Preview

Julius Caesar Ethos Pathos Logos

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1553 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Julius Caesar Ethos Pathos Logos
Ethos, Logos, and Pathos are the three tools that have been used to persuade any individual, and throughout Julius Caesar you tend to see towards the end Brutus and Antony using these tools to pursued the crowd of people. While Brutus used ethos, logos, and pathos to try and justify his reasoning for killing Caesar, Antony used them to get the citizens in an uproar and avenge Caesar’s death. Logos is used to persuade by using logic, Ethos’s appeal is based on the character of whoever is speaking or being spoken of, and Pathos is used by appealing to your emotions. At the end of the play you see Brutus and Antony become very good at persuasive speaking by making the citizens believe them and in turn making them choose who’s side they would be …show more content…
In Julius Caesar Marc Antony’s speech used many rhetorical devices but the one he mainly used was logos. He appealed to logic and reasoning to persuade the citizens that the fall of Caesar was not just. During Antony’s speech he starts by building up Caesars character by saying “I come to speak in Caesar’s funeral. He was my friend, faithful and just to me.” (3, 2, #85-86) right here Antony is showing what a great friend that Caesar was to him and is trying to show his admiration for his friend to try and get the citizens feel the same way about him. Antony always points out another flaw in Brutus’s statement when he said that Caesar was ambitious by saying “You all did see on the Lupercal I thrice presented him a kingly crown, which he thrice refuse. Was this ambition? yet Brutus says he was ambitious and Brutus is an honorable man.” Antony once again contradicts Brutus, he does this in an innocent way but it’s still very effective in a way to where it takes away Brutus’s credibility, not only that but its once again showing Caesar’s true character that the conspirators were trying to besmudge. Brutus in his speech says “Had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men.” (3, 2, #23-24) this part of his speech was very powerful because it left the citizens to ponder if this would have really happened leaving the citizens to sway …show more content…
While each of them used the same rhetorical devices such as logos which is used to persuade by using logic, Ethos’s appeal is based on the character of whoever is speaking or being spoken of, and Pathos is used by appealing to your emotions. Even though Brutus and Antony each used these devices to persuade the people of Rome overall Antony’s speech was better because of the way he captured the heart and minds of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The art of manipulation and persuasion is truly effective when one is incompetent to the fact that they alone are not thinking for themselves. Since the beginning of time, humankind has wanted to have control. In some instances they will strive for power in ways that make them oblivious to right and wrong. Occasionally, they will go against what they are told to do and instead to what they want to do. In the play Julius Caesar the power of persuasion and manipulation of language is clear when two men, Brutus and Mark Antony, spiel to the people of their country, each attempting to gain the support of the populace over the death of Caesar. Even though Brutus establishes ethos throughout his speech, Mark Antony’s uses it to his advantage…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From what I observed in the speeches, Anthony is the more persuasive speaker. Anthony used ethos, pathos, and logos in his speech while Brutus only used pathos and logos, Anthony also connected with the crowd showing he had the same emotions as them while Brutus only challenged the crowd. Ethos is a persuasive speech tactic that speakers use when persuading the audience by using ethics. It focuses on the ethics of either the speaker or the audience.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout Cassius’ speech, he used the persuasive appeals logos, pathos, and ethos to try to turn Brutus against Caesar. Out of all three appeals, I believe he used ethos best. In Act 1, Scene 2, one of the first things Cassius says when he is alone with Brutus is, “Well honour is the subject of my story.” In other words, Cassius is saying, “Brutus, you can trust me because I am a very trustworthy person.” This persuades Brutus into listening to what Cassius has to say because it makes him feel as if he can trust in what Cassius is saying. Then, as Cassius continues to talk he says, “I, as Aneas, our great ancestor, did from the flames of Troy upon his shoulder the old Anchises bear, so from the waves of Tiber did I the tired Caesar.” Here,…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Literature naturally comes to mind as a rich resource for the study of persuasion. To persuade someone completely, one must use rhetorical devices to overcome one of the three key decision making factors: Logos, Pathos, and Ethos. One major concern of Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar is about rhetoric, the skill of persuading people with words. Appeals to logos, pathos and ethos are effectively made to reveal the characters as seen in Cassius, Brutus and Mark Antony respectively throughout the play.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The citizens of Rome were moved by both Brutus's and Antony's speech at Caesar's funeral. Persuasion can be ingenious in plentiful ways, Brutus and Antony swept the crowd in their own ways. However, by looking at the ethos, pathos, and logos in both Brutus's and Antony's speeches, Antony can be seen as more persuasive.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although much of Mark Antony’s speech presents a plethora of pathos, he uses logos very well to justify how Caesar was a good man because when presented with the crown “he did thrice refuse.”(Act III Scene 2) Antony is confused that Brutus would say he was ambitious for power when Caesar refused to be crowned the king of Rome three times. The logic behind someone who refuses the crown to one of the most powerful empires of all time is that they are not thirsty for power or ambitious, as otherwise…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Antony's speech, he talks about the bad things that Caesar has done and how Brutus was ambitious. It says, "The noble Brutus hath told you Caesar was ambitious. If it were so, it was grievous fault, and grievously hath Caesar answered it." (III.ii.75-78) Which is a logo because it is a logic on how Caesar and Brutus are both ambitious. It also says, "But Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man. He hath brought many captives home to Rome whose ransoms did the general coffers fill." (III.ii.84-87) Which means that Brutus is an straightforward man by reason of him brought captives home. Antony is speaking satisfactory about Brutus so the people would listen to Antony more effectively because of the nice things he is saying.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By bringing up elements of Roman history and true events involving Caesar, Brutus seeks to demonstrate that the assassination was a planned (Antony knew nothing about the assassination) action based on thought and facts. Antony, too, employs logos when he lists examples of Caesar's actions on behalf of all Roman citizens. Therefore, his willingness to share the spoils of war with the people and his establishing a reputation for Rome throughout the known world; even Brutus could not the truth in Antony's words. The will itself is also an example of logos. While Antony uses, the literal will to stir up the crowd's emotions, the contents of the will represent logical support for Antony's defense of…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sometimes, Brutus’s speech is considered to be the better of the two speeches. Yes, Brutus does use a lot of pathos to move the crowd. But Brutus doesn’t use a lot of other aids like ethos and pathos. Antony uses pathos, ethos, and even some logos to appeal to the crowd.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antony loved Caesar and was completely against his murder, so he used rhetorical strategies to persuade the Romans to be against the perpetrators. For example when Antony says “Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man” he is using the mix of sarcasm and logos. Antony repeats this same thing over and over again until the Romans start questioning if Brutus truly is an honorable man. His sarcasm and repetition were both great rhetorical tactics that were used to manipulate and confuse the Roman’s minds. Antony brings together the perfect amount of ethos and pathos when he states, “ ‘Tis his will. Let but the commons hear this testament- which pardon me, I do not mean to read- And they would go and kiss dead Caesar’s wounds And dip their napkins in his sacred blood,” (III,ii,127-132). This is essential because it shows that Antony is credible and trustworthy because he has Caesar’s will. This also appeals to the people’s emotions because they become saddened over Caesar’s death. Antony used his tactics to make the Romans trust him and his views, which led to them rioting against the perpetrators. His use of ethos, pathos, and logos convinced the people that the assassination of Caesar was a cruel act and that Brutus, Cassius, and the other perpetrators are…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most obvious times Antony uses logos to persuade a crowd is at Caesar’s funeral. Here, he speaks of how Caesar never betrayed him and was a benefit to the Roman Empire, contrary to Brutus and Cassius’ positions. When Antony speaks of his benefit to the Roman Empire, he says “He hath brought many captives home to Rome, whose ransoms did the general coffers fill.” (Shakespeare 3.2.97). In this quote, Antony speaks of how Caesar was a powerful, successful military leader, and how the selling back of captive soldiers to their home countries benefitted the Romans economically. The logic used here is that if Caesar had ambitious intentions like…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus gives reason for why he had to slay Caesar. To the crowd he eloquently orates, “Not that I loved Caesar less, But that I loved Rome,”(III.ii.21-22). Furthermore, Brutus is saying he killed Caesar for the good of Rome because he loves his country. He even portray the assassination as a patriotic act. On the other hand Antony uses logos to prove Caesar wasn’t ambitious and shouldn’t have been slaughtered for that reason. While reading Caesar’s will he says, “To every Roman citizen he gives, to every several man, seventy-five drachmas,”(III.ii.242-243). By reading this Antony shows Caesar’s generosity and implies that if Caesar really were ambitious he wouldn’t have left seventy-five drachmas to every Roman…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethos is a form of establishing your credibility to other. Brutus’s use of Ethos far surpasses Antony’s because of how he reminds the crowd how honorable he is and how much more honor he has than Antony. Brutus states, “believe me for mine honour, and have respect to mine honour, that you may believe” (3.2.2-4). This is proves that Brutus compared to Antony has better ethos while Antony’s ethos is “I thrice presented him a kingly crown, Which he thrice refuse; was this ambition” (3.2.24-25). This is stating that Caesar thrice denies the crown but the reason he had done this was to seem less ambitious no matter how ambitious he was which he was very ambitious to be the king of rome. This example of ethos is inferior to Brutus’s because the way Antony uses his form of ethos is to show that Caesar did not deserve this connecting to Caesar more than the people of rome. While Brutus’s statements have personal connections to the crowd way more than Antony’s because of how his example is something that could happen to the them more than just one person. Ethos is a major key on connecting with this crowd by establishing credibility and how Brutus demonstrates his connections show better ethos than…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    rhetorical appeals

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Brutus’s also said, “Had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?” which appeals to logos because his is making a logical statement that says Caesar’s death was for the best to Rome’s men freedom. At the end Brutus appeals pathos by saying, “who is there so vile that will not love his country? If any, speak; for him have I offended” Brutus tells the Roman citizen that Caesar deserved what he got because he was too ambitious and would eventually become a much powerful ruler and would make the romans his slave.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the opposite, Antony camp up. His speech was aimed to turn the public in his favor. He was restricted by many things but he didn't let that set him down. He mocked Brutus in kind words. He slowly turned the public against the conspirators. He took himself off of a pedestal and stood with the people, showing them that he wasn’t any better than them at this time. HE uses emotional rhetorical question to get to their hearts which starts the fire against the conspirators. After he was sure that he had them eating from his hand he brought out his "last card which is Caesars’ will. They pleaded and begged to hear it but Antony use the will against…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays