Preview

John K. Roth: The Relation Between God And Evil

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
992 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
John K. Roth: The Relation Between God And Evil
Where is God in the midst of the Holocaust, the war in Africa involving dictator Joseph Kony, or even events such as Jim Jones and the People’s Temple? The question comes to, where be God during these awful catastrophes? Why doesn’t God intervene and stop the evil before it happens? John K. Roth expresses his opinion on God and Evil in the book Encountering Evil. Roth explains God in the midst of evil by a Theodicy of Protest, which he mentions can also be expressed as an anti-theodicy. Roth easily gets flustered at other theodicies because they defend God. Roth quotes, “Most people want a totally good God or not at all” (Pg. 7). He believes in God but also believes God should not be defended because he is guilty. God is guilty of evil and also guilty for being a bystander, instead of doing something about the wickedness. Freewill is used to explain why there is evil, but freewill is not enough to let God off the hook. Roth states, “Human freedom has been used as God’s defense; in fact, it is crucial in God’s offense” (Pg. 8). Christians commonly say cliché things like, “We just have to make it to heaven, this suffering is in Gods plan, and this will pay off in the future.” Roth would not tolerate responses to evil of that kind. He believes no blessing can ever make up or be excused for …show more content…
Other theodicies make up reasoning behind the problem of evil. In their reasoning they start to make excuses for why this evil is okay. Calvin and his theodicy is a great example of accepting evil. Calvin belief that evil has a purpose, allows Calvin to tolerate the evil. The theodicy of protest is good because it allows Christ followers to protest. People who agree with this theodicy can feel the pain that comes with evil and they have enough compassion to lament for it to stop. This idea allows room for people to boldly approach God and ask him to do something about

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The explanation for why someone or something is evil can not be easily defined, as the answer may vary based on a person’s psychological thought process or intellectual reasoning. The justification of this paper is to discuss Peter Van Inwagen and his philosophical response to the argument from evil, as well as his free will defense theory for the answer to this complication. I will carefully evaluate the two standard objections to his solution and offer my personal opinion of rather or not he offers a successful resolution for this universal problem.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the excerpt Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God by Jonathan Edwards, he demonstrates many different Puritan ideas. Edward feels just as the thoughts that are changing later on were based upon. He believes God as a deity who longs for his people to lead great, generous lives. Rather than talk gently about sinful behavior, Edwards considered it most effective to discuss God’s wrath. Rather than believing in the idea of predestination, he believed people had the power to save themselves by living a good life. His relationship with God was very strong, which encouraged him to to create better individuals by writing his sermons. The purpose is to aware of people of their behavior and conduct here on earth is for more significant more essential…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Vladek's Quirks and Habits

    • 1578 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Cited: Works cited Cohn-Sherbok, Dan. "The Challenge Of The Holocaust." International Journal Of Public Theology 7.2 (2013): 197-209. Academic Search Complete. Web. 12 May 2014.…

    • 1578 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He begins to ponder and tear at the origin of evil. He asks “where did it from”, “why is it still allowed? Bayle acknowledges that God is supposed to be wholly good and powerful. However, despites god’s power and goodness, god has allowed evil to run free. Bayle addresses in this essay the questions the ancient Greek philosopher Epicurus brought to light. Epicurus states that God is either “willing to remove evil and cannot; or he can and is unwilling; … or else he is both willing and able” (Bayle p 169). However, these options bring to light an idea that is not so comfortable about God. If he is willing to remove evil but can’t to address the problem of evil, then God is not all powerful. If he can and is unwilling, then he is not good, for whom that is good would want to put his children through the trials of evil? Bayle suggests that if God is willing and able to remove evil, then why does he not remove it? In the story Candide, Voltaire agrees with the Manichean view and shows it through his writing. There are several instances where a God of Good is present in Candide’s life, and then the God of Evil interferes…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Holocaust, state-sponsored murder of the Jews in the concentration camps, is one of the darkest events in the human history. Six million people were heartlessly tortured and executed in various places in Germany, France, Netherlands, Poland, Czech Republic, and Austria. It is impossible to deny the evil nature of the Holocaust, and scholars have been trying to investigate the essence of evil in the concentration camps. Richard L. Rubenstein, exploring the nature of the Holocaust from the Judeo-Christian perspective, rejects the idea that God who is worthy of worship would impose such evil punishment upon the Jews, while Primo Levi attributes the evil nature of the Holocaust to lack of structure in the camps and its effect of the moral degradation on its members, and Resnais ascribes the evil of the Holocaust to the ignorance of human nature and absence of moral development of…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jonathan Edwards’ “Sinners in the hands of an Angry God” approaches the audience with a call to action. Jonathan does not soften his blows of aggression towards those listening to his sermon. Edwards’ use of imagery and syntax add to the emotional effect of the sermon. “The bow of God’s wrath is bent, and the arrow made ready on the string.” This metaphor is directed to those that sin, and is used as a more blunt approach to those who do bad, than Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave”. Plato approaches the topic of ignorance with ease and softness, using an epic metaphor to compare humans finding self-knowledge to those in a cave. Edwards uses many similes as well, but with a more aggressive impact. “And the fiery…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As shown in the last paragraph you weren’t supposed to survive anything that the Nazi’s did to you, or even survive in the concentration camps, but a struggle for the Jews was to maintain their faith while they were going through these hard times through the Holocaust. Many lost faith in their God, many asked why they were left to suffer, many thought that God was testing them to see if their faith would remain strong through hard times. On page 65, it says “For God’s sake, where is God?” And from within me, I heard a voice answer: “Where He is? This is where--hanging here from this gallows…” and on page 76 it says “ It’s over. God is no longer with us.”. These two examples show evidence that Jews struggled to maintain faith in God while going through the Holocaust and that they struggled to look for answers as to why he was not with them or helping…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Hebrews 11:1, “Faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.” Many of the Jews found themselves questioning their faith as they witnessed and endured the horrors of the Holocaust. Although they hoped to survive the German’s cruelty and leave the concentration camps, they saw no evidence of it ever happening. They had so many questions that needed answers. Where was God? Why was He allowing this to happen? Why was He staying silent when His children needed Him? However, no answers were received, and they felt like they were “… alone- terribly alone in a world without God” (Wiesel 65).…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Where Was God During the Holocaust?” Out of the four premises I find 1, “The better question is where were we?” the most reasonable. It says, “God did not murder six million Jews. God did not start a destructive war. Human beings did… God gave us the gift of free will, and we cannot blame God for the way we use it..” (Rabbi Evan Moffic). It’s reasonable because God didn’t, or wouldn’t want humans to have hatred and choose to kill each other. The Nazis chose to do those terrible things to the Jews. God is believed to want the best for everyone. The Holocaust brought the worst out of people. They could have chosen not to do those terrible things. God didn’t make them do…

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why Is Blackburn Wrong

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He further argues God’s unwillingness to solve the issues at hand in the first place such as how the survival of some creatures are undeniably based upon the suffering of others; he goes as far as even giving…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Holocaust Synthesis Essay

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Holocaust is one of the most remembered tragedies in history. It is unfathomable to presume that another human being was capable of causing such terror and horror to millions. The tragedy is widely known and recognized for those who were victims of Hitler and his depraved mind. Yet, one doesn’t know that the world is gradually resurrecting the horrors of this catastrophic event. It is possible for a Holocaust to recur once again and will continue to be a threat, so long as there are people who use others religion as a mechanism of hate, ignorance, and live in fear and vulnerability.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    claims that God gave humans the freedom to choose between doing acts of good and…

    • 2109 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The problem of evil is a significant and enduring philosophical and theological debate. A question is often raised and discussed: if God is both all-loving and all-powerful, then how can evils-including natural evil and moral evil---exist in our world? In response to the charge that the evils of the world are incompatible with God's omnipotence and perfect goodness, the word"theodicy" is coined to deal with the problem of evil. Usually it is an attempt to show that it is possible to affirm the omnipotence of God, the love of God, and the reality of evil without contradiction. Two of the most well-known and most frequently discussed theodicies are the Augustinian theodicy and the Irenaean theodicy.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Does God Allow Evil?

    • 1771 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many people dispute the true intentions of God, himself, since the beginning of mankind. Opposing and concurring arguments can be just as primitive. Regardless of personal perspective on any indefinite theory, it is undeniable that the controversy between good and evil will inevitably exist. Two dominant philosophers discussed in “The Problem of Evil” are Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz and David Hume. Both of these authors discuss interesting motives from both sides of the issue: why and why not God should allow evil.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Untenable Faith

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Taking into account the Holocaust and all of the other suffering that some groups of people have inflicted on others, an argument could easily be made to show that religious faith is untenable, or not defendable. How could all powerful and loving God let all of these bad things happen? This reminds me of Epicurus quote around 300 BC, "If God is willing to prevent evil, but is not able to then He is not omnipotent. If He is able, but not willing then He is malevolent. If He is both able and willing then whence cometh evil? If He is neither able nor willing then why call Him God?" (Mastin)…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays