English Composition I
Mrs. Robyn Weaver
12/01/2010
Human Genetic Engineering
The ability to genetically engineer and modify our children before birth is now a reality. Genetic Modification is a new science that has created significant controversy for the human race. If genetic modification becomes a common practice without any legal restrictions, our world as we know it would completely change. With this unfathomable practice, our world is now open to an array of opportunities. Scientists can now prevent certain medical conditions passed down to children. The economic advantages that could be generated from this industry are huge. Even though there are advantages to genetic engineering, there are many disadvantages that will outweigh everything else. Richard Hayes, the executive director of the Center for Genetics and Society, talks about the major problems with genetic modification in his essay called “Supersize you Child?”. Hayes makes a very good and agreeable argument about the severe consequences of this scientific discovery. Genetic modification, if not restrained by strict regulations and limits, will be accompanied by detrimental consequences to the human race in social, biological, and economic ways. There is lots of evidence and many reasons to why this claims is true. Richard Hayes is a credible scientist that works for a nonprofit organization working for the responsible governance of genetic technology. In his essay, “Supersize your Child?” he tries to inform the audience about genetic modification and prove why it will hurt our society. He highly encourages the implementation of strict regulations and policies on scientists practicing genetic engineering. He begins his essay with background information and important facts about the emergence of genetic modification. With this new technology, scientists can insert genes into an embryo to create a certain trait or alter the biology of a human being. For example, Hayes talks about the 5-HTT gene that can reduce the risk of depression. Another gene, called DAF-2, can be used to double the life span of humans (185). Hayes discusses his thorough research on the subject and quotes many different scientists involved in genetic modification. He quotes Dr. Richard Lynn, a supporter of human genetic modification by stating, “What is called for here is not genocide, the killing off of the population of incompetent cultures. But we do need to think realistically in terms of the “phasing out” of such peoples… Evolutionary progress means the extinction of the less competent” (186). This provides a good example of the type of attitude and excitement some scientists have with the development of this technology. Richard Hayes presents an opposing argument to the type of attitude displayed by supporters of human genetic modification. These scientists are looking for the creation of a genetic elite. After establishing a platform for genetic modification and discussing the possible advantages described by scientists, Hayes goes on to explain why it has enormous consequences. He lists the many reasons why the use of this science will essentially harm the human race and the society we live in. For example, Hayes suggests there will be a rise in inequality and that it will alter the fundamental biology of the human species. Hayes states, “The birth of the first genetically modified child would be a watershed moment in human history. It would set off a chain of events that would feed back upon themselves in ways impossible to control”(187). At the end of his essay, Hayes proposes a solution to the development of genetic modification and how we can prevent it from destroying our society. He suggests that every country needs to create a set of regulations and restrictions that limit the technology to medical purposes only. To achieve this goal, Hayes lays out a list of steps that will help the world seize control over the matter. Hayes wants the reader to realize the seriousness of the issue and take action against genetic modification. The opinions and points Richard Hayes makes about the issue of genetic engineering are very realistic and completely true. Humans now have the ability to take control our own evolution and launch it into overdrive. It is a dangerous scientific technology that will be the gateway to societal destruction. The concept of phasing out the genetically inferior people is a power that should not be left in the hands of any human. As a society, we should accept the diversity of the human race. We should embrace the less than perfect nature of all humans. The embracement of our flaws is a significant part of life. It is the factor that makes our lives so precious. If the practice of human genetic modification can alter the biology of our species, then something should be done to keep it from becoming out of control. As a common species, homo sapiens, we share a fundamental biology that dates back thousands of years ago. Altering with our shared fundamental biology could be horrible for humans (187). There are many reasons to why genetic engineering is a dangerous and potentially destructive science. All of these reasons are discussed in Hayes’s essay. Hayes addresses one of the underlying questions: “Once we allow children to be designed through embryo modification where would we stop?”(187). As long as it is possible to alter one gene, people will want to alter more and more until the original human genome barely exists. Considering there are no limits, we would not know where to stop in the use of this technology. Human genetic modification is so dangerous, that even the strictest regulations will hardly help in limiting its use. The prohibition of genetic modification for cosmetic and enhancement purposes is a very flexible limitation. Drugs like Prozac, Viagra, and Botox were originally produced and used for medical purposes only. However, this has significantly changed over time as many people use them for enhancement and cosmetic reasons. These consumer products have become very profitable (187). Genetic modification is no different from these products. Limitations on the new technology will be stretched until it becomes a tool for cosmetic improvement. We should not allow ourselves to abuse developments made for medical purposes. Furthermore, the possible societal implications of human genetic modification are another reason why it should be restricted. Hayes believes that the use of the technology will cause a rise in inequality. It will be similar to the inequality present about three hundred years ago when masters and slaves existed. Humanity will be divided into those who are “superior” and those who are “inferior”(187). As he compares the era of slavery to a genetically enhanced society, Hayes states, “Human beings were bred, bought, and sold, like cattle or dogs… If left uncontrolled, the new human genetic technologies could set us on a trajectory leading to a Dark Age in which people are once again regarded as little better than cattle or dogs”(188). Human genetic technologies will promote a sense of discrimination in our society. As the use of human genetic engineering further develops, it will leave a huge mark on our world historically. Something that could generate this huge change throughout the whole world will be a historical turning point. Unless the entire world places restrictions on the use genetic modification, the international implications could cause serious tension between countries (188). The treat of international competition will grow. Every country will be competing to create the best breed of human beings. Even though the newly developed science of genetic alteration has its advantages, there are many disadvantages that will outweigh the positive outcomes. Now that we have this technology so easily available, we must take action on establishing limitations. If there are no regulations, then there will be no time before people start to abuse its powers. To achieve a solution, we must recognize the unique nature of the challenges presented by human genetic technologies. Individuals, organizations, political leaders, and scientists need to protect humanity form being divided. The newfound science of human genetic modification has created a lot of controversy throughout our world. Many scientists believe that this technology will solve many medical problems and create new medical breakthroughs. We will be able to create our own evolution and genetically perfect our race. However, the consequences of this scientific discovery will take a huge toll on humanity. With human genetic modification our society will be affected by issues such as the deepening of inequality and countries across the world will complete to create the best race of humans. A new Dark Age will emerge in history that will define the way humans are treated. In “Supersize your Child?”, by Richard Hayes, Genetic Modification is proven to change the entire world unless we put limitations and restrictions against its use. Human Genetic Modification is a practice that should be stopped as soon as possible and as much possible.
Works Cited
Hayes, Richard. “Supersize your Child?”. Elements of Argument. Ed. Annette T. Rottenberg and Donna Haisty Winchell. Boston: Bedford/ St. Martin’s. 185-189. Print.
Cited: Hayes, Richard. “Supersize your Child?”. Elements of Argument. Ed. Annette T. Rottenberg and Donna Haisty Winchell. Boston: Bedford/ St. Martin’s. 185-189. Print.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Human genetic engineering is the process by which the human genome is being modified and manipulated in order to remove or select certain genes. Moreover, traits that are desirable can be selected, and preventing the genetic causes of diseases is possible. Human genetic engineering, as a new field, has raised a lot of questions and ethical issues. I argue about where we should put the limits for our genetic editing. Should we just use it to prevent harmful diseases or can we carry on with the modification and choosing the desirable traits of our future generations? Who decides? Who has the right to object? I will try my best to provide reasonable answers to those questions throughout my series of blogs, based on scientific articles that talk about its controversial and ethical aspects.…
- 255 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In the essay, titled "Building Baby from the Genes Up?" Ronald M. Green proclaims his approval of genetic selection and extraction of human genes. He gives reasons that support his outlook on the matter, that this will be useful to civilization. Ronald M. Green is in violation of several ethical codes, with his view on genetic modification. I am against genetically modified humans, and I will explain to you, why this is my stance on the subject. First, I will summarize exactly what Ronald M. Green says in his article about his view on genetic modification and why practicing it is vital. Second, I will describe research involving human embryos and the disadvantages that genetic modification could possess for the future of human species by using research. Third, I will give you my viewpoint of why genetic modification is unethical and morally disturbing.…
- 1670 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
By using the techniques of genetic engineering scientists are able to modify genetic materials so that a particular gene of interest from one cell can be incorporated into a different cell. It is necessary to obtain a gene to modify genetic material. First a scientist isolates plasmid DNA from bacteria and DNA carrying a gene of interest from cells of another organism, such as an animal. A piece of DNA containing the gene is inserted into a plasmid, producing recombinant DNA, and the recombinant plasmid is returned to a bacterial cell. This cell is then grown in culture forming a clone of cells. The foreign DNA spliced into the plasmid is replicated with the rest of the plasmid as the host cell multiplies. In this way, the gene of interest is cloned. A critical step in gene cloning is the identification of the bacterial clone carrying the gene of interest.…
- 541 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Genetic modification is a concerning topic due to the questioning of moralities. Not only would it concern the parent’s choices and ethics, but in a speculative future, if people were ranked based on whether or not they were genetically engineered, it would create a difficult situation for those who were not. Furthermore, Lee Silver has projected a dystopian like future if genetic engineering were to occur more often.…
- 763 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Genetic modification is becoming closer and closer to an everyday possibility. With this possibility comes a whirlwind of possible effects, both positive and negative. There has been a history of opposition towards these technologies, oftentimes because of fear that the capabilities would be abused. However, the potential that newborns could be born free of hereditary diseases outweighs the fear of “designer babies”.…
- 189 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
In this essay, the ethical analysis applied to debate human genetic engineering is the Utilitarianism theory. The Utilitarian method seeks to maximize the utility of an act or a rule while minimizing the pain that could possibly be caused. Utilitarian principles are the foundation of many US policies, especially those that deal with economics and trade (1, P4, Williams, 1999). Utility is very tightly linked to efficiency and productivity, and maximum efficiency classically concurs with maximum utility. However, a Utilitarian argument can seem imperfect when dealing with concerns of justice and personal rights, which is the case with…
- 1595 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Picture a young couple in a waiting room looking through a catalogue together. This catalogue is a little different from what you might expect. In this catalogue, specific traits for babies are being sold to couples to help them create the "perfect baby." This may seem like a bizarre scenario, but it may not be too far off in the future. Designing babies using genetic enhancement is an issue that is gaining more and more attention in the news. This controversial issue, once thought to be only possible in the realm of science-fiction, is causing people to discuss the moral issues surrounding genetic enhancement and germ line engineering. Though genetic research can prove beneficial to learning how to prevent hereditary diseases, the genetic enhancement of human embryos is unethical when used to create "designer babies" with enhanced appearance, athletic ability, and intelligence.…
- 1634 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
It is amazing to think that we can choose how our kids will be. Do we want to raise generations of fools or generations of intellects and scholars? Of course we want the latter. We do not want our futures in the hands of incompetent beings, which is why genetic engineering is such a plausible solution. Right now, genetic engineering control is in the hands of government which is where it needs to stay. The ability alter the chemical make-up of a population or food is too much power and responsibility for one person to hand, which is why it needs to be in the watchful eye of our government superiors. We have trusted our government to directly deal with issues we as Americans would rather ignore like war and discrepancies regarding the value of money over the past; consequently, this emphasizes my main idea, which is that genetic engineering should be monitored and overseen by our…
- 866 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In his article “Supersize Your Child?,” Richard Hayes explains the pros and cons of genetic engineering. His claim is one of policy that states by giving examples of what could happen if you genetically engineer your child; you could make them attractive, give them photographic memories, or even ensure they have a life span of up to 200 years. The warrants of his claim are that Hayes makes this all sound very attractive to the reader. He also assumes that the reader wants this for their children; the parents want the children to be the best of the best. (Hayes 184)…
- 1060 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Genetic Engineering Debate: Are There Lines We Shouldn’t Cross? written by Jessica Erickson, shows that just because we can genetic engineer, doesn’t mean we should leave it unsupervised. Currently genetic engineering is available for plants, animals, and humans. Genetic engineering for plants and animals is quicker and less complex then doing it on humans. The next subject Erickson wrights about is the uses of genetic engineering. Erickson believes that genetic engineering could be good if it benefits diseases, prevent, and treatments, on the other hand Erickson believes genetic engineering could be bad if it is used for “designer babies”. Erickson believes that there should be a “Do not cross line”, which means that there should be government…
- 129 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
In the next decade the technology to design children’s genetic traits will become available. People will have the power to engineer their children to be smarter, stronger, taller, and even predetermine the gender. This technology is referred to as Eugenics, but the products are commonly called designer babies. Although this technology isn’t entirely available it is causing quite the debates. Which leads many people to think: what are the pros and cons to genetic engineering? According to Stephen Baird, “Some will curse these new technologies, sounding the death knell for humanity, envisioning the social, cultural, and moral collapse of our society and perhaps our civilization. Others see the same technologies as the ability to take charge of our own evolution, to transcend human limitations, and to improve ourselves as a species” (13).…
- 1020 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In the article “The New Eugenics: The Case Against Genetically Modified Humans,” the author discusses what human germline engineering could bring if it is allowed to be continued and why there need to be laws put in place to regulate it. The author makes several main points throughout the article. The author states that if human germline engineering is continued the future of our society may be filled with prejudice among the classes due to humans being genetically altered for their certain class. This will allow for parents to pick the characteristics of their children which will develop a different outlook on life than now. This may also lead to the loss of support for people with a disability. The author also states that human germline engineering is still supported because many individuals believe that it can lead to the development of new medical treatments. The author also discusses the laws that many countries have passed, banning human cloning. They have developed a line between human germline engineering and genetic studies. The United States does not have a law against human germline engineering or banning human cloning but federal money can’t be used for either. The author explains that the only way for human germline engineering to be regulated or banned is through strong political pressure and social movements. It is easier to prevent genetically modifying humans than to stop it later.…
- 661 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
What if you could design your child before it was even born? What if you could cut out any life threatening diseases, make sure that your child is not susceptible to smoking addictions or alcoholism, and then make your child genius? Would you? Are you asking yourself how this could be done? Have you ever considered human genetic engineering?…
- 1539 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Eighty-five years ago, the publication of the novel Brave New World by Aldous Huxley changed the perspective of Americans towards genetic engineering. “Genetic engineering is the deliberate modification of the characteristics of an organism by manipulating its genetic material” (Michaels 1). In this novel, there is an abundant misapplication of genetic engineering to control society. The practice of genetic engineering in Huxley’s world is extremely dangerous as it denies social order, diminishes individual freedom and enhances government supremacy within the society which is manifested in modern civilization as well.…
- 989 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Science has now reached a point where upcoming parents can choose what type of genes their children can be born with and not realizing that it can go terribly wrong.While trying to modify our babies the ending result can create a new illness that might not have a cure for it. According to Sheldon Krimsky “with respect to the farmer, there are safer and more dependable methods for preventing the birth of a child with a severe genetic abnormality than by genetic modification of the germ cell”. Modifying our babies can create an illness that will inquire a cure that won’t be existing but these babies will also create a gap in our society.…
- 616 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays