Preview

Iqbal's Theory of Knowledge

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
5058 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Iqbal's Theory of Knowledge
IQBAL 'S THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE BY: JAMEELA KHATOON

IQBAL REVIEW
Journal of the Iqbal Academy, Pakistan
April 1960 – Volume: 01– Number: 1

Iqbal cannot be classed under any of the three schools of philosophical thought: the empiricist, the rationalist or the intuitionist. In his theory of knowledge, sense perception, reason and intuition, all are combined in an organic whole. He knew full well that light from one direction alone could not illumine the whole of reality in all its manifestations. The ontological problem needs to be approached from all angles, scientific and religious, in order to secure some articulate, luminous and well-established grounds. It is in the light of this view that he advances his theory of knowledge, which promises both direct evidence and indirect experience of God or Reality—the former by intuition or immediate experience and the latter by reflective thought. Rationalism, though not admired, is not wholly condemned and discarded by him. On the contrary, according to him, if rationalism is not divorced from concrete reality, it represents truth. This is visible from his own attitude and is also betrayed by his admiration for prophets and mystics and non-mystic rationalists, whose quest and yearning for a coherent system of ideas resting on a rational foundation and rendering religion more secure and fruitful is well-known[1]. He admits and justifies the metaphysical methods. In his words, "Now since the transformation and guidance of man 's inner and outer life is the essential aim of religion, it is obvious that the religious truths which it embodies must not remain unsettled. No one would hazard action on the basis of doubtful principles of conduct. Indeed, in view of its function, religion stands in greater need of rational foundation of its ultimate principles than even the dogmas of science. Science may even ignore a rational metaphysics; indeed it has ignored it so far. Religion can hardly afford to ignore the



References: [pic] [1] Sir Mohammad Iqbal, The Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam, 1944 [11] Spaulding, The New Realism P. 161. (1922), [12] lqbal, The Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam, P

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    BipRoberts

    • 901 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The major developments in religion and philosophy in the period 2000 BCE to 600 CE were that religions moved from concrete, polytheistic and localized to abstract, monotheistic and universal. In both the Middle East and Europe, especially after about 500 BCE, there was anincrease in the use of logic, reason, and science to explain some of life’s most basic questions. Throughout the period, people in both regionsremained religious and continued to seek answers to questions such as their existence, afterlife and natural phenomena, but the more complex thesocieties became and the more dissatisfied they became with the polytheistic religions, the more they moved toward monotheism and rationalism.…

    • 901 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The book acknowledges that this discipline is overwhelmingly secular. Because of this, science tries to leave out God as creator and the ultimate answer to difficult questions. Accordingly, the author does not suggest that all scientific thought and testing be discarded, rather science confirms what we know about God.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the discussion concerning the nature of religion in philosophy, the most prominent names include John Hick, Michael Goulder, John Herman Randall, Karen Armstrong, and Paul Tillich. Two primary vantage points exist in this discussion: the theistic view, in which the individual believes in an ultimate, transcendent being called “God,” and the non-theistic view, in which the individual sees “God” as a hypothesis rather than another Holy Being. To draw focus toward three particular names-- John Herman Randall, Karen Armstrong, and Paul Tillich-- is to draw specific attention to a compelling perspective regarding religion. To begin, John Herman Randall champions a point about religious symbols: “All ideas of God… are religious symbols… Such…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Every major school of thought has its authors, its influencers, and its divine chosen, if you will. These men and women influence everything from macro economics and political science to the physical sciences of the known universe. Without the contribution of these grand individuals, academics would be destined to their origins, they would cease to develop and many would not even exist. So it is on the existence of these great minds in which we invest our confidence for an ever-growing world. There is one topic in particular, though, whose existence and development is greatly attributed to these individuals: religion.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Rationalists are right to claim that knowledge is a priori and depends primarily on reason. Discuss.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When I now claim to believe in the rationality of God, I mean that the question is settled to my satisfaction. I do not have any doubts—after pondering the arguments, the balance of evidence and argument has a definite tilt. Although I do not claim that the Mark Howard view of the rationality of God would make a compelling case for why someone else ought to believe, I now am better able to articulate an argument that provides something for them to think about. I have moved beyond the realm of automatic, unchallenged acceptance of an inherited belief and am now better able to communicate the faith that Peter admonishes us to be able to give an account of. Admittedly, this is not the end of my inquiry.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the course of time, many philosophers, dogmatic religions and even individual human beings themselves have tried to prove the existence of God. The recurrent question that constantly arises is whether or not you can prove the existence of God solely by rational thinking alone. To that, the answer is no. It is not possible to prove the existence of God solely by rational thinking as you also need to incorporate aspects of faith, but rational thinking helps solidify your beliefs pertaining to God and leaves the answers we cannot conceive rationally up to faith. You cannot understand something outside of your existence rationally because you cannot experience it or see it; you can only theorize, believe and trust in it. You will never be able to reason what you have no knowledge of. In this essay, I will argue that in…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s essays Critique of Pure Reason and Critique of Practical Reason led to his critique Religion Within the Limits of Reason Alone.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We strengthen our autonomy by challenging beliefs in our lives, such as our belief in a higher being, God. By doing so, individuals can deduce whether the belief in God is ‘rational’ or not. For theists, the façade of their deduction is irrational due to their commitment of faith. Also, humans are fundamentally irrational because we select deductions that are based on irrational facts and reasons. Therefore, in this essay, I will argue that no rational person can believe in God.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    3. The basis for your answers should primarily come from the resources provided in the lessons covering the philosophy of religion unit of the course (Evans and Manis, Craig, and the presentation) and these sources should be mentioned in your paper. You are not merely to quote these sources as an answer to the question—answer them in your own words.…

    • 1075 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Teleological Argument

    • 2343 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Some theists of the Abrahamic persuasion claim that the harmony of the universe is proof of an intelligent designer. This argument is known as the teleological argument and has evolved from classical philosophy to modern theology. In addition, subscribers of the Abrahamic religions also hold that God has attributes that include omniscience, omnipotence, and benevolence. Fundamentally, God is all knowing, all-powerful, and all good. In contrast, God created a perfect universe that is in harmony, but occasionally practices miracles. Can the teleological argument, miracles, and God’s attributes coexist in a rational universe? This essay’s goal is…

    • 2343 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Therefore, in this work am going to answer two questions: does God exist And the other is what do the five arguments by Aquinas speak concerning his metaphysics1, 2. I will discuss how perfect do the existence of God presented by the five ways that St. Aquinas Thomas argued in his philosophical work. During his time, 1225 to 1275, some existing condemnation term their work heretical by bishops in Paris. Later the church agreed with him and made him a great philosopher and a…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, there are some scientist that “concludes to reject religion” based off of their scientific findings (Al-Ghazzali)”. Unfortunately, this sense of “otherness” made some “free-thinkers” an outcast from mainstream…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The question of God is a perennial subject of debate in the history of philosophical scholarship and can be located in nearly all the epochs of philosophy. The subject however occupies a central space in the medieval epoch that was characterized by religious thinkers. The debate is largely between two schools of thought. There are those who opine that there is no such entity as God. To such thinkers, the question of God does not amount to anything but is largely a product of human imagination. On the other hand, there are certain group of thinkers who insist that God is a reality that exist and must be given due consideration. Thus, the onus lies on the one who affirms the existence of God to explain who or what this God is and to prove his existence.…

    • 2680 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Allow ?

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Over the last 50 years Swinburne has been a very influential proponent of philosophical arguments for the existence of God. His philosophical contributions are primarily in philosophy of reason and philosophy of science. As a member of the Eastern Orthodox Church, he incorporates his beliefs and argues in many articles and books that faith in Christianity is rational and coherent in a rigorous philosophical sense. While he presents many arguments to advance the belief that God exists, he argues that God is a being whose existence is metaphysically necessary. Swinburne has attempted to reassert classical Christian beliefs with an apologetic method that he believes works hand in hand with contemporary science. This specific method relies heavily on a cause of logic, seeking to show that his Christian beliefs fit best with the evidence. Furthermore, Swinburne uses his beliefs in this writing.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays