Hunting as a Sport
Hunting as a Sport is not Acceptable
Hunting is the process of killing or catching wild animals. It is a subject of arguable morality. While some hunters hold a deep respect for the animals and try to make the killing process as quick as possible and painless, other hunters may not be as considerate towards animals. Supporters claim that hunting is necessary to prevent overpopulation, whereas opponents believe that killing and hunting is morally wrong. First of all, hunting keeps animal populations under control, and prevents overpopulation. If there are too many animals in a certain territory, over time they will consume the territory of recourses, for instance, water and food, which means that there is a high possibility that this will lead to starvation, diseases and illnesses. However, opponents of hunting claim that the hunters may use unethical means to kill. Many hunters practice harmful hunting methods such as trophy hunting and bow-hunting. Trophy hunting is a type of hunting that involves killing wild animals, and parts of the slain animal may be kept as a trophy. Often these wild animals are endangered species, for example, polar bears, rhinoceros, tigers, gorillas, and other species. Bow-hunting is shooting animals with bows, very often animals shot with a bow die painfully and slowly. Secondly, the supporters of hunting, especially sport hunting, maintains that the hunting involves fair chaise - either the animal will be killed, or it will run away. According to Boone and Crocket: “"Fair Chase" is the original code of conduct first used by Boone and Crockett Club members in the early 1890s. [...] It was defined as the ethical, sportsmanlike, lawful pursuit, and taking of any free-ranging wild, native North American big game animal in a manner that does not give the hunter an improper advantage over such animals.”[1] On the other hand, the supporters of hunting believe that also hounding includes fair chase, supporters strongly disagree.
Hunting is the process of killing or catching wild animals. It is a subject of arguable morality. While some hunters hold a deep respect for the animals and try to make the killing process as quick as possible and painless, other hunters may not be as considerate towards animals. Supporters claim that hunting is necessary to prevent overpopulation, whereas opponents believe that killing and hunting is morally wrong. First of all, hunting keeps animal populations under control, and prevents overpopulation. If there are too many animals in a certain territory, over time they will consume the territory of recourses, for instance, water and food, which means that there is a high possibility that this will lead to starvation, diseases and illnesses. However, opponents of hunting claim that the hunters may use unethical means to kill. Many hunters practice harmful hunting methods such as trophy hunting and bow-hunting. Trophy hunting is a type of hunting that involves killing wild animals, and parts of the slain animal may be kept as a trophy. Often these wild animals are endangered species, for example, polar bears, rhinoceros, tigers, gorillas, and other species. Bow-hunting is shooting animals with bows, very often animals shot with a bow die painfully and slowly. Secondly, the supporters of hunting, especially sport hunting, maintains that the hunting involves fair chaise - either the animal will be killed, or it will run away. According to Boone and Crocket: “"Fair Chase" is the original code of conduct first used by Boone and Crockett Club members in the early 1890s. [...] It was defined as the ethical, sportsmanlike, lawful pursuit, and taking of any free-ranging wild, native North American big game animal in a manner that does not give the hunter an improper advantage over such animals.”[1] On the other hand, the supporters of hunting believe that also hounding includes fair chase, supporters strongly disagree.