Preview

Is It Morally Wrong to Copy Cd's Downloaded from the Web or Borrowed from a Friend

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1054 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is It Morally Wrong to Copy Cd's Downloaded from the Web or Borrowed from a Friend
Is it morally wrong to copy CD’s downloaded from the web or borrowed from a friend?
Gary N. Larsen
ITM434 / Business Ethics and Social Issues in Computing
10May2010

Is it morally wrong to copy CD’s downloaded from the web or borrowed from a friend? The fight over music piracy and file sharing is becoming brutal and getting out of control. A large segment of the population would readily agree that pirated music is stolen music, only because that’s what they’ve read or heard in the media. Arguably, many of these so called law-abiding citizens probably don’t even own or use a computer, much less know how to create a digital copy of a song; yet they make claims and argue points daily just as lawyers do in court. In order to make your own decision about whether or not it is morally wrong to take part in illegal downloading or file sharing and to better understand music piracy, we will look at Utilitarian and Deontological considerations as well as my own personal views and beliefs about this subject. The population views downloading and file sharing as a socially acceptable practice, while the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) and the Justice Department stand against media piracy.
According to Jeremy Bentham and, later, John Stuart Mill the Utilitarianism view suggests that an action is right if it maximizes happiness for the greatest number of people over the long term. When we try to relate this view to media piracy and file sharing it is difficult to find happiness when people are being sued every day. According to George Ziemann, “the dollar value of all music product shipments decreased from $14.3 billion in 2000 to $13.7 billion in 2001” (Ziemann, 2002). He reported the RIAA lost 4.1 percent in revenue over the span of one year. Ultimately, downloading media saved consumers $600K and potentially maximized happiness for a large portion of the world’s populace. So how does this correlate with the Deontological view?
The Deontological



References: Ziemann, G. (2002). RIAA’s Statistics Don’t Add Up to Piracy. Retrieved on May 1, 2010 from http://www.azoz.com/music/features/0008.html Temple, L. (2010). Piracy: It’s wrong, don’t do it (Pt 1). Retrieved on May 2, 2010 from http://yetanotherstrugglingwriter.blogspot.com/2010/03/piracy-its-wrong-dont-do-it pt-1.html Masnick, M. (2010). Entertainment Industry Get Their Own ‘Piracy Police’ In the Justice Department. Retrieved on May 2, 2010 from http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100212/1351148152.shtml Sandoval, G. (2010). Feds raise questions about big media’s piracy claims. Retrieved on May 2, 2010 from http://news.cnet.com/8301-31001_3-20002304-261.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    If “retardchicken” had to partake in an ethical argument against CD piracy, I think he would have a very easy time based on the perennial duties we should all live by. Historically, the philosophical world has agreed that we have several responsibilities toward other people. For example, “retardchicken” could claim that by pirating the CD, “overstand” is wronging another person. That is, “overstand” is basically stealing a copy of a CD that someone worked tirelessly on. Also, by “overstand” burning another copy, he is not promoting the beneficence of the band or person who created that particular CD. Additionally, “retardchicken” could claim that by “overstand” burning the CD, he is in part not showing his fidelity toward the record label.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I will go on to defend the idea that illegally downloading music is stealing. Illegally downloading music is no different then going into a store and taking a CD right off the shelf and walking out without paying. I will base my defense on the concept that the artists and the people involved in the music industry have rights. Whenever a song is downloaded off the Internet illegally it is a violation of the artists and the people involved in the music industry’s rights.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pescue, Mark. "Piracy Is Good?" Australian Film Television and Radio School. Sydney, May 6th, 2005…

    • 2159 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Music, a very popular trend in our day. There are all types of music; hip hop, rock, rap, pop, etc. With the growing amounts of songs and artists, people want to listen to them more. Therefore they need some source in order to listen to these songs. If downloading music off the internet is considered “illegal”, then why do people have music sharing websites? There are about 500 online services located in 40 countries. With all these websites people should be allowed to download music and let it not be considered stealing. For example: If I walk into a record store, steal a CD and then walk out it is no longer there and no one can have it, it is gone. But on the other hand if I download a song off a music sharing website, many other people can do the same and it is also free! I’ll admit that artists sell their music on programs such as “ITunes” where people pay about a dollar or more for a song, which can help benefit their songs, but who wants to pay that much money for songs? When you download music for free they will get recognized a lot quicker because the community will start sharing with many others and considering that it is free it may be more popular. People over 30 years of age may consider it stealing because at their age, there were no music sharing sites like “Limewire, or Napster”. Instead they would buy CD’s then either copy them on to cassettes or share them with friends. There are also sites like “MySpace” where it is okay to demand free music on a playlist, but it’s not okay on custom playlists just because the contracts aren’t right. Eventually downloading music may not be considered stealing, but until this is ethically wrong, downloading music should not be considered…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Companion Essay

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Cited: Cohen, Maxwell. "Illegally Downloading." Interview by Elizabeth Z. Schwartz. 17 Apr. 2010: 2. Print.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    downloading music

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Music is an art form whose medium is sound and silence ,and to many people in many cultures, music is an important part of their way of life . Invention of the internet and copyable audio-file formats made downloading and sharing music very easy . However, this should be considered a criminal acts as downloading music for free is equal to stealing . There are several reason why downloading music for free is equal to stealing . Firstly , because it is legal issue . Music is under copyright and taking it without permission for the rightful owner is wrong despite the fact that “ everyone doing it” . Besides, artists own the rights to their music as they create the music from the scratch . As for conclusion, just because it’s easy , downloading music for free is wrong , ethically and morally .…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After recording companies experienced record losses over the last few years, contributed largely to this controversial practice, the record industry has made its position clear. They commenced to "take legal action against thousands of people for illegally sharing music files". They view this as the fist step to encouraging file-sharers to stop illegally downloading music. According to the RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America), over “2.6 billion song files are unlawfully downloaded each month.” While the RIAA had substantial losses, they are not the only parties potentially harmed by illegal file-sharing. The artists who work to produce these albums, arguably short-changed from the beginning, are losing money as well. Recording artist Dave Matthews feels that "if you dig an artist that much, then you should want to help keep that artist alive by purchasing the actual recording.” As a matter of moral and financial significance, file-sharing is a considered a large threat to the entertainment industry. So, while the RIAA and many recording artists stand staunchly opposed to illegal downloading, people continue to download every day.…

    • 758 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ii. Actually, compact disc is a small plastic disc used for the storage of digital data.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Movie Piracy

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The world we live in today is a world of Technology, where anyone with access to the internet can either stream or share files conveniently and quickly. A big result of all this new technology, that a lot of people have access to, is the theft of copyrighted products by way of the internet. The Movie Industry throughout the World lost $18.2 billion in 2005 due to the higher growing piracy rates. In 2005 the U.S movie industry lost approximately 6.1 billion dollars as a result of piracy being a worldwide epidemic.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Film Piracy

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This may not be very important to many citizens. However, movie piracy is still wrong. It does not matter if the movie is copied and sold in high quantity or if it is copied from a friend for personal use. There are laws that confirm how copying movies without proper authorization is illegal. Those who copy and sell movies without proper licensing areperforming an illegal act. Those who purchase pirated movies are contributing to illegal activity.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    National Center for Educational Statistics, “Internet Access in US Public Schools and Classrooms: 1994–2003, March 24, 2005.…

    • 21087 Words
    • 85 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When music is downloaded illegally, the artist suffers. This is one of the primary reasons why downloading free music should remain illegal. When a person illegally downloads a song from a website, that is one less potential sale for the music artist. Teenagers and students have an average of more than 800 illegally copied songs each on their digital music players (Sabbagh). One reason people may not care about illegally downloading music because they think that music artists already make enough money. Well, that certainly is not true in the case of music artists who aren’t very popular. Furthermore, even if the artist already has a lot of money, who is anyone to judge how much they should be making. They earned the money, so they have a right to it. Another problem that occurs for music artists when their music is downloaded illegally is, often, the downloaded song isn’t of good quality. Occasionally, if people are downloading a song from one of these websites, they are not really getting the best quality of music available. Usually the song has been burned or reproduced a few different times. The quality of the artist’s hard work is being destroyed and it makes the artist look bad and lose fans. In apparent frustration, some music companies have introduced defective copies of their music into the file-sharing…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Internet Piracy

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Theft is the action of stealing something that belongs to someone else, but what if that which is stolen is never actually taken? The debate over what is to be done about a current issue involving “internet piracy” has been a hot topic in several countries, including the United States. The issue at hand is a claimed figure that allegedly spans upwards of 250 billion dollars translated to American currency in losses on behalf of several international multimedia franchises according to statistics compiled by the Director’s Guild of America. These losses are observed in franchises including but not limited to: film, music, computer software, video games, publishing, and etc. Despite the claimed numbers of losses and statistics there is a lot of internal conflict among average people over whether or not anything should be done about the matter of “internet piracy” or, as pro-piracy supporters of open media call “file sharing.” Acts of pro-piracy as of late include a petition against recently proposed anti-piracy legislation such as SOPA and PIPA that has received over 7 million signatures according to the Washington Post on January 19th, 2012. This large petitioning body of citizens represents a larger consensus demanding if anything is to be done about the act of file sharing, then many of the citizens of the U.S. do not want to be held responsible or suffer from any legislation proposed with effects such as the closing of websites or restriction of open web access, prosecution of file sharers, or prosecution of site owners. Due to this popular opinion among U.S. citizens, it is inadvisable for the United States government to proceed with any legislation regarding the matter without serious notice of the public opinions regarding current statistics in relation to media economics, and the trending support of open media or “file sharing”.…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people argue that downloading music from internet is not just illegal but morally wrong because you are stealing the artist who has put a lot of effort into that music that you are stealing. If you believe that you should not steal from an old shoemaker, who works because he needs the money to live, so why do it from a music artist who puts a lot of work in his songs is right? However, many of these artists make more money that they will ever need as they also make money from concerts. A lot of people run short of money and do not have much to spend on music, movies or TV programmes and downloading it for free seems the best option for them who don’t want to be left aside from the new technological society who offers these entertainments. Before you had to spend a lot of money to get all of these, but nowadays they are closer to our needs, closer for the people with limited resources, so why are we going to take away this privilege from them. People who support this side of the argument consider that downloading music, movies or TV programmes is not a way of steeling it, is a way of sharing. It is very common that when you are with your friends you listen to list of music so you share songs with your friends and widen your music spectrum including more artists and types of songs that you didn’t know before. Many people start to know artists and listen to their music by downloading music from internet because as it is free you try new artists and types of music that you may never have though of buying their CD in a store. This gives the artist a wider audience. Besides, new artists benefit from this, because few people buy CDs from an unknown artist, but a lot of people download music made by new artists and gives them a try because they do not…

    • 653 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Texts 1 and 3 represent two opposing attitudes to copyright violation and illegal downloading in today’s technologic world. In text 1, “It’s Evolution, Stupid”, by co-founder of The Pirate Bay, Peter Sunde, Sunde displays his growing dissatisfaction with the current copyright law. As the co-founder of one of the world’s most popular torrent downloading sites, he claims that copyright protection is extremely out-of-date and seeks to convince the audience that he has been unjustly convicted for having given people the opportunity to share music and movies online. Calling the traditional entertainment industry, an industry that refuses to evolve, Peter Sunde shows his attitude towards the traditional copyright and uses evolution as an argument for changing attitudes and laws. In text 3, “You Like My Poems? So Pay for Them”, English poet Wendy Cope expresses her opposing view. As a writer, she personally suffers because of, for example, free downloading websites such as The Pirate Bay. In fact, she often finds her own poems, and for that matter, those of other writers, copied online without any formal permission. Although such an amount of copying might be meant as an indication of talent, this considerably illegal act has caused harm to the income of writers, publishers, and other artists. Wendy Cope therefore argues that ignorance of copyright law is a major problem, due to the fact that society doesn’t realize the damage they’re causing. Despite this, the problem will likely continue with popular torrent downloading websites such as The Pirate Bay, being used by millions of people worldwide.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays