Preview

John Winthrop's Influence On American Society

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1000 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
John Winthrop's Influence On American Society
Aidana Jenishbek kyzy
Puritan political thought and the thought of revolutionary generation of Americans.

Today, The United States of America represents true democracy and a sample of strong and free country, which is fully able to ensure human equal rights to its citizens. However, the history of American democracy and liberty has a long and bloody path. The early colonies of Puritans played a significant role in the establishment of American democratic regime. Next, but not less important contributions made the revolutionary generation of Americans in gaining liberty and equal rights. Two generations of two different periods had one common idea - building a faithful community, which will agree to follow set of rules and recognize the authority
…show more content…
John Winthrop, the colony's governor says that the world is watching them like “a city upon a hill” and if they do not succeed, people will think of them and, more importantly, God in vain... He ends with a warning of what would happen if they stray from their original goals. (Model of Christian Charity, 10)

John Winthrop has also distinguished between "natural liberty" which suggested, "a liberty to evil" and "moral liberty ... a liberty to do only what is good."(Speech on Liberty, 1-2)
According to these definitions, natural liberty would mean corrupted nature of humans and the moral or civil liberty was considered as a proper liberty, which gives way to the needs of the community. In his view, the unrestrained individual enjoying natural rights would lead to the anarchy, which is the opposition to liberty.

According to Alexander Hamilton the law of nature is the law, "which, being coeval with mankind, and dictated by God himself, is, of course, superior in obligation to any other. It is binding over the entire globe, in all countries, and at all times. No human laws are of any validity, if contrary to this; and such of them as are valid, derive all their authority, mediately, or immediately, from this original." (The Farmer Refuted,
…show more content…
The former is inherently aggressive, constantly attempting to escape its constitutional bounds. Society should guard their liberty jealously.
Thomas Jefferson argued in his opening two paragraphs that a people had the right to overthrow their government when it abused their fundamental natural rights over a long period. (Declaration, 1). “America was conquered, and her settlements made, and firmly established, at the expense of individuals, and not of the British public. Their own blood was split in acquiring lands for their settlement.” (Rights of British America, 1)
The revolutionary generation started to think about the entire country, national people. They counted all colonies as one community. They were against taxes imposed by British parliament and claimed that they are not going to recognize Parliament’s authority. Parliament can regulate trade, but not internal issues. According to them, it was a natural right to manage own trade. (Rights of British America, 2) This generation shared common ethnic, ideological, racial identities and believed in democracy and the natural

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that Winthrop would be a strong leader. Though I don't believe he would make it in politics in America today. Certain beliefs that he has would not go along with todays views. We have a separation of church from state, which I don't think he would understand. People have many different beliefs in America now. Which I don't think he would understand. He also wouldn't understand equality for all, which is a big thing now. We have democracy which he didn't believe in.…

    • 85 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Winthrop essay

    • 560 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The most prominent of the Founding Fathers was John Winthrop. Winthrop was the first Governor of the Massachusetts Colony. He served his term from 1630 to 1634. He was one of the best educated of the Puritan company. Winthrop had great wisdom and strict integrity. He was very religious, and was very aware about all his choices, both in public and private life.…

    • 560 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The natural law theory is the point at the crossing between morals and laws. It can be argued that the Declaration of Independence of 1776, which states, “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness,” has conveyed the natural law theory in its finest. The Declaration of Independence puts it, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator, with certain unalienable rights.” St. Thomas Aquinas interpreted natural law as the basic notion that good be done, a good that is known by proclivity, and evil be eluded. For Aquinas, the good is prior to the right. For him, whether the act is right is less important than whether the act is good (Wacks, 2012). So, natural law are the rights that so many believe are ascended unto them from their Creator. Ben’s vision of constitution does not embrace the natural law theory. It presents the…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Locke Synthesis

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The natural state of humanity promotes personal freedom and rights with the demand of peace. They are born inherently good and in a “state of perfect freedom.”1 The law of nature is the primitive law of life that creates personal rights. The law of nature protects people’s freedoms and keeps them under a code. While individuals are born inherently good, moderate greed is included in the law of nature as a way for “[man] to preserve himself” and to “preserve the rest of mankind.”2 The individual is put before all of mankind because mankind cannot survive without the individual. While the individual is the most important there are restrictions to protect each man’s freedom. The law of nature Hobbes creates a state of nature where each man fights and survives for himself. In Hobbes’s state of nature there is no way for each man to thrive. Locke believes that not all men are evil and sets the law of nature to be livable for all individuals. Locke does not follow Hobbes’s brutal state of nature by not allowing men to violate the rights of other individuals.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Liberalism vs Conservatism

    • 2976 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Locke tries to express his thoughts in his essay, “The Second Treaties of Government” and attempts to defend the rulers of the divine right of the kings; he also speaks against Sr. Roberts Filmers. Through the essay Locke explains the state of nature. He says everyone is considered equal and that no one has power over another. Therefore they have the right to do as they please because they are free. Locke says, “To understand political power aright, and derive it from its original, we must consider what estate all men are naturally in, and that is, a state of perfect freedom to order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and persons as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of Nature, without asking leave or depending upon the will of any other man.” (Locke, p.1) However Locke adds that there are limits to freedom in the state of nature, he asserts that in society there are natural laws that prevent anyone from taking abuse of the natural law. Locke provides, “And that all men may be restrained from invading others’ rights, and from doing hurt to one another, and the law of Nature be observed, which wills that the peace and preservation of all mankind, the execution of the law of Nature is in that state put into every man’s hands, whereby every one has a right to punish the transgressors of that law to such a degree as may hinder its violation.”(Locke, p. 2)…

    • 2976 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He refers to the state of nature as “a State of perfect Freedom to order their action and dispose of their possessions, and persons as they think fit, without the bounds of the Law of Nature” (Wooton, pg.312, 1996). Locke suggests that it follows the Natural Law’s tradition, which implies that men are innate with morals. Consequently, for Locke, the state of nature does not suggest that it is a state of license, “he has not liberty to destroy himself, or so much as any creature in his possession” (Wooton, pg.313, 1996). As such reason teaches man to not harm anyone’s life, liberty or possessions, however man has “a right to punish transgressors” (Wooton, pg.313,…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Give Me Liberty

    • 947 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The theme of liberty is a common value, which has always inflamed human’s hearts in all historic events. But what do we mean by liberty? It is a complex concept, but in this essay we will sum up this idea as the ability to do no matter when or what without any abusif oppression of someone else. People are always ready to defend this abstract concept with words and, if necessary, guns. However, even if this idea of liberty is common to everyone, it does not mean that everybody have access to this fundamental concept. Indeed if we give American history a closer look we will see that today’s obvious right was not that obvious nor allowed to all individuals in the oppressed society at the time. In this essay we will discuss how this notion of liberty shaped the different Revolts and Revolutions against inequality. It will especially focus on Bacon’s Rebellion and Nat Turner’s Revolt relating them to the notion of liberty, democracy and the American Experience.…

    • 947 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Philosophers such as Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau gave free reign to their passion: the analysis of the human nature. They analyzed human social organization and nature of man/woman in society by comparing two major notions: the state of nature and civil society. The state of nature is a term used in contract social theories to describe the hypothetical condition that preceded civil society and government. Social contract theory implies that people give up sovereignty to a government in order to maintain social order through the role of Law. People do not only obey the laws because they are afraid of punishment, but also because it is in every individual’s interest to obey them.…

    • 3351 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The state of nature according to Locke is “a state of perfect freedom to order their actions and dispose of their possessions and persons as they think fit... without asking leave or depending upon the will of any other man.” For Locke, the state of nature is where humans exist without an established government or social contract. In a since the state of nature is a state of anarchy, of no order. What John Locke believed about the state of nature was that if men could act in a positive way, they could reach order without being absolutely controlled by one person. The state of nature is a state of liberty where persons are free to pursue their own interests and plans, free from interference. People act according to "laws of nature" which include moral equality and natural freedom. Society can exist and stay civil as long as people can work together to protect themselves and each other from those who do not obey the laws of nature. In the law of nature, natural moral principles that people are naturally inclined towards are implemented. The basic laws stated in the law of nature were that man is God's property, therefore one has the right to defend oneself from harm. It also stated that one has the duty to protect others from harm, therefore one is also obligated to punish those who cause harm. These views of the law of nature are partly stemmed from Locke’s belief in God and His creation of man and all things on Earth.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Locke's theory about political power is based on the idea of "perfect freedom", a state everyone is "naturally in" while conducting personal proceedings and using possessions in normal way without pressing over or depending on other men. A law of nature governs the state of nature teaching that all people are "equal and independent" but they cannot hurt or destroy another person's "life, liberty, health or possessions".…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Social Contract Theroy

    • 2534 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes suggests numerous things about the state of nature and the nature of man under no governing authority. In the state of nature everything is fair game. Everyone has the right to everything present in the world and is not violating any laws when they seek these things. For example, one can steal someone else’s house if they are capable of doing so without violating any laws as there are none in the state of nature. “It is consequent also to the same condition, that there be no propriety, no dominion, no mine and thine distinct…” (Leviathan. Chapter 14.) In the state of nature everyone has the right to self defense; this is the right of self preservation which is the only right present under no governing authority. Everyone is also always in competition for what goods are available in the state of nature. Because of scarcity people constantly battle with one another and this becomes the “war of all against all.” The only motive is that of the individualistic nature and in that people are only driven by their desires. This constant battle of self interest makes life in the state of nature “nasty, brutish, and short.”…

    • 2534 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    State of Nature

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    John Locke in his Second Treatise of Civil Government addresses the issue of state of nature. According to Locke, The state of nature is a condition earlier the development of society where all individuals are free and equal. Furthermore, it is a state where power and jurisdiction is "reciprocal". (Locke, 1690) No man has power over another and individuals are entirely equal. However, this liberty does not permit individuals to harm other's freedom or property. Therefore the state of nature has "a law of nature to govern it, which obliges every one"…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    POOPmom

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The state of nature is “natural” in one specific sense only. I believe that the only authority that naturally exists among human beings is that of a mother over her child, because the child is so much weaker than the mother. It is extremely unlikely that human beings will live in security and peaceful cooperation without government. We have a right to do whatever we think will ensure our self-preservation. The worst that can happen to us is violent death at the hands of others. “The notions of right and wrong, justice and injustice have no place [in the state of nature].”…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Political Science

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It is the liberty which men enjoyed in the imaginary 'state of nature' when civil society did not exist. It is generally identified with unlimited and unrestricted freedom. Rousseau was the chief exponent of the concept of natural liberty. In his opinion, man lost natural liberty with the emergence of the state or civil society. But such a concept of liberty is illusory. It is license, not liberty.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Locke believed people had a natural right to overthrow their leaders, should those leaders betray them.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays