Preview

Hume’s Theory of Causation, Its Relation to the Simple Regularity Theory of Laws of Nature and the Problems That the Latter Theory Faces.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1271 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hume’s Theory of Causation, Its Relation to the Simple Regularity Theory of Laws of Nature and the Problems That the Latter Theory Faces.
Hume’s theory of causation, its relation to the simple regularity theory of laws of nature and the problems that the latter theory faces.

This essay will disscuss Hume’s theory of causation and its relation to the simple regularity theory of laws of nature. Firstly, it will describe Hume’s theory concerning causation. Secondly, it will define laws of nature and give some examples. And finally, it will describe the simple regularity theory of laws of nature and look at the relation of this theory and the causation theory. David Hume created many important philosophical works and one of the most famous is the Treatise of Human Nature. It is divided into three books, the first two of them were published in 1739 and the third book was published in 1740. Each book is concerned with different problems. The first volume discusses understanding, the second deals with passions and the third with morals. The section ‘Of Knowledge and Probability’ of the Treatise gives the necessary explaining of causation. However, the meaning of the word ‘probability’ in this case does not coincide with that in mathematics, because Hume dealt with data obtained without direct observation. Therefore, this knowledge was uncertain and was not connected with mathematics and logic. Hume considered that all philosophical relations could be divided into two groups. The first group included those that depended only on ideas and the second group contained those that did not depend. In other words, the first group contains relations that concern certain knowledge and the other concerns uncertain knowledge. We are interested in the second group, which includes so-called spatio-temporal relations and causal relations. The philosopher believed that there existed seven types of such relations. They are resemblance, proportion in quantity or number, degrees in any quality, contrariety, identity, relations of time and space and causation. Spatio-temporal and causal relations here are

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Chrysippus argued that the cause is action or event that results in another action or event. He also stated that the cause, as well as, the body is all existent. The event that results from the cause is non-existent instead, therefore, a predicate. The cause of an event is inferred as ‘because’ while that which it causes is inferred as ‘why’. The cause and effect, according to Chrysippus, are not only relative but also inseparable. Chrysippus provided a distinction between “auxiliary and proximate” causes and “perfect and principal” causes. He argues that antecedent causes, when they are auxiliary and proximate, render their effects necessary. Perfect and principal causes, when they are antecedent, render their effects necessary. On the other…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    An analysis of how the first paragraph of The Metamorphosis supports the theory of Determinism .…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Bernard Williams’s article “Induction”, he introduced several versions of the induction problem, including Hume’s original statement of the problem and Goodman’s “new riddle” of induction. In this essay, I will explore the differences and similarities between these two versions of the problem of induction. 

Both Hume and Goodman seek to address the uncertainty human face while trying to predict the future or making a generalization statement, given our limited knowledge. Hume approached via the inductive argument, whereas Goodman’s “new riddle” of induction used the deductive argument. 

Hume, first, claimed that our general assumption about the world might be false as our understanding about the world is never demonstrative. In other words,…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The philosopher Roderick Chisholm (1916-1999) used many of arguments to explain how his trusted of determinism was untruthful as well as in what way it is conflicting with freedom. Determinism is everything that happens has a cause or causes that determined it to happen. On the other hand, freedom is significantly more subjective and conveys set of concepts all through metaphysics. Metaphysics is the study of the nature of reality. Throughout the paper, I will clarify freedom as described by Roderick Chisholm and compatibilism as described by Harry Frankfurt and argue that compatibilism is conceivable and obvious theory from Frankfurt’s arguments.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Although the “free will” problem envelops a spectrum of ideas, I agree with the following belief: “The folk are compatibilists about free will.” While there are, of course, incompatibilists and indeterminists, for the most part, the general population consists of compatibilists. Now, I know experimental philosophy has a problem with the use of generalizations without actual statistics, but throughout this paper, I will explain exactly why the world revolves in a generally compatibilist manner.…

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * Hume, David. Liberty and Necessity: an Argument against Free-will and in Favor of Moral Causation. London: Progressive Pub. 1890. Print.…

    • 2044 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A more disturbing consequence of Hume's analysis was its undermining of empirical science itself. The mind's logical progress from many particulars to a universal certainty could never be absolutely legitimated. Just because event B has always been seen to follow event A in the past, that does not mean it will always do so in the future. Any acceptance of that law is only an ingrained psychological persuasion, not a logical certainty. The causal necessity that is apparent in phenomena is the necessity only of conviction subjectively, of human imagination controlled by its regular association of ideas. It has no objective basis. The regularity of events can be perceived, however, there necessity can not. The result is nothing more than a subjective feeling brought on by the experience of apparent regularity. Science is possible, but of the phenomenal only, determined by human psychology. With Hume, the festering empiricist stress on sense perception was brought to its ultimate extreme, in which only the volley and chaos of those perceptions exist, and any order imposed on those perceptions was arbitrary, human, and without objective foundation. For Hume all human knowledge had to be regarded as opinion and he held that ideas were faint copies of sensory impressions instead of vice - versa. Not only was the human mind less than perfect, it could never claim access to the world's…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this paper I will do the following: I will explain Hume’s thesis and define the terms that Hume uses, I will discuss the characteristics of the principle that may cause doubt in philosophers, I will analyze the structure that Hume uses for one of his arguments that helps establish his copy principle, and, finally, I will evaluate this argument with adherence to the reasoning, the structure, and possible objections.…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compatibilism

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are 3 basic views that can be taken on the view of determinism, (1) deny its reality, either because of the existence of free will or on independent grounds; (2) accept its reality but argue for its compatibility with free will; or (3) accept its reality and deny its compatibility with free will.In this paper I am going to be defending the view compatibilism, specifically W. T. Stace’s view of compatibilism.…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Hume Research Paper

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages

    David Hume is a naturalist, which means he believes our thoughts are not based on reason at all, but are based in nature. Hume suggests that nature is all we need to justify our beliefs. This means that we make conclusions about things around us based on habits and patterns. Hume suggests that experiences explain justifications and notions far greater than any rationalization. A part of Hume’s theory lies in the sentiment of feeling. “It must be excited by nature… [and] whenever any object is presented to the memory or senses, it immediately, by the force of custom, carries the imagination to conceive that object…” (Hume p. 31). This means that a feeling occurs when the senses bring an object to the imagination. Nature creates being…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He first uses the examples of the billiard balls. He says, “…we are never able, in a single instance, to discover any power or necessary connexion; any quality which binds the effect to the cause…” (Hume). We are not able to sense why the first billiard ball moves the second billiard ball when it hits it. We just see it happen but cannot sense the connection between the first one’s movements and the second one’s movements.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    David Hume was aiming at understanding reasonableness and meaningfulness of religion in his work “Dialogues concerning natural religion”. In order to be certain about represented beliefs in religion, Hume illustrated his thoughts through series of dialogues between three main characters. Each character symbolize three different ideologies: Demea shows tolerance to religious beliefs and claims that our understanding is limited to know anything about God; on the other hand, Cleanthes argues that people can observe existence of God through reasoning and evidences represented in nature; and the third character agrees with God’s inscrutability, but questions God’s intensions on morality. This paper focuses on analysis of the main ideas represented by David Hume in “Dialogues concerning natural religion” and connects with teachings of other philosophers.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume argued that conditions are based upon experience and they are always subject to change. And linking the fact to the science behind the secret nature of body which is learned from the past experience, changes subsequently without change in their sensible qualities. Foundations of substance are always established after the subject has been developed, not before the development. For example, science, after carrying out certain number of experiments, comes with a conclusion, which is established as the scientific truth. The future conditions/occurrences are imagined as well as believed to be based upon the summary of the science, which is…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    determinist thesis would have no effect on our moral psychology and therefore the common worry that determinism undermines ordinary moral concepts and practices is unwarranted (Strawson, 2003). In addressing the objection that this still does not justify our moral concepts and practices, he says that this misses the point since our moral concepts and practices are intrinsic to our psychology, which is unaffected by determinism. This essay will attempt to argue that Strawson fails to address key issues about his moral psychology which could strengthen the stance of the objector, and that his dismissal of the objection is therefore not fully qualified. The structure of the essay will be as follows: the first section will explain the pessimist worry over the determinist…

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although distinctions similar to Kant’s a priori–a posteriori distinction and his synthetic–analytic distinction have been made by thinkers such as Hume and Leibniz, Kant is the first to apply two such distinctions to generate a third category for knowledge. Hume, for instance, does not distinguish between what Kant calls the analytic and the a priori and what he calls the synthetic and the a posteriori, so that, for Hume, all synthetic judgments are necessarily a posteriori. Since only a priori truths have the important qualities of being universal and necessary, all general truths about reality—as opposed to particular observations about unconnected events—must be a priori. If our a priori knowledge is limited to definitional analytic judgments, then Hume is right in concluding that rationally justified knowledge of universal and necessary truths is impossible. Kant’s coup comes in determining that synthetic judgments can also be a priori. He shows that mathematics and scientific principles are neither analytic nor a posteriori, and he provides an explanation for the category of the synthetic a priori by arguing that our mental faculties shape our…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays