Is state violence justified?
State laws are not always just. State violence is not always legitimate. Discuss these issues in relation to protest and dissent.
In his 1918 essay Politics as a Vocation, Max Weber described the monopoly of state violence as an essential characteristic of modern governments. (1918 p.1) State violence is monopolised towards the pursuit of societal compliance, which according to political history, is a necessary condition for a functioning democracy. (1918 p.2) As Tolstoy points out, history has demonstrated the advent of modern states to be forming under extreme violence. (1918 p.2) According to Noam Chomsky violence is legitimised by its efficacy at lessening a greater evil. (1967, p.1) This suggests that in order to assess the legitimacy of state violence, one must apply it to specific historical circumstances. This essay will focus on the state violence during the Civil Rights Movement in the USA from 1955-1968 arguing that state violence is legitimised by the fabrication of an objective morality, using laws created through an assumed national identity. Anthropology, as a subject, is concerned with people and how ideas of self-hood ally with their political society. The Civil Rights Movement started revolutionary protests like the Montgomery Bus Boycott and radical dissent movements such as the Black Panthers and political ideologies such as Black Power in self-defense against the state-advocated violence. (1990 p.111-116) The dissidence persisted against both the violence and the legal policies of the US, and was therefore seen as a threat, not only to national identity, but national security as well.
The need for a Civil Rights Movement in the USA to ensure equal liberties to all its citizens was an example of an unrepresentative government failing to provide its people with the justices they thought they deserved. Following the abolition of slavery in 1865, black Americans have been awarded minimal freedom and agency within their own country with
In his 1918 essay Politics as a Vocation, Max Weber described the monopoly of state violence as an essential characteristic of modern governments. (1918 p.1) State violence is monopolised towards the pursuit of societal compliance, which according to political history, is a necessary condition for a functioning democracy. (1918 p.2) As Tolstoy points out, history has demonstrated the advent of modern states to be forming under extreme violence. (1918 p.2) According to Noam Chomsky violence is legitimised by its efficacy at lessening a greater evil. (1967, p.1) This suggests that in order to assess the legitimacy of state violence, one must apply it to specific historical circumstances. This essay will focus on the state violence during the Civil Rights Movement in the USA from 1955-1968 arguing that state violence is legitimised by the fabrication of an objective morality, using laws created through an assumed national identity. Anthropology, as a subject, is concerned with people and how ideas of self-hood ally with their political society. The Civil Rights Movement started revolutionary protests like the Montgomery Bus Boycott and radical dissent movements such as the Black Panthers and political ideologies such as Black Power in self-defense against the state-advocated violence. (1990 p.111-116) The dissidence persisted against both the violence and the legal policies of the US, and was therefore seen as a threat, not only to national identity, but national security as well.
The need for a Civil Rights Movement in the USA to ensure equal liberties to all its citizens was an example of an unrepresentative government failing to provide its people with the justices they thought they deserved. Following the abolition of slavery in 1865, black Americans have been awarded minimal freedom and agency within their own country with
Bibliography: Anderson, Benedict (1983) Imagined Communities. Verso: London Arendt, Hannah (1959) ‘Reflections on Little Rock’, Dissent, 6(1) pp Arendt, Hannah (1958) The Human Condition. University of Chicago Press: Chicago Johnson, Jacqueline (1990) Stokely Carmichael: The Story of Black Power Chomsky, Noam (1992) Chronicles of Dissent. David Barsamian: USA Chomsky, Arendt, Sonntag (1967) The Legitimacy of Violence as a political Act? Noam Chomsky debates with Hannah Arendt, Susan Sonntag et Crozier, Michael, Huntington, Samuel, Watanuki, Joji (1975) The Crisis of Democracy. New York University Press: New York Davis, Angela (2003) Are Prisons Obsolete? Foucault, Michel (1975) Discipline and Punish: The birth of the Prison. Random House: New York Hobbes, Thomas Lemke, Thomas (2001) 'The Birth of bio-politics: Michael Foucault 's ectures at the College de France on neo-liberal governmentaity ' in Economy and Society v.30, 1.2 Marx, Karl (1848) The Communist Manifesto Orbach and Chambers (eds) (1971) Angela Davis: If they come in the morning. The Philip Parks Press: Manchester Rawls, John (1971) A theory of Justice Rousseau, Jean-Jaques (1762) The Social Contract, or Principles of Political Right Said, Edward (1978) Orientalism Pantheon Books, USA Tolstoy, Leo (1900) Thou Shall not Kill Tucker, and Kopel, David B Weber, Max (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organisation Oxford University Press: NY Weber, Max (1918) Politik als Beruf, ' in Gesammelte Politische Schriften (Muenchen, l921), Duncker & Humblodt, Munich .