Is Osama Really Being Immoral?
I can’t blame him for his risk. He risked his life for his family because he and his family were struggling. Family is everything even before yourself. A homeless man steals a can of soup for his family. The Can is worth $1.00 at CVS and he only did it to feed his starving, dying family. Is it really that bad that you are stealing one can of soup worth a dollar? I think it’s ok to be immoral because sometimes you need to what's best for you and the others around you.
Being immoral is ok because if we didn’t take risks than we wouldn’t human we would be an object and humans take risk and sometimes is for the best but you should never be ok with being basic.Being immoral can be anything and stupid people always think that the definition of …show more content…
Osama bin laden was the biggest terrorist in the world at the time and was causing so much harm to the US. Osama was on the verge of Madness for the US and we needed to do something. It is not Immoral to do something if it's for the greater good. President Obama has to make the decision to intrude a house he wasn’t 100% positive that he was even in there and he went into there to kill. If Obama didn't do what he did we could be in great danger still and the whole world could be different. It’s ok to be immoral if you are doing it for the best.
You should not go against your morals, because if you go against your morals then you aren't doing the right thing. Stealing, There is no reason to steal. If you truly need something like let's say medicine than its ok to steal.
It’s ok to be Immoral in some situations. You shouldn’t always follow the rules because it’s ok to make mistakes because if you don’t make mistakes than you aren’t developing as a person and if you don’t go out of your comfort zone then you are ok with being basic. If you don’t do something that you aren’t used to then you aren’t human because you need to be immoral sometimes to become a better
Being immoral is ok because if we didn’t take risks than we wouldn’t human we would be an object and humans take risk and sometimes is for the best but you should never be ok with being basic.Being immoral can be anything and stupid people always think that the definition of …show more content…
Osama bin laden was the biggest terrorist in the world at the time and was causing so much harm to the US. Osama was on the verge of Madness for the US and we needed to do something. It is not Immoral to do something if it's for the greater good. President Obama has to make the decision to intrude a house he wasn’t 100% positive that he was even in there and he went into there to kill. If Obama didn't do what he did we could be in great danger still and the whole world could be different. It’s ok to be immoral if you are doing it for the best.
You should not go against your morals, because if you go against your morals then you aren't doing the right thing. Stealing, There is no reason to steal. If you truly need something like let's say medicine than its ok to steal.
It’s ok to be Immoral in some situations. You shouldn’t always follow the rules because it’s ok to make mistakes because if you don’t make mistakes than you aren’t developing as a person and if you don’t go out of your comfort zone then you are ok with being basic. If you don’t do something that you aren’t used to then you aren’t human because you need to be immoral sometimes to become a better