Preview

Inside Job

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
534 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Inside Job
Inside Job is about the causes of the global financial crisis of 2008. It is the effect of a series of causes beginning in the 1970s.These causes most obviously includes - the deregulation that allowed excessive and reckless actions in finance, fraud, conflicts of interest, and sabotage. The result of these actions was a massive decline of financial stability for the global masses and a correspondingly massive incline of financial gain for a minority of heads in high finance and government.
It was shown in the movie that deregulation started in the Reagan Administration which allowed the financial sector to have more freedom and less discipline, which provided more opportunity for profit and risk. A new method of mortgage lending was developed in the financial system that allowed for excessive betting without immediate risk and incentives to sabotage the system for personal profit. The result is an incredible, foreclosures and bankruptcies. That ends to loss of people homes and jobs. And this financial crisis was spreading around the globe including in Iceland, those results to global recession- the economic decline in GDP for two consecutive years.
Dishonesty. In Principle 6: Efficient Capital Market- Positive Image in the market must be insured. However, it was shown in the movie that many of the leaders in the financial sector (receive big amount of corporate bonuses) were brought to congress but they did not accept the responsibility or did not show much concern for their actions. And some of these leaders are now working in the new administration.
Principle 7: The Agency Problem. Top executives of the bankrupt companies walked away with their personal fortunes intact. The executives had hand-picked their boards of directors, which handed out billions in bonuses. The major banks grew in power and doubled anti-reform efforts. Economists advocated for deregulation and helped shape U.S. policy. Many of these economists had conflicts of interest, collecting

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    As a result, the housing market prices were increasing at a faster rate than wages were, resulting in people who had bought a house at a price they could not afford, were now defaulting on their loans. Once they realized what exactly was going on, they could not prevent what was bound to happen, and that was the beginning of the 2008 financial…

    • 1644 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

    • 4123 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Ibrahim 2 Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………………………3 History of the Act………………………………………………………………………...4 Corporate Scandals……………………………………………………………….4 Loss of Investor Confidence……………………………………………………..4 Market Failure and Government Intervention…………………….……………..5 Why Sarbanes-Oxley was Necessary…………………………………………….5 Implementing Sarbanes-Oxley…………………………………………………………...6 Title I-XI……………………………………………………………………....6-11 Impact on Business and Society………………………………………………………...11 Impact on Business……………………………………………………………...11 Impact on Society……………………………………………………………….12 Policy Analysis………………………………………………………………………….12 Did It Work?........................................................................................................12 Strengths and Weaknesses ……………………………………………………..13 Recommendations for Future Policy Makers..…………………………………14 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………...14…

    • 4123 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. Prior to 2002, the U.S. government had very little oversight of the financial practices and corporate governance of public companies and accounting firms. Corporate investors, to include banks, and public company employees took for granted that public companies they invested in or worked for operated ethically in regards to their financial practices. However, this blind faith offered little protection and had devastating consequences for those investors and employees of such powerhouse companies like Enron and WorldCom that went bankrupt without ever publicizing financial hard times. How could this ever happen? According to Horngren, Harrison Jr., and Oliver (2010), both Enron and WorldCom overstated profits, but WorldCom took it a step further by reporting expenses as assets (p. 380).…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Econ

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages

    4. (From about 53:00) How does the real economy (industries/corporations) get affected by a financial sector panic? You can use the example of General Electric as shown in the movie.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2008 there was a significant banking crisis that led to "the great recession," during which millions of people lost their homes, their jobs, and their standard of living. This disaster was caused by reckless behavior on Wall Street.…

    • 222 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Did Wall Street’s financial meltdown really have nothing to do with ethics or governance? Was it instead about bad business decisions and poor government oversight? That is what some business leaders, in a series of 30 interviews I recently conducted, have suggested.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After the 2007 Financial crisis, confidence in free markets was at an all time low: the public was increasingly skeptical about the ability of governments and regulatory institutions to improve market conditions. In an attempt to restore financial stability and improve investor confidence, the Obama administration enacted the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Easily one of the most controversial pieces of legislation passed by the US government, this act was met with extremely varied reactions from the public, from fierce opposition to straight adulation. While the lack of hindsight prevents us from giving a fair assessment of the act’s outcome and efficiency, a few questions can be formulated: what prompted the US government to pass the Dodd Frank act? What kind of changes did it implement and how did this modify the already existing regulatory architecture? What were the main criticisms? To answer these questions, we will first examine the background of the financial crisis, how these changed the regulatory architecture and finally expose the differing views on the Dodd Frank act.…

    • 3937 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ethics Paper--Bailout

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Americans are outraged. Billions of taxpayer dollars were committed last year to rescuing firms such as Citigroup and the American International Group (AIG). Earlier this year, several companies who received Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) assistance were awarding top executives with extravagant bonuses. According to the Wall Street Journal, the U.S. government lent $238 billion in TARP taxpayer funds to almost 700 banks; 44 of these banks have repaid a $71 billion (Johnston, para 6). There remains $167 billion invested in banks. Some critics argue that a “mere” $167 billion is not significant to warrant public indignation against bonuses. However, the issue is not about specific bonus amounts but the principle of business ethics and responsibility.…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    2008 Financial Crisis

    • 2289 Words
    • 10 Pages

    As Secretary of Treasury, Hank Paulson’s lax supervision let too many subprime mortgage bonds get into the market. The investment banks purchased this big short, which was like a time bomb. This was the environment, which Mr. Paulson created to lead up to the financial crisis. In March 2008, the Wall Street fifth investment bank, Bear Sterns, got trouble, as it set foot in subprime mortgage market and the real estate bubble began to burst. Because of the ability to figure out the problem, Bear Sterns was the first one to have the liquidity crisis so that the whole market panic. Fed reserve and DOF decided to let J.P. Morgan purchased Bear Sterns, and Fed Reserve paid more on the loss, which we call the government gave Wall Street the bailout. And then, as the collateral economy, the third and fourth investment banks, Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch, got trouble some days later. As government was facing serious pubic duties for the bailout last time, they decided not to help Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch and gave a hand to the other Wall Street financial companies to merge them to ride out this financial storm. Unfortunately, BOA was more interested in Merrill Lynch. Lehman Brothers had to seek the other company to get help. Barclays tried to merge Lehman Brothers, but British decided to give up this deal at the last critical moment so that Lehman Brothers had no choice to apply for bankruptcy before the stock market opened on Monday.…

    • 2289 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition to that, it also brings in light how the general American population were adversely affected by this, yet the corporations took no liability and were not punished in any way. Instead, immigrants and poor were accused for the disaster. It shows how the greed and deception of the wealthy population broke the economy causing middle and lower class to suffer and how easily they got away with it. This film relates to issues like the adversaries of capitalism and nativism. It resembles the 1920s The Great Depression in many ways; assets bought on credit was actually liabilities to the owners and the crash of the market resulted in millions of people losing their jobs, homes, pensions, and social security. In both the cases, banks conducting risky investments was the cause of the calamity.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Inside Job

    • 1002 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of the reasons for the crisis was because of immoral decisions. After The Great Depression the industry was tightly regulated. Everything was fine for 40 year’s up until the 1980’s when Don Reagan, newly appointed Treasury Secretary and former Meryl Lynch CEO, pushed for deregulation. Without oversight, companies such as Meryl Lynch, and others like Goldman Sachs, started making risky investments. This is one of the reasons why the film made me angry, but also helped me realize what actually happened. We saw these companies start to become huge and gain more power, which in turn was one reason that led to the financial crisis. In my eyes they are responsible for some of the wrongdoings because if we were still regulated, the chances of the financial crisis would have been slimmer.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The sudden financial crisis and the unexpected economic collapse in 2008 came as a shock to many because the speed and severity of the crisis were unpredicted (Bondt, 2010). Its consequences had strong influences on the financial system of many industrialized countries as well as a large number of developing and emerging economies. Huge cost are carried by every parts of society. Much wealth has been destroyed. Millions of jobs have been lost. The crisis has tarnished the belief in free enterprise, the financial system, and in financial theory (Bondt, 2010).…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When the banks first created the swaps, it gave investors the opportunity to invest in bank loans. From there, banks sold derivatives on all portfolios by synthetic investment. Investors were able to invest in credit default swap and make it grow. Credit then became a more available asset which stroke employment. Now all banks wanted credit derivatives; which are privately held negotiable contracts that allow consumers to manage their exposure to credit risk. The main problem with this was they assumed risk could be eliminated, but it couldn’t. In order to regulate derivatives, Congress passed the Glass-Steagall Act in 1933 to establish deposit insurance, and implemented a number of banking regulations. As learning in class, this affected every business in America. There was now a high rating, and high yield. The big return was bankers now bought bundled mortgages. Homebuyers were able to pay double, but lending was too much; making people going bankrupt in home mortgages. Borrowers gave loans greater than the value of that loan, which made the financial bubble burst, creating a recession. With bankers ignoring all the possible risks from the beginning, they feel into a deep crash. Goldman Sachs was the only bank to…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Inside Job

    • 2833 Words
    • 10 Pages

    3. Read the article “The Article “Canadian Housing Bubble? 9 Signs We're In For A Major Correction”, and answer the questions at the end of the article. Here is the link to the article:…

    • 2833 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    who depend on the organisation to fulfil their own goals, and on whom the organisation…

    • 467 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics