Preview

Conflict of Norms and Legal Reasoning in the European Union Law

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
167509 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Conflict of Norms and Legal Reasoning in the European Union Law
CONFLICT OF NORMS IN EUROPEAN UNION LAW AND THE LEGAL
REASONING OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE
A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Gerard Martin Conway

School of Law
Brunel University
December 2010

ii

Abstract: This thesis examines the topic of conflict of norms in European Union
(EU) law and the legal reasoning of the European Court of Justice (ECJ), arguing that the framework of conflict of norms provides conceptual insight into justification and the role of value choices in legal reasoning. After examining the theory of conflict of norms, which seems to have been relatively under-studied generally and especially in EU law, it examines three particular aspects of norm conflict resolution in the legal reasoning of the ECJ and EU law: conflict of interpretative norms, especially the opposition between conserving and innovative interpretation; conflicts of human rights norms, looking in particular at the idea of a hierarchy of rights and of specificationism in the articulation of rights; and conflicts of competence norms. It concludes that the scope exists for a fuller justification of the choice of norms in the legal reasoning of the ECJ and generally in EU law and offers a perspective on how the values articulated by the EU suggest particular approaches to norm conflict resolution by the ECJ in its decision-making in these fields, in particular, a greater resort to lex specialis and originalist or historical interpretation, in contrast to its current method.

iii

Summary Table of Contents
Notes and Acknowledgments…………………………………………………………......x
Table of Abbreviations………………………………………………………………......xii
Table of Treaties and Legislation……………………………………………………...xvi
Table of Cases…………………………………………………………………………...xix
Chapter 1 – Values and Conflicts of Norms in EU Law and the Legal
Reasoning of the European Court of Justice – Introduction and



Bibliography: Press 2008). Press 1989). Press 2002). Press 2007). J. Bengoetxea, The Legal Reasoning of the European Court of Justice (1993). B. Bercusson, European Labour Law (Cambridge Univ. Press 2nd ed. 2009). I. Berlin, Four Essays on Liberty (Oxford Univ. Press New ed. 2002) (original edition 1969). P. Bobbitt, Constitutional Interpretation (Blackwell 1991). R. Bork, The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law (Simon & Schuster 1990). I. Cameron, The Protective Principle of International Criminal Jurisdiction (Ashgate 1994). P. Craig, EU Administrative Law (Oxford Univ. Press 2006). P. Craig & G. de Búrca, EU Law (Oxford Univ. Press 3rd ed. 2004). P. Craig & G. de Búrca, EU Law (Oxford Univ. Press 4th ed. 2008). D. Davidson, Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective (Clarendon Press 2001). A.V. Dicey, An Introduction to the Law of the Constitution (Macmillan 1885). J. Dickson, Evaluation and Legal Theory (Hart Publishing 2001). S. Douglas-Scott, Constitutional Law of the European Union (Longmans 2002). B. Driesser, Interinstitutional Conventions in EU Law (Cameron May 2007). R. Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously (Harvard Univ. Press rev. ed. 1978). R. Dworkin, Law’s Empire (Harvard Univ. Press 1986). R. Dworkin, Freedom’s Law (Harvard Univ. Press 1996). R. Dworkin, Justice in Robes (Harvard Univ. Press 2006). JH. Ely, Democracy and Distrust (Harvard Univ. Press 1980). N. Emilou, The Principle of Proportionality in European Law: A Comparative Perspective (Kluwer 1996). J. Finnis, Natural Law and Natural Rights (Clarendon Press 1980). N. Foster, Foster on EU Law (Oxford Univ. Press 2006). L. Fuller, The Morality of Law (Yale Univ. Press revd. ed. 1969). K. Goldman, S. Berglund & G. Sjöstedt, Democracy and Foreign Policy, the Case of Sweden (Gower 1986). P. Goodrich, Reading the Law: A Critical Introduction to Legal Method and Techniques (Blackwell 1986). RM. Hare, Moral Thinking (Oxford Univ. Press 1981). C. Harlow, Accountability in the European Union (Oxford Univ. Press 2002). HLA. Hart, The Concept of Law (Clarendon Press 2nd ed. 1994). F. Hayek, The Political Ideal of the Rule of Law (National Bank of Egypt 1955). D. Held, Models of Democracy (Polity 3rd ed. 2006). R. Higgins, Problems and Process (Oxford Univ. Press 1994). F. Horn, Reservations and Interpretative Declarations to Multilateral Treaties (TMC Asser Institute 1988).

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In order for EU law to be effective, individuals need to be able to enforce their rights, so in order to give…

    • 2511 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Friedrich a Hayek

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Hayek, F. A. (1978). The Constitution of Liberty. The University of Chicago Press, 133, 394.…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Struggle of the Identity

    • 12572 Words
    • 51 Pages

    Habermas, J. 1998. The European nation-state: On the past and future of sovereignty and citizenship. Public Culture 10(2):397-416.…

    • 12572 Words
    • 51 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Prior to an analysis of the doctrine of supremacy and the relevant case law and implementation of the doctrine, an introduction into the composition, structure and practices of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) will be followed.…

    • 6873 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Cox, “...custom and western law have often been falsely compared, and that this false comparison largely occurred on the basis of the prevailing legal theories at the time”. However, despite the false comparison between the two they have certain characteristics that differentiate them from each other.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Decisions made in the EU have a great effect on all member states, as such it is important that all the nations involved have a fair and equal share in the decision making process. In an attempt to achieve this end, the method of decision making involves several European institutions. These institutions have representatives from all involved nations, in order that said nations can put their views forward, to, hopefully, influence the decisions, laws and restrictions passed.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To answer the relation between norms, the grund norm and the legitimacy of law, we first need to understand what Kelsen means by the term ‘grund norm’. ‘Grund norm’ as defined by Kelsen is a norm which is presupposed in juristic thinking and is not a norm created by will of a legal organ. When Kelsen talks about the how the grundnorm is presupposed to be valid, he means that the basic norm, the one norm from which all norms are derived, has to be assumed to be valid. Only then all the current norms that are functional in our society can be validated through it. By supposing that the grund norm is valid all the existing norms can also be considered legitimate, as they are also somehow derived from the same basic norm.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eu Law

    • 6312 Words
    • 26 Pages

    The legal doctrine of supremacy of EU law means that EU labour law takes precedence over domestic labour law. The creation of a new legal order of EU law and its supremacy means that EU institutions may create rules affecting employment and industrial relations, even where some Member States oppose such rules and vote against them in those EU institutions, provided that a voting procedure based on a majority rule applies to that specific field. Where adopted, these rules must be enforced in national courts, even where this involves overriding rules produced by domestic law-making institutions. In the course of time, national constitutional courts have accepted the principles of supremacy of the EU law affirmed by the European Court of Justice, but at the same time they have envisaged a limit to it in the fundamental principles of each national constitution.…

    • 6312 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    european law

    • 18527 Words
    • 75 Pages

    Article 110. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9…

    • 18527 Words
    • 75 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Universität Hamburg Fakultät Wirtschafts-­‐ und Sozialwissenschaften M.A. European Studies Right to Same-­‐Sex Marriage Under Article 8 ECHR Melek Günay Hamburg, 2013 Table of Contents 1.Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 3 2.Definition of ‘sexual minorities’ ............................................................................................. 5 3.The right of same-­‐sex marriage and the ECHR .................................................................. 6 4.Case Studies ................................................................................................................................... 8 4.1. Rees v UK ..............................................................................................................................................…

    • 7354 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Hayek F, 1960, The Constitution of Liberty, University of Chicago Press. Levine R, 1999, ‘Law and Finance, and Economic Growth’, Journal of Financial Intermediation, vol.8(1), pp.8-35.…

    • 2117 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the position or views of the European Commission…

    • 22430 Words
    • 130 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jens-Peter Bonde is the author of 60 books on the EU. He has also published a reader-friendly edition of the Lisbon Treaty and the Constitution containing and index of more than 3000 alphabetically listed words. This book can be downloaded for free along with a practical guide and a commentary on the web pages: www.bonde.com and www.euabc.com…

    • 35078 Words
    • 141 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    European Law Directive

    • 2367 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Steiner, J., Woods, L., Twigg-Flesner, C. (2006) EU Law. 9th edn. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.…

    • 2367 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper will analyze one of the most fundamental rules of law in criminal law, the Principle of Legality under the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) found in Article 7 ECHR. “Nullum crimen sine lege, nulla poena sine lege” (“no crime without law, no punishment without law”- NCSL), is often referred to as the Principle of Legality in many legal contexts. It is considered a human right and also at the heart of many national criminal legal systems. It is a crucial element of legal defense to a criminal prosecution in which no crime or punishment can exist without a legal ground. It is a guarantee of human liberty; it ensures the fairness and transparency of the judicial authority and it protects individuals from state abuse and unjust treatment. The principle of legality (“nullum crimen sine lege, nulla poena sine lege”) is found in Article 7 of the ECHR and this paper will also examine the way in which the ECHR has developed the Principle of Legality to encompass three overlapping mechanisms which are: “…only the law can define a crime and prescribe a penalty; the prohibition on retrospective criminal law and the prohibition on the imposition of harsher penalties”.…

    • 2876 Words
    • 83 Pages
    Powerful Essays