In the essay “Is Google Making Us Stupid? What the Internet is Doing to Our Brains,” the author Nicholas Carr argues that the Internet has detrimental effects by altering the way we comprehend and the way our brain functions. Carr’s mind is changing because he is not thinking the way he used to think. He used to love reading books and articles, but now he can barely get through two or three pages because his “concentration often starts to drift after two or three pages” (Carr 138). Reading a printed media has become a struggle since Carr is losing the ability to focus on deep thinking. He just skims through the text without actually thoroughly reading it. In reality, we have to struggle to stay focused in a long piece of writing because we use the web so much. Carr believes that deep reading is indistinguishable from deep thinking. However, the Internet does all the thinking for us with a great database of information that can answer all of our questions and many sources online with short passages of text. Everything that the Internet does has become a “shortcut,” so the printed media has to reach those expectations now. Our brain relies on the Internet so much that it starts draining out our ability to think independently. Therefore, according to Carr, the Internet has made him feel “an uncomfortable sense that someone, or something, has been tinkering with [his] brain…” (Carr 138). Although the Internet can affect our brains, it has made a huge impact on our daily lives by providing easy and responsive communication among peers and a secure access to information.…
As the internet offers us the benefits of quick and easy knowledge, it is affecting the brain’s capacity to read longer articles and books. Carr starts Is Google Making Us Stupid with the closing scene from Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey when Dave taking apart the memory circuits that control HAL, the artificial brain of the ship. Carr feels the time he spends online is rewiring his brain. He is no longer able to concentrate long enough to read more than a few paragraphs. Even though the internet is useful, it seems to be changing the way our brain takes in information. He feels as though this brain wants to take information in the same way the internet disperses it: in rapid streams. Carr compares himself to a guy on a jet ski instead of a deep-sea diver. He is no longer able to focus and contemplate.…
Information in this day and age is power. Because if you look at information all it is a collection of knowledge stored within a database for people to look at. This article goes over information and how it is used in my company, how we use our information and the safeguards we use from the employee as an individual and as a company to protect our clients…
Firstly, Carr argues that the internet has greatly affected by readers the loss of concentration. As the author states, “The deep reading that used to come naturally has become a struggle” (Carr). Carr blames the internet for humans not being able to read and think as deeply as before. Secondly, Carr discusses that technologies impact a problem in today's society. As Carr states “Television programs add text crawls and pop-up ads, magazines and newspapers shorten their articles, introduces capsule summaries, and crowd their pages with easy- to-browse-snippets.” The author argues that humans rely on network technology because it is changing our brain structure. However, he also explain that people have depended on the internet that everything that went to a book has become easier to look up on the internet. Lastly, Carr believe that people are not using critical thinking as to interpret the text and interact with information “mere decoders of information” (qtd. in Carr). Maryanne Wolf a psychologist at Tufts University believe that people are not have the capacity of deep reading. Ultimately, Carr discourage the internet and direct the reading to be less…
as to whether organizations are likely to find better solutions to information overload through changes to their technical systems or their social systems. With the research I conducted and along with my experiences in the workplace, I have concluded that information overload can be improved through changes to technical and social systems. I will also present evidence that will go against my position on information overload. I am also tasked to rebut the position of the counterargument, showing how inadequate the counterargument is, against my original position.…
In Nicholas Carr’s book The Shallows, he talks about many things, including the titular topic of What the Internet is Doing to Our Brains. He relates the story of the development of the written word, and the book, and the computer, and then the Internet, telling how the advent of each sparked a revolution in our culture, and, in the case of the internet, in the way we think, going on to say that “Once I was a scuba diver in the sea of words. Now I zip along the surface like a guy on a jet ski.” (Carr, 7) due to his interactions with the internet. He provides a story that could give an answer to the question we’ve been asking. How is the exponential increase of information that we process in all forms of media affecting the way we live?…
In his article, Carr talks about the changes in his attention span since he began using the internet more. Carr describes this change by saying, “Once I was a scuba diver in the sea of words. Now I zip along the surface like a guy on a jet ski.” Carr uses many examples to support his argument which will be discussed in this paper.…
Nicholas Carr’s Atlantic Online article “Is Google Making Us Stupid,” discusses how the use of the computer affects our thought process. Carr starts out talking about his own experience as a writer and how he felt like “something had been tinkering with his brain, remapping his neural circuitry and reprogramming his memory”. Since starting to use the Internet his research techniques have changed. Carr said before he would immerse himself in books, lengthy articles and long stretches of prose allowing his “mind to get caught up in the narrative or the arguments”(July/August 2008, Atlantic Monthly). Today Carr has found that “his concentration drifts away from the text after several pages and he struggles to get back into the text”. His premise is that since he has spent the past ten years working online, searching and surfing and writing content for databases” his brain circuitry has changed. He indicates that some of his fellow writers have experienced the same kinds of changes in their reading books and maintaining concentration. Some of them said they do not read books as easily because their concentration and focus has become shorter.…
The draw back to the information age is the accuracy and usefulness of the information that…
It is far easier to accept data on the internet superficially than it is to be skeptical of information. Carr asserts that this ideology that information collection should be based on efficiency rather than skepticism may be detrimental in the future as artificial intelligence (AI) software develops. The brain will be seen by the public as a computer, much like that of an AI, that should transmit information hastily, rather than seen as a being that should ponder and question sources. He inquires on the safety of such an ideology and encourages readers to analyze that which they read and research. People are capable of deep thought and analysis, so accepting information superficially is dangerous.…
We learn to take in information the way the Internet distributes it, “in a swiftly moving stream of particles.” At best we skim the surface, rather than go deep into information, and our fragmented journey results in lack of concentration and comprehension.…
We are in what is known at the Information Era. The Information Era is the ability to exchange information in a manner that is effective and efficient. Information is important to the way we do things. It gives instructions on what to do and how to do it. There are many different genres of communications. They all provide different information in different situations…
information not allowing our brain to work hard enough. Carr claims, "the internet has altered his…
Carr states, “My mind now expects to take in information the way the Net distributes it: in a swiftly moving stream of particles” (Carr, 2008). The ability of the human brain to absorb information as quickly as a computer can generate it is highly improbable. This in it of itself proves in fact, that the Internet is making us stupid. The human brain cannot compete with a computer processor. In doing so, the consumer’s brain is only absorbing less amounts of information as it tries to keep up with the speed of the World Wide Web. Carr eloquently identifies with both the young and the old and highlights different aspects of factual information in creative examples to allow the reader to imagine his examples accurately. Carr leads the reader down his intended path, example after example, word by word while stressing that he himself has been a victim of the mental shortcomings. The Internet is a seemingly boundless information highway – unfortunately running at a speed that the human brain cannot contend with. In an attempt to keep up with the ever changing way knowledge is presented to consumers, once reliant upon word of mouth news – which evolved into hand pressed newspaper articles to fire side chats on the radio, the general…
Modern technology has its merits. As Bauerlein points out in his article “the Dumbest Generation”, the digital revolution has provided us with “miraculous quick and effortless contact with information.” Indeed, we are the generation surrounded by technology, and the immediate access to countless of information has definitely aided us in many aspects of the modern society. Researching information has become…