Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

importance of sovereignty

Good Essays
631 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
importance of sovereignty
IMPORTANCE OF SOVEREIGNTY

Although much criticized, the concept of sovereignty is still central to most thinking about international relations and particularly international law. The concept is condemned in context of a nation-state 's "right" to monopolize certain exercises of power with respect to its territory and citizens but it is still prized by those who maintain certain "realist" views or who otherwise wish to prevent (sometimes with justification) foreign or international powers and authorities from interfering in a national government 's decisions and activities. It cannot be ignored that sovereignty is an essential ingredient of the State as it makes the State supreme in both internal and external matters. A State can only be independent if it enjoys sovereignty. Furthermore, when one begins to analyse and disaggregate the concept of sovereignty, it quickly becomes apparent that it has many dimensions and several important functions. For example, the concept is central to the idea of "EQUALITY OF NATIONS". The concept of equality of nations is linked to sovereignty concepts because sovereignty has fostered the idea that there is no higher power than the nation-state, so it is "sovereignty" that negates the idea that there is a higher power, whether foreign or international (unless consented to by the nation-state).

Sovereignty also plays a role in defining the status and rights of nation-states and their officials. Thus, we recognize "SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY" and the consequential immunity for various purposes of the officials of a nation-state.

Similarly, "sovereignty" implies a right against interference or intervention by any foreign (or international) power. Therefore, one can easily see the logical connection between the sovereignty concepts and the very foundations and sources of international law. If sovereignty implies that there is "no higher power" than the nation-state, then it is argued that no international law norm is valid unless the state has somehow "consented" to it. Of course, treaties (or "conventions") almost always imply, in a broader sense, the "legitimate" consent of the nation-states that accepted them. One classic exception may be the end-of-a-war treaty, at least in some circumstances. In addition, there are sticky problems in connection with state succession, including whether the colonial imposition of obligations carries over to a newly independent state.

Broadly speaking we can analyse the importance of sovereignty as:

Sovereignty is the supreme power over all individuals and associations. The State is able to control and regulate the activities and subsequently the behaviour of individuals as well as associations because it can punish anybody with its sovereign rights.

Sovereignty is the most important feature which differentiates the State from other associations which have no sovereign power.

The State can maintain unity and integration when it has supreme powers. Society will become worse and mutual disputes will occur without sovereign power in the State.

Sovereign authority is essential to maintain order in society. Without sovereignty, anarchy will prevail in society and there will be chaos and disorder.

State exists, survives and continues only when there is sovereignty.

The State can give protection to the citizens from any external threat or internal disturbances with its sovereign power. It is the responsibility of the State to create an atmosphere of peace and security in the society. One State controls and curbs any anti-social qne qnti-national elements since it possesses coercive power.

The State cannot make and implement laws in the absence of sovereignty.

A country can be independent only when it has sovereignty. Sovereignty makes the State to run trade and commerce freely and frame its foreign policy for the sake of welfare of people.

Bibliography

Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Dem. Rep. Congo v. Belg.), 41 ILM 536 (2002) (Int 'l Ct. Justice, Feb. 14,2002) (especially separate opinion of Judge _ad hoc_ Bula-Bula, _id._ at 597 (in French))

John H. Jackson, _The WTO "Constitution" and Proposed Reforms: Seven "Mantras" Revisited,_ 4 J. INT 'L ECON. L. 67(2001) (addressing "mantras" related to the WTO).

Bibliography: Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Dem. Rep. Congo v. Belg.), 41 ILM 536 (2002) (Int 'l Ct. Justice, Feb. 14,2002) (especially separate opinion of Judge _ad hoc_ Bula-Bula, _id._ at 597 (in French)) John H. Jackson, _The WTO "Constitution" and Proposed Reforms: Seven "Mantras" Revisited,_ 4 J. INT 'L ECON. L. 67(2001) (addressing "mantras" related to the WTO).

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Sovereignty is in essence ultimate and unchallengeable power, in the UK sovereignty in theory lies within parliament, A.V. Dicey said that ‘no person or body is recognised by the law of England as having a right to override or set aside the legislation of Parliament’. Sovereignty was placed formally to parliament after the Bill of Rights act in 1688 when the monarch’s powers were removed. Ultimate power lies in parliament due to the fact that the electorate vote for the members of parliament in free, fair and regular elections. Two types of sovereignty exist, legal and political. Legal sovereignty is the principle that one body has the authority and right to change any law in anyway it wants to, legal sovereignty in the UK has been said to lie in Westminster Parliament. Political sovereignty is where power effectively and actively is used and implemented, in other words who holds political power and who has can influence it. For example, political sovereignty lies with the electorate at election time, but at other times lies with parliament when debating legislation and constitutional statues.…

    • 1577 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nation states (being the country) have sovereignty, which means that they have the right to make all the laws within the territories they govern, but also allows them to make treaties with other states and these treaties are the primary source of international law. State sovereignty is the states exclusive right to make laws for its own people without interference from outside countries. It is defined by having : defined borders (geographical area), a permanent population…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Before evaluating whether or not Parliament is sovereign, it’s important to define what sovereignty means. Sovereignty can be split into two; political and legal. Legal sovereignty is the ultimate power to make laws which will be enforced within the state. Members of Parliament and the Prime Minister have ultimate legal power because they propose and enforce legislation. Citizens have no legal sovereignty because they don’t play a role in the legislative function even though pressure group activity may influence decisions. Political sovereignty is where real political power lies, and depending on the situation political sovereignty doesn’t always lie within Parliament. Critics have argued that due to recent changes, Parliament is no longer truly sovereign. This essay will assess the arguments for and against.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The state is a self-governing body that is independent, has a permanent population as well as a defined territory and is self-supporting. It acquires the power to create and modify legislation. Therefore a state has sovereignty over its territory; this indicates that is has considerable economical, political, social and legal power. The state however also has an obligation to address the needs of the individuals of the state as well as the community, yet; on the other hand legislation is introduced to help limit the power of the state. When the needs of the individual come in difference with the varying needs of the sate, conflict arises; thereby it is required for the needs of the individual and the state to be in balance. Citizens of a sovereign state are able to challenge state power in two ways: by informal means and formal means.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A close ratiocination of the instances where there have been claims for self determination one can sufficiently claim that the right to self determination and the right of a state to its sovereignty are always at logger heads. When these two rights are pitted against each other, the quest here is for the determination of which rights supersedes the other in such scenarios. It can be referred to as a difficult balancing act. In today’s multi ethnic states there clearly have to be a balance, an acceptable equilibrium between a states sovereign power and the rights of minorities which international law has been extremely succinct about which affirms the commitment of international actors and policy makers to human dignity.…

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    International Mkt

    • 3534 Words
    • 15 Pages

    | Learning Objective: 06-01 - What the sovereignty of nations means and how it can affect the stability of government policies…

    • 3534 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A. "We claim that the constitution...shall be the supreme law of the land. But we also…

    • 2320 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The straight forward answer for the definition of sovereignty would be “a country’s independent authority and the right to govern itself”. A good way to think of it would be a country’s independence or their basic liberties and self-governance. In the United States we always make statements about freedom, this thought that we were able to do what we want would be a great example of sovereignty that we as Americans can all relate to.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Traditionally any discussion on recognition in international law considers two theories: constitutive and declaratory. The constitutive theory perceives recognition as “a necessary act before the recognized entity can enjoy an international personality,” while the declaratory theory sees it as “merely a political act recognizing a pre-existing state of affairs.” In the constitutive perception the question of “whether or not an entity has become a state depends on the actions of existing states.” However, the situation in which one state may be recognized by some states, but not by others, is an evident problem and thus a great deficiency of the constitutive theory. In the absence of a central international authority for granting of recognition, this would mean that such an entity at the same time has and does not have an international personality.…

    • 5411 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Michele Foucault Biopower

    • 2131 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Sovereignty was the power where the sovereign had the right to decide life and death. This came from the ancient Roman law “Patria Potestas” where the father of a Roman family was given the option to choose whether or not his children and his…

    • 2131 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    The second part to the statement posed is the notion of ‘national sovereignty’. But what is national sovereignty? As former British Secretary, Sir Geoffrey Howe, stated, ‘Sovereignty is not like virginity, which you either have or you don’t… it is a resource to be used, rather than a constraint that limits our capacity for action.’5 Thus, sovereignty is perceived to be the ability for a nation to act however it deems fit politically, economically and socially within its territory. The…

    • 2485 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this essay I will be discussing countries and whether they should have independent laws or not. I recognise that some countries may have to base their laws according to their government's policies, culture and religion. However what some citizens may not know is that they have 'Human Rights' that allow them to contradict any laws they don't agree with.…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Issues arise between the antagonist relationship between sovereignty and human rights. For instance, when it comes to the sovereignty, Murphy argues that all of the 193 nation states that are fully sovereign regard themselves as equal in the context of the horizontal structure. Despite their differences to land mass, population size, or financial capabilities, all states that are fully sovereign have an equal right to function as a state and make decisions within their borders. With this in mind, it is…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    countries like India follow the „dualist‟ school of law in respect of implementation of international…

    • 4731 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    WORLD WARS PAPER

    • 1055 Words
    • 3 Pages

    References: [1] Biersteker, T. J. and C. Weber, Eds. (1996). State Sovereignty as Social Construct. New York: Cambridge University Press.…

    • 1055 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays