When it came to the areas of the issues agenda, public image of candidates and mobilization of voters, it is obvious that there is evidence of interest group activity here. Nonetheless, the economic concerns on the agenda included several different links to other issues as well. In result, interest groups chose to focus on congressional elections in 2008 instead of presidential elections. Interest groups did not play a huge role in campaign funding during presidential elections, but it did play a role in polarization as they were pointing fingers to problems that the other side was having. They also played a role in changing the way elections are administered (Kimball, …show more content…
Interest groups respond to mobilization of the government just as much as the government responds to mobilization from interest groups. The social security program transformed the patterns of political mobilization for the entire elder generation. Increased government activity had a stimulating effect on the interest group community. Growth in the lobbying community and the size of the government could be driven by external changes in the socioeconomic environment. Growth in the interest group community is driven by interest groups themselves as they organize to seek economic advantage. Growth in the interest group community come from within the government system. An interest group's biggest problem is attention/time (Baumgartner,