Preview

In 1862 Bismarck Said, 'the Great Question of the Day Will Not Be Settled by Speeches and Majority Decisions...'

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2045 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
In 1862 Bismarck Said, 'the Great Question of the Day Will Not Be Settled by Speeches and Majority Decisions...'
In 1862 Bismarck said, 'The great question of the day will not be settled by speeches and majority decisions...'
What were 'the great questions of the day' for Bismarck, and how did he settle them up to 1871?

The significance of Otto Eduard Leopold von Bismarck-Schönhausen for world history is indisputable. Bismarck, a German Junker who was born on April 1st 1815 and died on July 30st 1898, is often referred to as the first modern politician of world history and it is very important to know what kind of man he was to understand his motives and what his 'great questions of the day' were.
While his father was from an old noble family his mother was only from a common one with no special background and history. She always told him that he needed to burst out of the status his family was in. He wanted to make history and wanted to be considered as one of the best politicians in history and not an underpart. It is not clear if his national feelings were for Germany or Prussia.

The experience he gained for his later political career came from his early times as politician which he spend in Frankfurt, Russia and France, partially as ambassador for Germany. The most significant step in his political career was maybe when he was made chief minister of Prussia under Wilhelm I. His relation to the King and later the Kaiser was so good that he was much trusted by Wilhelm I. In the later years of his career, during the unification, Bismarck really ruled the country.

Even though many Germans wanted a nation and something that was secure and powerful they did not see Bismarck as somebody who did want to unite Germany but as somebody who wanted to increase the power and influence of Prussia. But that is the reason why the answer for the first part of the question in the heading is very clear. The quote about 'the great questions of the day' was taken from Bismarck's famous 'Iron and Blood' speech (also 'Blood and Iron speech) and represented most certainly the unification of



Bibliography: History notes Notes on the server http://zeus.zeit.de/text/1998/31/Fuenf_Schuesse_auf_Bismarck http://www.military-quotes.com/otto-von-bismarck.htm http://www.deutsche-schutzgebiete.de/deutscher_krieg.htm www.zdf.de (mediatehk)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    education. It was in Berlin that he first became aware of a different side of life. Hapgood took…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The liberal on Bismarck’s ship wheel is shown telling the conservative and ultramontane, who is a Catholic, that he will indeed be on top again when the wind blows Bismarck. This document shows how Bismarck is a new type of conservative who forsakes some traditional values in order to do follow the realpolitik value of doing what’s best for the country. In order to do what’s best for the country, Bismarck sometimes has to change sides in order to keep the peace and unite Germany. In Kaiser Wilhelm I’s speech to the people of Berlin in November 1881 (Document 5), Wilhelm I talks about his support for Bismarck’s new welfare reforms that support Christianity and incorporate socialism. Document 5 shows how Bismarck has had to move away from his goal of suppressing the Church in order to do what’s best for the country, which is supporting Christianity. Nevertheless, Wilhelm I does hold a bias as he is a puppet of Bismarck who lets Bismarck implant his new conservative reforms as long as they keep the peace, which is why he is supporting the reforms and tying God and the country together. Document 6 is Otto von Bismarck’s 1884 speech in support of his new bill that helps socialist, but stays true to conservative values but not forsaking his and the…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Rise of Adolf Hitler

    • 606 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hitler’s political abilities were outstanding. In order to attract and unite the German citizens, he used his personality, propaganda and wisely planned his speeches. Hitler used simple and concise language during his speeches so all citizens will understand him more and hopefully support him. He also had strong propaganda slogans painted promises of an alluring future for Germany. His first and most significant point was the “rebirth” of Germany to after the catastrophic Treaty of Versailles, which would be abolished when he seized power along with the other reparations. He promised to improve economic prosperity by changing the strategy that the current government used. A German whom had given Hitler…

    • 606 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An important factor of Hitler becoming Chancellor in January 1933 was his personality, Adolf Hitler was a genius; it took overwhelming intelligence to come from such a poor background to the Chancellor of Germany, but he managed it suggesting that he was a stubborn man and doesn’t stop until he gets what he wants. Hitler was a very popular man, which helped him make the public like him. In doing this he was able to make them listen to what he had to say, he was a very powerful speaker and the speeches he wrote were very inspiring which filled the listeners with aspiration. His personality links to every one of the point I am going to make in this essay because if he didn’t put his twist on things he would never have done them, he turned the Depression into a beam of hope for Germany. This factor defiantly helped Hitler in his rise to power because his personality is who he is, his stubbornness and arrogance defiantly helped him become one of the most listened to men in Germany.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bismarck Dbq

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He quickly learned how to play the uber Catholic, conservative, and liberal sides when needed, and he eventually learned how to balance his policies so that each side remained fairly contained (Doc 4). During the 1800s, talk of liberal reforms, socialism, and communism was rising. Many people in the German government realized this insurgent of new thoughts and encouraged Bismarck to modify his policies. Politicians such as Wagener in document three wrote to audiences in the Reichstag and even Bismarck himself because the politicians knew that they could not risk losing the worker’s votes to the Socialist Party who promised laborers their own rights and insurance (Doc 3). Bismarck realized his politicians spoke the truth. From Bismarck’s point of view, he knew that if he didn’t adapt at least some version of these rising demands, he would remain Chancellor for a very short time. Thus, when it came to social reforms, Bismarck adopted his own version of the socialist party’s platform. He stated he would compromise by taking on some socialistic reforms because those reforms were a way to help those who cannot help themselves (Doc 6). Even the Kaiser himself realized his government must make their own approach to social reform. Bismarck promoted accident coverage for laborers and welfare for people who do not have the ability to work-- all ideas sprung from moderate…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, Prussia realized Germany’s vulnerability, seeing how its loose union and its central geographical spot in the continent made it vulnerable to attack from strong neighbors like France and Russia. So, Prussia set out to unify Germany to form one large, stronger state. However, this unification could not have been possible without Otto von Bismarck, a Prussian noble who had risen through the ranks to become a major political figure and the driving force behind German unification. The question is begged, however: how did Bismarck do it? How did he rise to power and unite these fragmented pieces into one union? Well, for one, Bismarck had connections. A noble by birth, Bismarck had high social standing, but no governmental or military background that would facilitate a career in politics. Nonetheless, he befriended two military generals by the names of Helmut von Moltke and Albrecht von Roon. Moltke and Roon, both cunning military minds and dedicated ideologues, rose up the Prussian power ladder. In 1859, Roon was appointed minister of war, allowing him a direct link to the king. A strong believer in Bismarck’s potential, Roon lobbied the king to appoint Bismarck to a high post. It was a success, and in September 1862, Bismarck was appointed minister-president. Now that Bismarck had reached high office, it was up to him to use his power wisely. This is where Bismarck’s political cunning comes into play. Soon after receiving his position, Bismarck began winning the king over. Within a short while, Bismarck…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Otto von Bismarck is widely recognized as the statesman who engineered the unification of Germany in this period, via astute political awareness, cunning diplomacy and the use of effective military power. However many historians have different views with regard to Bismarck’s real influence and even whether he wanted German unification or just expansion of the power and influence of his home state of Prussia. Bismarck has been described a great statesman, but also an autocrat who resented any opposition to his views . In contrast it has also been suggested that he was merely an astute politician who enhanced the position of his home state of Prussia, through clever management of the internal and external political circumstances that he lived through . This enquiry will attempt to assess the importance of Bismarck’s role in the unification of Germany by identifying and reviewing key historical events in the period 1789-1890.…

    • 4333 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bismarck was successful in political control over Germany as he had created a new constitution which benefitted and suited his needs as chancellor as he had created an autocratic constitution which revolved around the Kaiser and himself. Bismarck’s success was due to numerous factors such as control over the Reichstag as Bismarck had manipulated the Reichstag so that he would be supported by the party with the majority. Thus proving that Bismarck’s political prowess was a force to be reckoned, with as he successfully and tactically negotiated deals which saw him “jumping into bed with the enemy”, meaning that Bismarck would remain the figurehead for political power ensuring a pre-eminent position for Prussia this is proven as 17/58 representatives in the Bundesrat were Prussian nationals.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Franco-Prussian war of 1870 acted as a watershed in European history with the formation of the German Empire. No power alone, (perhaps with the exception of Russia) could defeat the new German Empire, and all the European powers with the exception of France were willing to allow Bismarck to consolidate German gains provided there was no further expansion. Bismarck having successfully won the Franco-Prussian war of 1870 and having united Germany, sought to ‘preserve the settlement of 1871’ by maintaining the status of the German empire as a great power amongst the European nations and avoiding conflict. Between 1871- 1890 Bismarck presided as the chancellor and introduced a variety of foreign and domestic policies in the hope of keeping Germany a great power. At home, he concentrated on building a powerful German state and encouraged nationalism and the ideal of a German national identity. In foreign affairs his goal was to make Prussia the dominant power in the German Empire, and to establish the empire as a great power in Europe. Through various alliance systems he managed to accomplish this aim. His resignation in 1890 marked the end of the Bismarckian system and ushered in the Wilehenmne era. This essay will set out to explore the extent to which Bismarck’s successors, William II, Leo von Caprivi, Hohenlohe and Bülow, changed his policy in the decade 1890-1900.…

    • 2011 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Germany and serving his motherland. But, his passion of patriotism led to nationalism which then…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    He had the King's approval, Bismarck would rule without the consent of parliament and without legal budget, it was a direct violation of the constitution. He'd twisted his speeches and told lies to achieve his goals. He could look like a modest spokesman or a devious and crafty politician who abused his power. He stirred up conflicts to start…

    • 60 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the years before the war, around 1848-1914, the period of Nationalism began, where each country was unifying their states. These states wanted national identity, meaning similar language, mission, religion, territory, etc. The German unifier was the chancellor of Prussia, known as Otto Von Bismark. He was a very romantic nationalist and believed in the quote "might makes right", believing that you get what you want through force. He was very powerful and it showed in the three steps he took to unify the country of Germany. He won the war with Denmark in 1864, won the Autro/Prussian war in 1866, and won the war of 1871, finally unifying the country on January 18, 1871.…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Historians Views on Bismark

    • 5261 Words
    • 22 Pages

    Hamerow's introduction gives a very good foundation of German history and review of his and others thoughts on Bismarck. He sets up very well a good basis for what the rest of the book will be about. He puts out several different areas of consideration on Bismarck that will later be discussed in the book and keeps it interesting.…

    • 5261 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    bismark essay

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Bismarck took the initiative, as opposed to Austria, in the war against denmark. he done whatever was best for germany in order to publish his sense of leadership. he controlled all foreign interference when prussia was against france. many believed he was born - in 1815 - in order to be the hero for germans unification. he had good relationships with other countires such as Russia, he know for prussias securit being fiendly with Russia would be key. he supported king williams budget dupiute by going to paris and solved that said despute. bismarcks actions and succes seemed too good to be true, historians arued that bismarck always did have a long-term plan for the unification of germany whereas others argued that he followed a day-to-ay policy, taking a course most likely to achieve his aims. bismarck first gave some support to the ideas if liberalism and nationalism, but he later changed his mind. as he himself noted in 1898: "my sympathies remained on the side of authority".…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the time he was a very modern, up to date person. He took advantage of the available technology. For example he was one of the first German politicians to fly in an aeroplane. He almost brain washed the country, by giving them hope of a better future, and shifting the blame of the nation’s state onto a common enemy: the Jewish population. The Jews were an easy target, mainly because the majority of them were fairly rich. Because the war was blamed on the Jews, the rest of Germany felt less guilty about losing the war.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays