Intersectionality Approach: Interlocking Inequality And
The accurate definition for ‘Intersectionality’ would be the concept often used in critical theories to describe the best ways in which oppressive institutions (racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, classism, etc) are interconnected and cannot be examined separately from one another. An intersectionality structure came out during the late 1980s with roots in critical race, ethnic studies, and feminism. This developed interdisciplinary structure of theory and practice focus attention mainly on the simultaneity of oppressions. Collins (21:18) addresses that ''oppression cannot be reduced to one fundamental type, and that oppressions work together in producing injustice.'' Within this framework ''there are no gender links as such,
…show more content…
This tradition understands systems of oppression as rooted in relational power differentials. Men's superiority is thus linked to women's inferiority and the status of poor women of color is related to the status of wealthy white women. Thornton Dill (1997) recognized five basic claims familiar to intersectionality approaches: the existence of interlocking systems of inequality and oppression, the necessity for historically specific, local analyses to understand interlocking inequalities, the rejection of an a priori assumption that women constitute a unified category, the recognition of the interplay of social structure and human agency, and the conceptualization of gender and race as structures and not simply individual …show more content…
Individuals take numerous and often different status positions that affects their lives in both negative and positive way . This ''matrix of domination,'' as described by Collins (2001), embraces a both/and model of inequalities rather than an additive model of inequalities or binary oppositions. A woman's gendered experiences are always put into the context of her class and racial locations. Using this approach let researchers to (1) highlight how ranking positions are related such that positions of advantages and privileges and disadvantage are linked together; and (2) understand far-reaching differences among women (or among men) rather than solely differences between women and
This tradition understands systems of oppression as rooted in relational power differentials. Men's superiority is thus linked to women's inferiority and the status of poor women of color is related to the status of wealthy white women. Thornton Dill (1997) recognized five basic claims familiar to intersectionality approaches: the existence of interlocking systems of inequality and oppression, the necessity for historically specific, local analyses to understand interlocking inequalities, the rejection of an a priori assumption that women constitute a unified category, the recognition of the interplay of social structure and human agency, and the conceptualization of gender and race as structures and not simply individual …show more content…
Individuals take numerous and often different status positions that affects their lives in both negative and positive way . This ''matrix of domination,'' as described by Collins (2001), embraces a both/and model of inequalities rather than an additive model of inequalities or binary oppositions. A woman's gendered experiences are always put into the context of her class and racial locations. Using this approach let researchers to (1) highlight how ranking positions are related such that positions of advantages and privileges and disadvantage are linked together; and (2) understand far-reaching differences among women (or among men) rather than solely differences between women and