Preview

John Mill Conformity

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
568 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
John Mill Conformity
‘Tyranny of the majority’ is a concept that the liberty of the people is restricted because of the socially expected conformation to customs, beliefs and opinions, and attitudes that are accepted by the majority as the right way of thinking (Morasch, 2016). Resistance to the conformity results in renowned shame and exclusion from the majority people, making the revolter an outcast. John Mill was a strong proponent of individualism, stressed the importance of an eccentric life and believed that unique people are necessary for prosperity. “Human nature is not a machine to be built as a model, and set to do exactly the work prescribed for it, but a tree, which requires growth and development” (On Liberty, 105). Mill describes in On Liberty that …show more content…
In On Liberty, Chapter 2: Of the Liberty of Thought and Discussion, Mill elaborates on free speech by saying “If all mankind minus one were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind” (On Liberty, 515). Meaning that if a person revolting against the conformity was to have a differing opinion than that of the conforming majority, it would be as unjust to silence that singular person as it would be to silence the entire majority. The majority may share a popular opinion, yet that does not ensure that it is right. If there is no other opinion to be regarded then the truth may never be discovered and the ‘tyranny of the majority’ will result in an overwhelming ignorance and a failure to form new ideas. Free speech must be preserved because without radical ideas the original theory will remain valid, but result in stymied progress of human nature. For example, Galileo, a now renowned scientist, was very unpopular and jailed for his opinions and discoveries because they did not conform with the ideas of the church. Without his discoveries and resilience against the majority, we would lack the knowledge about the universe and laws of
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, the court held that the harm principle is not a principle of fundamental justice for the purposes of Section 7 of the Charter..
    • 2441 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, the court held that the harm principle is not a principle of fundamental justice for the purposes of Section 7 of the Charter..

    Mill begins his essay by expressing a concern with the amount of control that society can exert over an individual 's liberty. Mill is afraid of the "the tyranny of the majority"1 and suggests that one should protect himself not only from the tyranny of the state itself, but also from the prevailing opinions of the majority. He says that the opinions of the majority become the rules and laws…

    • 2441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mill Diffusion Of Knowledge Analysis
    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    John Stuart Mill Diffusion Of Knowledge Analysis

    He also presents the idea that “whatever the risks, the people must be informed, especially on those matters relating to the government” (110). Mill would first agree that people must be informed and ideas must not be suppressed due to those ideas potentially being true. However, Mill would also be concerned with Fuller’s statement “whatever the risks.” This is because Mill emphasizes the idea that opinion needs to be debated. When people are being given information through newspapers or other resources as Fuller uses as examples, particularly those containing political opinion, it is a one-sided conversation. People’s ideas may not be 100% true because they may not understand their opinion whole-heartedly, or the opinion is weakened without a discussion taking place. As said in Mill’s third point, a misunderstanding of the opinion can lead to serious mistakes. This was evident in Fuller’s chapter when the government officials did not want to give up their franking privileges, and postal monetary deficits were created…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Nature And Nurture In John Stuart Mill's Rising Middle Class
    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nature And Nurture In John Stuart Mill's Rising Middle Class

    Throughout this paper I discussed Mills view on Nature verses Nurture which is he is belief that we are who we are because of our education and upbringing rather than our nature. I also explained how Mill became a supporter of women’s rights. Next, I explained Mills view of Representative Democracy and how to minimize corruption. After that, I discussed how enlightenment plays a role in Mills views on the tyranny of the majority. The fifth topic that was discussed was about the voucher system and how Mill believes it will lead to higher quality education; followed by Mill’s belief that the middle class should be the backbone of politics. Lastly, I have discussed Mill’s views on inheritance. In conclusion, the views of Mill that have been discussed thus far in class include Mills views on nature verses nurture, women in the Victorian Era, representative democracy, tyranny of the majority, voucher system, middle class and inheritance as well as my opinions on some of these…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Thomas Hobbes: Source Analysis
    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes: Source Analysis

    The source argues that in the name of protecting civil liberties, the mass people have too much of a say over things, and that those strong leaders in power do not "get a chance to serve the common good." The ideology presented in the source is that a single, strong leader provides more stability than a democracy. The source presented advocates in favour of a collective, authoritarian form of government. The philosopher Thomas Hobbes would have supported the source by referring to society's need for a "leviathan" or centralization of power, since he believed that people were incapable of governing themselves. However, this source is not a complete rejection of the values and principles of liberalism as it still maintains democracy as the system of government used, and democracy is…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    John Stuart Mill's On Liberty Analysis
    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages

    John Stuart Mill's On Liberty Analysis

    In Mill's perspective, oppression of the dominant part is more regrettable than oppression of government in light of the fact that it is not constrained to a political capacity. The predominant feelings inside of society will be the premise of all tenets of behavior inside of society. In this manner there can be no protection in law against the oppression of the larger part. The greater part assessment may not be the right supposition. The main avocation for a man's inclination is the individual’s inclination itself whenever a specific good conviction is the situation. Individuals will adjust themselves either for or against this issue. To analyze the examination of past governments, Mill recommends a solitary standard for which a man's freedom may be limited and that the main reason for which authority can be legitimately practiced over any individual from an civilized group, without wanting to, will be to prevent harms to others. Consequently, when it is not helpful, it may be…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mill Being Human Analysis
    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages

    John Stuart Mill Being Human Analysis

    Mill’s perspective on the human condition is one that I favor immensely opposed to Schopenhauer, because it displays an appreciation for what it means to be a human in its truest form. The fact that we are able to innately enjoy pleasures and reflect on the experience is unique and should be valued. Furthermore, we also are capable of enduring mental suffering and advancing through the struggle as a better being on the other side. Both of these situations effectively demonstrate the privilege we are granted by being human. In this paper I will present why Mill makes a strong argument for this case, and also contribute some of my own ideas to towards the concept.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    James Madison's Contribution to the Enlightenment
    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages

    James Madison's Contribution to the Enlightenment

    The enlightenment era, can be said, produced some of the most critical ideas that clearly impacted the development of democracy. This intellectual period that roughly lasted from the 17th to the 18th century is responsible for producing some of the most brilliant political philosophers. Amongst these philosophers and philosophes were political revolutionaries such as Voltaire, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Cesare Baccaria, Baron de Montesquieu, David Hume, and John Locke. The ideas they promoted and would later be adopted by flourishing democracies included the individual’s freedom of expression and religion by Voltaire, the separation of powers and checks and balances by Montesquieu, rights in the field of criminal justice by Baccaria, federalism by David Hume, and the idea of natural rights by John Locke. One of the most critical enlightenment ideas that contributed greatly to the understanding of the role of government was Rousseau’s social contract. This idea was viewed and generally accepted by many contemporary philosophers and seen as genuine and practical. According to Rousseau, legitimate political authority comes only from a Social Contract agreed upon by all citizens for their mutual preservation. The collective grouping of all citizens, or the “sovereign” he states, expresses the general will that aims for the common good. Thomas Paine further explains this point in his essay Rights of man (1791) by writing that government is not a compact between those who govern and those who are governed, but instead it is a compact between the individuals themselves to produce a government.1 According to both, the general will finds its clearest expression in the general and abstract laws of the state2. Furthermore John Locke viewed the Social Contract as a form of giving legitimacy to a government only through the consent of those whom it governs and that the objective of the government is to protect the individual’s natural rights. Paine further explains that a…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A fear of democracy runs throughout liberalism
    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A fear of democracy runs throughout liberalism

    Plato and Aristotle viewed democracy as a “chaotic rule of masses at the expense of wisdom and property”. Nineteenth century liberals agreed with this idea as they saw democracy as dangerous and feared it. They were concerned that democracy could threaten individual liberty. Democracy is necessarily collectivist, in that it places political authority in the hands of the people who are not a single entity but are turned into a collection of individuals or groups. This contradicts the liberal principle of individuality and atomistic society. Therefore this might lead in the interests of individual citizens being ignored. In society people have different opinions and opposing interests often resulting to political instability and conflict. The democratic solution to this conflict is the application of the majority rule; the principle that the will of the majority should prevail over that of the minority. Mill feared the unintended consequences of the rule of masses. Therefore nineteenth century liberals feared the negative repercussions of democracy such as the tyranny of the majority as the principle of the majority rule can result into the suppression of individual freedom and minority rights. Majoritarianism can not only ignore the interests of the minority but it can also create a culture of dull conformism, where people according to Mill become “transformed into mere industrious sheep as they defer to the judgments of the majority based on the unfounded assumption that the…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tyranny Of The Majority Analysis
    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Tyranny Of The Majority Analysis

    Tocqueville, Mill, and Thoreau, all believe that the tyranny of majority is negatively effecting and harming both the government and society. They believe that to fight the majority people hould stand up for what they want and believe and not let this majority take…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mill
    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages

    John Stuart Mill

    “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. Happiness is intended pleasure and the absence of pain.” – John Stuart Mill…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    John Stuart Mill
    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages

    John Stuart Mill

    1. John Stuart Mill – On Virtue and Happiness (1863)The utilitarian doctrine is, that happiness is desirable, and the only thing desirable, as an end; all other things being only desirable as means to that end. What ought to be required of this doctrine, what conditions is it requisite that the doctrine should fulfill, to make good its claim to be believed? The only proof capable of being given that an object is visible is that people actually see it. The only proof that a sound is audible, is that people hear it; and so of the other sources of our experience. In like manner, I apprehend, the sole evidence it is possible to produce that anything is desirable, is that people do actually desire it. If the end which the utilitarian doctrine proposes to itself were not, in theory and in practice, acknowledged to be an end, nothing could ever convince any person that it was so. No reason can be given why the general happiness is desirable, except that each person, so far as he believes it to be attainable, desires his own happiness. This, however, being a fact, we have not only all the proof which the case admits of, but all which it is possible to require, that happiness is a good, that each persons happiness is a good to that person, and the general happiness, therefore, a good to the aggregate of all persons. Happiness has made out its title as one of the ends of conduct, and consequently one of the criteria of morality. But it has not, by this alone, proved itself to be the sole criterion. To do that, it would seem, by the same rule, necessary to show; not only that people desire happiness, but those they never desire anything else. Now it is palpable that they do desire things which, in common language, are decidedly distinguished from happiness. They desire, for example, virtue, and the absence of vice, no less really than pleasure and the absence of pain. The desire of virtue is not as universal, but it is as authentic…

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A Supreme Moral Principle
    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A Supreme Moral Principle

    John Stuart Mill on the other hand believed that majority rules basically. He believes that some actions are justified on utilitarian grounds, utilitarianism. If one person has to suffer to entertain or please multiple others, so be it.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Compare And Contrast Mill Vs Aquinas
    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Mill Vs Aquinas

    This results in Mill’s claim that a Government’s sole responsibility is to represent the interests of its people: “Those interests, I contend, authorize the subjection of individual spontaneity to external control only in respect to those actions of each which concern the interest of other people” (On Liberty 139). He claims that there are certain situations where it is better to have legal remedies than condemning people morally. In these instances he believes Government to be beneficial to society as it promotes the higher good of freedom. Furthermore, he asserts that laws should be made to protect people from engaging in actions that have been tried since the beginning of time and have proven to be harmful (On Liberty 141).…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Mill on Free Speech
    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages

    John Mill on Free Speech

    In this essay I will attempt to elaborate on John Stuart Mill’s view on Free Speech while also discussing how the opposing side would argue his view on the topic. In this specific topic Mill addresses whether people should be allowed to persuade or limit anyone else’s expression of opinion. Mill argues that everyone should share the equal opportunity of free speech. He supports his theory with four arguments.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Importance of Expression
    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Importance of Expression

    “If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind”(Mill). This quote, by John Stuart Mill, is a quote that I originally disagreed with. Before reading the essay, I thought on all of the different examples in which the silencing of a certain opinion can be beneficial to the masses. A particular example that still sticks out to me is the silencing of the Westboro Baptist Church, a prolific hate group known for speaking out against marine funerals and picketing tragedies such as the Sandy Hook Massacre. How could such a volatile group of hate mongers possibly have any right to such opinions? But after reading a few different essays on the subject, and applying the opinions and logic of the authors into my daily life and other real world situations, I came to the conclusion that all ideas and opinions should be openly debated, respected, and tolerated regardless of how society views the subject matter, so as to enlighten and instill progress in mankind.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics