The argument of Intelligent Design commences from a denial of evolutionism, which turns Intelligent Design into a sophistry. This argument roots the correctness of its idea on the ground that Darwinism is inconceivable and lacks evidence to prove its correctness. However, a theory should not establish its argument from the denial of another theory. "The fundamental problem with intelligent design is that you can't use it to explain the natural world. It's essentially …show more content…
Although the idea of Intelligent Design shows only two choices, there exist more in reality. The dichotomy is presented as that either human beings were created as written in the bible, or evolved by chance. The supporters of the Intelligent Design claim that a gap exists in the understanding of some aspects of Darwinism, and that, therefore, the cause must be supernatural. "Evolution may produce small-scale changes—like the different finch beaks Darwin observed—but for humans to come about requires the intervention of some kind of intelligence," asserts Phillip Johnson, the law professor of University California,