Preview

Ib History Ia

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1811 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ib History Ia
Historical Investigation into; How were the Nazi Government able to benefit from the Reichstag Fire?

Word Count: 1,752
Section A: Plan of the Investigation

The subject of this investigation is to study how the Nazi government was able to benefit from the Reichstag on fire in 1933. I will conduct research into this topic using primary and secondary sources. This evidence will be discussed in section B. Two key texts, A.J Nicholls, Weimar and The Rise of Hitler and Ian Kershaw, Hitler will be closely examined in section C. Detailed analysis will be undertaken in Section D. A conclusion will be reached in Section E.

Section B: Summary of Evidence

Historical Context:

• On January 1933, after years of struggling for power, Hitler and entered General Hindenburg’s office, where he were sworn into power. Thirteen years after he had set up the NSDAP in Munich, Adolf Hitler, forty-three years of age, was appointed chancellor of Germany.

• As Chancellor Hitler did not have full power over the country, the Nazi politicians were only a minority in the cabinet and in the Reichstag.

• Hitler decided that one more election must be held in order to gain majority of the cabinet for the Nazis.

• Strong resistance was present by the Communists towards the Nazi party.

• On 27th February 1933, the Reichstag in Berlin, Germany’s lower house of parliament was set on fire.

• Marinus Van Der Lubbe was arrested hours later under suspicion of setting the fire.

• Van der Lubbe was put on trial, and confessed to setting the fire. He was ruled guilty for treason, and sentenced to death.

• Seven months later, he was beheaded by an axeman in evening dress

Evidence for the fire being a communist plot:

• Van der Lubbe was found to have in his possession, fire starting equipment and various pro communist pamphlets.

• Van der Lubbe openly admitted to setting the



Bibliography: Elliott, B.J. 1991, Hitler and Germany, 2nd edn, Longman Inc., New York, U.S.A. Kershaw, I. 2008, Hitler, The Penguin Group, London, England. Lee, S.J. 2008, European Dictatorships 1918-1945, 3rd edn, Routledge, New York, U.S.A. Nicholls, A.J. 1991, Weimar And The Rise Of Hilter, 3rd edn, Macmillan Academic And Professional LTD, London, England. Good Reads Ian Kershaw, Good Reads, viewed 08/21, 2011, < http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/30702.Ian_Kershaw>. Oxford University Press Freedom with responsibility, Oxford University Press, viewed 08/20, 2011, < http://www.us.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/HistoryWorld/European/Germany/?view=usa&ci=9780198208525

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Source B Source Analysis

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Source D is a book written by a Nazi about the fire titled ‘’Armed Uprising.’’ Source A and Source B both show the fire in the background, however Source A presents Hindenburg and Hitler as the main figures in the cartoon whereas Source B shows Van der Lubbe and his ‘conspirators’ setting fire to the Reichstag. Source C expresses from the British point of view that the Nazis may have had more involvement in the fire than was revealed because of the way Hitler and Hindenburg are the main attraction in the cartoon and are both dressed in god – like robes, with hitler holding a staff with the nazi sign on it. The cartoon could even trying to say the Nazi’s started the fire themselves for their own benefit. It describes the event as a ‘’heaven sent opportunity,’’ indicating that the Nazis saw it as a way to advance politically even more. Source D expresses from the Nazi point of view to the public that the Reichstag fire was all one big conspiracy by the communists. It portrays Van der Lubbe and fellow communists as being the enemy and attempts to highlight the danger of having them in Germany. This by default makes the Nazi party look like heroes to the public for being anti- communism and gains them more popularity, further advancing Hitler. Both the sources express that the Nazi party…

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Within Source B, there is talk about the events that unfolded at the Kroll Opera House when the new Reichstag assembled on March 24th, 1933. This is the first important part of legislation within the year. The Enabling Act, once passed, gave Hitler the power to rule by decree without the approval of the Reichstag for a time of four years. This law required a two thirds majority in order to be passed and Hitler did not have this. Therefore, he put actions into place to make sure he did not necessarily need it. Centre and DNVP were bought off by threats and promises meaning the added to the attempted two thirds and the Communist Party was banned from taking its seat. Thus, Hitler had only the SPD duties who voted against the bill; this enabled Hitler to have his Act passed. This gave Hitler the ability to have his wishes instantly put into laws without having any opposition attempt to stop him. Within Source B, SPD deputy Wilhelm Hoegner, got across his point about the Nazis on the day the Act was passed. The Source gives off the impression that much intimidation was going on towards the SPD deputies as he states: ‘When we Social Democrats had taken our seats, SA and SS men lined up at the exits and along the walls behind us in a semi-circle’. This gives the…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The primary reason as to why the decree was introduced was the fact that Hitler’s grip on dictatorship was far from secure. By January 1933, the Nazis had absolutely no majority in the Reichstag with only 196 seats, compared with the combined 221 of the Social Democrats and the Communists who could easily out-vote them. However, the Reichstag fire on the 27th February 1933 played a pivotal role in changing the fate of the Nazi party. To this day there is dispute over who actually started the fire, Hitler was unwavering in blaming a simple-minded Communist, Marinus van der Lubbe, claiming that he intended to start a Communist revolution that only the Nazis could deal with. But it is widely believed that the fire was a Nazi conspiracy, that members of the SA used a secret tunnel, which connected the Reichstag and Göring’s residence, to torch the place and then escape unnoticed. But regardless who was responsible, Hitler used the Reichstag fire as a means of extending his power and the Decree for Protection of People and State was signed by Hindenburg a day later, under the direction of Hitler who declared a state of ‘emergency’.…

    • 603 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Hitler worked his way up the government hierarchy, their numbers took a massive jump. From 300 to 50,000 in 1933. This was when Hitler became Germany’s new chancellor. Hitler continued to move up after…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    |19 Aug 1934 |Führer - when Hindenburg dies, Hitler declares himself jointly president, chancellor and head of the army. This formally made |…

    • 4631 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    History Germany Notes

    • 5640 Words
    • 23 Pages

    On the evening of 27 February 1933, the Reichstag building was destroyed by a massive fire. A young Dutchman, a Communist supporter called Marinus van der Lubbe, was caught on the site. Van der Lubbe was put on trial, found guilty and executed. But his execution was not enough for Hitler; he saw the Reichstag fire as an opportunity to attack the Communists. He used the Reichstag fire to make President Hindenburg declare a State of Emergency.…

    • 5640 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sa Purge - June 1934

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages

    <br>Despite this mass terror campaign, the nazi party still failed to win the majority of seats in the election, gaining under 44% of the votes. However, a majority was eventually gained by the Nazi's winning the support of the Nationalist Party, as well as…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hitler led the Nazis to power in the March 1933 elections using underhand means. To get elected and eventually seize absolute power, Hitler used the SA to intimidate the voters, to disrupt his opponent’s meetings, and to arrest or kill anyone who got in his way. This reign of terror eventually led to the Nazis gaining 44% of the seats in the parliament. His use of fear, both of communism and of the SA was a major factor in Hitler’s ability to take the power.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hindenburg appointed Hitler chancellor of the Nazi party on January 30, 1933, after losing the presidential election. At this time the Nazi party held two out of the ten seats on the Weimar Republic Hitler was the head of the Nazi party and was a very popular figure in german politics. Then on February 27 of 1933, the Reichstag Fire Decree was passed. The Decree gets its name from the fire set in the Reichstag which to this day is unclear of who set the fire but it was believed to be set by the communists. Reichstag means parliament. What the Reichstag Fire Decree did was it allowed for anyone who was an enemy to the Nazi party to be arrested. The Reichstag Fire Decree mainly targeted communist party due to the belief that the communists started the fire in the Reichstag. The Decree was proposed to Hindenburg by Hitler and the decree also helped to serve in shutting down the left wing side of the Weimar…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    First Red Flag

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Germany’s Reichstag governmental building was set ablaze in the middle of the night on February 27 ("First Steps Leading to the "Final Solution"). Hitler was quick to deem this action as caused by Dutch Communists currently in Germany. However, this seemingly random act of arson was all Hitler needed to get Germany’s president to hand over his reins and suspend the civil liberties of his people to Hitler’s mercy. Hitler commenced his first phase of conditioning the German people; he used the supposed arson attack as an excuse to deprive citizens of their basic rights for a fictional belief of safety from the government ("First Steps Leading to the "Final Solution"). Hitler’s new ideas of “civil liberties” were extremely strict, for instance, thousands were arrested on mere “suspicion” of a conspiracy against German supremacy ("First Steps Leading to the "Final Solution"). S.S. guards rounded up thousands of people and took them to S.A. barracks where they were tortured, none ever received a trial for what they were accused ("First Steps Leading to the "Final…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1933, Hitler and his National Socialist (Nazi) party were elected into power in Germany. Hitler was chosen by his party to become the new chancellor of Germany. The National Socialist (Nazis) won 34.1% of the overall vote. The German people were looking for a new voice for their suffering; they wanted a new leader to help get them out of their downfall during World War I, the Great Depression of 1929, and the Treaty of Versailles.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Antisemitism in Mein Kampf

    • 1652 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Mein Kampf is a book of two volumes authored by Adolf Hitler. The first volume was written whilst dictated to Rudolph Hess and Emile Maurice in Landsberg prison where Hitler was sentenced to following the failure of an attempted coup d’état of the Bavarian government in 1924. Mein Kampf is significant amongst historiography as it is thought to be an insight into the mind of Adolf Hitler. This book is not only autobiographical but full of memoires and political ideologies, which have subsequently sparked debate as to whether this piece of primary historical evidence can be regarded as the blue-print for Hitler’s future ambitions. An intentionalist view by Historians’ such as Lucy Dawidowicz, argues that the Holocaust was the result of Hitler’s long term plan, whereas the functionalist perspective by Historians’ such as Christopher Browning is of the result of a competing agents within the Reich to answer the Jewish question. Chapter 11 of Mein Kampf: Nation and Race, shows to comprehend with the intentionalist interpretation that this did indeed set the foundation for Holocaust as a propaganda medium.…

    • 1652 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Reichstag fire

    • 898 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Reichstag fire took place on February 27th 1933. The Reichstag building was where Germany’s parliament sat.…

    • 898 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hitler became chancellor in 1933, after being voted ‘democratically’. Hitler was able to obtain this position by using a number of methods to fabricate himself as a man who would solve all of Germany’s problems, when in reality he was a power hungry, fascist dictator.…

    • 862 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Adolf Hitler surfaced in 1919, joining the Nazi party as a minority. However, by 1933, Hitler surprised everyone by becoming Chancellor, which was seen as a remarkable achievement. Yet many people underestimated his abilities, and thought that he would be removed from power. Even fewer people would have expected that by mid-1934, Hitler would become the sole leader of Germany, establishing a dictatorship. This essay will show how Hitler cleverly consolidated power, using a mixture of legal, illegal, and violent methods to remove any hindrance and oppositions in the way; and how Hitler, viewed by some as an opportunist, others a planner, made use of six major factors including the Reichstag fire, Emergency Decree, the Enabling act, the Night of the Long Knives, death of Hindenburg and the Army 's oath of Loyalty, which lead to his role 'Fuhrer ' and Reich Chancellor, securing his position between the Nazis and Germany.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays