Jongmo Yoo By George Whitefield Summary
Back in (1714-1770), George Whitefield’s was known as a revivalist in England. He dedicated most of his time in proclaiming the gospel than providing theology books. However, he wrote sufficient detailed interpretation on the deity of Jesus Christ. He presents evidences for the deity of Christ on the basis of the book of John. In spite of the clear evidence found in Scripture, Whitefield’s relies his arguments strict from the Bible and not from other outside sources. And that is exactly what Jeongmo Yoo is illustrating to the audience in this article. His summary it’s drawn from the works and sermons of this man of God.
Brief Summary
Yoo, begins with a brief background history of who George Whitefield is. He does it, by exposing some of Whitefield’s sermons and accomplishments as a preacher. He explains, how Whitefield’s doctrine of the deity of Jesus Christ is in alignment with the orthodox view. For instance, in order to show the true deity of Jesus Christ, “which is a fundamental foundation for the faith of the believers,” he exposes Whitefield’s criticism of the Arians and the Socinians viewpoint of the deity of Jesus Christ. For example, the Arians, belief that Jesus Christ …show more content…
One significant viewpoint that Yoo mentions at the end is that Whitefield’s interpretation of the deity of Jesus Christ is in line with the Nicene and Chalcedonian council. Whitefield and many others, are practicing true biblical interpretation and we need to examine them in order to learn more. I’m not saying we should view and consider everyone as worthy of studying, instead we must study what other writer and preachers from around the world are teaching in order to determine sound doctrine. It is evident, that Yoo want us to consider the detailed interpretation of Whitefield’s as true
Brief Summary
Yoo, begins with a brief background history of who George Whitefield is. He does it, by exposing some of Whitefield’s sermons and accomplishments as a preacher. He explains, how Whitefield’s doctrine of the deity of Jesus Christ is in alignment with the orthodox view. For instance, in order to show the true deity of Jesus Christ, “which is a fundamental foundation for the faith of the believers,” he exposes Whitefield’s criticism of the Arians and the Socinians viewpoint of the deity of Jesus Christ. For example, the Arians, belief that Jesus Christ …show more content…
One significant viewpoint that Yoo mentions at the end is that Whitefield’s interpretation of the deity of Jesus Christ is in line with the Nicene and Chalcedonian council. Whitefield and many others, are practicing true biblical interpretation and we need to examine them in order to learn more. I’m not saying we should view and consider everyone as worthy of studying, instead we must study what other writer and preachers from around the world are teaching in order to determine sound doctrine. It is evident, that Yoo want us to consider the detailed interpretation of Whitefield’s as true