Preview

Julius Caesar Brutus Speech Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
684 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Julius Caesar Brutus Speech Analysis
Confrontation is an important skill that people desire, yet are uncomfortable with. Being able to confront things that happen on the spot is not something many people are able to achieve. In “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar” by William Shakespeare, Brutus is able to sway the people to believe that Caesar’s assassination was for their own good by using a single analogy. However, Antony is able to confront that belief right after Brutus’ speech, swaying the Roman citizens to trust him rather than Brutus. By being able to merge voices and speaking to the people colloquially, Antony has an automatic linguistic advantage over Brutus. With this advantage, voice merging and emotional delivery, Antony is easily able to sway the crowd from Brutus and confront …show more content…
Before his speech begins, the whole crowd is going wild with overwhelming support for Brutus. Knowing this, Antony is quickly able to capture the attention of the people by saying, “For Brutus’ sake, I am beholding to you” (64). By starting off with saying that Brutus endorses whatever Antony is able to say, they are suddenly more curious to hear what he say and what exactly their beloved Brutus approves of. By saying this, Antony is able to borrow Brutus’ honest reputation and use it as his own. Towards the end of his speech, Antony borrows Caesar’s renewed ethos, once again merging voices and giving Antony even more credibility. He asks the audience, “Wherein hath Caesar thus deserved your love?” (234). Antony successfully borrows Caesar’s great reputation and increases his credibility for the people to trust him. All things considered have given Antony a great advantage over Brutus’ speech. While Brutus gave a lecture to the crowd, Antony was able to pour his true feelings and used smart diction to give himself credibility. Brutus’ confrontation of the people was uncomfortable, cheesy and awkward, while Antony was confident and clear about all of his points, changing the audience’s perspective to side with

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Now, Shakespeare was a famous playwright of the time and it seemed logical for him to express his ideologies through his popular plays to comment on his society. Shakespeare was able to use scenes such as the Brutus vs. Antony orations to stress the conflicting ideals between truth and propaganda, as well as their effects on society. Shakespeare captures Brutus’s honesty when he states “I honour him; but as he was ambitious, I slew him” through his use of prose within the speech. Prose reveals to the audience of plebeians Brutus’ rational and logical thinking behind assassinating Caesar, to which he emphasised “not that I loved Caesar less, but I loved Rome more.” The way in which Brutus excuses his actions appears to be beneficiary to the population instead for his selfish purposes, as well as depicting Caesar as a negative influence to the Roman Empire. This is soon contradicted by Antony’s oration which was written in blank verse. The speech mocks as well as contrasts Brutus’ intentions implicitly though the repetition of “But Brutus is an honourable man” which follows conflicting contradictory statements. This depicts Antony’s oration skills as both more superior and authentic to Brutus’s speech as it exposes the contrast between higher and lower order rhetoric. Brutus’s and Antony’s orations, create a powerful…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both speeches are very reluctant and have a persuasive passion about each topic. Moreover, Brutus's speech is more eloquent than Antony's speech considering it talks about Caesar's honor and his wisdom. Both essays start off with "Romans, countrymen..." (III.ii.13) (III.ii.72) Antony's speech talks more about burying Caesar, instead of praising him like Brutus's speech. Which is why Brutus's speech is more persuasive than Antony's speech because Brutus talks about only great things about Caesar and uplifts his spirit, unlike Antony who downgrades on…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The gift was a deep understanding of not just what to convey to an audience, but how to convey it: Ethos. From the very first sentence he spoke to the crowd, he had already received their rapt attention and their unconditional trust. He said, simply and honestly and without condescension, “Friends, Romans, Countrymen, lend me your ears…” (III.ii.74) In only seven-words, Antony’s genius for communication can be easily viewed. He began by placing himself and the crowd within three groups that they all belonged to, creating a sense of unity among the gathered Romans. In addition, Antony respectfully requests permission for those assembled to listen to what he had to say, making the crowd truly feel that Antony was a common Roman like them. However, Antony is able to maintain, through both how he identifies himself and the way he speaks, to command respect like a noble or emperor would. This balance that Antony strikes between modesty and arrogance allows him to speak with authority, and not appear to be giving orders even as he does so. A clear demonstration of that ability is when Antony tells the mob, “I come not, friends, to steal away your hearts; I am no orator, as Brutus is; but (as you know me all) a plain blunt man that love my friend…” (III.ii.218) Incredibly, Antony is able to mask his immense eloquence behind some of that very eloquence, casting himself and his tremendous words as the honest and simple words of a man whom loves his friend. Through this same passage, Antony distances himself from Brutus, whom he alleges as a practiced orator and politician trying to trick the people. The crowd, when then comparing Brutus to Antony, can connect to and hence trust the word of Antony far more, allowing him to widen the range of things he could say. Employing all of these tactics and many more, Mark Antony confirms how…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Senators Swansong

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Brutus and Antony go in different directions when it comes to ethos. Brutus gets on the stage and says, “Believe me for mine honour, and have respect to mine honour, that you might believe me” (III.i.14-15). He is telling the crowd to believe him based on his honor, and while they are judging what he has done, remember how honorable he is. His approach is formal and almost condescending. He is on the stage and he knows he has accomplished more admirable deeds than his audience which merits him honor. But, highlighting this sets him above his audience. Antony however comes up and says, “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears” (III.i.60). This opening is similar to Brutus’ except for one key word, friends. This automatically changes the entire tone of the speech. Now, Antony approaches the crowd on the same level as them, as equals. He is no better, no worse. He is a citizen of Rome, just like them.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mark Antony deftly speaks to his audience in a way that requires them to challenge their preconceived characterizations of Brutus and Cassius. He intentionally expresses the deliberate opposite of what he genuinely wishes and excessively compliments the people to the point that they forget their own seemingly unwavering convictions. His finesse and dexterity in bending words and minds ultimately works to his favor. Antony accomplishes his initial goal to convince the Roman people to revenge Caesar’s demise. This achievement in and of itself exhibits…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During Caesars funeral two of his best men gave speeches, Antony and Brutus, they both used ethos, pathos and logos in different ways to win over the crowd. Brutus was in the senate so he was supposed to give great speeches with structure. Antony was a general so he was not as good at giving speeches but was good at pumping up his solders before battle. Which he used to his advantage when speaking to the mourning crowd.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antony loved Caesar and was completely against his murder, so he used rhetorical strategies to persuade the Romans to be against the perpetrators. For example when Antony says “Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man” he is using the mix of sarcasm and logos. Antony repeats this same thing over and over again until the Romans start questioning if Brutus truly is an honorable man. His sarcasm and repetition were both great rhetorical tactics that were used to manipulate and confuse the Roman’s minds. Antony brings together the perfect amount of ethos and pathos when he states, “ ‘Tis his will. Let but the commons hear this testament- which pardon me, I do not mean to read- And they would go and kiss dead Caesar’s wounds And dip their napkins in his sacred blood,” (III,ii,127-132). This is essential because it shows that Antony is credible and trustworthy because he has Caesar’s will. This also appeals to the people’s emotions because they become saddened over Caesar’s death. Antony used his tactics to make the Romans trust him and his views, which led to them rioting against the perpetrators. His use of ethos, pathos, and logos convinced the people that the assassination of Caesar was a cruel act and that Brutus, Cassius, and the other perpetrators are…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Everything that was said by Brutus was completely blown away by what Antony says even though he never said anything bad about Brutus. Brutus and Antony are both very good at ethos, pathos and logos, but with the length and persistence of Antony, he won the crowd. By the end of the speech the people of Rome wanted to kill everyone that was in the conspiracy including…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Building upon Brutus’s opening statement, Marc Antony begins his speech with “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears;” By putting “Friends” first, Antony appeals to the people on a more personal level than Brutus, and sets a more informal tone for the rest of his speech, making himself part of the crowd instead of someone above it. Throughout his speech, he also predominantly uses “you” and “your”, only using personal programs when relating anecdotes about Caesar. This draws attention to the people…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Vernon Howard once said, “ People appreciate and follow the person who can persuade them properly.” In Shakespeare's play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus and Antony both gave speeches to the people of Rome regarding Caesar’s death. In comparison of the two speeches, there were many similarities and differences. By using his rhetorical skills, Mark Antony was able to persuade the people of Rome to support him. Considering that Brutus’ speech contained mainly logos, he wasn't able to captivate his audience as well as Antony did.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On the otherhand, Brutus' speech consisted more of appealing to logic and reason. He basically states why he killed Caesar and tries to justify himself. We can see this in his speech by him constantly using "I" through the speech. His speech feels cold,…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus' speech was meant to ease the crowd out of their hatred for him and the other conspirators for Brutus didn't want the Roman people to break up into an uproar due to Caesar's death and he did this by attempting to explain why his actions were for the good of Rome, however, Mark Antony's speech was meant to get the Romans into a mob mentality so that they chased after the conspirators. While the two speeches differed they were alike in ways that…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the opposite, Antony camp up. His speech was aimed to turn the public in his favor. He was restricted by many things but he didn't let that set him down. He mocked Brutus in kind words. He slowly turned the public against the conspirators. He took himself off of a pedestal and stood with the people, showing them that he wasn’t any better than them at this time. HE uses emotional rhetorical question to get to their hearts which starts the fire against the conspirators. After he was sure that he had them eating from his hand he brought out his "last card which is Caesars’ will. They pleaded and begged to hear it but Antony use the will against…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unlike Antony, Brutus tries to defend himself for the assassination of Caesar for “Rome’s sake”. Antony tries to defend Caesar and save his reputation from Brutus's statement, “ambitious”, by using logos and pathos towards the public and the people of Rome. Antony started off with Brutus’s description towards Caesar and the type of relationship he had with Caeser. He starts off using logic, “He hath brought many captives home to Rome, Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill...” (Shakespeare 82). Antony also points out how he offered the crown to Caesar three times but denied it those three times. He uses this examples to let the people of Rome see what Caesar did in his power. He also questions the public if this makes Caesar look ambitious, which questioned and changed the public’s point of view on Caesar. He also questioned and changed the public’s point of view on Caesar when he creates sarcasm by saying that Brutus is an honorable man. He later uses pathos, “When that poor have cried, Caesar hath wept” (Shakespeare 20). He shows how Caesar cared for the people of Rome and how an “ambitious” person would not do that. Antony contradicts Brutus’s statement with logos and pathos using examples Caesar did good to Rome and questions the public if an ambitious person would do…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mark Antony's Speech

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To make sure the crowd took his points seriously, Mark Antony has to appear fair and wise. He knows that the plebians are strongly in favour of Brutus, as Brutus has just given them a speech, so if he starts by accusing Brutus, no one would listen to him. Therefore, at the beginning of his speech, Mark Antony was saying that Brutus was “noble” and “honourable”. Mark Antony approaches the crowd discernibly. As his arguments grow stronger, the crowds begin to realize that Brutus and the conspirators are wrong. Every time he calls the conspirators “honourable”, it becomes more ironic and sarcastic and the people start believing it less.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays