Preview

Immanuel Kant's Ethical Law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
242 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Immanuel Kant's Ethical Law
Immanuel Kant saw the ethical law as an all-out basic, an indisputable order, and trusted that its substance could be set up by human reason alone. Subsequently, the incomparable all out basic is: "Act just one that is said so you can be lined up at the same time according to the universal law" (). Basically, it views that having good- will, definitely have a good principle behind it. Basically, people have free will to do, feel as they please rather it’s rational or not. Opposing to the utilitarian speculations of reflective quality, mankind has learned to be moral and find direction towards the goodness in life. Learning to lead an ethical life, regardless the reasons are, even if feelings inside is differing from our true feeling inside.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant's Ethical Summary
    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Immanuel Kant's Ethical Summary

    There is an old saying that it is better to be lucky than good. This may be true if a person is always lucky, but luck sometimes has a tendency to run out. Making decisions that affect other people’s lives based on luck can be sometimes dangerous, and usually ethically questionable. Leaders who routinely depend on luck for success may find themselves relying on other questionable actions, such as lying, cheating, or stealing, to ensure luck stays on their side. Additionally, this type of behavior may force subordinates to make ethically questionable decisions when luck begins to run out.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Kant's Grounding For The Metaphysics Of Morals Summary
    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Kant's Grounding For The Metaphysics Of Morals Summary

    Immanuel Kant’s Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals starts off by saying there is only one thing that is good without qualification which is a good will. Something can only be good if it is well-matched with a good will. In fact, “a good will is” according to him, “is good not because of what it effects or accomplishes, nor because of its fitness to attain some proposed end; it is good only through its willing i.e., it is good in itself” (7). He states that these specific obligations of a good will are called duties and then makes three propositions about them. Kant then says that “I should never act except in such a way that I can also will that my maxim…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Immanuel Kant's Theory Of Morality
    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page

    Immanuel Kant's Theory Of Morality

    Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher from the 18th century who is well known as an essential person in philosophy today. He has made the argument that there are a set of essential ideas that structure human experience and is the source of morality. His thought continues to have a major influence in contemporary thought, especially the fields of metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, political philosophy, and aesthetics. Kant’s theory on morality as often been criticized on being too…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    An Outline of Kant's Foundations of Metaphysics of Morals
    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages

    An Outline of Kant's Foundations of Metaphysics of Morals

    The foundation of the metaphysics of morals is a critical examination of a pure practical reason.…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Kant's Arguments On Ethical Decision-Making
    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Kant's Arguments On Ethical Decision-Making

    In this analytical paper I’ll be analyzing a scenario about a five year old girl who is in renal failure and is in need of a kidney transplant. In this the father is the only one compatible with her, but he does not want to donate his kidney to save her life. The scenario will be analyzed through the deontological/Kantian and the consequentialist/utilitarian viewpoints in ethical decision making. It’ll also be analyzed by deciding which perspective would be relevant and a discussion of what I as a doctor would do following the ethical view point of my choice.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant's Theory Of Business Ethics
    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page

    Immanuel Kant's Theory Of Business Ethics

    Immanuel Kant would never condone Scott’s behavior to use Bailey in the way he did. He would have called Scott’s actions immoral and unethical. Kant’s theory indicated that, “we should never use people” and “everyone, no matter who they are, should be both the legislator and the follower of moral laws” (Ciulla 95). He similarly stated, “For all rational beings stand under the law that each of them should treat himself and all others never merely as a means but always at the same time as an end in himself” (Ciulla 107). Kant would feel that it was Scott’s duty to make decisions without using another person as simply a means to an end, and that people should be treated as ends in themselves. By Scott attempting to make Bailey do these unethical…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant On Guilt And Punishment
    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Immanuel Kant On Guilt And Punishment

    For Immanuel Kant, guilt is considered a necessary condition for punishment and judicial punishment can never be used merely as a means to promote some other good for the criminal himself or civil society. He argues that, an offender must first be found to be deserving of punishment before any consideration is given to the utility of punishment for himself or his fellow citizens. In this view, utilitarian concerns can never justify the punishment of an innocent person while guilt itself demands punishment even where punishment is entirely devoid of social utility. Therefore, again we observe that the best action is the one that maximizes utility and can be applied in various ways, but most commonly relates to the maintenance of healthy emotional…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kant's Theory Of Utilitarianism
    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant's Theory Of Utilitarianism

    This essay aims to argue the views of two different theorist, Jeremy Bentham and Immanuel Kant, with regards to their views on moral worth of an action. The idea of good and bad creates heated debates among many, but this essay will successfully unravel the layers of Bentham’s theory of Utilitarianism and his belief that all our motives are driven by pleasure and pain. While arguing Kant’s opposing argument that moral worth of an act revolves around democratic attitudes, and that moral truths are founded on reasons that is logical to all people. When one breaks down both theories, it occurs that Kant’s theory comes out to be the more sensible one in numerous aspects.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Moral Theories: Kant and J.S Mill
    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Moral Theories: Kant and J.S Mill

    Throughout this paper, I will contrast and compare two moral theories in attempt to uncover what one provides a better argument and can be applied as a universal moral code. The two moral theorists Immanuel Kant and J.S Mill have created two distinctly different theories on morality and how to develop a universal moral code. Both theories focus on intentions and consequences. Kant believes that the intentions and reasons of our actions can be measured and defined as morally correct, where as Mill believes that our intentions really play no role in morality, and that we should focus on the consequences and outcomes of our actions to evoke the most happiness for the most people. Even though both philosophers make incredibly different points, each encompasses strong arguments as well as issues with their approach. However, Kant will be successful in articulating a better universal moral theory through the use of his categorical imperative.…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kant Principle Of Morality Essay
    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant Principle Of Morality Essay

    Kant philosophy has contributed in development of "pure" moral philosophy, a "metaphysics of morals" that is based on the concepts of reason, not on empirical observations. According to his philosophy moral obligations are applicable to all human beings as it applies not only for particular person in particular situation, but also to all rational beings in all circumstances.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kant And David Ross Deontological Ethics
    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page

    Kant And David Ross Deontological Ethics

    One of the approaches of ethics which bases morality on foundational principle of obligations or duties is called Deontology (Fieser, 2015). Deontological ethics is concerned on the action being morally right because of some characteristic of the action itself, not because the consequences or the outcome of the action is good (Brittanica.com, 2015). For instance, lying is morally wrong but if a person has to commit a lie in order to save the life of someone, the action of that person would still be wrong although that action may produce a good outcome (BBC.co.uk, 2014). The theories of Immanuel Kant and Sir William David Ross are widely known in the field of deontological…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kants Moral Argument
    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kants Moral Argument

    Kant's moral argument can be summarised in 4 points. Point 1, a good will or a person with right moral intentions seeks to bring about the summum bonum. If we take our ethics seriously we can see that we want to achieve the summum bonum. Kant, however was adamant that people should not act nice to receive an award at the end of the act. Kant was convinced that an act is only morally good if it is done for its on sake and without any selfish thoughts. He believed that people should do the right thing because it is the right thing and not for any reward or praise.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kantian Ethics
    • 3051 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Kantian Ethics

    Kant said that nothing was good in itself except for a good will. By will he meant the ability to act from principle; only when we act from a sense of duty does our act have moral worth. We determine our duty by the categorical imperative. An example of good will would be to use the “Golden Rule,” do unto others as you would have them do unto you. Kant uses this to say that a person’s…

    • 3051 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kant's Definition Of Ethics
    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kant's Definition Of Ethics

    I think that Kant’s views should be the basics of ethics. Based on the definition of ethics being universal, Kant’s views can be applied to everyone. It does not matter what a person’s ethnicity, nationality, religion, or time period he/she resides in, Kant’s views of a good will can be practiced by everyone. Rather than happiness, which is conditional and has consequences, the good will is good within itself. With the example of a pair of people shopping, person A tries on a variety of clothing. Person A asks person B if an outfit is flattering on him/her. If happiness was the base of ethics, person B may try to avoid making person A feel bad saying that an outfit looked bad if person A was happy about that outfit. Whereas based on the good…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Immanuel Kant's Categorical Imperatives
    • 3187 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Immanuel Kant's Categorical Imperatives

    Immanuel Kant was born on April 22, 1724 in Konigsberg, East Prussia. He was the son of a saddler. At age 8, he entered the Collegium Fredericianum, a Latin school, where he remained for 8 1/2 years and studied the classics. He then entered the University of Konigsberg in 1740 to study philosophy, mathematics, and physics. The death of his father halted his university career so he became a private tutor. In 1755, he returned to Konigsburg where he later resumed his studies. In 1756, he received a degree and was made a lecturer, and in 1770 he became a professor.…

    • 3187 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics