Preview

Jefferson and Madison DBQ

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
945 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jefferson and Madison DBQ
The Democratic - Republican Party was founded in 1792 by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison and was characterized as strict constructionist, which meant that members believed that the constitution should be interpreted by what was written. The ideas of the Democratic-Republicans were opposed to those of the Federalist who believed in loose interpretation. Both Thomas Jefferson and James Madison served as presidents under the Democratic - Republican Party. Jefferson served from March 4, 1801 – March 4, 1809 and Madison from March 4, 1809 – March 4, 1817, while both believed that the constitution should be interpreted strictly how it was written throughout both of their presidencies Jefferson and Madison stayed true to the beliefs of the Democratic - Republican Party while allowing for loose interpretation either to benefit person agendas or for the betterment of the country. When Jefferson first took office he took a strong stand against the ideas and beliefs of the Federalist Party. Jefferson alleged that the nation “can never be harmonious and solid while so respectable a portion of its citizens support principles which go directly to a change of the federal Constitution” (Doc. A). Jefferson initially viewed the use loose interpretation of the Constitution to make laws and policies, as a direct challenge to state power which the Democratic - Republican Party so strongly believed in . He believed that Federalists were wrong in their way of interpreting the Constitution and that they were trying to “sink the state governments, consolidate them into one, and to monarchies that” (Doc. A). Jefferson believed that the “country is too large to have all its affairs directed by a single government…” (Doc. A) And feared that with too much power a monarchy could soon consume the United States again. Jackson believed that with loose interpretation of the constitution things such as even religion could be controlled by the government. Jackson stated that “no power to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Often it was demonstrated that Federalists became more strict, while Republicans became increasingly loose. First, Federalist Daniel Webster demonstrated this change in political position in document D. In his speech, he opposed President Madison’s position regarding a mandated military draft. He claimed that Madison was acting outside the guidelines of the Constitution, which illustrated Webster’s change from a loose constructionist to more of a strict constructionist. Secondly, Jefferson, a self-proclaimed strict constructionist also joined the group of political hypocrites. For example, Jefferson’s most grand defiance of the Constitution of the United States was his approval of the Louisiana Purchase. Even though the Constitution didn’t necessarily allow for such action, Jefferson made an executive decision to pursue the idea of expanding America, and thus starting a westward movement. Apparently the success of the Louisiana Purchase must’ve altered Jefferson’s mindset, because eight years after his Presidency (1816), Jefferson wrote a letter to Samuel Kercheval (Doc. G), which gave support to exploring some change/further interpretation of the Constitution. Lastly, Republicans also at times slandered Madison for being too…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton, and James Madison were three key individuals in the formation of a young and uncertain United States in which failure was more prevalent than success. The three men gathered together at a dinner table to discuss the problems surrounding the young nation. The problems they discussed were issues of the nation’s debt and the location its new capital. The issues of the nation’s debt was of the two center point in the discussion between the three men especially between Alexander Hamilton and James Madison.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson, for example, could not immediately abolish Adams' national bank because it would be too drastic a move for someone with his popularity, despite the fact that it was established without the Constitution granting that power to the federal government (Blum). Jefferson's most grand defiance of his strict interpretation of the Constitution was his purchase of the Louisiana Territory. Even though he was not given the power to purchase land in the Constitution, Jefferson couldn't pass up the opportunity to double the nation's size at a time of such large-scale westward movement. After his presidency (1816), Jefferson wrote a letter to Samuel Kercheval (document G) that gave his support for change to the Constitution with change to the times, which is a very far leap from claiming that nothing could be done in the national government without the Constitution granting them the power to do it. Madison is guilty of the same deviations from typical Republican strict constructionist policy. He was attacked by John Randolph (document F) for being too much like a Federalist, particularly when using the national government's power to set tariffs like the one proposed in 1816. This was not the first time Madison was attacked for his pseudo-Federalist policies. He received abundant criticisms…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1789 when George Washington assumed the presidency, Thomas Jefferson served as Secretary of State. Then, John Adams succeeded the presidency with Jefferson as his Vice President. Jefferson then, in 1801 assumed President of the United States. During the time of his campaign in 1800, his actions lead him to call this period the Revolution of 1800. It was known as this time because; John Adams was running for reelection against his very own Vice President. With Adams a Federalist, and Jefferson a founder of the Democratic-Republican Party, their viewpoints were destined to be very oppositional. In the end, Jefferson won the election, bringing forth a new era for the Democratic-Republican Party, and bringing a close on the Federalist chapter…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson’s inauguration in 1800 lead to the defeat of the Federalists and the resurrection of republican control. The Judiciary Act of 1801 expanded and packed the Judicial branch with Federalists. The case of Marbury v. Madison (1803) led to the creation of judicial review, which allowed the Supreme Court to rule previous decisions unconstitutional and go against them. Jefferson strengthened forces in the Mississippi through Lewis and Clark’s expedition during his first term. Napoleon also offered him the whole of Louisiana, doubling the size of the United States for $15 million. American trade flourished from 1793-1807. The Chesapeake Incident in June 1807 ceased trade with the British after an attack on an American ship. In place of a declaration of war, the Embargo Act of 1807 was proposed, forbidding trade with any nation.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Jefferson's letter to Gideon Granger, a future member of his cabinet, he speaks of giving the states more power, which goes against the reasoning behind the drafting of the Constitution; to unite a new country. As a true Republican, Jefferson should have stuck close to the Constitution and remembered that its purpose was to have one central government versus many smaller state governments. Although Republicans preferred more power to the states, as President, Jefferson should have kept the county's best…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson and his group of republicans had no patience with the federalists view that only the “best people” should rule. To Democratic-Republicans, this view came close to monarchy, or rule by a king. Democratic-Republicans believed that the best government was the one that governed the least. A small government with limited powers was most likely to leave the people alone to enjoy the blessings of liberty. To keep the national government small, they insisted on a strict construction, or interpretation, of the Constitution. Opposingly, Alexander Hamilton and his group of federalists believed that the country should be ruled but the best people, educated wealthy public spirited man like themselves. People that had the tims education and background to run the country wisely. Federalists favored a strong national government, they believed in loose construction, a government's powers under the constitution to unite of the states were not nealy as important as national power and unity. They wanted one powerful national government to run the entire…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the years of 1801-1817 the Democratic-Republicans held back on their strict views of the constitution but did hold true to some of their basic beliefs. This can be seen during the presidency of Thomas Jefferson. Before being elected president, in a letter to one of his future cabinet members, Gideon Granger, Jefferson explained that, "the country was too large" to be "directed by a single government" (A). Jefferson also stated that it was best for the nation if the "states are independent" (A). Jefferson did not believe that the federal government should hold the most power in the nation and feared the birth of a monarchy. This letter demonstrates that Jefferson was true to his beliefs during this time in that he…

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hamilton Vs. Jefferson

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Opposed the National bank saying that it was unconstitutional and wanted to encourage state…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 13, 1800, Thomas Jefferson wrote to Gideon Granger, a future member of Jefferson’s cabinet, stating that United States can never be “harmonious and solid” if a portion of its citizens supports changes to the federal Constitution. Jefferson believed that the Constitution should remain unchanged and affairs that are not given the power to be regulated by the Congress should be regulated by individual states. He believed that majority of the legislature of the U.S. must preserve the federal Constitution and states must preserve the rights they are granted.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson Dbq

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Inaugurated into his presidency in March of 1801, Thomas Jefferson gradually began to stray away from his Democratic-Republican views. Prior to his presidency, Jefferson, along with his Republican followers, practiced ideas including a strict interpretation of the Constitution, a weak central government while obtaining strong state governments, and a separation of powers. When he came to office, he proved to the citizens of the United States that one’s views may easily be swayed when crucial political decisions are needed to be made. Thomas Jefferson contradicted his previous views as a Democratic-Republican by his decisions made through a loose interpretation of the Constitution, his failure to act in the best interest of the majority, and his violation of the separation of powers, proving to the people of the United States that even a highly respected politician can make unethical choices once given the power.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson’s (president through 1801-09) political party, the Jeffersonian Republicans, believed in a strict interpretation of the Constitution, while Jefferson’s opposing party, the Federalists, believed in a loose interpretation of the Constitution. In order to comprehend the clear distinction between the two parties it is imperative to analyze the events during Thomas Jefferson’s presidency and James Madison’s presidency. The Democratic Republican Party solidified their values in various instances: James Madison’s letter to Congress, the resolutions of the Hartford convention, and Jefferson’s letter regarding religious freedom. Likewise, the Federalist Party upheld to their values when they created a national bank and to an extent when Jefferson criticized the federalist Parties values. However, both parties contradict their values many times. The Democratic Republican Party contradicted their strict approach, when Jefferson imposed the Embargo Act (creating many political cartoons emphasizing the hypocritical Democratic Republicans), the Louisiana Purchase, criticism from own party members, and controversial and contradicting views by Thomas Jefferson. Similarly the Federalist Party contradicts their own party values when they criticized the vague conscription bill of the Democratic Republicans. Even though the Federalist Party followed their loose values to an extent, while the Democratic Republican Party followed their strict values to an extent, both of the parties became hypocritical and contradicted their values for personal party gain.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Towards the end of Jefferson's presidency was when the Federalists really lost their power and when the Democratic-Republicans increased theirs. With the loss of power of his party, James Madison changed his opinion of flexible interpretation to strict, while Jefferson did the opposite. They switched opinions because each believed that, with the changing times, their new views would be more effective in governing. In 1814, a Federalist expressed this change when he felt that the broad use of phrases in the Constitution could become dangerous because the stretching of a clause so…

    • 605 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jefferson believed that the Federalists he defeated represented not just a different political vision, but a dangerously wrong political vision—one that threatened to restore the antidemocratic principles and institutions of the British government Americans had rejected in 1776.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Revolutionary Period in the early 19th century, the two dominant political parties, the Democratic Republicans and the Federalists, had many conflicting belies. The Federalists believed that the federal government had certain implied powers that were not laid out in the Constitution. The Jeffersonian Republicans, on the other hand, believed that the government did not have the power to do anything that was not granted in the document. The DemocraticRepublicans can habitually be depicted as strict constitutionalists and the Federalists can be seen as broad constructionists, but to a certain extent, this classification of these two parties during the administrations of Jefferson and Madison, from 1801 to 1817, were fallacious as they occasionally strayed from their core beliefs for what they thought may benefit the United States; Jefferson and Madison both stuck to their original political beliefs for the most part, but in certain cases, strayed from these beliefs for the good of their country.…

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays