1.The Court in the case of Kurukshetra University v. State of Haryana, again stated the principle regarding the exercise of the inherent powers conferred by Sec. 482, Cr. P. C :
“It ought to be realised that inherent powers do not confer an arbitrary jurisdiction on the High Court to act according to whim or caprice. That statutory power has to be exercised sparingly, with circumspection and in the rarest of rare cases.”
2.In the case of Raj Kapoor and ors v. State, “Even so, a general principle pervades this branch of law when a specific provision is made : easy resort to inherent power is not right except under compelling circumstances. Not that there is absence of jurisdiction, but that inherent power should not invade areas set apart for specific power under the same Code.”
3. Smt Nagawwa v. Veeranna.
“It is therefore manifestly clear that proceedings against an accused in the initial stages can be quashed only if on the face of the complaint or the papers accompanying the same, no offence is constituted. In other words, the test is that taking the allegations and the complaint as they are, without adding or subtracting anything, if no offence is made out then the High Court will be justified in quashing the proceedings in exercise of its power under Sec. 482 of the present Code.”
4. Madhavrao Jiwajirao Scindia and ors. V. Sambhajirao Chandrojirao Angre and ors.
“The legal position is to be well settled that when a prosecution at the initial stage is asked to be quashed, the test to be applied by the court is as to whether the uncontroverted allegations as made prima facie establish the offence. It is also for the court to take into consideration any special features which appear in a particular case to consider whether it is expedient and in the Interest of justice to permit a prosecution to continue. This is so on the basis that the court chances of an ultimate conviction are bleak and, therefore, no useful purpose is likely to be served by allowing a criminal prosecution to continue, the court may while taking into onsideration the special facts af a case also quash the proceeding even though it may be at a preliminary stage.”
5.State of Haryanav. Bhajan Lal
An exhaustive list of myriad kins of cases wherein such a power should be exercised:
(1) Where allegations made in the FIR, even if they are taken at their face value and accepted in their entirety do not prima faci constitute any offence or make out a case against the accused.
(2) Where the allegations in the FIR and other materials, if any, accompanying the FIR do not disclose a cognizable offence, justifying an investigation by police officers under Sec. 156(1) of the Code except under an order of a Magistrate within the purview of Sec. 155(2) of the Code.
(3) Where the uncontroverted allegations made in the FIR or complaint and the evidence collected in support of the same do not disclose the commission of any offence and make out a case against the accused.
(4) Where the allegations in the FIR do not constitute a cognizable offence but constitute only a non-cognizable offence, no investigation is permitted by a police officer without an order of a Magistrate as contemplated under Sec. 155(2) of the Code.
(5) Where the allegations made in the FIR or complaint are so absurd and inherently amprobable on the basis of which no prudent person can ever reach ajust conclusion that there is sufficient ground for proceeding against the accused.
(6) Where there ia an express legal bar engrafted in any of the provisions of the Code or the concerned Act (under which a criminal proceeding is instituted) to the institution and continuance of the proceedings and/or where there is specific provision in the Code or the concerned Act, providing efficacious redress for the grievance of the aggrieved party.
(7) Where a criminal proceeding is manifestly attended with mala fide and/or where the proceeding is maliciously instituted with an ulterior motive for wreaking vengeance on the accused and with a view to spite him due to private and personal grudge.
6. Janata Dal v. H.S.Chowdhary,
The criminal courts are clothed with inherent power to make such orders as may be necessary for the ends of justice. Such power though unrestricted and undefined should not be capriciously or arbitrarily exercised, but should be exercised in appropriate cases, ex debito justitiae to do real and substantial justice for the administration of which alone the courts exist. The powers possessed by the High Court under Sec.482 of the Code are very wide and the very plenitude of the power requires great caution in its exercise.
7. Divine Retreat Centre v. State of Kerala
“It is well settled that Sec. 482 does not confer any new power on the High Court but only saves the inherent power which the Court possessed before the enactment of the Code. There are three circumstances under which the inherent jurisdiction may be exercised, namely, (i) to give effect to an order under Code, (ii) to prevent abuse of the process of court, (iii) to otherwise secure the ends ofjustice.”
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
11.45 Section 48(3) of the Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic) attempts to give some guidance on the meaning of…
- 839 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
| An important case in Australian constitutional law. It stands for the proposition that there are limits on the scope of express Commonwealth legislative powers which can be implied from the federal character of the Constitution.This concerned a situation where the Commonwealth passed a law that sought to rely on the banking power vested in s 51(13). The Commonwealth wanted to require that states would only bank with the Commonwealth Bank which was at the time a commonwealth instrumentality. This meant that the States required the consent of the Commonwealth Treasurer before banking with private banks, however, the law was passed so as to say no private bank shall do any business with any state unless they had the written consent of the Federal TreasurerThe court said in a 5:2 majority that the law was not applicable to the states as it singled out state body and burdened it in its governmental capacityLatham CJ with whom Williams J agreed, said that this Commonwealth law was not a law with respect to banking it was a law with respect to state…
- 28193 Words
- 113 Pages
Good Essays -
1.1 This is the appellant’s skeleton argument for his appeal. The arguments to quash the conviction under s. 18 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 (OAPA) are based on the misdirection’s made by the judge during the trial. There are three main misdirection’s for the appeal, which can render the conviction unsafe, include: Consent, causation and intention. The appellant Billy was convicted under s.18 OAPA of the offences against the person act for causing grievous bodily harm to the victim Anita.…
- 1766 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
This is the appellant’s skeleton argument for the case of his appeal. The arguments to quash the conviction under s. 18 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 (OAPA) are based on the misdirection’s…
- 1663 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
2. [EXAM TYPE QUESTION]: ‘State liability is the defining moment in the ECJ’s pursuit for effective judicial protection.’ Critically evaluate this statement.…
- 2511 Words
- 11 Pages
Good Essays -
“ In Common Law jurisdictions when a judge is called on to deal with a new set of circumstances he is at liberty to decide according to his own view of justice and expediency; however in Code jurisdictions a judge is bound to deal in accordance with the principles already established, which he can neither disregard nor…
- 788 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The constitution is supreme and must be respected by all that stated in clause 5. Judicial body upholds the supremacy of constitution which stated in the constitution implied the division of power has been upheld. For example, Mabo case no.1 1988 state that Coast Island Declatory Act 1985 has a conflict with Racial Discrimination Act 1975 to protecting their land’s right. By using section 109, the division of power upholds by…
- 956 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Lord Taylor C.J rejected the appellant’s submission that the Duffy2 Direction as found in Delvin J’s judgment used by the Judge at first instance was wrong and that direction was based on a failure to understand the impact of section 3 of the Homicide Act3 as supported by the House of Lords in DPP v Camplin4. He found that although in DPP v Camplin5, Lord Diplock in his judgment referred to that section 6as “abolishing all previous rules of law as to what can. amount to provocation”7, he did not provide a new definition. Lord Taylor Further looked into a case R v Thornton8 where a similar submission to that of the defendant was considered but rejected by the court.…
- 1299 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
”The uncertainties surrounding the scope and exercise of the royal prerogative give rise to serious constitutional questions concerning the rule of law in a democratic society.”…
- 1070 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
“It’s a general problem not specific to the law of the United Kingdom a criminal justice system characterized by an emphasis on crime control rather than due process will inevitably produce miscarriage of justice.”…
- 1758 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The court hierarchy plays a big part in deciding which decisions have more weight. Though the rules of precedent are applied rigidly and don’t appear to allow scope for creativity, there are ways in which the doctrine of precedent can be avoided ‘thus allowing…
- 860 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The use of judicial precedent is significant when dealing with a majority of court cases as it is based on the rule of stare decisis, meaning ‘let the decision stand’. This shows that what is decided by a court in the past should not be disregarded when looking into similar cases in lower courts. Although when any decision is made it is vital that Ratio decidendi is applied, this means that any points…
- 1417 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Concerning Blackstone’s declaratory theory, it may be accurate in describing the role of judges wherever the existing law is clear and the facts of the adjudicating case fall squarely within the existing precedents. Nevertheless, a judge may encounter novel situations in which several precedents compete with each other. In this case, it is difficult to say that the judge can declare what is the law. He has to make a decision…
- 1810 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
State of U.P. vs. Sanjay Kumar is also such a judgment which throws light on the judicial discourse which is relevant for understanding the working of law and sentencing decisions. The brief fact of the case is as follows:…
- 1393 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
“Non-compliance of the orders passed by this Court shakes the very foundation of our judicial system and undermines the rule of law, which we are bound to honour and protect…..”…
- 2328 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays