Preview

Human Resources

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1222 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Human Resources
TUI University

Matilde Wilson

MGT 412

Human Resource Management & Law

Dec 12, 2012

Discipline and Discharge In the case of Val-Tech’s termination of Susan, a brand new employee with numerous absences, the employer exercised their right to let her go. According to the company she had received several warnings about being tardy, talking on the phone and accountability issues. Susan was fired during her three month probationary period; the company handbook stated that any employee could be terminated with or without reason, which she did sign. She had only been employed for approximately 41 days, in which she was considered absent for 9 of these. It is difficult to state for a fact if she was or wasn’t either verbally counseled about her lack of focus, her inappropriate attire, and her excessive phone conversations at work, because there is no evidence to show that she was counseled either in writing or through some type of recording, other than the file for dismissal. It is possible that Val-Tech has an “at will employment” contract, agreement or policy that they elected to exercise, Susan however could have a fighting chance in court if the company does not have all their legal ducks in a row. “Employment At Will” is when a company does not offer tenured or guaranteed employment and either the company or employee can end employment at any time. This type of employment relationship may exist regardless of any other written policies or statements contained in their handbook or other company documents, or other verbal statements to the contrary. Val-Tech may have had this policy in place, but regardless they terminated Susan within her three month probationary period, which was in their right to do. A company is in no way obligated to follow any type of progressive discipline procedures, especially in an at will employment. However to document or record counseling sessions that may be needed if litigation should arise is a very



Bibliography: Diedrich, Elaine.  (2008, Feb 20).  Firing the right way.  Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, p. E8.  Miletsky, R. J. (2008, Nov).  How to avoid claims and lawsuits when hiring and firing employees at will.  Contractor 's Business Management Report, 11(1), 1-5.   Ramsey, R. D. (1998, Feb).  Guidelines for the progressive discipline of employees.  SuperVision, 59(2), 10-13.   Whitlock, D.. (2010, October). Discipline and termination: Employment law blocking and tackling. Construction Distribution, 13(4), 52.   Why you need to take more care with workplace investigations. (2009, December). HR Focus, 86(12), 6-7 Other Sources used: http://www.businessinsider.com/the-right-way-to-fire-someone-2010-3?op=1#ixzz2FQvAybZp https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=20&ved=0CIEBEBYwCTgK&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ada-audio.org%2FArchives%2FAudioConference%2FMaterials%2FFY2011%2F2010-10-19_What_are_the_Courts_Up_to.doc&ei=F8rQULP4D6P3igLAwoDYCA&usg=AFQjCNEtREDqv1CFe7pHF-zx0pKmEMh7SA&sig2=crYtHRsMDEP0gYm0fQRyWQ

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Cost Club One

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages

    References: Bennett-Alexander, D. D., & Hartman, L. P. (2007). Employment Law for Business (5th ed.). : The McGraw-Hill Companies.…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Employment relationships are presumed to be “at-will” in all U.S. states except Montana. The U.S. is one of a handful of countries where employment is predominantly at-will. Most countries throughout the world allow employers to dismiss employees only for cause. Some reasons given for our retention of the at-will presumption include respect for freedom of contract, employer deference, and the belief that both employers and employees favor an at-will employment relationship over job security.…

    • 2523 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bennett-Alexander, D. D., & Hartman, P. L. (2007). Employment law for business (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.…

    • 1462 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Bennett-Alexander, D., & Hartman, L. (2009). Employment law for business. (6 ed., pp. 247-249). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Walsh, D. J. (2010). Employment law for human resource practice: 2010 custom edition (3rd ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    5th Edition, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Retrieved April 1, 2007, from University of Phoenix, Resource, MGT434-Employment Law…

    • 2010 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bennett-Alexander D.D., & Hartman, L. P. (2001). Employment Law for Business (3rd ed.). New York: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Under the legal doctrine of “employment at will” an employee can be lawfully terminated from her job for:…

    • 2104 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Commonwealth vs. Hunt

    • 2089 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Taylor, Benjamin, and Witney, Fred. U.S. Labor Relations Law. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1992.…

    • 2089 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    1. What were the legal issues in this case? This case is based around the laws and regulations of OSHA. OSHA is an Occupational Safety and Health Act that has been put into place to ensure the safety of employees while on the job. These regulations are put into place to help reduce the number of on the job injuries and death. In this case, Williams Construction was put under investigation after a trench collapse, which resulted in the death of one employee and a serious injury in another. After the investigation Williams was charged with four OSHA violations that all resulted in expensive fines. The issues that arose from the investigation included; the failure to instruct employees and managers on how to recognize and avoid hazardous work conditions, the failure to ensure that employees did not have to travel more than twenty five feet to a safe zone, the failure to have a “competent person” that was specifically trained in trench safety and the final violation was the failure to make sure that the walls of the evocation were either sloped or supported. It is the belief of OSHA that if these regulations were followed that this tragic accident could have been avoided. The legal issue here is whether or not the courts and the construction company itself should up hold the violations of specific OSHA standards.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Bennett-Alexander, D. D., & Hartman, L. P. (2001). Employment Law for Business (III ed.) Boston, Massachusetts: Mc Graw-Hill Primis.…

    • 1082 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hrm 546 Cost Club One

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: Bennett-Alexander, D. D., & Hartman, L. P. (2007). Employment Business Law (5th ed.). New York, NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dillon V. Champion Jogbra

    • 995 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. What is the legal issue in this case? Linda Dillon appealed her case against her employer, Champion Jogbra, on the grounds of wrongful termination. The company’s progressive policy for disciplinary action was not applied. Therefore, Dillon makes her claim that her at will status was modified according to the employee handbook and practices. Employee’s handbook should be written clearly and reviewed by legal experts (Walsh, 2010). Champion Jogbra countered that Dillon was an at-will employee and she could be terminated at any time. Dillon also, argues against that the summary of promissory estoppels is incorrect. Champion pointed out that the policies and procedures contained in the manual are for guideline purposes only, not contractual. The policies and procedures are not any part of a contract or a commitment to employees. The courts decided the disclaimer in the handbook could create an implied contract to the employees, even though the disclaimer statements states otherwise. The disciplinary system as outline in the employee handbook was inconsistent with the at-will language relationship, disclaimer statement and the companies progressive discipline policies. Handbooks when originally devised the method to counter labor union efforts, they have “become much more legally binding” as courts have found parts to be, in effect, promises or contracts. As stated by, Allen Weitzman, with Proskauer Rose Law Firm in Florida, “That’s why every word counts,” (SHRM). When issuing employee handbooks employers should ensure every word that is in the handbook count and they are not conflicting in nature.…

    • 995 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dillon V. Jogbra

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Walsh, D. J. (2010). Employment law for human resource practice: 2010 custom edition (3rd Ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    References: Twomey, D. P. (2013). Labor & Employment Law, Text and Cases (5th ed.). Mason,…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics