Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Informal Logic

Powerful Essays
2064 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Informal Logic
Week 5 Final Paper: “Should homosexuals be able to marry?”
PHI 103: Informal Logic
Instructor:
January, 28, 2013

“Should homosexuals be able to marry?” In the United States marriage laws are not supposed to discriminate, yet many people believe that marriages are clear religious and official vows, between a man and woman, which include the ultimate expression of love. The traditional belief does not claim a specific sexual orientation for homosexuals in this country who are Americans, and have the right to marry. This essay identifies specifically to the question; “Should homosexuals be able to marry.” Some people say “yes” and some say “no. Therefore, an evaluation of the marriage laws for the United State that allows homosexuals marriages, and the fact that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Constitution claim that homosexuals are equal, and have the same rights and limits as heterosexuals. This argument considers the rights of every person regardless of his or her sexual preference. Shell, (2004), writes “the issue of gay marriage can be reduced to the question of whether the desired union between homosexuals is more like a marriage between heterosexuals” (p. 1). Homosexual’s marriages seek the essence of marriage, in general as described above in a basic sense. A beginning step to define an approach to marriage is to discover methods that help individuals understand marriage. The similarity would be a human situation that simultaneously has a reasonable impartiality concerning respect to present-day conflicts such as homosexual’s marriages. Many people respect the concept of marriage, and acknowledge secure relationships; whether a man and a woman or same sex partners. The pros and cons are unbiased views that demonstrate the laws and civil rights for everyone. For example, disallowing marriage for gay couples or rejecting marriages for gay couples are mostly a religious belief. An example, homosexuality is an offense to GOD. United States, (2003), “The First Amendment bluntly states that a person's religious belief or lack thereof has to be look after” (p. 1). Marriage by the state is an action, and the government cannot create laws for reasons that conflict with religious beliefs. Religions consider homosexuality a sin; the belief is that it would deteriorate the meaning and value relating to the foundation of marriage; it would deteriorate the conventional family significance vital to the social order. For example, a slant in the legitimacy of marriage could create situations, such as marrying several wives or marrying an animal. This practice would confuse children in areas of gender roles and beliefs in society. For example, the belief may be, “only man and woman may pro-create,” therefore, the belief is that a homosexual lifestyle is something “not” supported. A counter-thesis for example, “homosexual should not be able to marry, and the counter-argument offers strong objections, which includes discrimination laws, and equal rights for homosexual people. Responses to rebut the counter-argument is based on evidence drawn upon, and shows that it would not be “just” to deprive homosexuals’ of their civil rights, Article One, Six of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The Universal Declaration of Human Summary adopted by the United Nations on December 10th, 1048 “consist of 30 articles setting forth the civil and political and economic, social and cultural rights to which all persons are entitled, with discrimination. Article 1, all human beings are born free and equal; article 6, everyone has the right to be recognized everywhere as a person before the law” (p. 1). The states that recognize and allow same-sex-marriages are Connecticut, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Vermont, Washington, and the District of Columbia. Same-sex marriage in Washington will go into affect December 6, 2012, in Maryland January 2013. Maine’s law for allowing same-sex marriage will go into effect, January 2013, see geographic map below. (NCSL, 2012) The colors in the map demonstrate the states that have granted gay marriages; this way gays and lesbians may enjoy his or her fundamental rights. The counter-thesis and counter-argument is that most states have implemented exclusions of same-sex marriage. These aforementioned states did this by adopting “defense of marriage” verbal communication (words) that characterizes marriage in their state’s Constitution or the state’s laws in a such a way that describes the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) —“meaning the word 'marriage'. In short “only authorized unions involving a man and a woman as husband and wife,” use this language. 29 states use this type of verbal communication (words) in their state’s constitutions, and 26 of these states also have constitutional provisions adopting the use of this language. The other states forbid same sex marriages or marriages involving people of the same sex or gender. Additionally, eight states have constitutional verbal communication (words) that adopts restrictive languages. Note: According to the NCSL, (2112), “This count does not include California; the federal courts have nullified a 2008 proposal changing additions to limit definitions of verbal communications (words) to unions concerning a man and a woman. The argument still continues in the United States “Should homosexuals be able to marry. State legislatures have continuously engaged in open discussions regarding the definition of marriage and alternatives of authorized acknowledgment of defining the word “marriage,” and if limited relationships involving a man and a woman or same-sex couples should also be entitled to “marry.” Decision makers have not been able to define the “word,” “marriage.” The debate has gone both ways, either enacting “defense of marriage” laws and constitutional prerequisites or considering different paths, such as the implementation of laws permitting same sex marriages. The opposition has some validity. According to David, and Wilson, (2011), “marriage is not a political or social invention, but a social reinforcement of biological reality: male, female, and offspring. The father of modern anthropology, Claude Lévi-Strauss, called marriage 'a social institution with a biological foundation'. All our social ceremonies and laws exist to buttress nature - helping bind a man to his mate for the sake of social stability and for the sake of the child they might create” (p. 1). Meaning, society’s opinion has stunt the growth of what is and what should be, and does not consider the civil right of all, according to the laws of the Constitution. According to David, and Wilson, (2011), “The heart of opposition to same-sex marriage is about same-sex parenting; same-sex parenting may mean that a child must miss out on either a mother or a father. Marriage is a compound right, under Article One Six of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights to not only have the right to an exclusive relationship, but the right to form a family. Therefore same-sex marriage carries the right to form a family by artificial reproduction- however, the children created within same-sex marriages would have no possibility of ever knowing both mother and father” (p. 2). If marriage did not have a meaningful significance such as the creation of children, the needs for secure care giving for overextended periods would not have urgency for a marriage contract or for adults entering a sexual relationship. Responding to counter-thesis, marriage is more than a legal status it affects numerous items with respect to society such as tax filing types, combined ownership of property, insurance benefits, and society laws, and it affects critical medical decisions. There are nine states, including the District of Columbia currently allowing same-sex marriages. States’ such as Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Iowa are with the highest courts ruled that their state’s Constitution requisite that same-sex couples be given the same marriage rights as heterosexual couples. The legislative bodies in Vermont, New Hampshire, the District of Columbia, and New York have passed legislative changes that permit same-sex marriages, and these are presently performed in these states. The Washington and Maryland legislatures, in 2012, approved laws that allowed same-sex marriage. In both states, challengers collected signatures and placed the issue on the November ballot; voters supported the approved laws in both states; the support also extended to the State of Maine. Ironically, this was the first time that the state’s voters were asked their opinion about legalizing same-sex marriage. According to NCSL, 2012, “California appeals court’s decision means that same-sex marriages will be allowed in California unless a higher court reverses that decision; the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has refused to rehear the case and the next step is the U.S. Supreme Court” (p. 2). Established laws to-date for heterosexuals does not apply in the same way to homosexuals. Each should be able to marry in any state, according to the Constitution of the United States that stands for a model of cooperative statesmanship and the art of comprise. If cooperation and comprise is practiced same or opposite sexes should be able to marry. Each should be able to attain benefits associated with above-board marriages, and heterosexuals, and homosexuals should be treated equally. Marriage by a state is an action, and the government cannot create laws for reasons that conflict with religious beliefs. Religions consider homosexuality a sin; the belief is that it would deteriorate the meaning and value relating to the foundation of marriage; it would deteriorate the conventional family significance vital to the social order. A slant in the legitimacy of marriage could create situations, such as marrying several wives or marrying an animal. This practice would confuse children in areas of gender roles and beliefs in society. For example, the belief may be, “only man and woman may pro-create,” therefore; the belief is that a homosexual lifestyle is “not” supported. The strongest support for this essay is interpretation and is a form of discrimination. “Should homosexuals be able to marry?” Festy, (2006), write “legal modernization has to be viewed in a broad context that encompasses the growing diversity in partnership behavior, the desire to increase access to the statutory safeguards and welfare provisions hitherto restricted to married (heterosexual) partners, and the demands of couples for non-discrimination on the grounds of their sexual orientation” (p. 2). A full faith and credit phrase in the Constitution states, “if one state enacts a law, additional states should identify it. As of April 2011, the five U.S. states that allow same-sex marriage are Iowa, New Hampshire, Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Vermont. Beach (2011), write “various other states allow partnerships, civil unions or offer some form of protection to same-sex couples. Therefore, “no” legal limitations are for homosexuals that do not relate to heterosexuals. Neither can marry their sibling, both are forbidden from marrying someone already married, each cannot marry a minor, and each has the freedom to marry someone of the same sex. This essay explains traditional beliefs of society and specifics sexual orientations as it relates to homosexuals civil rights in this country acquiring the right to marry. The essay provides counter-thesis and counter-arguments specifically to the question; “Should homosexuals be able to marry.” Some people say “yes” and some say “no. The arguments and counter-arguments have been demonstrated with explanations and examples for marriage laws in the United States that allows homosexuals marriages, and the fact that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Constitution claim that homosexuals are equal, and have the same rights and limits as heterosexuals.

Reference
Beach, J., (2011, States Where Gay Marriages are Legal retrieved from http://www.ehow.com/info_81881043_states-gay-marriages.html#ixzz2ErropPIc
David, v. G., & Wilson, T. (2011), the gay marriage debate. Review - Institute of Public Affairs, 3(3), 36-37. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1020406430? Accounted=32521
Festy, P., (2006) Legal recognition of same-sex couples in Europe. Population, 61(4), 417-453. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/196881372?accountid=32521
Messerli, J., (2012), Should Same-Sex Marriages be legalized? http://www.balanceddpolitics.org/same_sex_marriages.htm
NCSL, 2012, retrieved image from http://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/human-services/same- Sex-marriage-overview.aspx
Susan, M. S. (2004), the liberal case against gay marriage. Public Interest, (156), 3-16 Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/222059857?accountid=32521
United States: The meaning of marriage; homosexual unions, (2003, Aug 09), The Economist, 368, 37-37: Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/224026706?accountid=32521
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Summary), (2013), retrieved from www.wscpedia.org

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    David Blankenhorn is a world authority on the institution of marriage. One of the biggest debates concerning marriage today is whether we should expand the concept to include same-sex marriage. Blankenhorn thinks not, and in his book titled, The Future of Marriage, sets out to make the case against homosexual marriage. But he does so, pre-eminently, by making the case for the institution of heterosexual marriage. Blankenhorn first seeks to get a handle on what marriage is, and then he shows how it has been experienced over the centuries. The first half of the book is about what marriage is, and how it has developed. The second half deals with the challenge of same-sex marriage. Although homosexual couples should have the right to love one another without experiencing prejudice, their unions should not be labeled as a “marriage”, for this would cause our society to rethink the values of marriage and how it pertains to children.…

    • 2069 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    WGU GLT1

    • 878 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When asked if one believes in equal rights for all citizens, the typical, rote response is a resounding “Yes”. If the question becomes more specific as to include the right for homosexuals to marry, a hesitation follows. The concept of gay marriage is far deeper a societal problem for most because its roots lie in prejudicial perspectives that have permeated us for years. Before the fight for the right to marry, the gay community has long endured simply the right to exist openly without feeling pariah-like.…

    • 878 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most controversial topics of today’s matter is whether gay marriage should be legalized or not. There are numerous reactions when this subject comes to discussion and can sometimes lead to a heated debate. Some individuals believe that homosexuality is unethical while people who agree with gay marriage believe to put in consideration that the sexual preference of another human being is necessary. With every conflict comes pros and cons and this topic is like pulling a tight-rope if ever brought up in a debate because you never know who will pull the rope tighter. Gay marriage has a vast influence on the society today, relevant to it becoming legalized, it is bound to impact future generations, and will affect the establishment of marriage later in life.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gay Marriage has quickly become a significant topic in today’s society. Leading to many different discussions of homosexuals having the rights to marry. Most people are opposed to gay marriage, stating it will interfere with the Bible’s concept of marriage which is one man and one woman (Genesis 2.3). Also stating how it can interfere with the reproduction of mankind. Everyone in our society in entitled to happiness and should be entitled to equal rights.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gay marriage is a heated issue that pulls in various responses from those supporting and those restricting the tight clamp. The problem concerning whether lesbian and gay weddings draws in warmed open deliberation. In the societal setting, certain people consider that homosexuality is sinful while gay promoters consider that putting into thought the sexual inclinations of each individual is fundamental. Gay promoters believe that lesbians and gay people must have the same social equality, including wedding anyone, one wishes. This section presents two sides of opinions concerning pros and cons of gay matrimony.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A very big topic that lingers on the hearts and minds of so many Americans today, on the desks of so many politicians and in so many courtrooms around the country today is gay marriage. There are two very identifiable sides to this debate and both sides have very defendable points of view, which are constantly being publically expressed by radicals and extremist from both sides of the spectrum. My point of views differ from those who believe that gay marriage should remain illegal however, I am going to look at both sides of this huge debate and argue the point that homosexuals should be granted the right to marry whomever they please because it is not only unconstitutional, but unjust and logically improper to forfeit to this group of people the same, equal rights to marriage as heterosexuals simply because of their sexual orientation.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gay Marriage

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gay marriage discussions are highly present in our society. Student writer, A.J. Chavez argues that not only should marriage occur between a man and a woman, but also the same sex. He articulates his thoughts on how if the same sex feels the same way a straight couple feels, and then it shouldn’t be a problem. However, our society uses religious views and traditional morals to restrain gay marriage. Apparently, we as a nation are indecisive on this issue today. The student writer states valid arguments and backs it up completely. In Chavez’s essay, he argues his point of view on gay civil unions.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Same-Sex Marriage Equality

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There are over 105 million households in the United States today and out of those households, there are over 1.2 million gay people living with same-sex partners (“Census on Gays in America”). This makes the proposed legalization of same-sex marriage one of the most significant issues in contemporary America. It is presently one of the most discussed reforms in law reviews and the American court systems. If legalized, it could be one of the most revolutionary policy decisions in the history of America, along with women’s rights, interracial marriage, and slavery. There are many people who are opposed and feel it is morally and ethically wrong and others who feel that same-sex marriages are acceptable. Prior to writing about this topic, I had no strong feelings toward or against the issue on same-sex marriages. After researching and finding out more information on the topic, I became in favor of legalizing same-sex marriages.…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Argumentative Essay

    • 1599 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As of November 20, 2014, same –sex marriage has been legalized in 35 out of 50 U.S. states. Same-sex marriage is a hot topic which the Supreme Court is considering to legalize. Many people say a homosexual person is a sinner. The question is do homosexual people choose his or her gender? They were born that way and they are happy with their lives. Homosexual people are nothing unlike heterosexual people. They are living, they are working, and they contribute to society. Proponents state that same-sex couples should have access to the same marriage benefits and public acknowledgment enjoyed by heterosexual couples and that prohibiting gay marriage is unconstitutional discrimination. On the other side, opponents argue that altering the traditional definition of marriage as between a man and a woman will further weaken a threatened institution and that legalizing gay marriage is a slippery downhill way that may lead to polygamous and interspecies marriages (gaymarriage.procon.org). All people in the world should understand the meaning of marriage, whether a same-sex marriage or a traditional marriage. For that reason, same-sex marriage should be considered as a legal marriage because it is an equal right for humankind and beneficial for society as well as preventing youth suicide.…

    • 1599 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are many controversies surrounding today's world, such as abortion, animal testing, and social reform issues. It seems that no one can come to a common agreement on the legitimacy of these topics. Personal characteristics, such as upbringing, culture, religion and ethnicity, all play a role in determining one's feelings on a given controversial issue. However, one of the most protested and discussed issues in current political debate is same-sex marriage. There is no right or wrong answer to this question, only hard pressed arguments expressing speculation regarding supposed outcomes, benefits and possible tribulations that would come along with the endorsement of gay marriage. Such ideas are shown in pieces of writing by Manuel A. Lopez, in "The Case Against Gay Marriage" and by Scott Bidstrup in " Gay Marriage: The Arguments and Motives." These issues both discuss and contend common controversy surrounding the gay marriage debate. After reading and analyzing each essay, it is observed that Manuel A. Lopez' style of writing and literary tone give him the upper hand in establishing a more effective piece.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Same Sex Marriage

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages

    "Marriage is a coming together for better or for worse, hopefully enduring, and intimate to the degree of being sacred. It is an association that promotes a way of life, not causes; a harmony in living, not political faiths; a bilateral loyalty, not commercial or social projects.” (U.S. Supreme Court). Marriage has been defined as a religious & legal commitment between a man and woman, as well as an expression of love. Homosexuals have not been allowed to partake in these commitments and the rising support for same sex marriage is becoming more of an issue for the government and voters. There are those that are against same sex marriage, who believe that marriage should be strictly between a man and a woman (Barber), and then there are those who believe that it is up to the individual on whom they want to marry (Quindlen). Despite the complexities surrounding the issue of gay marriage and the expansive argument on either side authors Anna Quindlen and La Shawn Barber present extremely simplistic yet opposing views on same sex marriage.…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gay marriages have been one of the hottest and controversial topics in our society. There are still problems concerning this issue of homosexuality and gay marriages. Same sex marriages are legal in Hawaii, but in all other states couples must be of the opposite sex to form a marriage. Hawaii’s decision to legalize same sex marriages is considered a milestone victory for gays and may cause a ripple affect for similar action in other states. Those who support gay marriages justify their position by the concept of love. These supporters of gay marriages feel as though gay people are being deprived of their right to love. Many people believe that gay people deserve the right to love and to take that love and form a marriage. These people believe that gays want to feel justified, meaning that as a couple they should be able to define their own marriage for themselves and make their own set of rules. Supports of same-sex marriages feel as though homosexuals are being deprived of their God given right to get married. They believe that arguments against same sex marriages are unconstitutional, and they simply do not justify a ban on same sex marriages. It is not the idea of two people of the same sex getting married that frightens people so much, but it is the thought of change and the fact that the federal government will redefine marriage to allow same sex unions. When people picture the results of same sex marriages, they see images of unstable homes. Everyone would probably agree that homosexuality has changed our society, and legalizing same sex marriages is not likely to be an exception. It would be an injustice to discriminate against a person if he or she were…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gay Marriage Exploratory

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The proposed legalization of same-sex marriage is one of the most significant issues in contemporary American family law. As a heavily campaigned development currently discussed in law assessment; these extremely confrontational and debatable political questions are facing present day American courts. If same-sex marriage is legalized, its affect on the parents, children, same sex couples, families, and the social and political world will be astronomical. The arguments surrounding the issue though confrontational nonetheless are easily seen from a wide array of perspectives. One of the perspectives states that marriage is a promise to a spouse to stay loyal and faithful in all aspects of the words. The act of marriage includes financial, legal and social responsibilities for each partner. No matter the composition of the couple, the rules of marriage are the same from most every angle. In the act of marriage two adults bond and lawfully and often, religiously, make a promise to take on its responsibilities. The greatest question, however, is to the sole reason as to why homosexual marriages should be declared illegal or nonexistent.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    gay marriage outline

    • 2022 Words
    • 8 Pages

    a. Marriage is a basic human right for every individual. Same sex marriage should be legalized.…

    • 2022 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    same sex marriage

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Should Gay Marriage be Legalized? Gay marriage has been a critical topic in many countries since 1924. Around the year 2000, countries such as America and the UK started approving gay marriages, although not everyone agreed with this decision. Still in 2013, homosexuals are fighting for their right to get married to someone of their same sex. People against gay marriage feel that if it was to be legalized, the importance of marriage would fade away and some people would refer to marriage in a different way. According to an article from the Human Rights Campaign, there is nothing wrong with allowing homosexuals to have the same rights as those who are heterosexual. Every individual person should have equal rights, regardless of sexuality. Gay marriage should be legalized in all states and countries, as it has been held off for too long.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics