Preview

International Law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1088 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
International Law
SUMMARY OF RELEVANT ASPECTS OF CORFU CHANNEL CASE (MERITS)
Judgment of 9 April 1949
The Corfu Channel Case (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland-Albania) arose from incidents that occurred on October 22nd, 1946, in the Corfu Strait: two British destroyers struck mines in Albanian waters and suffered damage, including serious loss of life. The United Kingdom first seized the Security Council of the United Nations which, by a Resolution of April 9th, 1947, recommended the two Governments to submit the dispute to the Court. The United Kingdom accordingly submitted an Application which, after an objection to its admissibility had been raised by Albania, was the subject of a Judgment, dated March 25th, 1948, in which the Court declared that it possessed jurisdiction. On the same day the two Parties concluded a Special Agreement asking the Court to give judgment on the following questions. Only one aspect of the first question – Is Albania responsible for the explosions? – is relevant for our purposes here.
In its Judgment the Court declared on the first question, by 11 votes against 5, that Albania was responsible.
The facts are as follows. On October 22nd, 1946, two British cruisers and two destroyers, coming from the south, entered the North Corfu Strait. The channel they were following, which was in Albanian waters, was regarded as safe: it had been swept in 1944 and check-swept in 1945. One of the destroyers, the Saumarez, when off Saranda, struck a mine and was gravely damaged. The other destroyer, the Volage, was sent to her assistance and, while towing her, struck another mine and was also seriously damaged. Forty-five British officers and sailors lost their lives, and forty-two others were wounded.
* * *
In relation to the first question, the Court finds, in the first place, that the explosions were caused by mines belonging to the minefield discovered on November 13th. It is not, indeed, contested that this minefield had been recently

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Legt 1710 Assignment 1

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this case, the appellant is Mileva Novakovic and the respondents are Michael Stekovic and Snezana Stekovic.…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lawsuits could surface based upon negligence of a third person. Any time something outside of the agreement or damage of property by an employee the company would be held liable for this negligence. Also Gentura could violate its non-disclosure agreement and eventually sell CadMex’s ownership information to the highest…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Blockades have always been employed as a strategy in naval wars. In the simplest of terms, a blockade is nothing more than the use of naval forces to deny an enemy the ability to move ships and goods across bodies of water. Though the general concept of a naval blockade is easy to understand, the conduct of such a strategy not only involves the deployment of warships but also generates a complex set of diplomatic and legal problems. For upon the institution of a naval blockade, questions such as what kinds of goods are contraband? what constitutes a legal blockade? and what are the rights and duties of neutral vessels on the high seas? are raised immediately in admiralty courts and foreign offices by both belligerent and neutral nations.…

    • 20251 Words
    • 82 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study Assignment

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3. The passage above also discusses one court case. Who were the parties involved in the case?…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study Questions

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3. The passage above also discusses one court case. Who were the parties involved in the case?…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Retard

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    (d) The case: (12 marks) • What happened in this case? (1 mark) Summarise the facts. PLEASE BE CAREFUL NOT TO SIMPLY RE-WRITE OR RE-STATE THE FACTS. What is required is a BRIEF summary, in your own words. What was the decision in the case? (1 mark) Identify and explain the main legal issue or issues of the case in your own words. (10 marks) NOTE: this part of the question will require students to do some reading and to conduct some independent research beyond the case and beyond the prescribed textbook. Please see the attached Guidelines for this Assignment, as well as the Research Guidance Notes for Assignment 1 on Blackboard to help you with your research.) 3. Please include footnotes AND a bibliography (list of references at the end of your assignment). Please note footnotes and the bibliography will NOT be included in the word limit. NOTE: You should also refer to the Course Outline (section 4) regarding Assessment Format (paragraph 4.3), Assignment Submission Procedure (paragraph 4.4) and penalty for late submission (paragraph 4.5).…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the period leading up to the First World War, international tensions ran at an all time high. The sinking of the RMS Lusitania in 1915 was all that was needed to inflame the passions of millions of people. But such a tragedy left the world with the question of who was really responsible hanging on their minds. Attention quickly centered on three main groups: the Cunard Line, Germany, and the English government. Though much of the evidence went down with the ship, one may produce a valid conclusion simply by looking at the surrounding circumstances prior to the disaster.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Douglas Wilhelm Harder

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Court which dismissed the appeal: “This Court was in full agreement with the reasons for judgment…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ENRICA LEXIE INCIDENT

    • 8692 Words
    • 22 Pages

    The Enrica Lexie incident of 15 February 2012, off the coast of Kerala had attracted unprecedented attention in all the world. The legal issues involved in bringing the Italian marines to justice for the killing of two Indian fishermen on board an Indian fishing boat in a shoot-out from Enrica Lexie, an Italian flagged commercial boat, in the contiguous zone of India had been the subject matter of legal dispute before the Kerala High Court and the Supreme Court of India. The judgments of both Kerala High Court and the Supreme Court of India in regard to the Enrica Lexie incident dealt with the legal aspects of coastal state jurisdiction and the sovereign immunity available to the Italian marines under international law and the national law extensively. The views of the Supreme court on the coastal state jurisdiction with regard to Enrica Lexie incident appears to be final, despite the Court having allowed the Italian marines to re- agitate the jurisdiction issue in the Special Court, which will try the crimes committed by the Italian marines from Enrica Lexie . The investigation of the Enrica Lexie incident is now destined to go to the Special Court once the investigation is completed and charges are laid. The legal aspects of other post judgment developments such as Italy’s initial refusal to send back the Italian marines for trial in India and the consequential order of the Supreme Court restraining the movement of the Italian Ambassador outside India are also dealt with.…

    • 8692 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Corfu Channel

    • 2315 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The second incident was on 22 October 1946, a Royal Navy flotilla composed of the cruisers HMS Mauritius and HMS Leander, and the destroyers HMS Saumarez and HMS Volage, was ordered northward through the Corfu Channel with the express orders to test the Albanian reaction to their right of innocent passage. The crews were instructed to respond if attacked. They were passing close to the Albanian coast in what they considered to be a mine-free zone with Mauritius leading and Saumarez following closely. Leander was about one and two thirds of a nautical mile or three kilometres away accompanied by Volage. Near the bay of Saranda, the destroyer Saumarez struck a mine and was heavily damaged. The destroyer Volage was ordered to tow the Saumarez south to Corfu harbour. While towing, Volage struck a mine also and sustained heavy damage. Forty-four men died and forty-two were injured in the incident. Since Albania had no appropriate vessels at that time, it was contemplated that the mines were probably laid by Yugoslavian minelayers…

    • 2315 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Therefore, Rigalia has no jurisdiction and has no obligation to investigate the attack. As a consequence, this Court should not compel Rigalia to order an investigation, and neither should it order an investigation into the…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The court shall not decline any dispute since it is within its obligation to accept all legal cases and protect the right and freedom of its citizens. The activists’ complaint to the court on the ground of land dispute and their freedom being infringed upon. However, the land dispute was rejected and ignored. One the other hand, the court also has to review all of the evidences and eye witnesses before accusing someone of being guilty adhering strictly and consistently to laws. The judges made snap decisions in regard to Tep Vanny cases based on weak evidences on the ground of obstructing public official’s work, when it was the public official that incited the violence first. For The Supreme court has obligation to examine the decision of the municipal court if there is a possibility that the decision made by the municipal court is unjust. The Supreme Court rejected Tep Vanny’s appeals despite the fact that the appeal was due to the unjust nature of the decision made by the municipal court to convict…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [ 46 ]. ICRC, PROTOCOL ADDITIONAL TO THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS OF 12 AUGUST 1949, AND RELATING TO THE PROTECTION OF VICTIMS OF INTERNATIONAL ARMED CONFLICTS (PROTOCOL I), 8 JUNE 1977 480 (Yves Sandoz, Christopher Swinarski & Bruno Zimmermann eds., 1987).…

    • 7321 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The PCIJ was superseded after the Second World War by the International Court of Justice (ICJ), described in article 92 of the Charter as the ‘principal judicial organ’ of the United Nations. In essence, it is a continuation of the Permanent Court, with virtually the same statute and jurisdiction, and with a continuing line of cases, no distinction being made between those decided by the PCIJ and those by the ICJ.…

    • 5068 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    CASE BRIEFS

    • 4633 Words
    • 15 Pages

    The Court declined jurisdiction because Interhandel’s case was still pending in US court, therefore Switzerland had not exhausted US domestic remedies. The Court stated that any distinction, so far as the rule of the exhaustion of local remedies is concerned between the various claims or between the various tribunals, is unfounded. This is because the interest of the local claim was the basis before the ICJ, the local claim had induced Switzerland to institute international proceedings. US declaration of…

    • 4633 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays