Inclusive Growth
What is Inclusive Growth?
February 10, 2009 The purpose of this note is to define the meaning of the term ‘inclusive’ growth. It is often used interchangeably with a suite of other terms, including ‘broad-based growth’, ‘shared growth’, and ‘pro-poor growth’. The paper clarifies the distinctions between these terms as well as highlights similarities.
The paper argues that inclusive growth analytics has a distinct character focusing on both the pace and pattern of growth. Traditionally, poverty and growth analyses have been done separately. This paper describes the conceptual elements for an analytical strategy aimed to integrate these two strands of analyses, and to identify and prioritize the country-specific constraints to sustained and inclusive growth.
Defining Inclusive Growth
Rapid and sustained poverty reduction requires inclusive growth that allows people to contribute to and benefit from economic growth. 1 Rapid pace of growth is unquestionably necessary for substantial poverty reduction, but for this growth to be sustainable in the long run, it should be broad-based across sectors, 2 and inclusive of the large part of the country’s labor force. 3 This definition of inclusive growth implies a direct link between the macro and micro determinants of growth. The micro dimension
This note was prepared by Elena Ianchovichina (PRMED) and Susanna Lundstrom (PRMED) with input from Leonardo Garrido (PRMED). The note was requested by donors supporting the Diagnostic Facility for Shared Growth. We thank Carlos Braga, Vandana Chandra, Edgardo Favaro, Loga Gnanasambanthan, Harry Hagan, Fernando Hernandez, Eduardo Ley, Lili Liu, Elina Scheja, and Juan Pedro Schmid for their useful comments on earlier drafts. 1 This statement is in line with the OECD Development Assistance Committee’s policy statement on propoor growth. However, a difference between pro-poor and inclusive growth is that the pro-poor approach is mainly interested in the welfare of the poor while
February 10, 2009 The purpose of this note is to define the meaning of the term ‘inclusive’ growth. It is often used interchangeably with a suite of other terms, including ‘broad-based growth’, ‘shared growth’, and ‘pro-poor growth’. The paper clarifies the distinctions between these terms as well as highlights similarities.
The paper argues that inclusive growth analytics has a distinct character focusing on both the pace and pattern of growth. Traditionally, poverty and growth analyses have been done separately. This paper describes the conceptual elements for an analytical strategy aimed to integrate these two strands of analyses, and to identify and prioritize the country-specific constraints to sustained and inclusive growth.
Defining Inclusive Growth
Rapid and sustained poverty reduction requires inclusive growth that allows people to contribute to and benefit from economic growth. 1 Rapid pace of growth is unquestionably necessary for substantial poverty reduction, but for this growth to be sustainable in the long run, it should be broad-based across sectors, 2 and inclusive of the large part of the country’s labor force. 3 This definition of inclusive growth implies a direct link between the macro and micro determinants of growth. The micro dimension
This note was prepared by Elena Ianchovichina (PRMED) and Susanna Lundstrom (PRMED) with input from Leonardo Garrido (PRMED). The note was requested by donors supporting the Diagnostic Facility for Shared Growth. We thank Carlos Braga, Vandana Chandra, Edgardo Favaro, Loga Gnanasambanthan, Harry Hagan, Fernando Hernandez, Eduardo Ley, Lili Liu, Elina Scheja, and Juan Pedro Schmid for their useful comments on earlier drafts. 1 This statement is in line with the OECD Development Assistance Committee’s policy statement on propoor growth. However, a difference between pro-poor and inclusive growth is that the pro-poor approach is mainly interested in the welfare of the poor while
References: Aghion, P., N. Bloom, R. Blundell, R. Griffith, and P. Howitt (2005) “Competition and innovation: an inverted-u relationship” Quarterly Journal of Economics 120(2). Aghion, P., and P. Howitt (1992) A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction. Econometrica, Econometric Society 60(2) (March):323-51. Alesina, A. and R. Perotti (1996) “Income Distribution, Political Instability, and Investment.” European Economic Review 40. Alesina, A. and D. Rodrik (1994) “Distributive Policies and Economic Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economic.109. Barro, R. 2000. “Inequality and Growth in a Panel of Countries.” Journal of Economic Growth 5. Birdsall N. and J. Londono (1997) “Asset Inequality Matters: An Assessment of the World Bank’s Approach to Poverty Reduction”. American Economic Review Papers and Proceeding, 87(2), pp 32-37. Bourguignon, F. (2003) “The Growth Elasticity of Poverty Reduction; Explaining Heterogeneity across Countries and Time Periods.” In Inequality and Growth: Theory and Policy Implications, ed. T. Eicher and S. Turnovsky. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Deininger, K., and L. Squire (1996) “A New Data Set Measuring Income Inequality.” World Bank Economic Review 10, pp. 565–91. 14 Commission on Growth and Development (2008) Growth Report: Strategies for Sustained Growth and Inclusive Development, the World Bank. DFID (2004) “What is Pro-Poor Growth and Why Do We Need to Know?”, Pro-Poor Growth Briefing Note 1, Department for International Development, London. Deininger, K., and L. Squire (1996) “A New Data Set Measuring Income Inequality.” World Bank Economic Review 10, pp. 565–91. Deininger, K., and L. Squire (1998) “New ways of looking at old issues: inequality and growth,” Journal of Development Economics 57, pp. 259-287. Dollar, D. and A. Kraay (2002) “Growth Is Good for the Poor.” Journal of Economic Growth 7, pp. 195–225. Easterly, W. (1999) “Life during Growth.” Journal of Economic Growth 4. Forbes, K. (2000) "A Reassessment of the Relationship between Inequality and Growth." American Economic Review 90. Hausmann, R., Rodrik D., and A. Velasco (2005) Growth Diagnostics. Mimeo, Harvard Kennedy School. Cambridge. Hausmann, R., J. Hwang, and D. Rodrik (2007) “What you export matters” Journal of Economic Growth 12(1). Imbs, J. and R. Wacziarg (2003) “Stages of Diversification” American Economic Review 93(1), pp. 63-86. Kraay, A. (2004) “When Is Growth Pro-Poor? Cross-Country Evidence.” IMF Working Paper 4-47, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC. Li H. and H. Zhou (1998) "Income Inequality is not Harmful for Growth: Theory and Evidence." Review of Development Economics 2(3). Lopez, H. (2004a). “Pro Growth, Pro Poor: Is There a Trade Off?” Working Paper WPS3378, World Bank. Washington, DC. Lopez, H. (2004b). “Pro-Poor Growth: A Review of What We Know (and of What We Don’t)” Mimeo. World Bank. Lopez, H. and L. Servén (2004). "The Mechanics of Growth-Poverty-Inequality Relationship." Mimeo, World Bank. McCulloch N. and B. Baulch (1999) “Tracking pro-poor growth.” ID21 insights No. 31. Sussex: Institute of Development Studies. OECD (2008) Growing Unequal? Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries 15 Ravallion, M. (2001) “Growth, Inequality and Poverty: Looking Beyond Averages”, World Development 29(11), pp 1803-1815. Ravallion, M. and S. Chen (2003) “Measuring pro-poor growth.” Economics Letters 78, pp. 93-99. Ravallion, M. and S. Chen (1997) “What Can New Survey Data Tell Us about Recent Changes in Distribution and Poverty?” The World Bank Economic Review 11(2). Romer, P. (1990) “Endogenous Technological Change”. Journal of Political Economy 98(5). Sida (2006) Integrated Economic Analysis for Pro-poor Growth: A Methodological Approach. Method Document. Stockholm: Sida. White H. and E. Anderson (2001). “Growth vs. Redistribution: Does the Pattern of Growth Matter?” Development Policy Review 19(3), pp 167-289. World Bank (1990). World Development Report 1990. Washington DC: World Bank. World Bank (2005). Economic Growth in the 1990s: Learning from a Decade of Reform. Washington DC: World Bank. World Bank (2007) Mongolia: Sources of Growth Report No. 39009-MN, Washington DC: World Bank. World Bank (2008) What Are the Constraints to Inclusive Growth in Zambia? Report No. 44286-ZM, Washington DC: World Bank. 16