Immigration in Texas
Immigration has been a topic for while. In this debate, they state facts that show why immigration is either a positive or negative effect in the U.S. Some people are against it and some people are completely fine with it. While watching this debate about immigration, you find out information pertaining to poverty in our country. However going back and forth, they’re arguing their point but also trying to convince the audience and listeners on how immigration has a big impact in our world.
When listening to Kris Kobach, I feel as if he’s making a demonstrative plea. My reasoning behind that is because Kris is explaining how people in poverty are more likely to be on welfare and also how immigration is gradually slowing down our country’s progress and also terminating it. His dispute is very eye opening to me because it informs us on the positive part of immigration but also the negative. As citizens of the United States we should be aware of these facts.
While watching the argument about immigration, I noticed how many facts and logical reasons on why immigration is actually suitable for our country. For example, Tamar Jacobs talked about a couple of recognized physicians that were born in different countries and how they made a great impact when they reached the United States. While spending their time in the United States, they have discovered new cures and also decreased the obesity rate of plenty of Americans surprisingly. These facts are supported with evidence and explain how immigration is positive towards our country.
As the debate gets more passionate, Julian Castro, who is for immigration, starts stating facts. For example, the IRS reported 45% of households would not have to pay income taxes. During the debate, Tamar Jacobs says that no economy is look for a “wage effect”, which is a valid point towards immigration. As the debate was narrowing down most of the information that was being said was backed up by examples. With that being
When listening to Kris Kobach, I feel as if he’s making a demonstrative plea. My reasoning behind that is because Kris is explaining how people in poverty are more likely to be on welfare and also how immigration is gradually slowing down our country’s progress and also terminating it. His dispute is very eye opening to me because it informs us on the positive part of immigration but also the negative. As citizens of the United States we should be aware of these facts.
While watching the argument about immigration, I noticed how many facts and logical reasons on why immigration is actually suitable for our country. For example, Tamar Jacobs talked about a couple of recognized physicians that were born in different countries and how they made a great impact when they reached the United States. While spending their time in the United States, they have discovered new cures and also decreased the obesity rate of plenty of Americans surprisingly. These facts are supported with evidence and explain how immigration is positive towards our country.
As the debate gets more passionate, Julian Castro, who is for immigration, starts stating facts. For example, the IRS reported 45% of households would not have to pay income taxes. During the debate, Tamar Jacobs says that no economy is look for a “wage effect”, which is a valid point towards immigration. As the debate was narrowing down most of the information that was being said was backed up by examples. With that being