are wrong. The plebeians say, (Away, then! Come, seek the conspirators" (III.ii.223). The plebeians grab weapons and start to find Brutus to kill him.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Antony started out his speech much the same as Brutus’, by welcoming the crowd with a friendly tone. At first, he also praised Caesar, saying “he hath brought many captives home to Rome.” However, Antony subtly laces what seems to be sincere praise with a darker undertone by adding the sentence “Yet Brutus says he was ambitious” after every compliment given, making the audience wonder how truthful Brutus’ words were. The Plebeians’ support shift in support of Antony as he provides more and more evidence of how Caesar was a good man and ruler. As he goes on, Antony’s speech differs from Brutus’ by appealing to audience’s emotion, which is pathos. The Plebeians, now having a completely different perspective, are emotional, and Antony uses this to his advantage by continuing to drive in the flawed logic and subliminal idea that Brutus was in fact NOT an honorable man. Near the end of his speech, Antony uses the late Caesar’s will (which is very kind to the commoners) to first taunt and then enrage…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In William Shakespeare The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, language is a powerful weapon. I choose to use examples from Act 3 Scene 2. The first example is Act 3 Scene 2 in lines 23-24 when Brutus is talking at Caesars funeral and tells the people he was seeking power. "Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free man?" This supports the claim because someone in power in power can make and set rules. Also at Caesar funeral, when Mark Antony changes the minds of the crowd, and Brutus left. (Evidence Act 3 Scene 2 75-109 Julius Caesar). In the play or drama speech is powerful weapon and when put in the hands of a skillful person, it can be used against or to persuade people to do something. In…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays