Preview

In Defense of Torture

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
260 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
In Defense of Torture
In Defense of Torture

The essay “In Defense of Torture”, Sam Harris argues about the torturing of terrorists. Starting his essay, he provides a realistic perspective, giving real life examples in which the reader agrees with the concept of torture. Harris's perspective goes as far as saying “picture your little seven-year-old daughter being slowly asphyxiated in a warehouse just five minutes away...” this perspective Harris puts onto the reader is quite scary. In the further evolution of his argument Harris reveals his grandfather was an active participant in the Second World War as a pilot, and in war, dropped bombs over thousands of innocent people, which resulted in collateral damage. Harris states that torturing should only be used as getting the truth out of an individual and that collateral damage should not be. Harris's argument to me is found to be a dead end. The world should not be focusing on the circumstances of torturing but instead, how to make the world better. Our world strives for world peace, and understanding this is the authors perspective, he fails to mention or include how to better the laws and fight against criminals. Harris inputs a lot of information about war, and gives examples between collateral damage and torturing. Collateral is something that may not be fully controlled, almost like a ripple affect. Although there is so much about war in the essay, Harris feels there should be a difference in torturing, torturing to Harris, should be only to get the truth and should not affect innocent people, to which I agree.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Naomi Klein’s article, “Torture’s Dirty Secret: It Works” from the May 30, 2005 asserts that torture is a tool that has been used for a long time by investigative personnel to extract important information from detainees. Naomi Klein describes the effects of torture on its victims by including a victim’s ordeal in her article. One of the victims of torture that Naomi Klein includes in her argument is a Syrian-born Canadian known as Maher Arar. Maher Arar is the world’s most famous victim of rendition by US officials. He was detained by US investigators at an airport in New York and then rendered to Syria. Arar was held in a tiny cell in Syria for ten months. While in detention, he was periodically taken out for beatings. The evidence that was…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author Jonathan Alter has written essay titled:”time to think about torture.” Mr. alter refers to the time. It in the United States history as the: “autumn to of anger.” He describes multiple torture methods and gives examples in detail their uses. He refers to the time: Prior to September 11th, “hopelessly September 10th.” Mr. Altar explains that that era of time had many wrong assumptions about law and its enforcement in reference to terrorism. By a vote of 98 to 1 PM The Anti- terrorism bill was passed and history was made. Chief Justice Robert Jackson stated:”the Constitution is not a suicide pact. “This comment by the Chief…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The main idea of this passage is to expose the irrelevance of the ticking bomb scenario for the topic of torture. The article as a whole does not take a direct stand for or against or torture, however, it slightly attacks the areas for torture. In addition, with a vast amount of reasoning and evidence the authors cover all areas relating to the topic of torture such as morals and humanity being the most controversial questioned issues in reference to the…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Boom! Suppose a terrorist in custody has hidden a bomb in a very populated city, it is scheduled to go off in an hour and he is the only one that knows the location. He will not disclose the location unless his outrageous demands are met, it would be left to the assumption there is only one option left to save millions, that is, torture. Although this invented instance is effective it is just one tactic to get a readers attention and agreement. In the two essays, “Yes, It Should Be “On the Books”” by Alan M. Dershowitz and “The Case for Torture” by Michael Levin, being evaluated, the authors use not only this technique but also many others to persuade the readers to take on their views. Dershowitz uses real examples to support his points and is direct on where he stands on the matter, but sometimes he seems a little pushy and cold. Levin on the other hand fascinates us with his hypothetical cases while griping the reader’s attention throughout his essay, but assumes agreement on the reader’s part and uses tactics of fear to persuade. The styles of both essays differ greatly just as much as the personas and methods of persuading do, but the purpose of both essays are very similar, which is to persuade the audience to accept that torture is permissible under certain circumstances. These topics will be discussed and evaluated while ethos, logos, and pathos are being emphasized. And this will be done in order with article 1 then article 2.…

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Is torture ethically valid? We live in a world today, where we are surrounded by terrorism, bomb-threats, and chaos. So, we must ask ourselves, how far we would go, in the event, that a bomber was captured, to save millions of people. In the paragraphs below Utilitarianism and Deontology views will be compared to determine which view on torture would be best, in the efforts, to gather information on the location of bombs that could explode at any given…

    • 80 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    If torture is used in retaliation and as an “eye to eye” concept, then torture would be an unethical way of punishing someone (Guidebook). For this example, I would argue that torture is being used to provide the members with the realization for their actions, so torture is an unethical way of punishment. Also, torture is not a replacement for the death penalty, so it is not saving an individual’s life because in the guidebook it states that if “torture is vengeful and not being used to protect innocent lives, then it is not technically a moral reason for punishing someone” (Guidebook). Without protecting innocent lives, torture cannot be considered an ethical reason for punishing someone, so I would argue that the type of punishment that should be used is an elongated amount of jail time. Incarceration meets all the requirements for being a moral type of punishment because it doesn't cause mental harm that torture would and incarcerating the members would not be a retaliating…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tragedy In Torture

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Is the intentional pain that an individual experiences justified by the possibility of preserving the lives of many? Torture is the used as a weapon, but in reality does it work? The purpose of this essay is to identify what the motives are for using torture, the effectiveness of torture, and important issues or flaws with the entire process of torture.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I agree with “Tortures Terrible Toll” article that we should not treat any person even prisoners with torture. Not only as mentioned in the essay that torture might not be effective, but also the inhumane and degrading treatment of torture will reflect the country’s moral standing. I agree with the idea mentioned in the article that all people are created equal with inalienable rights. But some people think that we have to revenge from terrorists by torture. I am not against loss of any terrorist’s life, but I am caring about the way they treated. Children who watch any torture scenes might grew up showing huge violence. No doubt, countries that use torture even to terrorists will be affected in their children. Of course to defeat prisoners…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Is Torture Ever Ok?

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages

    As a I discussed in my third essay, there are many disputes between people on whether or not torture should ever be allowed. I am writing my opinion on this heated issue and explaining why torture should be allowed under extreme circumstances. Extreme instances that should allocate torture are: times of war, a terrorist attack, or high profile criminal activity. If lives are at stake in these circumstances than I believe torturing someone is permissible. Torturing can be a way of defending those people, but should be the last option. A lot of times in these scenarios there are no other options and torturing someone is the only way to get fast results before it is too late. I am a utilitarian thinker and I believe in the greatest good for the most people. If a lot of people 's lives are at stake in a situation and can be saved because of one criminal 's pain then torturing is the way to go. I believe that torture can be morally justified in many extreme circumstances and by regulating torture by law then it could benefit our society.…

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Torture

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Justifying the needs of implementing various methods of torture is strongly a recommended option to protecting America’s security and American citizens. While the debate of whether the use of torture is valid to protect the United States of America overall, supporters of the argument strongly argue that interrogating terrorists is only useful when various torture methods are involved. During one of the United States of America’s darkest periods in the nation’s history, the terrorists attack of September 11, 2001 rebooted the discussion of how various methods of torture are a justifiable means to not only place vengeance on the terrorists involved in the attacks on America’s soil. In the course of the aftermath of the horrific attacks of September 11, 2001, supporters of using various methods of torture during the interrogation process observed a central argument to prove their case. For example, if America’s security becomes unfortunately at risk of another terrorists attack, the nation could potentially protect Americans by implementing various methods of torture to only not question terrorists’ against their willpower.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In discussions of ticking time bombs, one controversial issue has been how to deal with the alleged guilty terrorist once he is captured. On the one hand, some people, including Michael Levin, a libertarian writer and educator, argue that it is in the US government’s right to torture the guilty terrorist because his knowledge could be used to save the lives of millions. On the other hand, others, such as Philip Heymann, who is a writer that had worked in the government field, firmly states that torture should never be used because the chance that it will produce true and useful information is nearly impossible and it is vastly more crucial to preserve the international bans on torture. Shirley Jackson elaborates on Heymann’s view when she…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Torture, as a simple definition, is the action or practice of inflicting severe pain on someone as punishment or in order to force them to do or say something. When we see it done on our TV screens we think it’s revolting; we find it hard to watch, even though it’s faked and censored in comparison to actual methods used. This practice is usually done using covert methods, and is ineffective. It’s unethical and damaging, especially when it is practiced on those who are only suspected terrorists; not convicted. It’s a sickening violation of ones humanity and should not be practiced on suspected terrorists.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "The Case for Torture" by Michael Levin, presents excellent justification for the use of torture in situations of extreme desperation. Levin gives great arguments for the use of torture through clever wording and great exemplification. In supplement to the already great argument, he provides potential counter-arguments and proves why they are invalid. It is made very clear that he believes that torture is morally mandatory and makes great effort to sway the opinion of readers, provided they keep an open mind. Levin presents a great argument and presents the ideas in an organized fashion, but as with many essays, it is not without flaw and could use some minor changes to make this great essay into a incredible essay.…

    • 751 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    History Of Torture

    • 1721 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Why was torture used in almost every civilization within historical record? Torture was first recorded to have been by vikings but it has been a part of every society known to man. Even though, each civilization has has a different spin on their forms and reasons for torture, it has lasted centuries. Torture has been around for an incredibly long time, and has many different methods used for many different reasons.…

    • 1721 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Torture and Ethics

    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages

    There are many views or definition of the word “torture”, which is often debated by many individuals. According to “International Rehabilitation Council For Torture Victims” (2005-2012), “torture is an act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining information or a confession, punishing him for an act committed” (para. 2). “Torture is anguish of body or mind; something that causes agony or pain; the infliction of intense pain (from burning, crushing, or wounding) to punish, coerce, or afford sadistic pleasure; or distortion or over refinement of a meaning or an argument” (“Torture,” 2013). There are debates about torture and whether or not is unethical or a cruel and unusual punishment. People have been taught to believe that torturing a person is unacceptable and inhumane. However, the torturing of an enemy to get answers is not considered cruel and inhumane especially, when it involves saving the lives of many. This paper will analyze whether torturing enemy combatants or high-value targets violates standards of morality in an American free society. It will also examine whether the act of torture violates basic human rights and if it could have global implications, and last determine if torture may be justified under ontological, deontological, utilitarianism, or the natural law theory.…

    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics