investment in facility changeover
POMS
PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
Vol. 14, No. 2, Summer 2005, pp. 159 –174 issn 1059-1478 ͉ 05 ͉ 1402 ͉ 159$1.25
© 2005 Production and Operations Management Society
Investment in Facility Changeover Flexibility for Early Entry into High-Tech Markets
Cheryl Gaimon and Alysse Morton
College of Management, Georgia Institute of Technology, 800 West Peachtree Street NW,
Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0520, USA
Gore School of Business, Westminster College, 1830 South 1300 East, Salt Lake City, Utah 84105, USA cheryl.gaimon@mgt.gatech.edu • amorton@westminstercollege.edu
A
model is introduced to analyze the manufacturing-marketing interface for a firm in a high-tech industry that produces a series of high-volume products with short product life cycles on a single facility. The one-time strategic decision regarding the firm’s investment in changeover flexibility establishes the link between market opportunities and manufacturing capabilities. Specifically, the optimal changeover flexibility decision is determined in the context of the firm’s market entry strategy for successive product generations, the changeover cost between generations, and the production efficiency of the facility. Moreover, the dynamic pricing policy for each product generation is obtained as a function of the firm’s market entry strategy and manufacturing efficiency.
Our findings provide insights linking internal manufacturing capabilities with external market forces for the high-tech and high-volume manufacturer of products with short life cycles. We show the impact of manufacturing efficiency and a firm’s ability to benefit from volume-based learning on the dynamic pricing policy for each product generation. The results demonstrate the benefits realized by a firm that works with its manufacturing equipment suppliers to develop more efficient and flexible technology. In addition, we explore how opportunities afforded by pioneer advantage enable a firm operating a less
efficient
PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
Vol. 14, No. 2, Summer 2005, pp. 159 –174 issn 1059-1478 ͉ 05 ͉ 1402 ͉ 159$1.25
© 2005 Production and Operations Management Society
Investment in Facility Changeover Flexibility for Early Entry into High-Tech Markets
Cheryl Gaimon and Alysse Morton
College of Management, Georgia Institute of Technology, 800 West Peachtree Street NW,
Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0520, USA
Gore School of Business, Westminster College, 1830 South 1300 East, Salt Lake City, Utah 84105, USA cheryl.gaimon@mgt.gatech.edu • amorton@westminstercollege.edu
A
model is introduced to analyze the manufacturing-marketing interface for a firm in a high-tech industry that produces a series of high-volume products with short product life cycles on a single facility. The one-time strategic decision regarding the firm’s investment in changeover flexibility establishes the link between market opportunities and manufacturing capabilities. Specifically, the optimal changeover flexibility decision is determined in the context of the firm’s market entry strategy for successive product generations, the changeover cost between generations, and the production efficiency of the facility. Moreover, the dynamic pricing policy for each product generation is obtained as a function of the firm’s market entry strategy and manufacturing efficiency.
Our findings provide insights linking internal manufacturing capabilities with external market forces for the high-tech and high-volume manufacturer of products with short life cycles. We show the impact of manufacturing efficiency and a firm’s ability to benefit from volume-based learning on the dynamic pricing policy for each product generation. The results demonstrate the benefits realized by a firm that works with its manufacturing equipment suppliers to develop more efficient and flexible technology. In addition, we explore how opportunities afforded by pioneer advantage enable a firm operating a less
efficient
References: Anand, G., P. Ward. 2004. Fit, flexibility, and performance in manufacturing: Coping with dynamic environments. Production and Operations Management 12(4) 369 –385. Balakrishnan, N., A. K. Chakravarty. 1996. Managing engineering change: Market opportunities and manufacturing costs Benjaafar, S., D. Gupta. 1998. Scope versus focus: Issues of flexibility, capacity, and number of production facilities Bordoloi, S. K., W. W. Cooper, H. Matsuo. 1999. Flexibility, adaptability, and efficiency in manufacturing systems Boyer, K. K., M. W. Lewis. 2002. Competitive priorities: Investigating the need for trade-offs in operations strategy Brown, M. 1997. Personal communications with Technical Marketing Manager, Intel Corporation. Burrows, P., G. Smith, S.V. Brull. 1997. HP pictures the future. Business Week July 7 100 –109. Carrillo, J. 2005. Industry clockspeed and the pace of new product development. Production and Operations Management 14(2) 125–141. Carrillo, J. E., R. M. Franza. 2003. Investing in product development and production capabilities: The crucial linkage between time-to-market and ramp-up time. Working Paper, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611. Carrillo, J. E., C. Gaimon. 2004. Managing knowledge-based resource capabilities under uncertainty. Management Science 50(11) 1504 –1518. Cohen, M. A., U. M. Apte. 1997. Manufacturing automation. Irwin McGraw-Hill, Chicago, Illinois. Datar, D., C. C. Jordan, S. Kekre, S. Rajiv, K. Srinivasan. 1997. Deuermeyer, B. L., G. L. Curry, R. M. Feldman. 1993. An automatic modeling approach to the strategic analysis of semiconductor fabrication facilities. Production and Operations Management 2(3) 195–220. Eliashberg, J., A. P. Jeuland. 1986. The impact of competitive entry in a developing market upon dynamic pricing strategies Fine, C. H., L. Li. 1988. Technology choice, product life cycles, and flexible automation Flaherty, M. T. 1983. Market share, technology leadership, and competition in international semiconductor markets Forney, M. 2000. Motorola wins accord to make chips in China. Franza, R. M., C. Gaimon. 1998. Flexibility and pricing decision for high volume products with short life cycles Franza, R. M., C. Gaimon. 2003. Investment in facility flexibility for early market entry under competitive uncertainty in Managing Gaimon, C. 1989. Dynamic game results on the acquisition of new technology Gaimon, C., V. Singhal. 1992. Flexibility and the choice of manufacturing facilities under short product life cycles. European Journal of Operational Research 60 211–223. Gerwin, D. 1993. Manufacturing flexibility: A strategic perspective. Management Science 39(4) 395– 410. Gupta, Y., T. M. Somers. 1996. Business strategy, manufacturing flexibility, and organizational performance relationships: A Hayes, R. H., G. P. Pisano. 1996. Manufacturing strategy: At the intersection of two paradigm shifts Hilton, C. 1998. Manufacturing operations system design and analysis Hauser, J. R., S. M. Shugan. 1983. Defensive marketing strategies. Kalyanaram, G., W. T. Robinson, G. L. Urban. 1995. Order of market entry: Established empirical generalizations, emerging empirical generalizations, and future research Kamien, M. I., N. L. Schwartz. 1991. Dynamic optimization: The calculus of variations and optimal control in Economics and Keenan, F. 2002. How Seagate got its groove back. Business Week, June 24, 124. Kerin, R. A., P. R. Varadarajan, R. A. Peterson. 1992. First-mover advantage: A synthesis, conceptual framework, and research Kirkpatrick, D. 1997. Intel’s amazing profit machine. Fortune, February 17, 60 –72. Kouvelis, P., D. Mallick, S. K. Mukhopadhyay. 1997. Dynamic 174 Kurawarwala, A. A., H. Matsuo. 1996. Forecasting and inventory management of short lifecycle products Lederer, P. J., V. R. Singhal. 1988. Effect of cost structure and demand risk in the justification of new technologies Li, S., R. Loulou, A. Rahman. 2003. Technological progress and technology acquisition: Strategic decision making under uncertainty Li, S., D. Tirupati. 1994. Dynamic capacity expansion problem with multiple products: Technology selection and timing of