Example of Dramatic Irony from Acts I & II|CharactersInvolved|Sympathy? Antipathy?|Reason your sympathies lean as they do|Evidence – Lines and Explanation of Effect|
In Act I Scene.5, the Ghost reveals to Hamlet that he was poisoned to death by Claudius, Claudius then spread the rumour that he died by a snake bite which is believed to be true .Only Hamlet and the readers know the truth that Claudius murdered Hamlet's father. |King Hamlets Ghost, Hamlet and Claudius|We sympathize with Hamlet.|The reason they lean this way is because Claudius tells a lie so he won’t be punished. Us as humans are taught not to lie and that it is wrong, this is we our empathy for Claudius begins to grow.||
||We as readers begin to develop an antipathy for Claudius.|||
In Act I Scene 5, Hamlet makes his two friends Horatio and Marcellus to swear that they must not reveal what they have just seen and heard. Only the readers, Marcellus and Horatio know that he is only pretending to be mad but he actually is not.|Hamlet, Horatio and Mercellus|We once again sympathize with Hamlet.|We sympathize with Hamlet because||
||There is no antipathy is this example.|||
In Act II Scenc 1 Ophelia reports to her father Polonius the strange behaviour of Hamlet. Polonius immediately concludes that Hamlet is in love with Ophelia and that he has gone mad because she has obeyed his instruction in spurning The readers know that Hamlet is only pretending to be mad. |Ophelia, Hamlet and Polonius||||
|||||
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The appearance of his father's ghost didn't seem very reliable to him as he began to question his own sanity over what he thinks he should do about the situation. Hamlet deeply contemplates about his soul being damned on actions he was willing to pursue in avenging his father's death. He cautiously plots his act of revenge and waits for the ideal moment to avenge his father's murder. He decides to show King Claudius a play, a similar performance of Claudius' own murderous deed, hopefully seeing some kind of reaction from the king. He says "I'll have these…
- 1027 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Ophelia was a modern day good girl gone bad. She obeyed her father, Polonius, and brother, Laertes’ wishes to stay away from Prince Hamlet while trying to fight for her love for Hamlet and being herself. Throughout the entire play Ophelia is used as pawn in a game of revenge between Hamlet, Polonius, and King Claudius. Polonius and Laertes forbid Ophelia from seeing Hamlet because they believe that he is only using her for sex, yet Polonius uses her to seek information from Hamlet as though she were his personal spy. Although Hamlet loves Ophelia and genuinely cares for her, he sees the danger he and the royal court pose on her. Hamlet wants to get her away from the corruption while putting on an act for King Claudius to prove that he is really mad, and in that attempt, acts as though Ophelia means nothing to him. He treats her in the same manner he treats his mother and all women for that matter. Hamlet sees all women as ignorant and deceitful. Despite Ophelia’s ability to see through Hamlet’s charade, there is still a sense of pain in the words he speaks to her. “Get thee to a nunnery, go. Farewell...To a nunnery, go, and quickly too. Farewell.” (Act 3.1) This had to have been the largest insult to Ophelia ever spoken, but was not meant in that…
- 582 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Ophelia, a fictional character in Hamlet, is the daughter of Polonius and young lover to the main character. Her father, the right hand of the king, originally requests she keep her distance from Hamlet. Quite soon, the company of Hamlet believes he has gone mad. Polonius, of course, asks his obedient daughter to spy on her lover. Mary Salter stated, “She certainly has a great deal of respect for her father and unquestioningly obeys his instructions…” Ophelia and Hamlet spend an extravagant amount of time together. In the time of Shakespeare, this was nearly unacceptable. One could understandably be under the impression they…
- 632 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In Act I scene V, the ghost of King Hamlet intends to ensnare Hamlet because it seeks revenge against Claudius for killing him. The ghost of King Hamlet announced to Hamlet that he did not die from a snake bite but instead was killed by Claudius during the time of sleep. With Hamlet being desperate to communicate with his father, he is attentively listening to every word that the ghost of King Hamlet gives to him. The ghost of King Hamlet knows that Hamlet loves his father very much therefore he takes advantage of him by announcing that he must “Revenge his foul and most unnatural murder” (I.V. 31). The ghost of King Hamlet is trying to entrap Hamlet into murdering Claudius by reassuring him that the deed or killing Claudius must be done…
- 309 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Ophelia’s relationship with Hamlet was one that was very hard to understand. She was in love with him and that complicated things. The character of Ophelia was the daughter of the King’s Advisor. She was not royalty or even remotely from a royal lineage. Hamlet, on the other hand, was a prince. He was the prince in line for the throne. Ophelia was in love with Hamlet and the only chance she had was to conspire with him and earn his trust. Hamlet discovered that his father had been murdered by his uncle. His uncle, Claudius, then became the king. Hamlet pretended to be crazy in order to expose his uncle. Ophelia found out that this was what was happening and went along with it in order to convince her father, Polonius, that Claudius had murdered the king. Polonius was, after all, the king’s advisor. Speaking of Hamlet, she says in Act 2 Scene 1, “He took me by the wrist, and held me hard” (1546). She knew, by telling her father that Hamlet had gone crazy and grabbed her, that he would relay it to the queen and her new king.…
- 978 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
For instance when Hamlet sees the ghost while he is with his mother, he states “This is very coinage of your brain. This bodiless creation ecstasy is very cunning” (3.4, 157-159). The manifestation made in this quote is that only Hamlet sees a ghost while his mother who is also in the scene does not see the ghost. Hamlet can be easily seen as mad by others who do not see the ghost since it is absurd to believe that ghosts actually exist. Although Hamlet believing that he sees a ghost can easily make him seem like he’s going mad, we know that he is not mad because other characters in the play have seen the ghost as well. For instance, when telling Hamlet about the ghost, Horatio states “Two nights together had these gentlemen Marcellus and Bernardo on their watch, in the dead waste and middle of the night, Been thus encountered: a figure like your father” (1.2, 206-209). Because other people have also seen the ghost, we can see that others are only convinced that Hamlet is mad but really, he isn’t he’s only acting mad because he knows that it is essential for him to be to get a reaction from Claudius. It is necessary for Hamlet to act mad to bring about Claudius’s guilt since it will allow him to have control in studying Claudius’s guilt. He knows that his madness will spark a reaction of guilt from Claudius. Gertrude only thinks he’s mad in this scene because he’s already pretended to be mad…
- 971 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
I think there is a misplaced speech in Hamlet which has resulted in much unnecessary confusion. You'll remember that in Act I Hamlet meets his father's ghost, who tells his son that he was murdered by Claudius. Hamlet is full of resolve to do the right thing, but he makes no attempt to kill Claudius until Act III, Scene IV. (That attempt is frustrated when he mistakenly believes Claudius is praying.)…
- 813 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Tragically, the state of Denmark is lead falsely to believe that a poisonous snake was the cause of his death. In reality, the king’s death was a murder committed by his brother-and-current-king, Claudius. During the course of the play, Claudius claims in his soliloquy, “I am still possessed / Of those effects for which I did the murder: / My crown, mine own ambition, and my queen. May one be pardoned and retain th’ offense?” (III, iii, 57-60). He recognizes his fault through repentance, but his ambition undermines his ability to abandon the throne. Being the king’s brother, Claudius’s coronation is a natural duty. It opposes the grief and relieves the mourning of the people of Denmark. In actuality, his ambition for power causes him to betray his loyalty towards his brother. Even though he deceives his subjects by compelling them to place their trust in his kingship, his duplicity does not go unseen for long. The first person to see through his deceit is prince Hamlet, when an apparition of the king Hamlet, prince Hamlet’s father, tells him, “Tis given out that, sleeping in my orchard, / A serpent stung me. So the whole ear of Denmark / Is by a forged process of my death / Rankly abused. But know, thou noble youth, / The serpent that did sting thy father’s life / Now wears his crown” (I, v, 42-47). The appearance of the ghost itself shows the unnatural nature of Claudius’s murder and symbolizes…
- 809 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Hamlet, himself, exhibits faults in his personality, often acting volatile and reckless in situations beyond his control. In Act 1, Scene 3, Ophelia describes Hamlet as an admirer who had ‘made many tenders of his affection’ to her but later on, in Act 3, Scene 1, when they confront each other about their feelings, Hamlet angrily shouts ‘Get thee to a nunnery’, insulting her and not realising the possible consequences of his actions. Ophelia isn’t without flaws, herself, as shown by her tendency to be influenced by the men around her. Whilst it was common for the women during Shakespeare’s time to be obedient to their men, Ophelia’s submissiveness eventually drives her to insanity and leads to her suicide. Furthermore, Ophelia’s father, Polonius, is also a fatally flawed character, with his peripeteia being his nosiness and propensity to pry, which then leads to his death. Shakespeare uses the weaknesses of each character to emphasise that human beings are flawed to warn his audience that if these flaws are not recognised, they may, and often will, bring…
- 943 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
We can definitely see his madness and the evidence that he really goes mad when he said he sees his father’s ghost in his mother’s chambers while his mother does not see the ghost. Hamlet intentions in acting insane in order to get to his goal: "I essentially am not in madness”, Hamlet tells his mother that he is not mad and that he is mad in craft. [Act III, scene IV, lines 188-199]. Hamlet believes he is sane all the times, and did not realize that his actions and his madness is overwhelming him. His attitude resulted to the death of several people which included his mother and the King of Denmark. He is more desperate with the marriage of his mother to his uncle. We realize his violence and jealousy towards his mother. With these events, he builds frustration and anger and which turns him into an insane character. After Hamlet had killed Polonius, he had nothing to say and he even went on to call him a rat. This shows that he doesn’t care much about killing someone and moreover it does not affect him too much because he is so persistent in revenge. It seems as if he will go above and beyond his limits to get revenge. After the death of Polonius, Ophelia dies and this does not affect Hamlet as much as we believe in the consequences because he does state that, “[He] did love [Ophelia] once,”…
- 868 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
After talking with the Queen, Ophelia felt that she should try talking to Hamlet herself. Of course, Hamlet will think that she is crazy and she know it. Her strategy may have been decent but not good enough to change Hamlet. In Act: IV Scene: I the King states “His liberty is full of threats to all.” That moment is when the King and Queen wants an end to all of Hamlets madness. They both speak of the death of Polonius. They then realized he should be killed and orders that he be killed upon his arrival in England. Eventually it seems that everyone, in their own way wants to either help Hamlet or get rid of…
- 591 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Otherwise, Claudius covers his actions and conceals the resulting emotions thoroughly, especially concerning Hamlet. “When Hamlet goes ‘mad,’” Jones says, “Claudius does everything that a reasonable and kindly man could be expected under such circumstances to do; he ... treats [Hamlet] throughout the greater part of the tragedy with amazing patience and kindness. ... The king’s methods are admirably calculated for the man he is dealing with, leaving Hamlet no opening to pick a quarrel, no occasion for complaint; forcing him back upon his purpose, making him doubt the ghost ... Claudius, far from proving a fool and a beast, is remarkable above everything else for his treatment of those about him.” (Jones 56). His wit is admirable. Suppressing his nervousness and paranoia, he carefully draws everyone around him with flattery and amiability. He strategically chooses his friends as if he were creating a network of unofficial social alliances, offering Hamlet a “polished and unassailable front” (Jones 56). With the support so unevenly balanced, the crowd would trust and favor Claudius’ rebuttal against any verbal accusation or statement Hamlet could make against him. Though a hypocritical, pathological liar would never do on the throne, Claudius’ impressive wit simply goes to verify the great potential he had within him for being a good…
- 1430 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
At the beginning of the play, the dilemma of what is real is established. It appeared as though King Hamlet has died from being bitten by a snake. In reality we learn that Claudius had murdered King Hamlet to attain the position of the throne. We learn the truth that King Claudius killed King Hamlet, and that the appearance that King Hamlet was bitten by a snake was false. We discovered the truth when the ghost of King Hamlet came to tell Hamlet, his son, to avenge his death and said,…
- 1725 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
In Act II Claudius, Polonius, Gertrude and even Ophelia spend their time spying on Hamlet to find out his true disposition. This is dramatic irony since we and Hamlet know something significant while the other characters do not. Polonius, the father of Ophelia, whom is the lover of Hamlet, comes to a conclusion that Hamlet is mad from neglected love. Polonius assumes this as he used Ophelia as a bate for him to trap Hamlet. Also, here it seems as Polonius and Claudius are in this together to plan something against Hamlet as Claudius does not want him to live. Polonius goes to tell Claudius he has “found” out the cause of Hamlet’s madness.…
- 524 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Dramatic irony is a literary technique that occurs when an event happens in the story that the audience understands, but the story’s characters cannot grasp. William Shakespeare uses this device throughout a numerous amount of his plays, whether it be a comedy or tragedy. This particular element, in Shakespearian tragedies, is used in order to add a tragic element of not knowing to the story. It is also used to engage the audience and to help reveal the tragic flaw that evidently leads to the hero's downfall. In Shakespeare’s tragedy Hamlet, dramatic irony is a key piece to the stories unveiling of the major plot. It occurs many times throughout the play and all have an essential purpose.…
- 565 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays