The results showed that the central business district of Philadelphia had the lowest rates at only 54.9 percent. South Philadelphia had the highest, with 73.2 percent of marriage. The second highest was in Northwest Philadelphia with 71.1 percent. The third highest was the central north with 68.1 percent, and the fourth highest was Southwest Philadelphia with 61.4 percent. It’s important to note that at this time, Philadelphia’s population was declining in the center, and studies were also conducted to test how marriage rates varied in areas of declining or increasing populations. Rates were shown to be higher in areas of declining population than those with growing populations. Marriage rates from 1920 to 1930 in declining areas were 74.5 percent while growing areas were at 65.1 percent. Also, areas with high marriage rates tended to be in central city areas, and old sections. Low areas with less than 50 percent marriage rates tended to be middle or low class areas, with choice residential sections, and a distinct downtown transition zone. In order to be less “vague” ~~(78) ~~ mention the racial category of the married …show more content…
Author Robert Wood’s first statistics show that in 1960, 80 percent of black women and 66 percent of black men who were aged 20 to 34 were married at least once. In 1990 the percentages had dropped to 46 and 38 percent respectively. White rates, on the other hand, were 86 for women and 73 for men in 1960, and 68 and 54 in 1990. The result from the drop in black marriage was an increase in births out of wedlock in the black community, at 38 percent in 1970, up to 61 percent in 1988. White levels were 6 percent in 170 and 16 percent in 1988. William Julius Wilson ([proposed] the explanation as a lack of male employment levels among young black men, leading to worse marriage partners. Wood conducted a study to test this theory using standard-metropolitan-statistical-area-level data from U.S censuses in 1970 and