Preview

JDT2-Task 1

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1828 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
JDT2-Task 1
MEMO

TO: CEO
FROM: Division Manager
DATE: January 29, 2014
RE: Discrimination Research
******************************************************************************
The following are my findings regarding the constructive discharge from the employee that has left our company after our policy change.
The employee is alleging that we discriminated against them because we made them work on a “Holy Day.” He is claiming “constructive discharge.” Constructive Discharge is when an organization makes the employee’s work environment was so intolerable that they had no choice but to quit (constructive dismissal). He is stating that because we change the work schedule from a five day Monday through Friday to a 12 hours shift, four days on and four days off. Since this new schedule means that they can end up working any day of the week including Saturday or Sunday, he would have to work on the “Holy Day”. Since the production workers are the only ones that the schedule changed for, this can be portrayed that we are discriminating them.
Religion is one of the protected categories that are protected under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This is Act protects employees from being discriminated on the bases of race and color, national origin, religion, and sex. This Act is only in effect for companies that have more than 15 employees. Discrimination is in all aspects of a person’s employment. You cannot discriminate in the Recruiting, Hiring, Performance, Training, Wages, and Benefits. What is relevant to our situation is religious discrimination. According to this Act, you may not treat a person unfavorably because of religious beliefs (Religious Discrimination). This is relevant in our situation because we needed to make sure we accommodated him and left him off on the “Holy Day.”
The first thing we have to worry about is the “reasonable person test”. This test in reality is to state if a normal person would have suffered



References: (14, 02 11). Retrieved from Merriam-Webster Dictionary: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/discrimination Am I protected from religious discrimination? (n.d.). Retrieved 02 10, 2014, from Open Jurist: http://openjurist.org/law/am-i-protected-from-religious-discrimination constructive dismissal. (n.d.). Retrieved 02 01, 2014, from Business Dictionary.com: http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/constructive-dismissal.html Gwendolyn I. Cooper v. Oak Rubber Company and John Doe, Supervisor, 92-4039 (United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit 02 09, 1994). Hussein v. Raban Supply Co, 95-15914 (United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 03 04, 1996). Kenneth R. Yott v. NORTH AMERICAN ROCKWELL CORPORATION and International Union, United Automobile Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local 887, 72-1383 (United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 08 21, 1979). Religious Discrimination. (n.d.). Retrieved 02 01, 14, from U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commision: http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/religion.cfm Resources. (14, 02 11). Retrieved from AAUW: http://www.aauw.org/resource/title-vii-of-the-civil-rights-act-of-1964/#titlevii5

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Search and Seizure

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages

    State v. Pearson, 234 Kan. 906, 631 P.2d 605 (1984); Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412. Thompson v Louisiana 469 US 17 (1984).S. 218, 225-26, 93 S.Ct. 2041, 36 L.Ed.2d,…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rudolph A. Hardman, Frances N. Hardman and Hardman, Inc. Appellants, v. United States of America, Appellee, 827 F.2d 1409 (9th Cir. 1987)…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    C. F. Industries v. Long,364 So. 2d 864 (Fla. Dist.Ct. App.1978), cert. denied, 85 N.M. 5, 508 P.2d 1302 (1973)…

    • 4200 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jdt2 Task 1

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages

    | Per your request to investigate and recommend Toy Company’s position regarding Claim #1-2013; this report was generated. The initial research has been finalized and recommendations determined. I will refer to the claim by its number #1-2013 and the claimant as AA23 to keep the confidentiality of the claimant. First this report will provide a summary of the claim and the history associated with it. Second it will discuss the definition of Constructive Discharge and its relevance to this claim. Third it will provide the specific areas under the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Fourth it will offer recommendations and supporting legal references. Fifth it will recommend proactive steps to avoid future legal issues in relationship to the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. And finally any references used in this research will be provided. A. Definition of Constructive DischargeSummary of Claim and history:In January 1, 2013 a new policy was implemented to support exponential company growth. This policy impacted all production employees. The impacted employees were notified of the changes two months in advance of the January 2013 implementation to allow for assimilation and training on the new shifts schedules and there impacts. Production employee schedules were shifted from a Monday through Friday schedule, 8 hour shift to a Monday through Sunday schedule, 12 hour shift, four working days can occur any day of the week. This schedule requires all production employees to work on holy days regardless of religious affiliation as the production now runs seven days a week.Office staff members were not impacted by this policy change.AA23 quit on January 2, 2013 after new policy was in effect.…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    X that we are willing to work with him to find an acceptable solution and to inform him we are aware of the Code of Federal Regulations (Guidelines on discrimination because of religion, 2009). Several accommodations could be discussed if he would come back to work for the organization, such as, voluntary shift substitutions or flexible scheduling. The organization will need to clear with Mr. X that every effort will be made to resolve the situation.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cooper V. Austin

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Philip J. Cooper v. Charles Austin 837 S. W. 2d 606 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1992)…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    JDT2 Task 1

    • 1672 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees from workplace discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex and national origin. When an employer engages in practices that create a hostile work environment for any of these protected groups, making conditions so intolerable that an employee feels compelled to resign, it is known as constructive discharge Former employee Andy Anderson now alleges that our company engaged in religious discrimination when our production schedule changes went into effect at the first of the year. The changes required all production employees to occasionally work on a religious holy day, and Mr. Anderson has submitted a constructive discharge claim with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).…

    • 1672 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rjdt Task-1

    • 1591 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Given that the employee has resigned as a result of being required to work on a religious holy day, the following Supreme Court case law applies: In Trans World Airlines Inc. v. Hardinson, (1977), the United States Supreme Court ruled that as long as the plaintiff (Hardinson) held legitimate religious beliefs concerning the performance of labor on a religious holy day and providing that the plaintiff had made a documentable effort to bring this conflict to the attention of his employer, the employer was required to accommodate the religious beliefs of the employee. The Court further held that requiring the employee to work on a religious holy day did in fact amount to constructive discharge as the employer had not made any reasonable efforts to accommodate the religious beliefs of the employee.…

    • 1591 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Memo for Task 1

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A. According to US Legal Constructive Discharge is generally when working conditions are so intolerable to amount to a firing, despite a lack of a formal termination notice. Most of the time unemployment benefits are not payable unless a Constructive Discharge can be proven. However, it can be established by one of the following: evidence of difficult/unpleasant working conditions so bad that a reasonable person would not remain or evidence of poor conduct by the employer or its agent such as sexual harassment, assault or harassment. Before this can be proven the employee should have notified the employer in writing about the condition and allowed the employer 15 days to respond to see if a reasonable agreement can be made. In the referenced scenario Constructive Discharge does not apply because of these factors: the shift change was due to company growth and the entire production department was affected not one single person therefore no misconduct was shown to employee; the employee failed to notify the employer of the intent to cease working due to the shift change and the employer was not given the appropriate amount of time (15 days) to respond to see if an alternative could be reached such as allowing the employee to move to a different department that was not affected by the shift change; to prove a Constructive Discharge claim the plaintiff would need to prove that it violated his/her religious beliefs and that the employer made the working conditions intolerable. The employee in the referenced scenario felt that the employer was purposefully changing the work week to make conditions intolerable but in fact the employer made these changes to accommodate for the increase in growth and to avoid undue hardship on the company made the decision to change regardless of working on holy days. Because the employer…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Wgu Human Resources Task 1

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages

    At the beginning of the year the toy Company instituted a work schedule change to keep up with the growth of production of the company. The schedule change consisted of 12 hour shifts with 4 days of work and 4 days off. This change means that some of the work days would fall on a religious holy day. All of the production employees will immediately begin working this new schedule. Due to this new work schedule, a claim has been filed against the toy Company under the Title Vii of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The employee is alleging that the toy Company’s enforcement of the new schedule policy on shift work is discriminatory because the policy requires the employee to work on their religious holy day. Constructive discharge occurs when working conditions are so intolerable the employee feels forced to resign from their employment. (Glazer, 2009, p. 1). Constructive discharge is part of the Title VII Civil Rights Act of 1964 that prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin and religion. ("Title VII," “n.d.”, p. 4). Religion is the…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Courts of The United States (2003, December 2). Raytheon Co. v. Hernandez. Certiorari To the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2003, p.1. Retrieved February 24, 2007, from http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/03pdf/02-749.pdf…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a federal law that protects individuals from discrimination based on religion. Religious discrimination is treating a person differently because of their religious believes. In this case Elaine Mobley, a member of the nonsectarian Unitarian Universalist Church, can file a legal sue under religious discrimination or the Civil Rights Act of 1964, because she was discriminated by employees and her supervisor. They said that she would be “making efforts repeatedly to “save the soul” of a fellow employee” (Neill, 2014, Web). A proven wrongful dismissal will tend to lead to two main remedies: reinstatement of the dismissed employee, and/or monetary compensation for the wrongfully dismissed. In this case the court should look on how Elaine Mobley told her supervisor that she was feeling harassed by her employees, and shortly after that she was fired. In this case the judge should rule in favor of Elaine Mobley, because of what we have of the case it seems that she was being harassed and told her director of division and did nothing but fire her. The employer did in fact discriminate unlawfully, because you cannot force someone to become one of your same religion. It is especially unlawful to leave messages in her desk stating “How can you speak of God and Reject me? I love you and know all about you” as the book stated (Nkomo, Fottler, McAfee, 7 edition, p. 56).…

    • 2010 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Justia Company. (2011). 961 F.2d 260: United States of America v. Marion S. Barry, Jr.,…

    • 2047 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil Rights

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This case has a similar background to those of the assignment. The original action is based in 1962 in the city of Jackson, Mississippi. In that lawsuit, Clark v. Thompson, 206 F. Supp. 539 (SD Miss. 1962), the…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Factual Summary: Provide a succinct and accurate description of the scenario at hand. Summarize the scenario to include all relevant facts.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics