Preview

James Buchanan

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
537 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
James Buchanan
James Buchanan is the only president to remain a bachelor for his entire life. Historians agree that James was one of the worst presidents for his apparent indifferences on the civil war. The controversy of slavery divided the nation at his time of presidency. James Buchanan carried the reputation of a northern man with southern principles, causing tension between the already segregated nation with the complication of slavery.

James was a northern man born in Lancaster, Pennsylvania The buildup of the civil war plagued on as the issue of slavery worsened the tension between the North and South. Southern views were very different from northerners. The south was worried that the acquisition of new territories as a free state would totally abolish slavery. Kansas was admitted to the union as a free state to the union due to the process of popular sovereignty. Popular sovereignty is where the citizens living in the state vote whether it should be a slave or Free State. Family values and keeping traditional ways was very important in the south. James Buchanan represented the Democratic Party. The south was also known as the solid south for their electoral support to the Democratic Party. Democrats believed in a limited government and strong states’ rights. Buchanan blamed abolitionist for causing the problems in the south. Southerners had so much more to lose compared to northerners coming into the civil war. The result of the war could change their traditional way of life with slavery that they have had for centuries.

Northerners wanted to keep the union together and that was their main goal. The Dred Scott court case involved a slave, Dred Scott suing for his freedom. The decision was made two days after Buchanan’s inauguration that Scott could not sue for his freedom because slaves were property. This decision enraged Northerners. The Radical abolitionist John Brown took over Harper’s ferry and attacked slave owners; this showed the hatred of slavery in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    By the end of the year 1850, Clara resigned from her job as a teacher/principal and moved to Washington, D.C. She made Washington, D.C. her permanent home. Clara had used her connections with her district representative, Col. Alexander de Witt, to get a job at the Patent Office. She became one of the first female clerks working as a U.S. Patent officer. Unfortunately, when the fifteenth president, James Buchanan, took office, she was dismissed due to her position being eliminated. Yet, she returned to the Patent Office when the Civil War broke out. She wanted to help as much as she could, so she offered to do the work of two clerks for the price of one. Clara made the decision to offer her proposal so that two of the male clerks…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Initially John Brown was viewed as an irrational for his actions in Pottawatomie, Kansas. It was in Pottawatomie where Brown and a few colleagues took violent measures of vengeance against five pro-slavery southerners in Response to the Bleeding Kansas crisis. The northern view of Brown changed however after his 1859 raid on Harpers Ferry, Virginia. The northern people did not immediately view him as a hero however. Many northerners viewed his raid as “utterly mistaken and, in its direct consequences, pernicious”. (Doc A) Southern people viewed Brown’s raid as a commotion and an appeal to rebellion. The previous Bleeding Kansas crisis also pushed the south more towards succession. “It was by delegates chosen by the several states… that the Constitution of the United States was framed in 1787 and submitted to the several states for ratification… that of a compact between independent states.” (Doc H) President Lincoln responded “Having never been States, either in substance, or in name, outside of the Union, whence this magical omnipotence of ‘States Rights’, asserting a claim of power to lawfully destroy the Union itself?” (Doc I). Both of these statements were made in 1861, and clearly represent the division that sent our nation to…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The other main reasons are the control of the government, economy, states' rights, abolitionism, and the election of 1860. Although the focus revolved around slavery a lot of the tension that led to the war was from how the South felt it had no power when it came to making decisions. “As new states were added to the Union, a series of compromises were arrived at to maintain an equal number of “free” and “slave” states” (Hickman 1). However; as new states were added they were all being declared “free” states without the South having any say in the matter. Fearing they were losing power the South turned to the states' rights argument, stating that the federal government didn't have the right to change the laws of slavery in states whom already own slaves (Ayers). Things grew worse during the abolitionist movements which called for an end for slavery, whether it be immediate or gradual. This caused many disputes among the people which often led to biblical disputes (Hickman1). Harriet Beecher Stowe's Uncle Tom's Cabin should the cruelty of the Fugitive Slave Act and gave support to the abolitionist movement. The election of 1860 was the final straw. With the election of Abraham Lincoln as president, they feared all was about to change. “The North with its growing population and increased electoral power had achieved what the South had always feared: complete control of the government by the free states”(Hickman 2). After the election the South immediately began to discuss seceding from the Union. The secession of the South was the ultimate leading factor for the North to go to war, in order to keep the country united…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The election of Abraham Lincoln terrified the southern states. Southerners new that Lincoln favored abolition and he desired to rule against slavery in the western territories. There was a fear that Lincoln would eventually outlaw slavery for good. Therefore, the southern way of life would forever be changed. The southern states came together and decided the best solution would be to secede from the union.…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The majority opinion stated that because of Dred Scott’s race he was not a citizen and had no right to sue under the Constitution, in March of 1857. Stretching beyond the case of the moment, the court’s decision also invalidated the Missouri Compromise of 1820 that had for nearly 40 years placed restrictions on slavery north of the parallel 36 degrees, 30 minutes, in the vast territory of the Louisiana Purchase. Scott’s abolitionist lawyers might have hoped for a landmark decision but not the one they got. The Supreme Court’s ruling galvanized the abolition movement and spurred Abraham Lincoln to publicly speak out against it, the event that led to the resurgence of his personal political career.…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unable to secure support in Congress Buchanan found his administration paralyzed. This was compounded by Lincoln's refusal to agree to any policy before actually becoming president. Buchanan did support efforts to conciliate the two sides, but when these failed, so did the Union. Many Northerners blamed Buchanan for the failing of the Union and the ensuing Civil War. Buchanan asserted that states did not have the right to secede; He also believed he had no power to stop…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Brown was an American born abolitionist who actively fought Slavery through the use of violence. His ultimate goal was to overthrow the entire system of Slavery in the south, and he went about doing so through armed attacks, including his infamous raid on Harpers Ferry in 1859. John Brown’s armed attack on Harper’s Ferry caused a major dispute between the nation’s separate slavery movements, and had substantial effects in the social and political ideologies of the American people. His antics ultimately played a key role in the swaying of opinions towards slavery leading into the upcoming presidential election of 1860, and as a result, should be considered America’s first true hero. Despite his poorly thought out, and short lasting raid…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1857, Dred Scott lost his case proving that he should be free because he had been held as a slave while living in a free state. The Court ruled that his petition couldn’t be seen because he did not own property. But it went further, to state that even though he had been taken by his 'owner' into a free state, he was still a slave because slaves were to be considered property of their owners. This decision furthered the cause of abolitionists as they increased their efforts to fight against slavery.…

    • 537 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott Decision Essay

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1847, a slave named Dred Scott tried suing for his freedom. Under Missouri law, any slave owner who traveled through Free states with their slave, was instantly emancipating them and it could not be reversed. Having lived in Free states for extended periods of time with his former owner, Dred Scott had the right to sue for his freedom and shouldn’t have had any problem getting it. After rising to the Supreme Court in 1857, his freedom was denied. The denial of freedom wasn’t what angered most people. It was the specific opinion of Chief Justice Roger Taney that was considered majority opinion. Seven of the justices, including Taney, were pro-slavery. Taney’s opinion didn’t just relate to Dred Scott specifically. Taney stated that the founders of the nation did not consider black Americans, free or not, to be citizens and they had no rights under the constitution, especially not the right to bring suit in federal court. He believed that all slaves were considered property, therefore he was never free even though he resided in Free states. He said that denying an owner of their property, such as a slave, would violate part of the Fifth Amendment. He also ruled that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional because Congress had no authority to prohibit slavery in federal territories. Since the final decision of this court case was highly anticipated,…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1857, a slave named Dred Scott went to the north with his owner. While the two men got to the north the Scott’s owner died. From this Scott looked at himself as a free man. He even sued for freedom. He argued that if is owner died in a free territory that would make him a free man. Scott went to the Supreme Court to defend his freedom. The court ruled seven to two that Dred Scott was not a free man and he had to return to slavery. Scott grew with anger and still believed he should be free. The court’s decision was final and Scott was later forced back into slavery. During the Dred Scott case Chief Justice ruled that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and he decided to abolish it.…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Buchanan was a very polemical president during office. James Buchanan was born in Pennsylvania and was the fifteenth president of the United States of America. He was very successful in school during his life. James Buchanan was elected president during a very difficult time in the U.S because of the separation of the democratic party and right before the Civil War, which is one of the reasons James Buchanan was considered one of the worst presidents in the U.S. Even though he tried to keep peace between the north and the south. Also James Buchanan was involved in many treaties like the Oregon Treaty. Buchanan occupied many jobs throughout his political career.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After Brown’s raid on Harper's Ferry he was perceived by the South as a villain and the North as martyr. Even more controversy arose between the two sides of the country because of Brown’s radicalistic approach to end slavery. Many have claimed that although he failed to attack Harper’s Ferry, he had a spark in him and had righteous cause. In the South, Brown was viewed as a dangerous criminal, and his actions increased the fear of a slave uprising.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Slavery was at the root of the case of Dred Scott v. Sandford. Dred Scott sued his master to obtain freedom for himself and his family. His argument was that he had lived in a territory where slavery was illegal; therefore he should be considered a free man. Dred Scott was born a slave in Virginia around 1800. Scott and his family were slaves owned by Peter Blow and his family. He moved to St. Louis with them in 1830 and was sold to John Emerson, a military doctor. They went to Illinois and the Wisconsin territory where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Dred Scott married and had two daughters. John Emerson married Irene Sanford. In 1842, they all returned to St. Louis, Missouri. John Emerson died the next year. In 1846, Scotts sued Irene Emerson for their freedom. The Scott’s stay in free territories gave them the ability to sue for their freedom. However, they did not do this while they were living there (Dred Scott’s Fight).…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Era of Good Feeling

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When Monroe became president the nation’s expectations were very high. After defeated the British in two major wars, American was slowly but surely becoming a strong power. America reached a high, socially and people became more dedicated to keep the union. There was a sense of separation between the north and south but Monroe and John Quincy Adams made it evident that there wasnt separation because Monroe won all electoral votes except for one. The only distinction was the North hated slavery and the abolitionists began to become stronger. South supported slavery and while new states were being added they wanted them to allow slavery as well. This also became a problem but was settled by the Missouri Compromise, which made it a slave state but all states above the 36 30 line. Thomas Jefferson saw this as a problem stating that “a geographical line coinciding with a marked principle, moral and political, once conceived and held up to the angry possessions of men will never be obliterated and every new irritation will mark it deeper and deeper. The industrial economy of the North and the agrarian economy of the South was difference between the two. The main problem created by this tension was the economic policies of the nation and as John Randolph pointed out to the Congress in 1816.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rutherford B. Hayes

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rutherford Bichard Hayes was not a well know president. He was not president that had the opportunity to lead us through a war. He was not a president that would draw much attention to the public eye. He was however one of the presidents that had a great triumph over a major U.S. problem, economics and civil rights following a war. The United States was just coming out of the Civil War and was in need of a new president. They were in need of one that could lead them into a booming economic system, start the process of paying off the national debt, and show them the benefits of a nation-wide unification of the North and the South.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays