Preview

John Coffey's Arguments Against The Death Penalty

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
724 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
John Coffey's Arguments Against The Death Penalty
I support the death penalty, in certain cases. Some people do horrible things, and they don't deserve to live when their victims died. If someone goes on a mass killing spree, don't they deserve punishment for what they did? Yes, they do deserve what is waiting for them on their last mile of their life. However, I’m totally against the death penalty if the person is innocent. For example, John Coffey got framed for a murder he didn't commit because he was in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Originally my family got Willow, our dog, for my sister Meredith. The goal was to train her to be a service dog. At first I thought Willow was only for my sister, it turns out she helps everyone in our family! When someone gets hurt she comes and licks
…show more content…
He did the right thing because it was too late to prove John Coffey’s innocence and Mr. Coffey wanted to end his suffering. Yet, he figured out that John was innocent and that it was a misunderstanding that he got blamed for the murder of the two girls. He couldn't do anything but go through with it because he knew no one would believe him about what he saw. I would have done the same thing. Back then, there was no need for solid evidence other than John had the bodies of the two girls in his arms. This proved to be enough evidence for the people to convict him of murder and sent to the electric …show more content…
I would have handled the situation the same way that the guards did. To think that there could be a cure to fix someone who was going to die. Why not take the risk to save that person from dying? The warden's wife was going to die, and the doctors had no way to help her. Paul devised a plan to get John Coffey to the warden's house to fix his wife. The guards risked losing their jobs or worse to save his wife, and they felt it was the right thing to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is a very controversial topic that some may oppose while others assent. I have read two interesting essays about the death penalty. One is entitled “The Penalty of Death” by H.L Mencken and the other “Execution” by Anna Quindlen. Both authors presented their arguments and used great points to support their opinions. H.L Mencken is for the death penalty while Anna Quindlen is against it. After reading these two authors work I was able to form my own opinion on this punishment. I condone the death penalty despite how cruel it may be.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some people might agree with the death penalty. Families get devastated when someone they love and care about has died. Its different when that person they care so much about has been murdered or killed. People tend to hate that person and have the urge to do just about anything to them in order for them to suffer, which causes us to take, revenge on them. This matter has lead to the death penalty. This is a punishment that slowly kills the man or woman that has committed the crime. Why should we have pity on those who choose to kill? If they felt powerful enough to kill, then we should be able to do the same to them. Whatever their reason is that they choose to kill they should be punished someway, somehow.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, the death penalty gives closure to the families of slain victims (Should). They feel like justice has been served. Secondly, it contributes to the problem of overpopulation in the prison system (Should). It is true all U.S. and state federal prisons are overpopulated, some as much as 33% (U.S.). Another reason people are pro-capital punishment, is because DNA testing is now available and can now effectively eliminate almost all uncertainty as to a person 's guilt or innocence (Should). Many people who opposed the death penalty are now for it, all because of the availability of DNA testing. They think if DNA proves a person is guilty, then they are guilty. However, what if there is not any DNA evidence, but other evidence linking a person to a crime such as, an…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is an extremely vital way of the criminal justice system. The punishment of death can help decrease crime rates. Also, this way of death can lessen the amount of criminals and give families closure. It gives closure because, the families now know that this person will never be able to hurt them or anyone else ever again. The death penalty is a very good way to end many troubles within the U.S.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty is the sentence of death upon a person by the state, as punishment for a crime of which the criminal was convicted in court.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The death penalty is used universally, in developed countries, as well as, in undeveloped countries. The death penalty is used more for retribution and retaliation than it is for justice. The death penalty does not deter crime effectively, it is incompatible with human rights and human dignity, used against minorities and the poor, and there is always the risk of executing innocent people. Its easy to agree to the death penalty when the accused is not someone you know...bu what if the accused was your son, daughter, father, mother, brother, or sister? Would you still be for the death penalty?…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The history of the death penalty can be traced back in time all the way to the fifth century B.C. through Roman’s Law of the Twelve Tablets, where people would be put to death through crucifixion, drowning, and even by being burnt alive.. From there it can be found in seventh B.C.’s Draconian Code, and even in eighteenth century B.C. through the Code of King Hammurabi of Babylon, in which twenty-five various crimes would lead to the death penalty (Part I, 2015). Though the crimes punishable under the death penalty and the methods of which the death penalty have changed over time, the ideology behind the method still stands the same: An eye for an eye. The argument for the death penalty stands that those who commit a crime such as capital murder should be punished the same way that they punished their victim: by death. However, while this ethical principle may sound clear and cut on paper, the stance-both for and against-and methodology behind the death penalty is much more complicated than that.…

    • 2028 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The argument for the death penalty is that many accept as true that if you kill then you deserve to die. When an individual takes another individual’s life they forgo or surrender their own right to their life. Committing a homicide is one of the vilest felonies anyone can do and therefore it should get the nastiest penalty they can receive.…

    • 2428 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is a punishment that results in death usually caused by capital crimes or capital offenses. It is commonly referred to as the death sentence. According to an article “Buzzle” not all countries accept capital punishment but there are still a lot of states who do (par.1). Capital punishment has been around for thousands of years, this punishment is said to have helped keep crime level down and alter the minds of future criminals to prevent them from committing atrocious crimes such as: murder, terrorism, and in some situations aggravated kidnapping.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I initially found it almost absurd that people who support the death penalty, but I soon realized that the grieving families who lost their loved one would feel more comfortable knowing that the punishment had been paid. It And that for them, they can rest easier and continue on with their lives. And that with the process of the death penalty, the criminal would have an impossible chance to escape the prison and commit more crimes.Many of the students that favored pro death were affected by a criminal hurting one of their loved ones. And as soon as I realized this, it made perfect sense that they wanted the death penalty out of defense for themselves and their community, because they did not desire anyone to endure their…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Study done by The Innocence Project concluded at least 4.1% of prisoners on death row are innocent. Experts from the same organization have stated that this is a low estimate and could possibly be much higher. Based on this fact alone it is completely immoral for any to support the death penalty. We have constantly seen the wrong people convicted to later be exonerated based DNA, new witnesses, and newly discovered evidence.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment has been a long-debated issue. Some states enforce it while others have abolished it. The United States is one of the few modern industrialized countries that still has capital punishment. There are several reasons, however, to support capital punishment. First, it’s economically a better choice; secondly, there are some crimes that a life sentence just isn’t fitting for the crime; and finally, it brings some sort of closure to the victim’s family. For these reasons I support capital punishment.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As for me I support the death penalty, because it serves as retribution. Guilty people deserve to be punished in proportion to the severity of their crime. Robert Macy, District Attorney of Oklahoma City, described his concept of the need for retribution in one case: "In 1991, a young mother was rendered helpless and made to watch as her baby was executed. The mother was then mutilated and killed. The killer should not lie in some prison with three meals a day, clean sheets, cable TV, family visits and endless appeals. For justice to prevail, some killers just need to die." I subscribe to his idea of resorting to capital punishment, but it’s necessary to take into account such factors as the atrocity of the crime, the conduct of the criminal, and the defenceless and unprotected state of the victim. These aspects are very important, and influence the sentence passed upon felon. We should not confuse retribution with revenge, because they’re two different phenomena. Vengeance describes the way of inflicting harm on the offender out of rage because of what he has done. However, retribution is “the rationally supported theory that the criminal deserves a punishment fitting the gravity of his crime”, as Louis P. Pojman, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Philosophy at West Point Military Academy stated. People treat capital punishment as though it is 'eye for an eye,' 'blood for blood' or 'murder for murder', and in this way they ignore the differences between public retribution and private revenge. The death penalty should restore the balance disturbed by the crime. Thus, the execution is legal…

    • 934 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why should someone who killed an innocent person deserve to keep his or her life and get the possibility of parole, and living, when that other person had to die for no reason? I believe the death penalty is very effective, and is a good way to make the criminal fear the consequences of his or her actions. Deserved punishment protects society morally by restoring order, and making the criminal pay a price equivalent to the harm that he or she has done. It serves as a simple reminder to the public that crime does not get rewarded, and the killer will never again have the chance to kill.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How do you feel about innocent people dying? Innocent people are wrongly convicted on a daily bases, so why put these people in jail. Those who opposed this argument say ''the people who commit a crime, deserve to die. ‘Six Canadian prisoners were convicted of a dangerous crime and later released due to their innocent. The six Canadians were condemned for the first degree murder and if there were death penalty then these six innocent people would have died.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays