Preview

Inbound Pepsi and Cocacola

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
291 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Inbound Pepsi and Cocacola
Inbound logistics, operations and outbound logistics
Inbound logistics for the Pepsi and Coca Cola consisted of largely the same operations. Both companies purchase their own ingredients through use of future contracts (to avoid market volatility) and produce their concentrate from their own facilities. Once this is done, these companies send their concentrate out to bottlers upon approval of contract for bottling company. Once the bottling company receives the shipment of concentration, it is diluted to the correct concentration by adding the correct amount of carbonated water, and sugar, and bottled for sale. This is done for two reasons. One reason is so that Pepsi and Coca Cola can maintain their exact mix of ingredients as a well-kept secret, and not let the bottling companies know what exactly goes into their product. This affects the image of the product, and preserves it as something of higher value, and actually applies a sense of prestige to the Pepsi and Coca Cola products that are kept such excellent secrets.
Inbound Logistics (Suppliers)

Some of Coca Cola's most notable suppliers include Spherion, Jones Lang LaSalle, IBM, Ogilvy and Mather, IMI Cornelius, and Prudential. These companies provide Coca Cola with materials such as ingredients, packaging and machinery. In order to ensure that these materials are in satisfactory condition, Coca-cola has put certain standards in place which these suppliers must adhere to (The Supplier Guiding Principles). These include: compliance with laws and standards, laws and regulations, freedom of association and collective bargaining, forced and child labor, abuse of labor, discrimination, wages and benefits, work hours and overtime, health and safety, environment, and demonstration of compliance (Coca Cola 2006).

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Pepsi Co. and Coca Cola, both are very well known multinational companies. They are so famous that they perhaps don’t need any introduction since almost everyone knows basic info about these companies and their widely used products. Both of these companies have been dealing in the production of flavored waters, plain drinking water and soft drinks for decades now and have always been each other’s competitors in almost all the mainstream products they have been producing.…

    • 1930 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both Coca-Cola and Pepsi have an agreement with their own bottler who specializes in this field. Moreover, the agreement restrains the bottlers to carry other brand. For instance, Coke bottler could not carry Royal Crown Cola.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The company Coca Cola produces concentrate, which is then sold to licensed Coca-Cola bottlers (a company that bottles beverages as part of a manufacturing process).throughout the world. The bottlers, who hold territorially exclusive contracts with the company, produce finished product in cans and bottles from the concentrate in combination with filtered water and sweeteners. The bottlers then sell, distribute and merchandise Coca-Cola to retail stores and vending machines.…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The bargaining power of suppliers is low. Most of the materials for producing soft drink are commodities such as sweetener, aluminum cans, and plastic bottles etc. Coke and Pepsi have the freedom to select the suppliers. They face low switching cost, which allow them to change its suppliers easily without any price difference. Thus, the suppliers of the commodities have virtually no bargaining power over pricing.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    PepsiCo and Coca Cola are two major companies that manufacture beverages. They compete to be the number on manufacturer and distributor of beverages in the world. These two companies are very identifiable in this market and you know them as PepsiCo and Coca Cola. These two companies have undoubtedly dominated the markets worldwide that they both receive universal recognition for their different products. Although, there are many other manufacturers and distributors of beverages these two are the major competitors. Not only do they produce soda drinks, they also produce flavored water, spring water, and some energy drinks.…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Blackmores

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages

    • BY PEPSICO: – New beverage product development – Manufacture of concentrate BY BOTTLERS – Mixing to produce beverage or syrup – Containerizing – Distribution to retail outlets…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why does the soft drink Dr Pepper depend on advertising to gain market share instead of offering cheaper sodas than Coke or Pepsi?…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Coke and Pepsi Issues

    • 5071 Words
    • 21 Pages

    The Coke and Pepsi are multinational companies. They have business in almost every country on the Earth. However, there are always problems occurred in business world as ‘business is risk’. Coke and Pepsi could not escape as well. They had faced an ethical crisis in India where it is concern about consumer’s health and the environment cleanliness. This paper will discuss about Coke and Pepsi issues with respect to issue management, crisis management, global business ethics and stakeholder management besides looking into their corporate social responsibilities and what lesson does this case portray to other multinational companies to be aware of.…

    • 5071 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cory Wells Coke And Pepsi

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The profitability of the concentrate business is so different to that of the bottling business because the concentrate producers are not responsible for distribution. Coke and Pepsi are to distribute their products. It also takes little capital investment for the concentrate producers. They need only one factory to serve all of the U.S. Bottlers deal with merchandising and have high fixed operation costs. They also pay for all redistribution costs. It is the power over suppliers and power over buyers that the concentrate producers employ. What keeps Coke and Pepsi in the game is because their internal rivalry seems to benefit the companies.…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coke and Pepsi Case Study

    • 2162 Words
    • 9 Pages

    1. Identify the ongoing issues in this case with respect to issues management, crisis management, global business ethics, and stakeholder management. Rank order these in terms of their priorities for Coca-Cola and for PepsiCo.…

    • 2162 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Concentrate price. Coca-Cola was able to determine its concentrate prices since 1987 when the Master Bottling Contract was established. Pepsi 's Master Bottling contract was a bit different to Coke 's as it obliged bottlers "to purchase raw materials from Pepsi at prices, and on terms and conditions, determined by Pepsi". They based the price of the concentrate on CPI and negotiated it with bottlers. "From the 1980s to the early 2000s, concentrate makers regularly raised concentrate prices, even as inflation-adjusted retail prices for CSD products trended downward", - another reason for greater returns in concentrate production business. As brand promotion was very strong and formula was always kept a secret the whole thing with concentrate was kind of exclusive, so…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    6. Coca-Cola and Pepsi are both very profitable soft drinks. Inputs for these products include corn syrup, bottles/cans, and soft drink syrup. Coca-Cola and Pepsi produce the syrup themselves and purchase the other inputs. They then enter into exclusive contracts with independent bottlers to…

    • 2029 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coke and Pepsi, the two main players in the duopoly market, have benefited from average growth of 3% since 1970 in the CSD market. There are many substitutes to CSD’s such as; milk, coffee, bottled water, beer, juices, tea, wine, sports drinks, and tap water yet American’s drank more soda than any other beverage. Coke and Pepsi competed fiercely for market share and this competition built brand recognition for both companies. Continuous improvements are always being made to the production and distribution networks of CSD’s, which consist of four major participants: concentrate producers, bottlers, retail channels, and suppliers. Coke and Pepsi achieved average annual revenue growth around 10% from 1975 through the mid- 1990’s. The combination of a consistently growing market, fierce head to head competition, brand recognition, and efficient production and distribution networks made the CSD industry extremely profitable.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Compare the economics of concentrated business to that of bottling business? Why is the profitability so different?…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cola Wars

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The barriers to entry are high for new companies; therefore, the threats of new entrants are low. For example, retailers enjoy significant margins for their bottom-line. This makes it tough for the new entrants to convince retailers to substitute their new products for Coke and Pepsi. There are an economy of scale, high required investment, high costs for advertising and marketing promotion, high channels of distribution, and high products differentiation from the new entries. Capital requirement for an efficient new plant could range as much as $75 million. Both Coke and Pepsi pursued a backward integration strategy, buying significant percent of bottling companies, and then creating independent bottling subsidiaries such as Coca-Cola Enterprises (CCE) and Pepsi Bottling group (PBG). Thus it is very difficult for a new concentrate producer entering the market to find any bottler who will distribute their product.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics