Moral Foundations 140
February 28, 2014
“Inevitable vs. Amendable”
The film “Inequality for All” tries to explain; what is the current status of the distribution of wealth and that of income equality? Why this is happening and if this is a problem. Yes, as stated in the film, social inequality is inevitable. But, there is without a doubt a problem with United States distribution of wealth. One of the facts that really opened my eyes was the fact that the 400 richest Americans, together hold more wealth than the poorest 150 million Americans have together. This said, it is scary to think about how obscure was the knowledge we had on the one percent with given how much economic influence they have.
The minimum wages vs. growth of productivity graph is one that I found very interesting. Why is “just” in today’s society to be part a more productive workforce that gets paid less than the workforce we had a few decades ago? The line graph for productivity growth is rising every year, meaning that more work is being done. On the other hand, the minimum wages growth rates were rising but after a while they seem to have plateau and they have been like this for about 30 years. Advances in globalization and technology are also inevitable because it is simple economics that a product shall be produced in the cheapest way possible. Yes, technology does create jobs but as we see in the film companies like Amazon are also opting to operate with high tech machinery instead of the traditional assembly line. Women going to work, general workforce working for longer hours and borrowing money from the financial sectors are coping mechanisms that the middle class used to keep up with their good lifestyles, but in my opinion these are more like defense mechanisms in order to survive in the concrete jungle with the same wages they had 30 years ago.
One other comparison that I liked was how the widening inequality leads to a deficiency cycle and when the wealth is equally distributed economic stability is transfused from sector to sector creating a domino effect leading to a virtuous cycle.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
After watching the video, "Wealth Inequality in America", published by Politizane, I was surprised when finding out that only the top one percent of America has 40 percent of all the nation's wealth. It was also surprising to discover that the top one percent owns half the country's stocks, bonds, and mutual bonds, while the bottom 50 percent of Americans own only half a percent of these investments. One of the notions I had that was challenged by the video was the amount of money the wealthy actually have compared to the rest of the classes. I was aware that wealth mostly distributed to the wealthy class, but I never imagined that the division between the wealthy class and the rest of the classes would be so huge. Its incredible that the CEO's…
- 227 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Modern economics have widened the gap between rich and poor in society. This gap can be illustrated by the fact that the three wealthiest individuals in the world have assets that exceed those of the poorest ten percent of the world’s population.…
- 1388 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
No one can argue that America is the country of the human rights and freedom and many people around the world dream to live in this great place. However, big problem is going to reshape the American society if nobody tried to solve it. The dilemma is simply that the rich got richer and the poor got poorer as a result of inequality of money distribution among rich and poor people.America had created a marvelous economic machine, but evidently it worked only for that at the top. Both Joseph E. Stieglitz and Timothy Noahintroduce a very critical issue which affects the American society in these days, is the widening gap between the rich and poor people. Stieglitz claims that the American economic system is failing for most of Americans and the inequality is increasing to the extent that one day will be unaffordable. The rising gap is created by the one top percent who are taking advantage of making a huge wealth. They are driven by their greed to accumulate big fortune upon poor’s shoulders. Stieglitz came up with some evidence to support his claim. One of these is the new statistics fromCensus Bureau’s statistics that shows that the one top percent gain 20 % of the total American income. Therefore, Noah says that this inequality income creates and retains the capitalism system which forms a serious threat upon middle and lower class (Noah The Great par 3).…
- 330 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In “Income Inequality: Too Big to Ignore”, Frank shows the influences in Americans’ lives in different classes by the disparity between the rich and the poor. He arouses people’s consciousness for the “rising inequality” which is being polarized and has been causing immense damages to Americans, no matter which class they are. It is true that the “Income Inequality” in America is very obvious and affecting more and more people. Indeed, “we should just agree that it’s a bad thing”, however, are we able to do something concrete to deal with it effectively? Is the” rising inequality really required in the name of fairness”? I stand neutral towards Frank’s opinion.…
- 379 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
• Weicher, John C. The Distribution of Wealth: Increasing Inequality?. Washington, DC: AEI Press, 1996.…
- 919 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Individually, the U.S. has the one percent of Upper Class, the thirty percent of the Upper Middle Class, the thirty two percent of the Middle Class, the seventeen percent of the Lower Middle Class, and lastly, the overwhelming twenty percent of the poor. Now lets specifically look at that top one percent and the bottom twenty percent. How is it that one percent of America controls fifty percent of the national currency, and twenty percent controls a small fraction of it? A major reason for this is due to the rich influencing a specific idea or creating legislation for wealthy politicians in return for a large payoff. If a person were to look at Paine’s quote, “There, the poor are not oppressed, the rich are not privileged,” he/she would be in great…
- 467 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The U.S. is home to some of the world's wealthiest families and corporations. It is a land of opportunity for many; however, among developed nations America has the highest rates of income inequality. Income inequality has been rapidly rising in America since the late 1970s. Income inequality has a host of social-economic consequences, and the topic has become a cornerstone issue for the socialist senator from Vermont, Bernie Sanders. His campaign is heavily focused on the economy, but more than that, his economic policies are heavily focused on reversing the upward trend in income and wealth inequality.…
- 1160 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
With nearly 99% of America’s wealth going to the top 1% (or estimated to be by 2016), how can there be even the slightest argument for a peaceful nation where all are intermingled in a way that creates equality? The proven statistic of America’s wealth distribution is not equal to any other developed country of the same stature. There’s even more proof and evidence for the “So clear it shouldn’t have to be proven“ wealth inequality in America. Using a scale called the Gini coefficient to calculate wealth inequality the results were (not exactly) surprising, “[The Gini coefficient is] a measure of inequality in which 0 is perfect equality and 100 perfect inequality. It found that the U.S. had the greatest wealth inequality, with a score of 80.56” (Sherman). A nation with a significant divide such as wealth inequality - and thus the lack of the wealth going to the majority- cannot possibly be perfect, just, or…
- 778 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
On the other hand, some say that income inequality is inevitable and has as many pros as it does cons. Arguments such as how inequality is necessary to encourage entrepreneurs and contractors to take risks and set up new businesses, because without the prospect of substantial rewards, there would be little incentive to take risks and invest in new business opportunities. More arguments on…
- 2351 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The income inequality gap has been growing over the past few decades, according to a study done by K. A. Bryan and L. Martinez. They not only recognize that the gap has been growing, but that lower income groups haven’t had a significant increase in inequality since the 1980s. Therefore, while their income has been growing minimally,…
- 1654 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
A crucial controversy of America today is the growing gap between the wealthy and the poor, and the discrepancy is caused by capitalism run wild and only the helping hand of the government can only fix the problem. A question that turns the tables is what if the growing wealth disparity in America is actually caused by the government? For years, the idea that inequality is economically neutral has been the prevailing view not just among traditionalists but also between most Americans outside the further reaches of a political audience. There could be ideological or moral reasons to object to a growing gap between the wealthy and the rest but for economic reasons, there are no such. Furthermore, there are many ways inequality places itself in America. In our society, a good amount of the population is forced to stand up and work for our country while hardly being redeemed for their time and effort, thus the problem of income inequality. An estimate of these people live from paycheck to another, barely coping with life itself, not because they cannot manage their money well, but the reason is that…
- 1215 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
I say more, because if you look back in history a century ago, it is all about time. According to the chart in Chapter 27, on page 600, in figure 27-2, it took a worker over an hour and some minutes (about 1 hour and 20 minutes) to earn enough to buy one dozen of eggs. But in 2012 it took only minutes (about 10-15 minutes) to earn enough to buy the same dozen of eggs. The growth has made the average workers significantly better off; the worker gets the same amount of money, but they have to work far less now than they did in the past. Even though the cost of living is much more now, than it was in the early 1900’s, growth has made the availability of new products. For an example that is in the book, like before 1952, air conditioners were not available at any price back then. The poor benefit a great deal from the growth that fosters markets. Through rivalry of markets, make the factors of production more productive and lower the cost of goods so more goods were available to everyone.…
- 334 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Wealth inequality can be described as a lot of different things. The one that comes to mind the most though is the gap between the rich and poor. This gap is made up of a variety of different things. The one that comes to many minds is the tax code system. In order to correct the wealth gap in the United States efforts should be made to change the tax codes to close the gap between the rich and poor.…
- 893 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
“Wealth inequality can be described as the unequal distribution of assets within a population. The United States exhibits wider disparities of wealth between rich and poor than any other major developed nation,” (www.inequality.org) There are two factors that I believe contribute to the wealth gap are income and race inequalities. As the gaps widen within those two factors, the wealth gap in the United States continues to grow exponentially.…
- 555 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In order to find out how to shrink the inequality gap, we have to find out what causes the gap to expand. Sita Slavov wrote an article starting with the National Basketball Association,…
- 1347 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays